Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Radiology 12/2020

30.06.2020 | Hepatobiliary-Pancreas

Does transient arterial-phase respiratory-motion-related artifact impact on diagnostic performance? An intra-patient comparison of extracellular gadolinium versus gadoxetic acid

verfasst von: Jordi Rimola, Anna Darnell, Ernest Belmonte, Victor Sapena, Carla Caparroz, Neus Llarch, Maria Reig, Alejandro Forner, Jordi Bruix, Carmen Ayuso

Erschienen in: European Radiology | Ausgabe 12/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objective

To compare the frequency of transient arterial-phase respiratory-motion-related artifacts in liver MRI after extracellular gadolinium and gadoxetic acid injection, and to determine the impact of these artifacts on the detection of focal areas of enhancement on arterial-phase images.

Materials and methods

Intra-patient comparison of 82 cirrhotic patients who prospectively underwent liver MR with extracellular gadolinium and with gadoxetic acid within 1 month. Two readers independently assessed the quality of dynamic T1-weighted MR images (pre-contrast, arterial, and portal-venous phases), rating respiratory-motion-related artifacts on four-point scale (0 [none]–3 [non-diagnostic]). We dichotomized these assessments, which were compared using McNemar’s test, defining transient arterial-phase respiratory-motion-related artifacts as a study with a pre-contrast score < 2 and arterial-phase score ≥ 2. Readers also recorded whether at least one focal area of enhancement ≥ 10 mm on arterial phase was present.

Results

The quality of arterial-phase images was worse when obtained after gadoxetic acid than after extracellular gadolinium (p < 0.01), and transient arterial-phase respiratory-motion-related artifacts were more common after gadoxetic acid than after extracellular gadolinium (p < 0.02). At least one area of arterial-phase enhancement ≥ 10 mm was detected more often after extracellular gadolinium than after gadoxetic acid. We observed significant differences on the comparison of the distributions of the presence of arterial-phase artifacts against the presence of arterial-phase enhancement ≥ 10 mm between the two contrast agents (p < 0.0001).

Conclusion

In cirrhotic patients, transient arterial-phase respiratory-motion-related artifacts are more common after gadoxetic acid than after extracellular gadolinium. Worse detection of arterial-phase enhancement on gadoxetic acid is only partly due to these artifacts.

Key Points

• In a patient-by-patient analysis, the quality of arterial-phase liver MR images was significantly worse with gadoxetic acid than with extracellular gadolinium.
• The frequency of transient arterial-phase artifacts was significantly higher after gadoxetic acid injection than after extracellular gadolinium injection.
• Differences in the detection of areas of arterial-phase enhancement between MRI studies done with extracellular gadolinium and those done with gadoxetic acid might not be related only to image quality.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Van Beers BE, Pastor CM, Hussain HK (2012) Primovist, Eovist: what to expect? J Hepatol 57:421–429CrossRefPubMed Van Beers BE, Pastor CM, Hussain HK (2012) Primovist, Eovist: what to expect? J Hepatol 57:421–429CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Gschwend S, Ebert W, Schultze-Mosgau M, Breuer J (2011) Pharmacokinetics and imaging properties of Gd-EOB-DTPA in patients with hepatic and renal impairment. Invest Radiol 46:556–566CrossRefPubMed Gschwend S, Ebert W, Schultze-Mosgau M, Breuer J (2011) Pharmacokinetics and imaging properties of Gd-EOB-DTPA in patients with hepatic and renal impairment. Invest Radiol 46:556–566CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Roberts LR, Sirlin CB, Zaiem F et al (2018) Imaging for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hepatology 67:401–421CrossRefPubMed Roberts LR, Sirlin CB, Zaiem F et al (2018) Imaging for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hepatology 67:401–421CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat European Association for the Study of the Liver (2018) EASL clinical practice guidelines: management of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol 69:182–236 European Association for the Study of the Liver (2018) EASL clinical practice guidelines: management of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol 69:182–236
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Marrero JA, Kulik LM, Sirlin CB et al (2018) Diagnosis, staging, and management of hepatocellular carcinoma: 2018 Practice Guidance by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Hepatology 68:723–750CrossRefPubMed Marrero JA, Kulik LM, Sirlin CB et al (2018) Diagnosis, staging, and management of hepatocellular carcinoma: 2018 Practice Guidance by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Hepatology 68:723–750CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Davenport MS, Caoili EM, Kaza RK, Hussain HK (2014) Matched within-patient cohort study of transient arterial phase respiratory motion-related artifact in MR imaging of the liver: gadoxetate disodium versus gadobenate dimeglumine. Radiology 272:123–131CrossRefPubMed Davenport MS, Caoili EM, Kaza RK, Hussain HK (2014) Matched within-patient cohort study of transient arterial phase respiratory motion-related artifact in MR imaging of the liver: gadoxetate disodium versus gadobenate dimeglumine. Radiology 272:123–131CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Davenport MS, Al-hawary MM, Caoili EM et al (2013) Comparison of acute transient dyspnea after intravenous administration of gadoxetate disodium and gadobenate phase image quality. Radiology 266:452–461 Davenport MS, Al-hawary MM, Caoili EM et al (2013) Comparison of acute transient dyspnea after intravenous administration of gadoxetate disodium and gadobenate phase image quality. Radiology 266:452–461
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim YK, Lin W-C, Sung K et al (2017) Reducing artifacts during arterial phase of gadoxetate disodium – enhanced MR imaging : dilution method versus reduced injection rate. Radiology 283:429–437CrossRefPubMed Kim YK, Lin W-C, Sung K et al (2017) Reducing artifacts during arterial phase of gadoxetate disodium – enhanced MR imaging : dilution method versus reduced injection rate. Radiology 283:429–437CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Davenport MS, Bashir MR, Pietryga JA, Weber JT, Khalatbari S, Hussain HK (2014) Dose-toxicity relationship of gadoxetate disodium and transient severe respiratory motion artifact. AJR Am J Roentgenol 203:796–802 Davenport MS, Bashir MR, Pietryga JA, Weber JT, Khalatbari S, Hussain HK (2014) Dose-toxicity relationship of gadoxetate disodium and transient severe respiratory motion artifact. AJR Am J Roentgenol 203:796–802
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Pietryga JA, Burke LMB, Marin D et al (2014) Phase imaging with gadoxetate disodium : examination recovery with a multiple arterial phase acquisition. Radiology 271:426–434CrossRefPubMed Pietryga JA, Burke LMB, Marin D et al (2014) Phase imaging with gadoxetate disodium : examination recovery with a multiple arterial phase acquisition. Radiology 271:426–434CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Shah MR, Flusberg M, Paroder V, Rozenblit AM, Chernyak V (2017) Transient arterial phase respiratory motion-related artifact in MR imaging of the liver : an analysis of four different gadolinium-based contrast agents. Clin Imaging 41:23–27 Shah MR, Flusberg M, Paroder V, Rozenblit AM, Chernyak V (2017) Transient arterial phase respiratory motion-related artifact in MR imaging of the liver : an analysis of four different gadolinium-based contrast agents. Clin Imaging 41:23–27
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Motosugi U, Bannas P, Bookwalter C, Sano K, Reeder SB (2016) An investigation of transient severe motion related to gadoxetic acid–enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 279:93–102 Motosugi U, Bannas P, Bookwalter C, Sano K, Reeder SB (2016) An investigation of transient severe motion related to gadoxetic acid–enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 279:93–102
13.
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Ayuso C, Forner A, Darnell A et al (2019) Prospective evaluation of gadoxetic acid magnetic resonance for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in newly detected nodules ≤ 2 cm in cirrhosis. Liver Int 39:1281–1291CrossRefPubMed Ayuso C, Forner A, Darnell A et al (2019) Prospective evaluation of gadoxetic acid magnetic resonance for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in newly detected nodules ≤ 2 cm in cirrhosis. Liver Int 39:1281–1291CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Rimola J, Forner A, Sapena V et al (2019) Performance of gadoxetic acid MRI and diffusion-weighted imaging for the diagnosis of early recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma. Eur Radiol 30:186–194CrossRefPubMed Rimola J, Forner A, Sapena V et al (2019) Performance of gadoxetic acid MRI and diffusion-weighted imaging for the diagnosis of early recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma. Eur Radiol 30:186–194CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174CrossRefPubMed Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Bashir MR, Castelli P, Davenport MS et al (2015) Respiratory motion artifact affecting hepatic arterial phase MR imaging with gadoxetate disodium is more common in patients with a prior episode of arterial phase motion associated with gadoxetate disodium. Radiology 274:141–148CrossRefPubMed Bashir MR, Castelli P, Davenport MS et al (2015) Respiratory motion artifact affecting hepatic arterial phase MR imaging with gadoxetate disodium is more common in patients with a prior episode of arterial phase motion associated with gadoxetate disodium. Radiology 274:141–148CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Bashir MR, Gupta RT, Davenport MS et al (2013) Hepatocellular carcinoma in a north American population : does hepatobiliary MR imaging with Gd-EOB-DTPA improve sensitivity and confidence for diagnosis ? J Magn Reson Imaging 406:398–406CrossRef Bashir MR, Gupta RT, Davenport MS et al (2013) Hepatocellular carcinoma in a north American population : does hepatobiliary MR imaging with Gd-EOB-DTPA improve sensitivity and confidence for diagnosis ? J Magn Reson Imaging 406:398–406CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim SY, Park SH, Wu E et al (2015) Transient respiratory motion artifact during arterial phase MRI with gadoxetate disodium: risk factor analyses. AJR Am J Roentgenol 204:1220–1227 Kim SY, Park SH, Wu E et al (2015) Transient respiratory motion artifact during arterial phase MRI with gadoxetate disodium: risk factor analyses. AJR Am J Roentgenol 204:1220–1227
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Chernyak V, Fowler MSKJ, Kamaya A et al (2018) Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System ( LI-RADS ) version 2018 : imaging of hepatocellular carcinoma in at-risk patients. Radiology 289:816–830CrossRefPubMed Chernyak V, Fowler MSKJ, Kamaya A et al (2018) Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System ( LI-RADS ) version 2018 : imaging of hepatocellular carcinoma in at-risk patients. Radiology 289:816–830CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Brismar TB, Dahlström N, Edsborg N, Persson A, Smedby O, Albiin N (2009) Liver vessel enhancement by Gd-BOPTA and Gd- EOB-DTPA : a comparison in healthy volunteers. Acta Radiol 50:709–715 Brismar TB, Dahlström N, Edsborg N, Persson A, Smedby O, Albiin N (2009) Liver vessel enhancement by Gd-BOPTA and Gd- EOB-DTPA : a comparison in healthy volunteers. Acta Radiol 50:709–715
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Tamada T, Ito K, Sone T et al (2009) Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of abdominal solid organ and major vessel: comparison of enhancement effect between Gd-EOB-DTPA and Gd-DTPA. J Magn Reson Imaging 29:636–640CrossRefPubMed Tamada T, Ito K, Sone T et al (2009) Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of abdominal solid organ and major vessel: comparison of enhancement effect between Gd-EOB-DTPA and Gd-DTPA. J Magn Reson Imaging 29:636–640CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Motosugi U, Ichikawa T, Sou H et al (2009) Liver parenchymal enhancement of hepatocyte-phase images in Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR imaging: which biological markers of the liver function affect the enhancement? J Magn Reson Imaging 30:1042–1046CrossRefPubMed Motosugi U, Ichikawa T, Sou H et al (2009) Liver parenchymal enhancement of hepatocyte-phase images in Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR imaging: which biological markers of the liver function affect the enhancement? J Magn Reson Imaging 30:1042–1046CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Son J, Hwang SH, Park S et al (2019) Imaging features of hepatocellular carcinoma: quantitative and qualitative comparison between MRI-enhanced with Gd-EOB-DTPA and Gd-DTPA. Invest Radiol 54:494–499CrossRefPubMed Son J, Hwang SH, Park S et al (2019) Imaging features of hepatocellular carcinoma: quantitative and qualitative comparison between MRI-enhanced with Gd-EOB-DTPA and Gd-DTPA. Invest Radiol 54:494–499CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Does transient arterial-phase respiratory-motion-related artifact impact on diagnostic performance? An intra-patient comparison of extracellular gadolinium versus gadoxetic acid
verfasst von
Jordi Rimola
Anna Darnell
Ernest Belmonte
Victor Sapena
Carla Caparroz
Neus Llarch
Maria Reig
Alejandro Forner
Jordi Bruix
Carmen Ayuso
Publikationsdatum
30.06.2020
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
European Radiology / Ausgabe 12/2020
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-07039-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 12/2020

European Radiology 12/2020 Zur Ausgabe

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.