Skip to main content
Log in

Pain during transrectal ultrasonography guided prostate biopsy: a randomized prospective trial comparing periprostatic infiltration with lidocaine with the intrarectal instillation of lidocaine-prilocain cream

  • Free Paper
  • Published:
World Journal of Urology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Prostate biopsy is usually performed without anesthesia. We evaluated the patient’s perception of pain/discomfort experienced during the procedure in terms of the type of anesthesia used: periprostatic infiltration with 2% lidocaine, or intrarectal instillation of lidocaine-prilocain cream. A total of 198 patients were divided into three groups: group 1 (control group, n=40) received sonographic gel intrarectally prior to biopsy, group 2 (n=75) were given intrarectal instillation of lidocaine-prilocain cream, and group 3 (n=80) received periprostatic anesthesia by injecting 10 ml of 2% lidocaine. Pain after each biopsy was assessed using an 11-point linear visual analog pain scale. The mean pain scores were 5.1 in group 1, 4.8 in group 2, and 2.5 in group 3, resulting in a significant difference between group 3 and both groups 1 and 2, but not between groups 1 and 2. The incidence of biopsy-related adverse events did not differ among groups. Transrectal ultrasonographic guided periprostatic anesthesia is superior to intarectal instillation of lidocaine-prilocain cream.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chang SS, Alberts C, Wells N, Smith JAJr, Cookson MS (2001) Intrarectal lidocaine during transrectal prostate biopsy: results of a prospective double-blind randomized trial. J Urol 166:2178–2180

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Clements R, Aideyan OU, Griffiths GJ, Peeling WB (1993) Side effects and patients acceptability of transrectal biopsy of the prostate. Clin Radiol 47:125–126

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Collins GN, Lloyd SN, Hehir M, McKelvie GB (1993) Multiple transrectal ultrasound-guided prostatic biopsies—true morbidity and patient acceptance. Br J Urol 71:460–463

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Desgrandchamps F, Meria P, Irani J, Desgrippes A, Telliac P, Le Duc A (1999) The rectal administration of lidocaine gel and tolerance of transrectal ultrasonography-guided prostatic biopsy. Br J Urol 83:1007–1009

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hollabaugh RS, Dmochowski RR, Steiner MS (1997) Neuroanatomy of the male rhabdosphincter. Urology 49:426–434

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Irani J, Fournier F, Bon D, Gremmo E, Dore B, Aubert J (1997) Patient tolerance of transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy of the prostate. Br J Urol 79:608–610

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Issa MM, Bux S, Chun T, Petros JA, Labadia AJ, Anastasia K, Miller LE, Marshall FF (2000) A randomized prospective trial of intrarectal lidocaine for pain control during transrectal prostate biopsy: the Emory University experience. J Urol 164:397–399

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Jones JS, Oder M, Zippe CD (2002) Saturation prostate biopsy with periprostatic block can be performed in the office. J Urol 168:2108–2110

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Leibovici D, Zisman A, Siegel YI, Sella A, Kleinmann J, Lindner A (2002) Local anesthesia for prostate biopsy by periprostatic lidocaine injection: a double-blind placebo controlled study. J Urol 167:563–565

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lynn NNK, Collins GN, Brown SCW, O’Reilly PH (2002) Periprostatic nerve block gives better analgesia for prostatic biopsy. Br J Urol 90:424–426

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Nash PA, Bruce JE, Induhara R, Shinohara K (1996) Transrectal ultrasound guided prostatic nerve blockade eases systemic needle biopsy of the prostate. J Urol 155:607–609

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Obec C, Onal B, Ozcan B, Onder AU, Yalcin V, Solok V (2002) Is periprostatic local anesthesia for transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy associated with increased infectious or hemorrhagic complications? A prospective randomized trial. J Urol 168:558–561

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Seymour H, Perry MJA, Lee-Elliot C, Dundas D, Patel U (2001) Pain after transrectal ultrasonography-guided prostate biopsy: the advantages of periprostatic local anesthesia. Br J Urol 88:540–544

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Soloway MS, Obec C (2002) Periprostatic local anesthesia before ultrasound guided prostate biopsy. J Urol 163:172–173

    Google Scholar 

  15. Walker AE, Schelvan C, Rockall AG, Rickards D, Kellett MJ (2002) Does pericapsular lignocaine reduce pain during transrectal ultrasonography-guided biopsy of the prostate? Br J Urol 90:883–886

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Wu CL, Carter HB, Naqibuddin M, Fleisher LA (2001) Effects of local anesthetics on patient recovery after transrectal biopsy. Urology 57:925–929

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Konstantinos Haritopoulos.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Adamakis, I., Mitropoulos, D., Haritopoulos, K. et al. Pain during transrectal ultrasonography guided prostate biopsy: a randomized prospective trial comparing periprostatic infiltration with lidocaine with the intrarectal instillation of lidocaine-prilocain cream. World J Urol 22, 281–284 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-003-0386-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-003-0386-4

Keywords

Navigation