Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Radiology 4/2019

25.09.2018 | Breast

Breast density implications and supplemental screening

verfasst von: Athina Vourtsis, Wendie A. Berg

Erschienen in: European Radiology | Ausgabe 4/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) has been widely implemented in place of 2D mammography, although it is less effective in women with extremely dense breasts. Breast ultrasound detects additional early-stage, invasive breast cancers when combined with mammography; however, its relevant limitations, including the shortage of trained operators, operator dependence and small field of view, have limited its widespread implementation. Automated breast sonography (ABS) is a promising technique but the time to interpret and false-positive rates need to be improved. Supplemental screening with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in high-risk women reduces late-stage disease; abbreviated MRI protocols may reduce cost and increase accessibility to women of average risk with dense breasts. Contrast-enhanced digital mammography (CEDM) and molecular breast imaging improve cancer detection but require further validation for screening and direct biopsy guidance should be implemented for any screening modality. This article reviews the status of screening women with dense breasts.

Key Points

• The sensitivity of mammography is reduced in women with dense breasts. Supplemental screening with US detects early-stage, invasive breast cancers.
• Tomosynthesis reduces recall rate and increases cancer detection rate but is less effective in women with extremely dense breasts.
• Screening MRI improves early diagnosis of breast cancer more than ultrasound and is currently recommended for women at high risk. Risk assessment is needed, to include breast density, to ascertain who should start early annual MRI screening.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Oeffinger KC, Fontham ET, Etzioni R et al (2015) Breast cancer screening for women at average risk: 2015 guideline update from the american cancer society. JAMA 314:1599–1614CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Oeffinger KC, Fontham ET, Etzioni R et al (2015) Breast cancer screening for women at average risk: 2015 guideline update from the american cancer society. JAMA 314:1599–1614CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Tabár L, Vitak B, Chen TH et al (2011) Swedish two-county trial: impact of mammographic screening on breast cancer mortality during 3 decades. Radiology 260:658–663CrossRefPubMed Tabár L, Vitak B, Chen TH et al (2011) Swedish two-county trial: impact of mammographic screening on breast cancer mortality during 3 decades. Radiology 260:658–663CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Broeders M, Moss S, Nyström L et al (2012) The impact of mammographic screening on breast cancer mortality in Europe: a review of observational studies. J Med Screen 19(Suppl 1):14–25CrossRefPubMed Broeders M, Moss S, Nyström L et al (2012) The impact of mammographic screening on breast cancer mortality in Europe: a review of observational studies. J Med Screen 19(Suppl 1):14–25CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Tabár L, Yen AM, Wu WY et al (2015) Insights from the breast cancer screening trials: how screening affects the natural history of breast cancer and implications for evaluating service screening programs. Breast J 21:13–20CrossRefPubMed Tabár L, Yen AM, Wu WY et al (2015) Insights from the breast cancer screening trials: how screening affects the natural history of breast cancer and implications for evaluating service screening programs. Breast J 21:13–20CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Brekelmans CT, Seynaeve C, Bartels CC et al (2001) Effectiveness of breast cancer surveillance in BRCA1/2 gene mutation carriers and women with high familial risk. J Clin Oncol 19:924–930CrossRefPubMed Brekelmans CT, Seynaeve C, Bartels CC et al (2001) Effectiveness of breast cancer surveillance in BRCA1/2 gene mutation carriers and women with high familial risk. J Clin Oncol 19:924–930CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Tilanus-Linthorst M, Verhoog L, Obdeijn IM et al (2002) A BRCA1/2 mutation, high breast density and prominent pushing margins of a tumor independently contribute to a frequent false-negative mammography. Int J Cancer 102:91–95CrossRefPubMed Tilanus-Linthorst M, Verhoog L, Obdeijn IM et al (2002) A BRCA1/2 mutation, high breast density and prominent pushing margins of a tumor independently contribute to a frequent false-negative mammography. Int J Cancer 102:91–95CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Komenaka IK, Ditkoff BA, Joseph KA et al (2004) The development of interval breast malignancies in patients with BRCA mutations. Cancer 100:2079–2083CrossRefPubMed Komenaka IK, Ditkoff BA, Joseph KA et al (2004) The development of interval breast malignancies in patients with BRCA mutations. Cancer 100:2079–2083CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Boyd NF, Guo H, Martín LJ et al (2007) Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 356:227–236CrossRefPubMed Boyd NF, Guo H, Martín LJ et al (2007) Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 356:227–236CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Houssami N, Abraham LA, Miglioretti DL et al (2011) Accuracy and outcomes of screening mammography in women with a personal history of early-stage breast cancer. JAMA 305:790–799CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Houssami N, Abraham LA, Miglioretti DL et al (2011) Accuracy and outcomes of screening mammography in women with a personal history of early-stage breast cancer. JAMA 305:790–799CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Berg WA (2016) Current status of supplemental screening in dense breasts. J Clin Oncol 34:1840–1843 Berg WA (2016) Current status of supplemental screening in dense breasts. J Clin Oncol 34:1840–1843
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Wolfe JN (1976) Breast patterns as an index of risk for developing breast cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 126:1130–1137CrossRefPubMed Wolfe JN (1976) Breast patterns as an index of risk for developing breast cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 126:1130–1137CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat van der Waal D, Ripping TM, Verbeek AL, Broeders MJ (2017) Breast cancer screening effect across breast density strata: a case-control study. Int J Cancer 140:41–49CrossRefPubMed van der Waal D, Ripping TM, Verbeek AL, Broeders MJ (2017) Breast cancer screening effect across breast density strata: a case-control study. Int J Cancer 140:41–49CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Gram IT, Funkhouser E, Tabár L (1997) The Tabár classification of mammographic parenchymal patterns. Eur J Radiol 24:131–136CrossRefPubMed Gram IT, Funkhouser E, Tabár L (1997) The Tabár classification of mammographic parenchymal patterns. Eur J Radiol 24:131–136CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Chiu SY, Duffy S, Yen AM, Tabár L, Smith RA, Chen HH (2010) Effect of baseline breast density on breast cancer incidence, stage, mortality, and screening parameters: 25-year follow-up of a Swedish mammographic screening. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 19:1219–1228CrossRefPubMed Chiu SY, Duffy S, Yen AM, Tabár L, Smith RA, Chen HH (2010) Effect of baseline breast density on breast cancer incidence, stage, mortality, and screening parameters: 25-year follow-up of a Swedish mammographic screening. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 19:1219–1228CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat McCormack VA, dos Santos Silva I (2006) Breast density and parenchymal patterns as markers of breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 15:1159–1169CrossRefPubMed McCormack VA, dos Santos Silva I (2006) Breast density and parenchymal patterns as markers of breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 15:1159–1169CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Sickles EA, D'Orsi CJ, Bassett LW et al (2013) ACR BI-RADS Mammography. In: D’Orsi CJ, Sickles EA, Mendelson EB, Morris EA (eds) ACR BI-RADS Atlas, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. American College of Radiology, Reston, VA Sickles EA, D'Orsi CJ, Bassett LW et al (2013) ACR BI-RADS Mammography. In: D’Orsi CJ, Sickles EA, Mendelson EB, Morris EA (eds) ACR BI-RADS Atlas, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. American College of Radiology, Reston, VA
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Sprague BL, Gangnon RE, Burt V et al (2014) Prevalence of mammographically dense breasts in the United States. J Natl Cancer Inst 106:ju255 Sprague BL, Gangnon RE, Burt V et al (2014) Prevalence of mammographically dense breasts in the United States. J Natl Cancer Inst 106:ju255
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Gubern-Mérida A, Kallenberg M, Platel B, Mann RM, Martí R, Karssemeijer N (2014) Volumetric breast density estimation from full-field digital mammograms: a validation study. PLoS One 9:e85952CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Gubern-Mérida A, Kallenberg M, Platel B, Mann RM, Martí R, Karssemeijer N (2014) Volumetric breast density estimation from full-field digital mammograms: a validation study. PLoS One 9:e85952CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Alonzo-Proulx O, Mawdsley GE, Patrie JT, Yaffe MJ, Harvey JA (2015) Reliability of automated breast density measurements. Radiology 275:366–376CrossRefPubMed Alonzo-Proulx O, Mawdsley GE, Patrie JT, Yaffe MJ, Harvey JA (2015) Reliability of automated breast density measurements. Radiology 275:366–376CrossRefPubMed
21.
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Destounis S, Arieno A, Morgan R, Roberts C, Chan A (2017) Qualitative versus quantitative mammographic breast density assessment: Applications for the US and abroad. Diagnostics (Basel) 7:30 Destounis S, Arieno A, Morgan R, Roberts C, Chan A (2017) Qualitative versus quantitative mammographic breast density assessment: Applications for the US and abroad. Diagnostics (Basel) 7:30
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Engmann NJ, Golmakani MK, Miglioretti DL, Sprague BL, Kerlikowske K, for the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium (2017) Population-attributable risk proportion of clinical risk factors for breast cancer. JAMA Oncol 3:1228–1236 Engmann NJ, Golmakani MK, Miglioretti DL, Sprague BL, Kerlikowske K, for the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium (2017) Population-attributable risk proportion of clinical risk factors for breast cancer. JAMA Oncol 3:1228–1236
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Warwick J, Birke H, Stone J et al (2014) Mammographic breast density refines Tyrer-Cuzick estimates of breast cancer risk in high-risk women: findings from the placebo arm of the International Breast Cancer Intervention Study I. Breast Cancer Res 16:451CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Warwick J, Birke H, Stone J et al (2014) Mammographic breast density refines Tyrer-Cuzick estimates of breast cancer risk in high-risk women: findings from the placebo arm of the International Breast Cancer Intervention Study I. Breast Cancer Res 16:451CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Kerlikowske K, Ma L, Scott CG et al (2017) Combining quantitative and qualitative breast density measures to assess breast cancer risk. Breast Cancer Res 19:97CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kerlikowske K, Ma L, Scott CG et al (2017) Combining quantitative and qualitative breast density measures to assess breast cancer risk. Breast Cancer Res 19:97CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Bae MS, Moon WK, Chang JM et al (2014) Breast cancer detected with screening US: reasons for nondetection at mammography. Radiology 270:369–377CrossRefPubMed Bae MS, Moon WK, Chang JM et al (2014) Breast cancer detected with screening US: reasons for nondetection at mammography. Radiology 270:369–377CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Hooley RJ, Greenberg KL, Stackhouse RM, Geisel JL, Butler RS, Philpotts LE (2012) Screening US in patients with mammographically dense breasts: initial experience with Connecticut Public Act 09-41. Radiology 265:59–69CrossRefPubMed Hooley RJ, Greenberg KL, Stackhouse RM, Geisel JL, Butler RS, Philpotts LE (2012) Screening US in patients with mammographically dense breasts: initial experience with Connecticut Public Act 09-41. Radiology 265:59–69CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Kolb TM, Lichy J, Newhouse JH (2002) Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations. Radiology 225:165–175CrossRefPubMed Kolb TM, Lichy J, Newhouse JH (2002) Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations. Radiology 225:165–175CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Carney PA, Miglioretti DL, Yankaskas BC et al (2003) Individual and combined effects of age, breast density, and hormone replacement therapy use on the accuracy of screening mammography. Ann Intern Med 138:168–175CrossRefPubMed Carney PA, Miglioretti DL, Yankaskas BC et al (2003) Individual and combined effects of age, breast density, and hormone replacement therapy use on the accuracy of screening mammography. Ann Intern Med 138:168–175CrossRefPubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Kerlikowske K, Hubbard RA, Miglioretti DL et al (2011) Comparative effectiveness of digital versus film-screen mammography in community practice in the United States: a cohort study. Ann Intern Med 155:493–502CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kerlikowske K, Hubbard RA, Miglioretti DL et al (2011) Comparative effectiveness of digital versus film-screen mammography in community practice in the United States: a cohort study. Ann Intern Med 155:493–502CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Berg WA (2009) Tailored supplemental screening for breast cancer: what now and what next? AJR Am J Roentgenol 192:390–399CrossRefPubMed Berg WA (2009) Tailored supplemental screening for breast cancer: what now and what next? AJR Am J Roentgenol 192:390–399CrossRefPubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Roubidoux MA, Bailey JE, Wray LA, Helvie MA (2004) Invasive cancers detected after breast cancer screening yielded a negative result: relationship of mammographic density to tumor prognostic factors. Radiology 230:42–48CrossRefPubMed Roubidoux MA, Bailey JE, Wray LA, Helvie MA (2004) Invasive cancers detected after breast cancer screening yielded a negative result: relationship of mammographic density to tumor prognostic factors. Radiology 230:42–48CrossRefPubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Pisano ED, Gatsonis C, Hendrick E et al (2005) Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening. N Engl J Med 353:1773–1783CrossRefPubMed Pisano ED, Gatsonis C, Hendrick E et al (2005) Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening. N Engl J Med 353:1773–1783CrossRefPubMed
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Sardanelli F, Aase HS, Álvarez M et al (2017) Position paper on screening for breast cancer by the European Society of Breast Imaging (EUSOBI) and 30 national breast radiology bodies from Austria, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Israel, Lithuania, Moldova, The Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and Turkey. Eur Radiol 27:2737–2743CrossRefPubMed Sardanelli F, Aase HS, Álvarez M et al (2017) Position paper on screening for breast cancer by the European Society of Breast Imaging (EUSOBI) and 30 national breast radiology bodies from Austria, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Israel, Lithuania, Moldova, The Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and Turkey. Eur Radiol 27:2737–2743CrossRefPubMed
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Niklason LT, Christian BT, Niklason LE et al (1997) Digital tomosynthesis in breast imaging. Radiology 205:399–406CrossRefPubMed Niklason LT, Christian BT, Niklason LE et al (1997) Digital tomosynthesis in breast imaging. Radiology 205:399–406CrossRefPubMed
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Machida Y, Saita A, Namba H, Fukuma E (2016) Automated volumetric breast density estimation out of digital breast tomosynthesis data: feasibility study of a new software version. Springerplus 5:780CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Machida Y, Saita A, Namba H, Fukuma E (2016) Automated volumetric breast density estimation out of digital breast tomosynthesis data: feasibility study of a new software version. Springerplus 5:780CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Ciatto S, Houssami N, Bernardi D et al (2013) Integration of 3D digital mammography with tomosynthesis for population breast-cancer screening (STORM): a prospective comparison study. Lancet Oncol 14:583–589CrossRefPubMed Ciatto S, Houssami N, Bernardi D et al (2013) Integration of 3D digital mammography with tomosynthesis for population breast-cancer screening (STORM): a prospective comparison study. Lancet Oncol 14:583–589CrossRefPubMed
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Skaane P, Bandos AI, Gullien R et al (2013) Prospective trial comparing full-field digital mammography (FFDM) versus combined FFDM and tomosynthesis in a population-based screening programme using independent double reading with arbitration. Eur Radiol 23:2061–2071CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Skaane P, Bandos AI, Gullien R et al (2013) Prospective trial comparing full-field digital mammography (FFDM) versus combined FFDM and tomosynthesis in a population-based screening programme using independent double reading with arbitration. Eur Radiol 23:2061–2071CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Lång K, Andersson I, Rosso A, Tingberg A, Timberg P, Zackrisson S (2016) Performance of one-view breast tomosynthesis as a stand-alone breast cancer screening modality: results from the Malmö Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial, a population-based study. Eur Radiol 26:184–190 Lång K, Andersson I, Rosso A, Tingberg A, Timberg P, Zackrisson S (2016) Performance of one-view breast tomosynthesis as a stand-alone breast cancer screening modality: results from the Malmö Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial, a population-based study. Eur Radiol 26:184–190
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Friedewald SM, Rafferty EA, Rose SL et al (2014) Breast cancer screening using tomosynthesis in combination with digital mammography. JAMA 311:2499–2507CrossRefPubMed Friedewald SM, Rafferty EA, Rose SL et al (2014) Breast cancer screening using tomosynthesis in combination with digital mammography. JAMA 311:2499–2507CrossRefPubMed
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Rafferty EA, Durand MA, Conant EF et al (2016) Breast cancer screening using tomosynthesis and digital mammography in mense and nondense breasts. JAMA 315:1784–1786 Rafferty EA, Durand MA, Conant EF et al (2016) Breast cancer screening using tomosynthesis and digital mammography in mense and nondense breasts. JAMA 315:1784–1786
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim WH, Chang JM, Lee J et al (2017) Diagnostic performance of tomosynthesis and breast ultrasonography in women with dense breasts: a prospective comparison study. Breast Cancer Res Treat 162:85–94CrossRefPubMed Kim WH, Chang JM, Lee J et al (2017) Diagnostic performance of tomosynthesis and breast ultrasonography in women with dense breasts: a prospective comparison study. Breast Cancer Res Treat 162:85–94CrossRefPubMed
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Houssami N (2015) Digital breast tomosynthesis (3D-mammography) screening: data and implications for population screening. Expert Rev Med Devices 12:377–379CrossRefPubMed Houssami N (2015) Digital breast tomosynthesis (3D-mammography) screening: data and implications for population screening. Expert Rev Med Devices 12:377–379CrossRefPubMed
44.
Zurück zum Zitat McDonald ES, Oustimov A, Weinstein SP, Synnestvedt MB, Schnall M, Conant EF (2016) Effectiveness of digital breast tomosynthesis compared with digital mammography: Outcomes analysis from 3 years of breast cancer screening. JAMA Oncol 2:737–743CrossRefPubMed McDonald ES, Oustimov A, Weinstein SP, Synnestvedt MB, Schnall M, Conant EF (2016) Effectiveness of digital breast tomosynthesis compared with digital mammography: Outcomes analysis from 3 years of breast cancer screening. JAMA Oncol 2:737–743CrossRefPubMed
45.
Zurück zum Zitat Corsetti V, Houssami N, Ferrari A et al (2008) Breast screening with ultrasound in women with mammography-negative dense breasts: evidence on incremental cancer detection and false positives. and associated cost. Eur J Cancer 44:539–544CrossRefPubMed Corsetti V, Houssami N, Ferrari A et al (2008) Breast screening with ultrasound in women with mammography-negative dense breasts: evidence on incremental cancer detection and false positives. and associated cost. Eur J Cancer 44:539–544CrossRefPubMed
46.
Zurück zum Zitat Scheel JR, Lee JM, Sprague BL, Lee CI, Lehman CD (2015) Screening ultrasound as an adjunct to mammography in women with mammographically dense breasts. Am J Obstet Gynecol 212:9–17CrossRefPubMed Scheel JR, Lee JM, Sprague BL, Lee CI, Lehman CD (2015) Screening ultrasound as an adjunct to mammography in women with mammographically dense breasts. Am J Obstet Gynecol 212:9–17CrossRefPubMed
47.
Zurück zum Zitat Berg WA, Blume JD, Cormack JB et al (2008) Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography vs mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer. JAMA 299:2151–2163CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Berg WA, Blume JD, Cormack JB et al (2008) Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography vs mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer. JAMA 299:2151–2163CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
48.
Zurück zum Zitat Berg WA, Zhang Z, Lehrer D et al (2012) Detection of breast cancer with addition of annual screening ultrasound or a single screening MRI to mammography in women with elevated breast cancer risk. JAMA 307:1394–1404CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Berg WA, Zhang Z, Lehrer D et al (2012) Detection of breast cancer with addition of annual screening ultrasound or a single screening MRI to mammography in women with elevated breast cancer risk. JAMA 307:1394–1404CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
49.
Zurück zum Zitat Buchberger W, Niehoff A, Obrist P, DeKoekkoek-Doll P, Dünser M (2000) Clinically and mammographically occult breast lesions: detection and classification with high-resolution sonography. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 21:325–336CrossRefPubMed Buchberger W, Niehoff A, Obrist P, DeKoekkoek-Doll P, Dünser M (2000) Clinically and mammographically occult breast lesions: detection and classification with high-resolution sonography. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 21:325–336CrossRefPubMed
50.
Zurück zum Zitat Sprague BL, Stout NK, Schechter C et al (2015) Benefits, harms, and cost-effectiveness of supplemental ultrasonography screening for women with dense breasts. Ann Intern Med 162:157–166CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sprague BL, Stout NK, Schechter C et al (2015) Benefits, harms, and cost-effectiveness of supplemental ultrasonography screening for women with dense breasts. Ann Intern Med 162:157–166CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
51.
Zurück zum Zitat Gordon PB, Goldenberg SL (1995) Malignant breast masses detected only by ultrasound. A retrospective review. Cancer 76:626–630CrossRefPubMed Gordon PB, Goldenberg SL (1995) Malignant breast masses detected only by ultrasound. A retrospective review. Cancer 76:626–630CrossRefPubMed
52.
Zurück zum Zitat Kaplan SS (2001) Clinical utility of bilateral whole-breast US in the evaluation of women with dense breast tissue. Radiology 221:641–649CrossRefPubMed Kaplan SS (2001) Clinical utility of bilateral whole-breast US in the evaluation of women with dense breast tissue. Radiology 221:641–649CrossRefPubMed
53.
Zurück zum Zitat Leconte I, Feger C, Galant C et al (2003) Mammography and subsequent whole-breast sonography of nonpalpable breast cancers: the importance of radiologic breast density. AJR Am J Roentgenol 180:1675–1679CrossRefPubMed Leconte I, Feger C, Galant C et al (2003) Mammography and subsequent whole-breast sonography of nonpalpable breast cancers: the importance of radiologic breast density. AJR Am J Roentgenol 180:1675–1679CrossRefPubMed
54.
Zurück zum Zitat Crystal P, Strano SD, Shcharynski S, Koretz MJ (2003) Using sonography to screen women with mammographically dense breasts. AJR Am J Roentgenol 181:177–182CrossRefPubMed Crystal P, Strano SD, Shcharynski S, Koretz MJ (2003) Using sonography to screen women with mammographically dense breasts. AJR Am J Roentgenol 181:177–182CrossRefPubMed
55.
Zurück zum Zitat Wilczek B, Wilczek HE, Rasouliyan L, Leifland K (2016) Adding 3D automated breast ultrasound to mammography screening in women with heterogeneously and extremely dense breasts: Report from a hospital-based, high-volume, single-center breast cancer screening program. Eur J Radiol 85:1554–1563CrossRefPubMed Wilczek B, Wilczek HE, Rasouliyan L, Leifland K (2016) Adding 3D automated breast ultrasound to mammography screening in women with heterogeneously and extremely dense breasts: Report from a hospital-based, high-volume, single-center breast cancer screening program. Eur J Radiol 85:1554–1563CrossRefPubMed
56.
Zurück zum Zitat Kelly KM, Dean J, Comulada WS, Lee SJ (2010) Breast cancer detection using automated whole breast ultrasound and mammography in radiographically dense breasts. Eur Radiol 20:734–742CrossRefPubMed Kelly KM, Dean J, Comulada WS, Lee SJ (2010) Breast cancer detection using automated whole breast ultrasound and mammography in radiographically dense breasts. Eur Radiol 20:734–742CrossRefPubMed
57.
Zurück zum Zitat Brem RF, Tabár L, Duffy SW et al (2015) Assessing improvement in detection of breast cancer with three-dimensional automated breast US in women with dense breast tissue: the SomoInsight Study. Radiology 274:663-673. Brem RF, Tabár L, Duffy SW et al (2015) Assessing improvement in detection of breast cancer with three-dimensional automated breast US in women with dense breast tissue: the SomoInsight Study. Radiology 274:663-673.
58.
Zurück zum Zitat Ohuchi N, Suzuki A, Sobue T et al (2016) Sensitivity and specificity of mammography and adjunctive ultrasonography to screen for breast cancer in the Japan Strategic Anti-cancer Randomized Trial (J-START): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 387:341–348CrossRefPubMed Ohuchi N, Suzuki A, Sobue T et al (2016) Sensitivity and specificity of mammography and adjunctive ultrasonography to screen for breast cancer in the Japan Strategic Anti-cancer Randomized Trial (J-START): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 387:341–348CrossRefPubMed
59.
Zurück zum Zitat Weigert JM (2017) The connecticut experiment; the third installment: 4 years of screening women with dense breasts with bilateral ultrasound. Breast J 23:34–39CrossRefPubMed Weigert JM (2017) The connecticut experiment; the third installment: 4 years of screening women with dense breasts with bilateral ultrasound. Breast J 23:34–39CrossRefPubMed
60.
Zurück zum Zitat Bae MS, Han W, Koo HR et al (2011) Characteristics of breast cancers detected by ultrasound screening in women with negative mammograms. Cancer Sci 102:1862–1867CrossRefPubMed Bae MS, Han W, Koo HR et al (2011) Characteristics of breast cancers detected by ultrasound screening in women with negative mammograms. Cancer Sci 102:1862–1867CrossRefPubMed
61.
Zurück zum Zitat Parris T, Wakefield D, Frimmer H (2013) Real world performance of screening breast ultrasound following enactment of Connecticut Bill 458. Breast J 19:64–70 Parris T, Wakefield D, Frimmer H (2013) Real world performance of screening breast ultrasound following enactment of Connecticut Bill 458. Breast J 19:64–70
62.
Zurück zum Zitat Chang JM, Koo HR, Moon WK (2015). Radiologist-performed hand-held ultrasound screening at average risk of breast cancer: results from a single health screening center. Acta Radiol 56:652–658 Chang JM, Koo HR, Moon WK (2015). Radiologist-performed hand-held ultrasound screening at average risk of breast cancer: results from a single health screening center. Acta Radiol 56:652–658
63.
Zurück zum Zitat Moon HJ, Jung I, Park SJ, Kim MJ, Youk JH, Kim EK (2015) Comparison of cancer yields and diagnostic performance of screening mammography vs. supplemental screening ultrasound in 4394 women with average risk for breast cancer. Ultraschall Med 36:255–263 Moon HJ, Jung I, Park SJ, Kim MJ, Youk JH, Kim EK (2015) Comparison of cancer yields and diagnostic performance of screening mammography vs. supplemental screening ultrasound in 4394 women with average risk for breast cancer. Ultraschall Med 36:255–263
64.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim SY, Han BK, Kim EK et al (2017) Breast cancer detected at screening us: survival rates and clinical-pathologic and imaging factors associated with recurrence. Radiology 284:354–364CrossRefPubMed Kim SY, Han BK, Kim EK et al (2017) Breast cancer detected at screening us: survival rates and clinical-pathologic and imaging factors associated with recurrence. Radiology 284:354–364CrossRefPubMed
65.
Zurück zum Zitat Corsetti V, Houssami N, Ghirardi M et al (2011) Evidence of the effect of adjunct ultrasound screening in women with mammography-negative dense breasts: interval breast cancers at 1 year follow-up. Eur J Cancer 47:1021–1026CrossRefPubMed Corsetti V, Houssami N, Ghirardi M et al (2011) Evidence of the effect of adjunct ultrasound screening in women with mammography-negative dense breasts: interval breast cancers at 1 year follow-up. Eur J Cancer 47:1021–1026CrossRefPubMed
66.
Zurück zum Zitat Berg WA, Mendelson EB (2014) Technologist-performed handheld screening breast US imaging: how is it performed and what are the outcomes to date? Radiology 272:12–27CrossRefPubMed Berg WA, Mendelson EB (2014) Technologist-performed handheld screening breast US imaging: how is it performed and what are the outcomes to date? Radiology 272:12–27CrossRefPubMed
67.
Zurück zum Zitat Bosch AM, Kessels AG, Beets GL et al (2003) Interexamination variation of whole breast ultrasound. Br J Radiol 76:328–331CrossRefPubMed Bosch AM, Kessels AG, Beets GL et al (2003) Interexamination variation of whole breast ultrasound. Br J Radiol 76:328–331CrossRefPubMed
68.
Zurück zum Zitat Berg WA, Blume JD, Cormack JB, Mendelson EB (2006) Operator dependence of physician-performed whole-breast US: lesion detection and characterization. Radiology 241:355–365CrossRefPubMed Berg WA, Blume JD, Cormack JB, Mendelson EB (2006) Operator dependence of physician-performed whole-breast US: lesion detection and characterization. Radiology 241:355–365CrossRefPubMed
69.
Zurück zum Zitat Berg WA, Blume JD, Cormack JB, Mendelson EB, Madsen EL, Investigators A (2006) Lesion detection and characterization in a breast US phantom: results of the ACRIN 6666 Investigators. Radiology 239:693–702CrossRefPubMed Berg WA, Blume JD, Cormack JB, Mendelson EB, Madsen EL, Investigators A (2006) Lesion detection and characterization in a breast US phantom: results of the ACRIN 6666 Investigators. Radiology 239:693–702CrossRefPubMed
70.
Zurück zum Zitat Vourtsis A, Kachulis A (2018) The performance of 3D ABUS versus HHUS in the visualisation and BI-RADS characterisation of breast lesions in a large cohort of 1,886 women. Eur Radiol 28:592–601CrossRefPubMed Vourtsis A, Kachulis A (2018) The performance of 3D ABUS versus HHUS in the visualisation and BI-RADS characterisation of breast lesions in a large cohort of 1,886 women. Eur Radiol 28:592–601CrossRefPubMed
71.
Zurück zum Zitat Skaane P, Gullien R, Eben EB, Sandhaug M, Schulz-Wendtland R, Stoeblen F (2015) Interpretation of automated breast ultrasound (ABUS) with and without knowledge of mammography: a reader performance study. Acta Radiol 56:404–412CrossRefPubMed Skaane P, Gullien R, Eben EB, Sandhaug M, Schulz-Wendtland R, Stoeblen F (2015) Interpretation of automated breast ultrasound (ABUS) with and without knowledge of mammography: a reader performance study. Acta Radiol 56:404–412CrossRefPubMed
72.
Zurück zum Zitat Moon WK, Shen YW, Huang CS et al (2011) Comparative study of density analysis using automated whole breast ultrasound and MRI. Med Phys 38:382–389CrossRefPubMed Moon WK, Shen YW, Huang CS et al (2011) Comparative study of density analysis using automated whole breast ultrasound and MRI. Med Phys 38:382–389CrossRefPubMed
73.
Zurück zum Zitat Moon WK, Lo CM, Chang JM et al (2013) Rapid breast density analysis of partial volumes of automated breast ultrasound images. Ultrason Imaging 35:333–343CrossRefPubMed Moon WK, Lo CM, Chang JM et al (2013) Rapid breast density analysis of partial volumes of automated breast ultrasound images. Ultrason Imaging 35:333–343CrossRefPubMed
74.
Zurück zum Zitat Giger ML, Inciardi MF, Edwards A et al (2016) Automated Breast Ultrasound in Breast Cancer Screening of Women With Dense Breasts: Reader Study of Mammography-Negative and Mammography-Positive Cancers. AJR Am J Roentgenol 206:1341–1350CrossRefPubMed Giger ML, Inciardi MF, Edwards A et al (2016) Automated Breast Ultrasound in Breast Cancer Screening of Women With Dense Breasts: Reader Study of Mammography-Negative and Mammography-Positive Cancers. AJR Am J Roentgenol 206:1341–1350CrossRefPubMed
75.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim EJ, Kim SH, Kang BJ, Kim YJ (2014) Interobserver agreement on the interpretation of automated whole breast ultrasonography. Ultrasonography 33:252–258CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kim EJ, Kim SH, Kang BJ, Kim YJ (2014) Interobserver agreement on the interpretation of automated whole breast ultrasonography. Ultrasonography 33:252–258CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
76.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang HY, Jiang YX, Zhu QL et al (2012) Differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions: a comparison between automatically generated breast volume scans and handheld ultrasound examinations. Eur J Radiol 81:3190–3200CrossRefPubMed Wang HY, Jiang YX, Zhu QL et al (2012) Differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions: a comparison between automatically generated breast volume scans and handheld ultrasound examinations. Eur J Radiol 81:3190–3200CrossRefPubMed
77.
Zurück zum Zitat Jiang Y, Inciardi MF, Edwards AV, Papaioannou J (2018) Interpretation time using a concurrent-read computer-aided detection system for automated breast ultrasound in breast cancer screening of women with dense breast tissue. AJR Am J Roentgenol 211:452–461 Jiang Y, Inciardi MF, Edwards AV, Papaioannou J (2018) Interpretation time using a concurrent-read computer-aided detection system for automated breast ultrasound in breast cancer screening of women with dense breast tissue. AJR Am J Roentgenol 211:452–461
78.
Zurück zum Zitat van Zelst JCM, Tan T, Clauser P et al (2018) Dedicated computer-aided detection software for automated 3D breast ultrasound; an efficient tool for the radiologist in supplemental screening of women with dense breasts. Eur Radiol 28:2996-3006 van Zelst JCM, Tan T, Clauser P et al (2018) Dedicated computer-aided detection software for automated 3D breast ultrasound; an efficient tool for the radiologist in supplemental screening of women with dense breasts. Eur Radiol 28:2996-3006
79.
Zurück zum Zitat Tagliafico AS, Calabrese M, Mariscotti G et al (2016) Adjunct Screening with Tomosynthesis or ultrasound in women with Mammography-Negative Dense Breasts: Interim report of a prospective comparative trial. J Clin Oncol 34:1882–1888 Tagliafico AS, Calabrese M, Mariscotti G et al (2016) Adjunct Screening with Tomosynthesis or ultrasound in women with Mammography-Negative Dense Breasts: Interim report of a prospective comparative trial. J Clin Oncol 34:1882–1888
80.
Zurück zum Zitat Destounis S, Arieno A, Morgan R (2017) Comparison of cancers detected by screening ultrasound and digital breast tomosynthesis. Abstract 3162. The American Roentgen Ray Society (ARRS) 2017 Annual Meeting (2017) New Orleans, LA Destounis S, Arieno A, Morgan R (2017) Comparison of cancers detected by screening ultrasound and digital breast tomosynthesis. Abstract 3162. The American Roentgen Ray Society (ARRS) 2017 Annual Meeting (2017) New Orleans, LA
82.
Zurück zum Zitat Saslow D, Boetes C, Burke W et al (2007) American Cancer Society guidelines for breast screening with MRI as an adjunct to mammography. CA Cancer J Clin 57:75–89CrossRefPubMed Saslow D, Boetes C, Burke W et al (2007) American Cancer Society guidelines for breast screening with MRI as an adjunct to mammography. CA Cancer J Clin 57:75–89CrossRefPubMed
83.
Zurück zum Zitat National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) (2018) NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines). Genetic/Familial High-Risk Assessment: Breast and Ovarian. NCCN, Fort Washington, PA National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) (2018) NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines). Genetic/Familial High-Risk Assessment: Breast and Ovarian. NCCN, Fort Washington, PA
84.
Zurück zum Zitat National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) (2018) NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines). Breast Cancer Screening and Diagnosis. NCCN, Fort Washington, PA National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) (2018) NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines). Breast Cancer Screening and Diagnosis. NCCN, Fort Washington, PA
85.
Zurück zum Zitat Monticciolo DL, Newell MS, Moy L, Niell B, Monsees B, Sickles EA (2018) Breast cancer screening in women at higher-than-average risk: recommendations from the ACR. J Am Coll Radiol 15:408–414CrossRefPubMed Monticciolo DL, Newell MS, Moy L, Niell B, Monsees B, Sickles EA (2018) Breast cancer screening in women at higher-than-average risk: recommendations from the ACR. J Am Coll Radiol 15:408–414CrossRefPubMed
86.
Zurück zum Zitat King V, Brooks JD, Bernstein JL, Reiner AS, Pike MC, Morris EA (2011) Background parenchymal enhancement at breast MR imaging and breast cancer risk. Radiology 260:50–60CrossRefPubMed King V, Brooks JD, Bernstein JL, Reiner AS, Pike MC, Morris EA (2011) Background parenchymal enhancement at breast MR imaging and breast cancer risk. Radiology 260:50–60CrossRefPubMed
87.
Zurück zum Zitat Sak MA, Littrup PJ, Duric N, Mullooly M, Sherman ME, Gierach GL (2015) Current and future methods for measuring breast density: a brief comparative review. Breast Cancer Manag 4:209–221CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sak MA, Littrup PJ, Duric N, Mullooly M, Sherman ME, Gierach GL (2015) Current and future methods for measuring breast density: a brief comparative review. Breast Cancer Manag 4:209–221CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
88.
Zurück zum Zitat Warner E, Messersmith H, Causer P, Eisen A, Shumak R, Plewes D (2008) Systematic review: using magnetic resonance imaging to screen women at high risk for breast cancer. Ann Intern Med 148:671–679CrossRefPubMed Warner E, Messersmith H, Causer P, Eisen A, Shumak R, Plewes D (2008) Systematic review: using magnetic resonance imaging to screen women at high risk for breast cancer. Ann Intern Med 148:671–679CrossRefPubMed
89.
Zurück zum Zitat Lo G, Scaranelo AM, Aboras H et al (2017) Evaluation of the Utility of Screening Mammography for High-Risk Women Undergoing Screening Breast MR Imaging. Radiology 285:36–43CrossRefPubMed Lo G, Scaranelo AM, Aboras H et al (2017) Evaluation of the Utility of Screening Mammography for High-Risk Women Undergoing Screening Breast MR Imaging. Radiology 285:36–43CrossRefPubMed
90.
Zurück zum Zitat Riedl CC, Luft N, Bernhart C et al (2015) Triple-modality screening trial for familial breast cancer underlines the importance of magnetic resonance imaging and questions the role of mammography and ultrasound regardless of patient mutation status, age, and breast density. J Clin Oncol 33:1128–1135CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Riedl CC, Luft N, Bernhart C et al (2015) Triple-modality screening trial for familial breast cancer underlines the importance of magnetic resonance imaging and questions the role of mammography and ultrasound regardless of patient mutation status, age, and breast density. J Clin Oncol 33:1128–1135CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
91.
Zurück zum Zitat van Zelst JCM, Mus RDM, Woldringh G et al (2017) Surveillance of women with the BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation by using biannual automated breast US, MR imaging, and mammography. Radiology 285:376–388CrossRefPubMed van Zelst JCM, Mus RDM, Woldringh G et al (2017) Surveillance of women with the BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation by using biannual automated breast US, MR imaging, and mammography. Radiology 285:376–388CrossRefPubMed
92.
Zurück zum Zitat Heijnsdijk EA, Warner E, Gilbert FJ et al (2012) Differences in natural history between breast cancers in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers and effects of MRI screening-MRISC, MARIBS, and Canadian studies combined. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 21:1458–1468CrossRefPubMed Heijnsdijk EA, Warner E, Gilbert FJ et al (2012) Differences in natural history between breast cancers in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers and effects of MRI screening-MRISC, MARIBS, and Canadian studies combined. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 21:1458–1468CrossRefPubMed
93.
Zurück zum Zitat Lehman CD, Blume JD, Weatherall P et al (2005) Screening women at high risk for breast cancer with mammography and magnetic resonance imaging. Cancer 103:1898–1905CrossRefPubMed Lehman CD, Blume JD, Weatherall P et al (2005) Screening women at high risk for breast cancer with mammography and magnetic resonance imaging. Cancer 103:1898–1905CrossRefPubMed
94.
Zurück zum Zitat Leach MO, Boggis CR, Dixon AK et al (2005) Screening with magnetic resonance imaging and mammography of a UK population at high familial risk of breast cancer: a prospective multicentre cohort study (MARIBS). Lancet 365:1769–1778CrossRefPubMed Leach MO, Boggis CR, Dixon AK et al (2005) Screening with magnetic resonance imaging and mammography of a UK population at high familial risk of breast cancer: a prospective multicentre cohort study (MARIBS). Lancet 365:1769–1778CrossRefPubMed
95.
Zurück zum Zitat Kuhl CK, Schrading S, Leutner CC et al (2005) Mammography, breast ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging for surveillance of women at high familial risk for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 23:8469–8476CrossRefPubMed Kuhl CK, Schrading S, Leutner CC et al (2005) Mammography, breast ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging for surveillance of women at high familial risk for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 23:8469–8476CrossRefPubMed
96.
Zurück zum Zitat National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (2013) Familial breast cancer: classification, care and managing breast cancer and related risks in people with a family history of breast cancer. (Clinical guideline 164). https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/CG164 (accessed on September 01, 2017) National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (2013) Familial breast cancer: classification, care and managing breast cancer and related risks in people with a family history of breast cancer. (Clinical guideline 164). https://​www.​nice.​org.​uk/​guidance/​CG164 (accessed on September 01, 2017)
97.
Zurück zum Zitat Meindl A, Ditsch N, Kast K, Rhiem K, Schmutzler RK (2011) Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer: new genes, new treatments, new concepts. Dtsch Arztebl Int 108:323–330PubMedPubMedCentral Meindl A, Ditsch N, Kast K, Rhiem K, Schmutzler RK (2011) Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer: new genes, new treatments, new concepts. Dtsch Arztebl Int 108:323–330PubMedPubMedCentral
98.
Zurück zum Zitat Foulkes WD, Chappuis PO, Wong N et al (2000) Primary node negative breast cancer in BRCA1 mutation carriers has a poor outcome. Ann Oncol 11:307–313CrossRefPubMed Foulkes WD, Chappuis PO, Wong N et al (2000) Primary node negative breast cancer in BRCA1 mutation carriers has a poor outcome. Ann Oncol 11:307–313CrossRefPubMed
99.
Zurück zum Zitat Tilanus-Linthorst MM, Kriege M, Boetes C et al (2005) Hereditary breast cancer growth rates and its impact on screening policy. Eur J Cancer 41:1610–1617CrossRefPubMed Tilanus-Linthorst MM, Kriege M, Boetes C et al (2005) Hereditary breast cancer growth rates and its impact on screening policy. Eur J Cancer 41:1610–1617CrossRefPubMed
100.
Zurück zum Zitat Bick U (2015) Intensified surveillance for early detection of breast cancer in high-risk patients. Breast Care (Basel) 10:13–20CrossRef Bick U (2015) Intensified surveillance for early detection of breast cancer in high-risk patients. Breast Care (Basel) 10:13–20CrossRef
101.
Zurück zum Zitat Le-Petross HT, Whitman GJ, Atchley DP et al (2011) Effectiveness of alternating mammography and magnetic resonance imaging for screening women with deleterious BRCA mutations at high risk of breast cancer. Cancer 117:3900–3907CrossRefPubMed Le-Petross HT, Whitman GJ, Atchley DP et al (2011) Effectiveness of alternating mammography and magnetic resonance imaging for screening women with deleterious BRCA mutations at high risk of breast cancer. Cancer 117:3900–3907CrossRefPubMed
102.
Zurück zum Zitat Cott Chubiz JE, Lee JM, Gilmore ME et al (2013) Cost-effectiveness of alternating magnetic resonance imaging and digital mammography screening in BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutation carriers. Cancer 119:1266–1276CrossRefPubMed Cott Chubiz JE, Lee JM, Gilmore ME et al (2013) Cost-effectiveness of alternating magnetic resonance imaging and digital mammography screening in BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutation carriers. Cancer 119:1266–1276CrossRefPubMed
103.
Zurück zum Zitat Phi XA, Houssami N, Hooning MJ et al (2017) Accuracy of screening women at familial risk of breast cancer without a known gene mutation: Individual patient data meta-analysis. Eur J Cancer 85:31–38 Phi XA, Houssami N, Hooning MJ et al (2017) Accuracy of screening women at familial risk of breast cancer without a known gene mutation: Individual patient data meta-analysis. Eur J Cancer 85:31–38
104.
Zurück zum Zitat Kuhl CK, Strobel K, Bieling H, Leutner C, Schild HH, Schrading S (2017) Supplemental breast MR imaging screening of women with average risk of breast cancer. Radiology 283:361–370CrossRefPubMed Kuhl CK, Strobel K, Bieling H, Leutner C, Schild HH, Schrading S (2017) Supplemental breast MR imaging screening of women with average risk of breast cancer. Radiology 283:361–370CrossRefPubMed
105.
Zurück zum Zitat O'Neill SM, Rubinstein WS, Sener SF et al (2009) Psychological impact of recall in high-risk breast MRI screening. Breast Cancer Res Treat 115:365–371CrossRefPubMed O'Neill SM, Rubinstein WS, Sener SF et al (2009) Psychological impact of recall in high-risk breast MRI screening. Breast Cancer Res Treat 115:365–371CrossRefPubMed
106.
Zurück zum Zitat Lehman CD (2006) Role of MRI in screening women at high risk for breast cancer. J Magn Reson Imaging 24:964–970CrossRefPubMed Lehman CD (2006) Role of MRI in screening women at high risk for breast cancer. J Magn Reson Imaging 24:964–970CrossRefPubMed
107.
Zurück zum Zitat Warren RM, Pointon L, Caines R et al (2002) What is the recall rate of breast MRI when used for screening asymptomatic women at high risk? Magn Reson Imaging 20:557–565CrossRefPubMed Warren RM, Pointon L, Caines R et al (2002) What is the recall rate of breast MRI when used for screening asymptomatic women at high risk? Magn Reson Imaging 20:557–565CrossRefPubMed
108.
Zurück zum Zitat Warner E, Hill K, Causer P et al (2011) Prospective study of breast cancer incidence in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation under surveillance with and without magnetic resonance imaging. J Clin Oncol 29:1664–1669CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Warner E, Hill K, Causer P et al (2011) Prospective study of breast cancer incidence in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation under surveillance with and without magnetic resonance imaging. J Clin Oncol 29:1664–1669CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
109.
Zurück zum Zitat Schacht DV, Yamaguchi K, Lai J, Kulkarni K, Sennett CA, Abe H (2014) Importance of a personal history of breast cancer as a risk factor for the development of subsequent breast cancer: results from screening breast MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol 202:289–292CrossRefPubMed Schacht DV, Yamaguchi K, Lai J, Kulkarni K, Sennett CA, Abe H (2014) Importance of a personal history of breast cancer as a risk factor for the development of subsequent breast cancer: results from screening breast MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol 202:289–292CrossRefPubMed
110.
Zurück zum Zitat Weinstock C, Campassi C, Goloubeva O et al (2015) Breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) surveillance in breast cancer survivors. Springerplus 4:459CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Weinstock C, Campassi C, Goloubeva O et al (2015) Breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) surveillance in breast cancer survivors. Springerplus 4:459CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
111.
Zurück zum Zitat Giess CS, Poole PS, Chikarmane SA, Sippo DA, Birdwell RL (2015) Screening breast MRI in patients previously treated for breast cancer: diagnostic yield for cancer and abnormal interpretation rate. Acad Radiol 22:1331–1337CrossRefPubMed Giess CS, Poole PS, Chikarmane SA, Sippo DA, Birdwell RL (2015) Screening breast MRI in patients previously treated for breast cancer: diagnostic yield for cancer and abnormal interpretation rate. Acad Radiol 22:1331–1337CrossRefPubMed
112.
Zurück zum Zitat Gweon HM, Cho N, Han W et al (2014) Breast MR imaging screening in women with a history of breast conservation therapy. Radiology 272:366–373CrossRefPubMed Gweon HM, Cho N, Han W et al (2014) Breast MR imaging screening in women with a history of breast conservation therapy. Radiology 272:366–373CrossRefPubMed
113.
Zurück zum Zitat Lehman CD, Lee JM, DeMartini WB et al (2016) Screening MRI in women with a personal history of breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 108:djv349 Lehman CD, Lee JM, DeMartini WB et al (2016) Screening MRI in women with a personal history of breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 108:djv349
114.
Zurück zum Zitat Cho N, Han W, Han BK et al (2017) Breast cancer screening with mammography plus ultrasonography or magnetic resonance imaging in women 50 years or younger at diagnosis and treated with breast conservation therapy. JAMA Oncol 3:1495–1502CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Cho N, Han W, Han BK et al (2017) Breast cancer screening with mammography plus ultrasonography or magnetic resonance imaging in women 50 years or younger at diagnosis and treated with breast conservation therapy. JAMA Oncol 3:1495–1502CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
115.
Zurück zum Zitat Berg WA, Blume JD, Adams AM et al (2010) Reasons women at elevated risk of breast cancer refuse breast MR imaging screening: ACRIN 6666. Radiology 254:79-87. Berg WA, Blume JD, Adams AM et al (2010) Reasons women at elevated risk of breast cancer refuse breast MR imaging screening: ACRIN 6666. Radiology 254:79-87.
117.
Zurück zum Zitat Radbruch A (2018) Gadolinium deposition in the brain: We need to differentiate between chelated and dechelated gadolinium. Radiology 288:434–435 Radbruch A (2018) Gadolinium deposition in the brain: We need to differentiate between chelated and dechelated gadolinium. Radiology 288:434–435
118.
Zurück zum Zitat Kuhl CK, Schrading S, Strobel K, Schild HH, Hilgers RD, Bieling HB (2014) Abbreviated breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): first postcontrast subtracted images and maximum-intensity projection-a novel approach to breast cancer screening with MRI. J Clin Oncol 32:2304–2310CrossRefPubMed Kuhl CK, Schrading S, Strobel K, Schild HH, Hilgers RD, Bieling HB (2014) Abbreviated breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): first postcontrast subtracted images and maximum-intensity projection-a novel approach to breast cancer screening with MRI. J Clin Oncol 32:2304–2310CrossRefPubMed
119.
Zurück zum Zitat Jain M, Jain A, Hyzy MD, Werth G (2017) Fast MRI breast screening revisited. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 61:24–28CrossRefPubMed Jain M, Jain A, Hyzy MD, Werth G (2017) Fast MRI breast screening revisited. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 61:24–28CrossRefPubMed
120.
Zurück zum Zitat Strahle DA, Pathak DR, Sierra A, Saha S, Strahle C, Devisetty K (2017) Systematic development of an abbreviated protocol for screening breast magnetic resonance imaging. Breast Cancer Res Treat 162:283–295CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Strahle DA, Pathak DR, Sierra A, Saha S, Strahle C, Devisetty K (2017) Systematic development of an abbreviated protocol for screening breast magnetic resonance imaging. Breast Cancer Res Treat 162:283–295CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
121.
Zurück zum Zitat Panigrahi B, Mullen L, Falomo E, Panigrahi B, Harvey S (2017) An abbreviated protocol for high-risk screening breast magnetic resonance imaging: impact on performance metrics and BI-RADS assessment. Acad Radiol 24:1132–1138CrossRefPubMed Panigrahi B, Mullen L, Falomo E, Panigrahi B, Harvey S (2017) An abbreviated protocol for high-risk screening breast magnetic resonance imaging: impact on performance metrics and BI-RADS assessment. Acad Radiol 24:1132–1138CrossRefPubMed
122.
Zurück zum Zitat Choi BH, Choi N, Kim MY, Yang JH, Yoo YB, Jung HK (2018) Usefulness of abbreviated breast MRI screening for women with a history of breast cancer surgery. Breast Cancer Res Treat 167:495–502CrossRefPubMed Choi BH, Choi N, Kim MY, Yang JH, Yoo YB, Jung HK (2018) Usefulness of abbreviated breast MRI screening for women with a history of breast cancer surgery. Breast Cancer Res Treat 167:495–502CrossRefPubMed
123.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen SQ, Huang M, Shen YY, Liu CL, Xu CX (2017) Abbreviated MRI protocols for detecting breast cancer in women with dense breasts. Korean J Radiol 18:470–475CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Chen SQ, Huang M, Shen YY, Liu CL, Xu CX (2017) Abbreviated MRI protocols for detecting breast cancer in women with dense breasts. Korean J Radiol 18:470–475CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
124.
Zurück zum Zitat Mori M, Akashi-Tanaka S, Suzuki S et al (2017) Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography in comparison to conventional full-field digital mammography in a population of women with dense breasts. Breast Cancer 24:104–110CrossRefPubMed Mori M, Akashi-Tanaka S, Suzuki S et al (2017) Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography in comparison to conventional full-field digital mammography in a population of women with dense breasts. Breast Cancer 24:104–110CrossRefPubMed
125.
Zurück zum Zitat Jochelson MS, Pinker K, Dershaw DD et al (2017) Comparison of screening CEDM and MRI for women at increased risk for breast cancer: A pilot study. Eur J Radiol 97:37–43CrossRefPubMed Jochelson MS, Pinker K, Dershaw DD et al (2017) Comparison of screening CEDM and MRI for women at increased risk for breast cancer: A pilot study. Eur J Radiol 97:37–43CrossRefPubMed
126.
Zurück zum Zitat McDonald ES, Hammersley JA, Chou SH et al (2016) Performance of DWI as a rapid unenhanced technique for detecting mammographically occult breast cancer in elevated-risk women with dense breasts. AJR Am J Roentgenol 207:205–216CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral McDonald ES, Hammersley JA, Chou SH et al (2016) Performance of DWI as a rapid unenhanced technique for detecting mammographically occult breast cancer in elevated-risk women with dense breasts. AJR Am J Roentgenol 207:205–216CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
127.
Zurück zum Zitat Partridge S (2018) Breast DWI Potential and Pitfalls: Results of ACRIN 6702 and 6698 Multicenter Trials. The 6th International Congress on Magnetic Resonance Imaging Partridge S (2018) Breast DWI Potential and Pitfalls: Results of ACRIN 6702 and 6698 Multicenter Trials. The 6th International Congress on Magnetic Resonance Imaging
128.
Zurück zum Zitat Hruska CB (2017) Molecular breast imaging for screening in dense breasts: state of the art and future directions. AJR Am J Roentgenol 208:275–283CrossRefPubMed Hruska CB (2017) Molecular breast imaging for screening in dense breasts: state of the art and future directions. AJR Am J Roentgenol 208:275–283CrossRefPubMed
129.
Zurück zum Zitat Rhodes DJ, Hruska CB, Phillips SW, Whaley DH, O'Connor MK (2011) Dedicated dual-head gamma imaging for breast cancer screening in women with mammographically dense breasts. Radiology 258:106–118CrossRefPubMed Rhodes DJ, Hruska CB, Phillips SW, Whaley DH, O'Connor MK (2011) Dedicated dual-head gamma imaging for breast cancer screening in women with mammographically dense breasts. Radiology 258:106–118CrossRefPubMed
130.
Zurück zum Zitat Rhodes DJ, Hruska CB, Conners AL et al (2015) Journal club: molecular breast imaging at reduced radiation dose for supplemental screening in mammographically dense breasts. AJR Am J Roentgenol 204:241–251CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Rhodes DJ, Hruska CB, Conners AL et al (2015) Journal club: molecular breast imaging at reduced radiation dose for supplemental screening in mammographically dense breasts. AJR Am J Roentgenol 204:241–251CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
131.
Zurück zum Zitat Shermis RB, Wilson KD, Doyle MT et al (2016) Supplemental breast cancer screening with molecular breast imaging for women with dense breast tissue. AJR Am J Roentgenol 207:450–457CrossRefPubMed Shermis RB, Wilson KD, Doyle MT et al (2016) Supplemental breast cancer screening with molecular breast imaging for women with dense breast tissue. AJR Am J Roentgenol 207:450–457CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Breast density implications and supplemental screening
verfasst von
Athina Vourtsis
Wendie A. Berg
Publikationsdatum
25.09.2018
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
European Radiology / Ausgabe 4/2019
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5668-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2019

European Radiology 4/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.