Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Radiology 9/2019

27.02.2019 | Imaging Informatics and Artificial Intelligence

Clinical trials in radiology and data sharing: results from a survey of the European Society of Radiology (ESR) research committee

verfasst von: Maria Bosserdt, Bernd Hamm, Marc Dewey

Erschienen in: European Radiology | Ausgabe 9/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objectives

To determine the current situation and future directions of clinical trials and data sharing in radiology.

Methods

This survey was conducted between July and September 2018 among European heads of imaging departments and speakers at the Clinical Trials in Radiology sessions at ECR 2015–2018. The survey was approved by the ESR research committee, was administered online, and chi-square tests were used.

Results

The overall response rate was 29% (132/460). Responses were received from institutions in 29 countries. These institutions reported having conducted 429 trials, leading to 332 publications, of which 43% were first and 44% were last authorships by those institutions. For future trials, 98% of respondents (93/95) said they would be interested in sharing data, although only 34% had shared data already (23/68, p < 0.001). The major barriers to data sharing were data protection (78%, 74/95), ethical issues (49%, 47/95), and the lack of a data sharing platform (49%, 47/95). Of the respondents, 89% believed a platform would facilitate data sharing (85/95 vs. 10/95 did not, p < 0.001) and should offer easy data uploading (74%, 70/95), data safety (66%, 63/95), easy communication between providers and re-users (62%, 59/95), and data access policies (56%, 53/95).

Conclusion

A considerable number of imaging trials are being performed and published by radiologists in Europe whilst data sharing is hardly taking place, despite great interest. This is most likely due to data protection and ethical issues, as well as the absence of a data sharing platform.

Key Points

• Radiologists have performed a considerable number of more than 400 imaging trials in the last 5 years.
• Although only 34% of institutions had shared trial data already, 98% are interested in doing so.
• Major data sharing barriers are ethics, data protection, and the absence of a sharing platform.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Sardanelli F, Hunink MG, Gilbert FJ, Di Leo G, Krestin GP (2010) Evidence-based radiology: why and how? Eur Radiol 20:1–15CrossRefPubMed Sardanelli F, Hunink MG, Gilbert FJ, Di Leo G, Krestin GP (2010) Evidence-based radiology: why and how? Eur Radiol 20:1–15CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Kruskal JB, Larson DB (2018) Strategies for radiology to thrive in the value era. Radiology 289:3–7CrossRefPubMed Kruskal JB, Larson DB (2018) Strategies for radiology to thrive in the value era. Radiology 289:3–7CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Sardanelli F, Ali M, Hunink MG, Houssami N, Sconfienza LM, Di Leo G (2018) To share or not to share? Expected pros and cons of data sharing in radiological research. Eur Radiol 28:2328–2335CrossRefPubMed Sardanelli F, Ali M, Hunink MG, Houssami N, Sconfienza LM, Di Leo G (2018) To share or not to share? Expected pros and cons of data sharing in radiological research. Eur Radiol 28:2328–2335CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Naudet F, Sakarovitch C, Janiaud P et al (2018) Data sharing and reanalysis of randomized controlled trials in leading biomedical journals with a full data sharing policy: survey of studies published in the BMJ and PLOS medicine. BMJ 360:k400CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Naudet F, Sakarovitch C, Janiaud P et al (2018) Data sharing and reanalysis of randomized controlled trials in leading biomedical journals with a full data sharing policy: survey of studies published in the BMJ and PLOS medicine. BMJ 360:k400CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Tricoci P, Allen JM, Kramer JM, Califf RM, Smith SC Jr (2009) Scientific evidence underlying the ACC/AHA clinical practice guidelines. JAMA 301:831–841CrossRefPubMed Tricoci P, Allen JM, Kramer JM, Califf RM, Smith SC Jr (2009) Scientific evidence underlying the ACC/AHA clinical practice guidelines. JAMA 301:831–841CrossRefPubMed
8.
10.
Zurück zum Zitat European Society of Radiology (ESR) (2015). ESR position paper on imaging biobanks. Insights Imaging 6:403–410 European Society of Radiology (ESR) (2015). ESR position paper on imaging biobanks. Insights Imaging 6:403–410
12.
Zurück zum Zitat European Society of Radiology (ESR) (2017). The new EU General Data Protection Regulation: what the radiologist should know. Insights Imaging 8:295–299 European Society of Radiology (ESR) (2017). The new EU General Data Protection Regulation: what the radiologist should know. Insights Imaging 8:295–299
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Hricak H (2018) 2016 new horizons lecture: beyond imaging-radiology of tomorrow. Radiology 286:764–775CrossRefPubMed Hricak H (2018) 2016 new horizons lecture: beyond imaging-radiology of tomorrow. Radiology 286:764–775CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Pesapane F, Codari M, Sardanelli F (2018) Artificial intelligence in medical imaging: threat or opportunity? Radiologists again at the forefront of innovation in medicine. Eur Radiol Exp 2:35CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Pesapane F, Codari M, Sardanelli F (2018) Artificial intelligence in medical imaging: threat or opportunity? Radiologists again at the forefront of innovation in medicine. Eur Radiol Exp 2:35CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Bierer BE, Li R, Barnes M, Sim I (2016) A global, neutral platform for sharing trial data. N Engl J Med 374:2411–2413CrossRefPubMed Bierer BE, Li R, Barnes M, Sim I (2016) A global, neutral platform for sharing trial data. N Engl J Med 374:2411–2413CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Mello MM, Lieou V, Goodman SN (2018) Clinical trial participants’ views of the risks and benefits of data sharing. N Engl J Med 378:2202–2211CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Mello MM, Lieou V, Goodman SN (2018) Clinical trial participants’ views of the risks and benefits of data sharing. N Engl J Med 378:2202–2211CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Haug CJ (2017) Whose data are they anyway? Can a patient perspective advance the data-sharing debate? N Engl J Med 376:2203–2205CrossRefPubMed Haug CJ (2017) Whose data are they anyway? Can a patient perspective advance the data-sharing debate? N Engl J Med 376:2203–2205CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Wilkinson MD, Dumontier M, Aalbersberg IJ et al (2016) The FAIR guiding principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Sci Data 3:160018CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wilkinson MD, Dumontier M, Aalbersberg IJ et al (2016) The FAIR guiding principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Sci Data 3:160018CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Ohmann C, Banzi R, Canham S et al (2017) Sharing and reuse of individual participant data from clinical trials: principles and recommendations. BMJ Open 7:e018647CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ohmann C, Banzi R, Canham S et al (2017) Sharing and reuse of individual participant data from clinical trials: principles and recommendations. BMJ Open 7:e018647CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Nasser M, Clarke M, Chalmers I et al (2017) What are funders doing to minimise waste in research? Lancet 389:1006–1007CrossRefPubMed Nasser M, Clarke M, Chalmers I et al (2017) What are funders doing to minimise waste in research? Lancet 389:1006–1007CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Leung KY, van der Lijn F, Vrooman HA, Sturkenboom MC, Niessen WJ (2015) IT infrastructure to support the secondary use of routinely acquired clinical imaging data for research. Neuroinformatics 13:65–81CrossRefPubMed Leung KY, van der Lijn F, Vrooman HA, Sturkenboom MC, Niessen WJ (2015) IT infrastructure to support the secondary use of routinely acquired clinical imaging data for research. Neuroinformatics 13:65–81CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Clinical trials in radiology and data sharing: results from a survey of the European Society of Radiology (ESR) research committee
verfasst von
Maria Bosserdt
Bernd Hamm
Marc Dewey
Publikationsdatum
27.02.2019
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
European Radiology / Ausgabe 9/2019
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-06105-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 9/2019

European Radiology 9/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.