Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Radiology 10/2016

26.01.2016 | Chest

Performance of ultralow-dose CT with iterative reconstruction in lung cancer screening: limiting radiation exposure to the equivalent of conventional chest X-ray imaging

verfasst von: Adrian Huber, Julia Landau, Lukas Ebner, Yanik Bütikofer, Lars Leidolt, Barbara Brela, Michelle May, Johannes Heverhagen, Andreas Christe

Erschienen in: European Radiology | Ausgabe 10/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objective

To investigate the detection rate of pulmonary nodules in ultralow-dose CT acquisitions.

Materials and methods

In this lung phantom study, 232 nodules (115 solid, 117 ground-glass) of different sizes were randomly distributed in a lung phantom in 60 different arrangements. Every arrangement was acquired once with standard radiation dose (100 kVp, 100 references mAs) and once with ultralow radiation dose (80 kVp, 6 mAs). Iterative reconstruction was used with optimized kernels: I30 for ultralow-dose, I70 for standard dose and I50 for CAD. Six radiologists examined the axial 1-mm stack for solid and ground-glass nodules. During a second and third step, three radiologists used maximum intensity projection (MIPs), finally checking with computer-assisted detection (CAD), while the others first used CAD, finally checking with the MIPs.

Results

The detection rate was 95.5 % with standard dose (DLP 126 mGy*cm) and 93.3 % with ultralow-dose (DLP: 9 mGy*cm). The additional use of either MIP reconstructions or CAD software could compensate for this difference. A combination of both MIP reconstructions and CAD software resulted in a maximum detection rate of 97.5 % with ultralow-dose.

Conclusion

Lung cancer screening with ultralow-dose CT using the same radiation dose as a conventional chest X-ray is feasible.

Key points

93.3 % of all lung nodules were detected with ultralow-dose CT.
A sensitivity of 97.5 % is possible with additional image post-processing.
The radiation dose is comparable to a standard radiography in two planes.
Lung cancer screening with ultralow-dose CT is feasible.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM et al (2011) Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 61:69–90CrossRefPubMed Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM et al (2011) Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 61:69–90CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Kaneko M, Eguchi K, Ohmatsu H et al (1996) Peripheral lung cancer: screening and detection with low-dose spiral CT versus radiography. Radiology 201:798–802CrossRefPubMed Kaneko M, Eguchi K, Ohmatsu H et al (1996) Peripheral lung cancer: screening and detection with low-dose spiral CT versus radiography. Radiology 201:798–802CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Henschke CI, Yankelevitz DF, Libby DM et al (2006) Survival of patients with stage I lung cancer detected on CT screening. N Engl J Med 355:1763–1771CrossRefPubMed Henschke CI, Yankelevitz DF, Libby DM et al (2006) Survival of patients with stage I lung cancer detected on CT screening. N Engl J Med 355:1763–1771CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat The National Lung Screening Trial Team (2011) Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening. N Engl J Med 365:395–409CrossRef The National Lung Screening Trial Team (2011) Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening. N Engl J Med 365:395–409CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Field JK, van Klaveren R, Pedersen JH et al (2013) European randomized lung cancer screening trials: post NLST. J Surg Oncol 108:280–286CrossRefPubMed Field JK, van Klaveren R, Pedersen JH et al (2013) European randomized lung cancer screening trials: post NLST. J Surg Oncol 108:280–286CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat van Iersel CA, de Koning HJ, Draisma G et al (2007) Risk-based selection from the general population in a screening trial: selection criteria, recruitment and power for the Dutch-Belgian randomised lung cancer multi-slice CT screening trial (NELSON). Int J Cancer 120:868–874CrossRefPubMed van Iersel CA, de Koning HJ, Draisma G et al (2007) Risk-based selection from the general population in a screening trial: selection criteria, recruitment and power for the Dutch-Belgian randomised lung cancer multi-slice CT screening trial (NELSON). Int J Cancer 120:868–874CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Wender R, Fontham ETH, Barrera E et al (2013) American cancer society lung cancer screening guidelines. CA Cancer J Clin 63:106–117CrossRef Wender R, Fontham ETH, Barrera E et al (2013) American cancer society lung cancer screening guidelines. CA Cancer J Clin 63:106–117CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Jaklitsch MT, Jacobson FL, Austin JHM et al (2012) The American association for thoracic surgery guidelines for lung cancer screening using low-dose computed tomography scans for lung cancer survivors and other high-risk groups. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 144:33–38CrossRefPubMed Jaklitsch MT, Jacobson FL, Austin JHM et al (2012) The American association for thoracic surgery guidelines for lung cancer screening using low-dose computed tomography scans for lung cancer survivors and other high-risk groups. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 144:33–38CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Nair A, Hansell DM (2011) European and North American lung cancer screening experience and implications for pulmonary nodule management. Eur Radiol 21:2445–2454CrossRefPubMed Nair A, Hansell DM (2011) European and North American lung cancer screening experience and implications for pulmonary nodule management. Eur Radiol 21:2445–2454CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Mahadevia PJ, Fleisher LA, Frick KD et al (2003) Lung cancer screening with helical computed tomography in older adult smokers: a decision and cost-effectiveness analysis. JAMA J Am Med Assoc 289:313–322CrossRef Mahadevia PJ, Fleisher LA, Frick KD et al (2003) Lung cancer screening with helical computed tomography in older adult smokers: a decision and cost-effectiveness analysis. JAMA J Am Med Assoc 289:313–322CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Swensen SJ, Jett JR, Sloan JA et al (2002) Screening for lung cancer with low-dose spiral computed tomography. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 165:508–513CrossRefPubMed Swensen SJ, Jett JR, Sloan JA et al (2002) Screening for lung cancer with low-dose spiral computed tomography. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 165:508–513CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Brenner DJ (2004) Radiation risks potentially associated with low-dose CT screening of adult smokers for lung cancer. Radiology 231:440–445CrossRefPubMed Brenner DJ (2004) Radiation risks potentially associated with low-dose CT screening of adult smokers for lung cancer. Radiology 231:440–445CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Baumueller S, Winklehner A, Karlo C et al (2012) Low-dose CT of the lung: potential value of iterative reconstructions. Eur Radiol 22:2597–2606CrossRefPubMed Baumueller S, Winklehner A, Karlo C et al (2012) Low-dose CT of the lung: potential value of iterative reconstructions. Eur Radiol 22:2597–2606CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Neroladaki A, Botsikas D, Boudabbous S et al (2013) Computed tomography of the chest with model-based iterative reconstruction using a radiation exposure similar to chest X-ray examination: preliminary observations. Eur Radiol 23:360–366CrossRefPubMed Neroladaki A, Botsikas D, Boudabbous S et al (2013) Computed tomography of the chest with model-based iterative reconstruction using a radiation exposure similar to chest X-ray examination: preliminary observations. Eur Radiol 23:360–366CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Gordic S, Morsbach F, Schmidt B et al (2014) Ultralow-Dose chest computed tomography for pulmonary nodule detection: first performance evaluation of single energy scanning with spectral shaping. Invest Radiol 49:465–473CrossRefPubMed Gordic S, Morsbach F, Schmidt B et al (2014) Ultralow-Dose chest computed tomography for pulmonary nodule detection: first performance evaluation of single energy scanning with spectral shaping. Invest Radiol 49:465–473CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Valencia R, Denecke T, Lehmkuhl L et al (2006) Value of axial and coronal maximum intensity projection (MIP) images in the detection of pulmonary nodules by multislice spiral CT: comparison with axial 1-mm and 5-mm slices. Eur Radiol 16:325–332CrossRefPubMed Valencia R, Denecke T, Lehmkuhl L et al (2006) Value of axial and coronal maximum intensity projection (MIP) images in the detection of pulmonary nodules by multislice spiral CT: comparison with axial 1-mm and 5-mm slices. Eur Radiol 16:325–332CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Christe A, Leidolt L, Huber A et al (2013) Lung cancer screening with CT: evaluation of radiologists and different computer assisted detection software (CAD) as first and second readers for lung nodule detection at different dose levels. Eur J Radiol 82:e873–e878CrossRefPubMed Christe A, Leidolt L, Huber A et al (2013) Lung cancer screening with CT: evaluation of radiologists and different computer assisted detection software (CAD) as first and second readers for lung nodule detection at different dose levels. Eur J Radiol 82:e873–e878CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhao Y, de Bock GH, Vliegenthart R et al (2012) Performance of computer-aided detection of pulmonary nodules in low-dose CT: comparison with double reading by nodule volume. Eur Radiol 22:2076–2084CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Zhao Y, de Bock GH, Vliegenthart R et al (2012) Performance of computer-aided detection of pulmonary nodules in low-dose CT: comparison with double reading by nodule volume. Eur Radiol 22:2076–2084CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Ebner L, Bütikofer Y, Ott D et al (2015) Lung nodule detection by microdose CT versus chest radiography (standard and dual-energy subtracted). Am J Roentgenol. doi:10.2214/AJR.14.12921 Ebner L, Bütikofer Y, Ott D et al (2015) Lung nodule detection by microdose CT versus chest radiography (standard and dual-energy subtracted). Am J Roentgenol. doi:10.​2214/​AJR.​14.​12921
21.
Zurück zum Zitat ICRP (2007) The 2007 recommendations of the international commission on radiological protection. ICRP publication 103. Ann ICRP 37:1–332CrossRef ICRP (2007) The 2007 recommendations of the international commission on radiological protection. ICRP publication 103. Ann ICRP 37:1–332CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Zar JH (2010) Biostatistical analysis. Prentice-Hall/Pearson, Upper Saddle River Zar JH (2010) Biostatistical analysis. Prentice-Hall/Pearson, Upper Saddle River
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Wilcoxon F (1946) Individual comparisons of grouped data by ranking methods. J Econ Entomol 39:269CrossRefPubMed Wilcoxon F (1946) Individual comparisons of grouped data by ranking methods. J Econ Entomol 39:269CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Light RJ (1971) Measures of response agreement for qualitative data: some generalizations and alternatives. Psychol Bull 76:365–377CrossRef Light RJ (1971) Measures of response agreement for qualitative data: some generalizations and alternatives. Psychol Bull 76:365–377CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174CrossRefPubMed Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Schoonjans F, Zalata A, Depuydt CE, Comhaire FH (1995) MedCalc: a new computer program for medical statistics. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 48:257–262CrossRefPubMed Schoonjans F, Zalata A, Depuydt CE, Comhaire FH (1995) MedCalc: a new computer program for medical statistics. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 48:257–262CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Veronesi G, Maisonneuve P, Spaggiari L et al (2014) Diagnostic performance of low-dose computed tomography screening for lung cancer over five years. J Thorac Oncol 9:935–939CrossRefPubMed Veronesi G, Maisonneuve P, Spaggiari L et al (2014) Diagnostic performance of low-dose computed tomography screening for lung cancer over five years. J Thorac Oncol 9:935–939CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Doo KW, Kang E-Y, Yong HS et al (2014) Comparison of chest radiography, chest digital tomosynthesis and low dose MDCT to detect small ground-glass opacity nodules: an anthropomorphic chest phantom study. Eur Radiol 24:3269–3276CrossRefPubMed Doo KW, Kang E-Y, Yong HS et al (2014) Comparison of chest radiography, chest digital tomosynthesis and low dose MDCT to detect small ground-glass opacity nodules: an anthropomorphic chest phantom study. Eur Radiol 24:3269–3276CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Godoy MCB, Kim TJ, White CS et al (2013) Benefit of computer-aided detection analysis for the detection of subsolid and solid lung nodules on thin- and thick-section CT. Am J Roentgenol 200:74–83CrossRef Godoy MCB, Kim TJ, White CS et al (2013) Benefit of computer-aided detection analysis for the detection of subsolid and solid lung nodules on thin- and thick-section CT. Am J Roentgenol 200:74–83CrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Li Q, Li F, Doi K (2008) Computerized detection of lung nodules in thin-section CT images by use of selective enhancement filters and an automated rule-based classifier. Acad Radiol 15:165–175CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Li Q, Li F, Doi K (2008) Computerized detection of lung nodules in thin-section CT images by use of selective enhancement filters and an automated rule-based classifier. Acad Radiol 15:165–175CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Slattery MM, Foley C, Kenny D et al (2012) Long-term follow-up of non-calcified pulmonary nodules (<10 mm) identified during low-dose CT screening for lung cancer. Eur Radiol 22:1923–1928CrossRefPubMed Slattery MM, Foley C, Kenny D et al (2012) Long-term follow-up of non-calcified pulmonary nodules (<10 mm) identified during low-dose CT screening for lung cancer. Eur Radiol 22:1923–1928CrossRefPubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Henschke CI, Yankelevitz DF, Naidich DP et al (2004) CT screening for lung cancer: suspiciousness of nodules according to size on baseline scans. Radiology 231:164–168CrossRefPubMed Henschke CI, Yankelevitz DF, Naidich DP et al (2004) CT screening for lung cancer: suspiciousness of nodules according to size on baseline scans. Radiology 231:164–168CrossRefPubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Travis WD, Brambilla E, Noguchi M et al (2011) International association for the study of lung cancer/American thoracic society/european respiratory society: international multidisciplinary classification of lung adenocarcinoma. Proc Am Thorac Soc 8:381–385CrossRefPubMed Travis WD, Brambilla E, Noguchi M et al (2011) International association for the study of lung cancer/American thoracic society/european respiratory society: international multidisciplinary classification of lung adenocarcinoma. Proc Am Thorac Soc 8:381–385CrossRefPubMed
34.
Zurück zum Zitat MacMahon H, Austin JHM, Gamsu G et al (2005) Guidelines for management of small pulmonary nodules detected on CT Scans: a statement from the fleischner society. Radiology 237:395–400CrossRefPubMed MacMahon H, Austin JHM, Gamsu G et al (2005) Guidelines for management of small pulmonary nodules detected on CT Scans: a statement from the fleischner society. Radiology 237:395–400CrossRefPubMed
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Horeweg N, van Rosmalen J, Heuvelmans MA et al (2014) Lung cancer probability in patients with CT-detected pulmonary nodules: a prespecified analysis of data from the NELSON trial of low-dose CT screening. Lancet Oncol 15:1332–1341CrossRefPubMed Horeweg N, van Rosmalen J, Heuvelmans MA et al (2014) Lung cancer probability in patients with CT-detected pulmonary nodules: a prespecified analysis of data from the NELSON trial of low-dose CT screening. Lancet Oncol 15:1332–1341CrossRefPubMed
36.
37.
Zurück zum Zitat McMahon PM, Kong CY, Bouzan C et al (2011) Cost-Effectiveness of CT screening for lung cancer in the U.S. J Thorac Oncol Off Publ Int Assoc Study Lung Cancer 6:1841–1848 McMahon PM, Kong CY, Bouzan C et al (2011) Cost-Effectiveness of CT screening for lung cancer in the U.S. J Thorac Oncol Off Publ Int Assoc Study Lung Cancer 6:1841–1848
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Priola AM, Priola SM, Giaj-Levra M et al (2013) Clinical implications and added costs of incidental findings in an early detection study of lung cancer by using low-dose spiral computed tomography. Clin Lung Cancer 14:139–148CrossRefPubMed Priola AM, Priola SM, Giaj-Levra M et al (2013) Clinical implications and added costs of incidental findings in an early detection study of lung cancer by using low-dose spiral computed tomography. Clin Lung Cancer 14:139–148CrossRefPubMed
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Bergh KAM, Essink-Bot M-L, Borsboom GJJM, et al. (2010) Long-term effects of lung cancer CT screening on health-related quality of life (NELSON). Eur Respir J erj01234–2010. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00123410 Bergh KAM, Essink-Bot M-L, Borsboom GJJM, et al. (2010) Long-term effects of lung cancer CT screening on health-related quality of life (NELSON). Eur Respir J erj01234–2010. doi: 10.​1183/​09031936.​00123410
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Vansteenkiste J, Dooms C, Mascaux C, Nackaerts K (2012) Screening and early detection of lung cancer. Ann Oncol 23:x320–x327CrossRefPubMed Vansteenkiste J, Dooms C, Mascaux C, Nackaerts K (2012) Screening and early detection of lung cancer. Ann Oncol 23:x320–x327CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Performance of ultralow-dose CT with iterative reconstruction in lung cancer screening: limiting radiation exposure to the equivalent of conventional chest X-ray imaging
verfasst von
Adrian Huber
Julia Landau
Lukas Ebner
Yanik Bütikofer
Lars Leidolt
Barbara Brela
Michelle May
Johannes Heverhagen
Andreas Christe
Publikationsdatum
26.01.2016
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
European Radiology / Ausgabe 10/2016
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-015-4192-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 10/2016

European Radiology 10/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.