Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Radiology 5/2017

29.08.2016 | Computer Applications

Usage of structured reporting in radiological practice: results from an Italian online survey

verfasst von: Lorenzo Faggioni, Francesca Coppola, Riccardo Ferrari, Emanuele Neri, Daniele Regge

Erschienen in: European Radiology | Ausgabe 5/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objectives

To assess the opinion on structured reporting (SR) and its usage by radiologist members of the Italian Society of Medical Radiology (SIRM) via an online survey.

Methods

All members received an email invitation to join the survey as an initiative by the SIRM Imaging Informatics Chapter. The survey included 10 questions about demographic information, definition of radiological SR, its usage in everyday practice, perceived advantages and disadvantages over conventional reporting and overall opinion about SR.

Results

1159 SIRM members participated in the survey. 40.3 % of respondents gave a correct definition of radiological SR, but as many as 56 % of them never used it at work. Compared with conventional reporting, the most appreciated advantages of SR were higher reproducibility (70.5 %), better interaction with referring clinicians (58.3 %) and the option to link metadata (36.7 %). Risk of excessive simplification (59.8 %), template rigidity (56.1 %) and poor user compliance (42.1 %) were the most significant disadvantages. Overall, most respondents (87.0 %) were in favour of the adoption of radiological SR.

Conclusions

Most radiologists were interested in radiological SR and in favour of its adoption. However, concerns about semantic, technical and professional issues limited its diffusion in real working life, encouraging efforts towards improved SR standardisation and engineering.

Key Points

Despite radiologists’ awareness, radiological SR is little used in working practice.
Perceived SR advantages are reproducibility, better clinico-radiological interaction and link to metadata.
Perceived SR disadvantages are excessive simplification, template rigidity and poor user compliance.
Improved standardisation and engineering may be helpful to boost SR diffusion.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Thrall JH (2014) Appropriateness and imaging utilization: "computerized provider order entry and decision support". Acad Radiol 21:1083–1087CrossRefPubMed Thrall JH (2014) Appropriateness and imaging utilization: "computerized provider order entry and decision support". Acad Radiol 21:1083–1087CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Hussein R, Engelmann U, Schroeter A, Meinzer HP (2004) DICOM structured reporting: Part 2. Problems and challenges in implementation for PACS workstations. Radiographics 24:897–909CrossRefPubMed Hussein R, Engelmann U, Schroeter A, Meinzer HP (2004) DICOM structured reporting: Part 2. Problems and challenges in implementation for PACS workstations. Radiographics 24:897–909CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Schwartz LH, Panicek DM, Berk AR, Li Y, Hricak H (2011) Improving communication of diagnostic radiology findings through structured reporting. Radiology 260:174–181CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Schwartz LH, Panicek DM, Berk AR, Li Y, Hricak H (2011) Improving communication of diagnostic radiology findings through structured reporting. Radiology 260:174–181CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Larson DB, Towbin AJ, Pryor RM, Donnelly LF (2013) Improving consistency in radiology reporting through the use of department-wide standardized structured reporting. Radiology 267:240–250CrossRefPubMed Larson DB, Towbin AJ, Pryor RM, Donnelly LF (2013) Improving consistency in radiology reporting through the use of department-wide standardized structured reporting. Radiology 267:240–250CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Brook OR, Brook A, Vollmer CM, Kent TS, Sanchez N, Pedrosa I (2015) Structured reporting of multiphasic CT for pancreatic cancer: potential effect on staging and surgical planning. Radiology 274:464–472CrossRefPubMed Brook OR, Brook A, Vollmer CM, Kent TS, Sanchez N, Pedrosa I (2015) Structured reporting of multiphasic CT for pancreatic cancer: potential effect on staging and surgical planning. Radiology 274:464–472CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Clunie DA (2000) DICOM structured reporting. PixelMed, Bangor Clunie DA (2000) DICOM structured reporting. PixelMed, Bangor
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Kahn CE Jr, Langlotz CP, Burnside ES et al (2009) Toward best practices in radiology reporting. Radiology 252:852–856CrossRefPubMed Kahn CE Jr, Langlotz CP, Burnside ES et al (2009) Toward best practices in radiology reporting. Radiology 252:852–856CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Bosmans JM, Peremans L, Menni M, De Schepper AM, Duyck PO, Parizel PM (2012) Structured reporting: if, why, when, how-and at what expense? Results of a focus group meeting of radiology professionals from eight countries. Insights Imaging 3:295–302CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bosmans JM, Peremans L, Menni M, De Schepper AM, Duyck PO, Parizel PM (2012) Structured reporting: if, why, when, how-and at what expense? Results of a focus group meeting of radiology professionals from eight countries. Insights Imaging 3:295–302CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Bosmans JM, Neri E, Ratib O, Kahn CE Jr (2015) Structured reporting: a fusion reactor hungry for fuel. Insights Imaging 6:129–132CrossRefPubMed Bosmans JM, Neri E, Ratib O, Kahn CE Jr (2015) Structured reporting: a fusion reactor hungry for fuel. Insights Imaging 6:129–132CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Margolies LR, Pandey G, Horowitz ER, Mendelson DS (2016) Breast imaging in the era of big data: structured reporting and data mining. AJR Am J Roentgenol 206:259–264CrossRefPubMed Margolies LR, Pandey G, Horowitz ER, Mendelson DS (2016) Breast imaging in the era of big data: structured reporting and data mining. AJR Am J Roentgenol 206:259–264CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Karim S, Fegeler C, Boeckler D, H Schwartz L, Kauczor HU, von Tengg-Kobligk H (2013) Development, implementation, and evaluation of a structured reporting web tool for abdominal aortic aneurysms. JMIR Res Protoc 2, e30CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Karim S, Fegeler C, Boeckler D, H Schwartz L, Kauczor HU, von Tengg-Kobligk H (2013) Development, implementation, and evaluation of a structured reporting web tool for abdominal aortic aneurysms. JMIR Res Protoc 2, e30CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Barbosa F, Maciel LM, Vieira EM, Azevedo Marques PM, Elias J, Muglia VF (2010) Radiological reports: a comparison between the transmission efficiency of information in free text and in structured reports. Clinics 65:15–21CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Barbosa F, Maciel LM, Vieira EM, Azevedo Marques PM, Elias J, Muglia VF (2010) Radiological reports: a comparison between the transmission efficiency of information in free text and in structured reports. Clinics 65:15–21CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Marcovici PA, Taylor GA (2014) Journal Club: structured radiology reports are more complete and more effective than unstructured reports. AJR Am J Roentgenol 203:1265–1271CrossRefPubMed Marcovici PA, Taylor GA (2014) Journal Club: structured radiology reports are more complete and more effective than unstructured reports. AJR Am J Roentgenol 203:1265–1271CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Durack JC (2014) The value proposition of structured reporting in interventional radiology. AJR Am J Roentgenol 203:734–738CrossRefPubMed Durack JC (2014) The value proposition of structured reporting in interventional radiology. AJR Am J Roentgenol 203:734–738CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Weiss DL, Langlotz CP (2008) Structured reporting: patient care enhancement or productivity nightmare? Radiology 249:739–747CrossRefPubMed Weiss DL, Langlotz CP (2008) Structured reporting: patient care enhancement or productivity nightmare? Radiology 249:739–747CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat European Society of Radiology (2013) ESR communication guidelines for radiologists. Insights Imaging 4:143–146CrossRef European Society of Radiology (2013) ESR communication guidelines for radiologists. Insights Imaging 4:143–146CrossRef
20.
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Vaché T, Bratan F, Mège-Lechevallier F, Roche S, Rabilloud M, Rouvière O (2014) Characterization of prostate lesions as benign or malignant at multiparametric MR imaging: comparison of three scoring systems in patients treated with radical prostatectomy. Radiology 272:446–455CrossRefPubMed Vaché T, Bratan F, Mège-Lechevallier F, Roche S, Rabilloud M, Rouvière O (2014) Characterization of prostate lesions as benign or malignant at multiparametric MR imaging: comparison of three scoring systems in patients treated with radical prostatectomy. Radiology 272:446–455CrossRefPubMed
22.
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Reiner BI (2012) Optimizing technology development and adoption in medical imaging using the principles of innovation diffusion, part II: practical applications. J Digit Imaging 25:7–10CrossRefPubMed Reiner BI (2012) Optimizing technology development and adoption in medical imaging using the principles of innovation diffusion, part II: practical applications. J Digit Imaging 25:7–10CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Ranschaert ER, Binkhuysen FH (2013) European teleradiology now and in the future: results of an online survey. Insights Imaging 4:93–102CrossRefPubMed Ranschaert ER, Binkhuysen FH (2013) European teleradiology now and in the future: results of an online survey. Insights Imaging 4:93–102CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Travis AR, Sevenster M, Ganesh R, Peters JF, Chang PJ (2014) Preferences for structured reporting of measurement data: an institutional survey of medical oncologists, oncology registrars, and radiologists. Acad Radiol 21:785–796CrossRefPubMed Travis AR, Sevenster M, Ganesh R, Peters JF, Chang PJ (2014) Preferences for structured reporting of measurement data: an institutional survey of medical oncologists, oncology registrars, and radiologists. Acad Radiol 21:785–796CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Johnson AJ, Chen MY, Swan JS, Applegate KE, Littenberg B (2009) Cohort study of structured reporting compared with conventional dictation. Radiology 253:74–80CrossRefPubMed Johnson AJ, Chen MY, Swan JS, Applegate KE, Littenberg B (2009) Cohort study of structured reporting compared with conventional dictation. Radiology 253:74–80CrossRefPubMed
28.
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Sistrom CL, Langlotz CP (2005) A framework for improving radiology reporting. J Am Coll Radiol 2:159–167CrossRefPubMed Sistrom CL, Langlotz CP (2005) A framework for improving radiology reporting. J Am Coll Radiol 2:159–167CrossRefPubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang S, Pavlicek W, Roberts CC et al (2011) An automated DICOM database capable of arbitrary data mining (including radiation dose indicators) for quality monitoring. J Digit Imaging 24:223–233CrossRefPubMed Wang S, Pavlicek W, Roberts CC et al (2011) An automated DICOM database capable of arbitrary data mining (including radiation dose indicators) for quality monitoring. J Digit Imaging 24:223–233CrossRefPubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Lauretti DL, Neri E, Faggioni L, Paolicchi F, Caramella D, Bartolozzi C (2015) Automated contrast medium monitoring system for computed tomography—intra-institutional audit. Comput Med Imaging Graph 46(Pt 2):209–218CrossRefPubMed Lauretti DL, Neri E, Faggioni L, Paolicchi F, Caramella D, Bartolozzi C (2015) Automated contrast medium monitoring system for computed tomography—intra-institutional audit. Comput Med Imaging Graph 46(Pt 2):209–218CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Usage of structured reporting in radiological practice: results from an Italian online survey
verfasst von
Lorenzo Faggioni
Francesca Coppola
Riccardo Ferrari
Emanuele Neri
Daniele Regge
Publikationsdatum
29.08.2016
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
European Radiology / Ausgabe 5/2017
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-016-4553-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2017

European Radiology 5/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.