nach oben

World Journal of Urology

Erschienen in:

01.06.2006 | Topic Paper

Robot-assisted versus pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy

verfasst von: Francois Rozet, Justin Harmon, Xavier Cathelineau, Eric Barret, Guy Vallancien

Erschienen in: World Journal of Urology | Ausgabe 2/2006

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

The aim of this study is to report the relative advantages and disadvantages of the radical prostatectomy with a laparoscopic (LRP) and a robotic (RALP) approach. A medline search was performed. Published data regarding perioperative parameters, complications, oncological results, functional results were analyzed. Shorter learning curves have been reported with the RALP. Intra-operative and post-operative outcomes appear to be comparable between the two approaches. The average time for LRP is 234 min (151–453) versus 182 min (141–250) for RALP. Estimated blood loss for the LRP averages 482 ml (185–850) versus 234 ml (75–500) for the RALP. Complication rates in single institution studies are similar. Long-term outcomes data on PSA progression is not yet available for LRP or RALP due to their relatively short existence. RALP appears to offer a significant benefit to the laparoscopically naïve surgeon with respect to learning curve when compared to LRP. This, however, comes at an increased cost. Intra-operative and post-operative outcomes appear to be similar. Longer follow-up data is necessary to compare oncological and functional outcomes.

Schuessler WW, Schulam PG, Clayman RV, Kavoussi LR (1997) Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: initial short-term experience. Urology 50(6):854–857PubMedCrossRef

Raboy A, Ferzli G, Albert P (1997) Initial experience with extraperitoneal endoscopic radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology 50(6):849–853PubMedCrossRef

Guillonneau B, Cathelineau X, Barret E, Rozet F, Vallancien G (1999) Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: technical and early oncological assessment of 40 operations. Eur Urol 36(1):14–20PubMedCrossRef

Guillonneau B, Vallancien G (2000) Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the Montsouris technique. J Urol 163(6):1643–1649PubMedCrossRef

Rassweiler J, Seemann O, Schulze M, Teber D, Hatzinger M, Frede T (2003) Laparoscopic versus open radical prostatectomy: a comparative study at a single institution. J Urol 169(5):1689–1693PubMedCrossRef

Salomon L, Sebe P, De la Taille A et al (2004) Open versus laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: part I. BJU Int 94(2):238–243PubMedCrossRef

Bhayani SB, Pavlovich CP, Hsu TS, Sullivan W, Su LM (2003) Prospective comparison of short-term convalescence: laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus open radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology 61(3):612–616PubMedCrossRef

Menon M, Tewari A, Peabody J (2003) Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy: technique. J Urol 169(6):2289–2292PubMedCrossRef

Vallancien G, Gupta R, Cathelineau X, Baumert H, Rozet F (2003) Initial results of salvage laparoscopic radical prostatectomy after radiation failure. J Urol 170(5):1838–1840PubMedCrossRef

10.

Sarle R, Tewari A, Hemal AK, Menon M (2005) Robotic-assisted anatomic radical prostatectomy: technical difficulties due to a large median lobe. Urol Int 74(1):92–94PubMedCrossRef

11.

Chang CM, Moon D, Gianduzzo TR, Eden CG (2005) The impact of prostate size in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 48(2):285–290PubMedCrossRef

12.

Brown JA, Garlitz C, Strup SE, Hubosky SG, Gomella L (2004) Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy after neoadjuvant hormonal therapy: an apparently safe and effective procedure. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 14(6):335–338PubMed

13.

Guillonneau B, el-Fettouh H, Baumert H et al (2003) Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: oncological evaluation after 1,000 cases a Montsouris Institute. J Urol 169(4):1261–1266PubMedCrossRef

14.

Parsons JK, Jarrett TJ, Chow GK, Kavoussi LR (2002) The effect of previous abdominal surgery on urological laparoscopy. J Urol 168(6):2387–2390PubMedCrossRef

15.

Stolzenburg JU, Anderson C, Rabenalt R, Do M, Ho K, Truss MC (2005) Endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy in patients with prostate cancer and previous laparoscopic inguinal mesh placement for hernia repair. World J Urol 27:1–5

16.

Rassweiler J, Sentker L, Seemann O, Hatzinger M, Rumpelt HJ (2001) Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with the Heilbronn technique: an analysis of the first 180 cases. J Urol 166(6):2101–2108PubMedCrossRef

17.

Roumeguere T, Bollens R, Vanden Bossche M et al (2003) Radical prostatectomy: a prospective comparison of oncological and functional results between open and laparoscopic approaches. World J Urol 20(6):360–366PubMed

18.

Menon M, Hemal AK (2004) Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy: a technique of robotic radical prostatectomy: experience in more than 1000 cases (discussion 619). J Endourol 18(7):611–619PubMedCrossRef

19.

Ahlering TE, Skarecky D, Lee D, Clayman RV (2003) Successful transfer of open surgical skills to a laparoscopic environment using a robotic interface: initial experience with laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Urol 170(5):1738–1741PubMedCrossRef

20.

Patel VR, Tully AS, Holmes R, Lindsay J (2005) Robotic radical prostatectomy in the community setting: the learning curve and beyond: initial 200 cases. J Urol 174(1):269–272PubMedCrossRef

21.

Smith JA Jr, Herrell SD (2005) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: do minimally invasive approaches offer significant advantages? J Clin Oncol 23(32):8170–8175PubMedCrossRef

22.

Hoznek A, Salomon L, Olsson LE et al (2001) Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. The Creteil experience. Eur Urol 40(1):38–45PubMedCrossRef

23.

Bollens R, Vanden Bossche M, Roumeguere T et al (2001) Extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Results after 50 cases. Eur Urol 40(1):65–69PubMedCrossRef

24.

Rozet F, Arroyo C, Cathelineau X, Barret E, Prapotnich D, Vallancien G (2004) Extraperitoneal standard laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (discussion 609–610). J Endourol 18(7):605–609PubMedCrossRef

25.

Abbou CC, Hoznek A, Salomon L et al (2001) Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with a remote controlled robot. J Urol 165(6 Pt 1):1964–1966PubMed

26.

Gettman MT, Hoznek A, Salomon L et al (2003) Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: description of the extraperitoneal approach using the da Vinci robotic system. J Urol 170(2 Pt 1):416–419PubMedCrossRef

27.

Cathelineau X, Rozet F, Vallancien G (2004) Robotic radical prostatectomy: the European experience. Urol Clin North Am 31(4):693–699, viii

28.

Salomon L, Levrel O, de la Taille A et al (2002) Radical prostatectomy by the retropubic, perineal and laparoscopic approach: 12 years of experience in one center (discussion 110–101). Eur Urol 42(2):104–110PubMed

29.

Webster TM, Herrell SD, Chang SS et al (2005) Robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus retropubic radical prostatectomy: a prospective assessment of postoperative pain (discussion 914). J Urol 174(3):912–914PubMedCrossRef

30.

Menon M, Tewari A, Baize B, Guillonneau B, Vallancien G (2002) Prospective comparison of radical retropubic prostatectomy and robot-assisted anatomic prostatectomy: the Vattikuti Urology Institute experience. Urology 60(5):864–868PubMedCrossRef

31.

Tewari A, Srivasatava A, Menon M (2003) A prospective comparison of radical retropubic and robot-assisted prostatectomy: experience in one institution. BJU Int 92(3):205–210PubMedCrossRef

32.

Guillonneau B, Rozet F, Barret E, Cathelineau X, Vallancien G (2001) Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: assessment after 240 procedures. Urol Clin North Am 28(1):189–202PubMedCrossRef

33.

Martina GR, Giumelli P, Scuzzarella S, Remotti M, Caruso G, Lovisolo J (2005) Laparoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: learning curve of a laparoscopy-naive urologist in a community hospital. Urology 65(5):959–963PubMedCrossRef

34.

Poulakis V, Dillenburg W, Moeckel M et al (2005) Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: prospective evaluation of the learning curve. Eur Urol 47(2):167–175PubMedCrossRef

35.

Menon M, Shrivastava A, Tewari A et al (2002) Laparoscopic and robot assisted radical prostatectomy: establishment of a structured program and preliminary analysis of outcomes. J Urol 168(3):945–949PubMedCrossRef

36.

Lee DI, Eichel L, Skarecky DW, Ahlering TE (2004) Robotic laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with a single assistant. Urology 63(6):1172–1175PubMedCrossRef

37.

Tewari A, Peabody JO, Fischer M et al (2003) An operative and anatomic study to help in nerve sparing during laparoscopic and robotic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 43(5):444–454PubMedCrossRef

38.

Lotan Y, Cadeddu JA, Gettman MT (2004) The new economics of radical prostatectomy: cost comparison of open, laparoscopic and robot assisted techniques. J Urol 172(4 Pt 1):1431–1435PubMedCrossRef

39.

Scales CD Jr, Jones PJ, Eisenstein EL, Preminger GM, Albala DM (2005) Local cost structures and the economics of robot assisted radical prostatectomy. J Urol 174(6):2323–2329PubMedCrossRef

40.

Steers WD, LeBeau S, Cardella J, Fulmer B (2004) Establishing a robotics program. Urol Clin North Am 31(4):773–780, x

41.

Menon M, Shrivastava A, Tewari A (2005) Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: conventional and robotic. Urology 66(5 Suppl):101–104PubMedCrossRef

42.

Stolzenburg JU, Rabenalt R, Do M et al (2005) Endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: oncological and functional results after 700 procedures (discussion 1275). J Urol 174(4 Pt 1):1271–1275PubMedCrossRef

43.

Rozet F, Galiano M, Cathelineau X, Barret E, Cathala N, Vallancien G (2005) Extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a prospective evaluation of 600 cases. J Urol 174(3):908–911PubMedCrossRef

44.

Brown JA, Rodin D, Lee B, Dahl DM (2005) Transperitoneal versus extraperitoneal approach to laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: an assessment of 156 cases. Urology 65(2):320–324PubMedCrossRef

45.

Ruiz L, Salomon L, Hoznek A et al (2004) Comparison of early oncologic results of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy by extraperitoneal versus transperitoneal approach (discussion 54–56). Eur Urol 46(1):50–54PubMedCrossRef

46.

Eden CG, King D, Kooiman GG, Adams TH, Sullivan ME, Vass JA (2004) Transperitoneal or extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: does the approach matter? J Urol 172(6 Pt 1):2218–2223PubMedCrossRef

47.

Gregori A, Simonato A, Lissiani A, Bozzola A, Galli S, Gaboardi F (2003) Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: perioperative complications in an initial and consecutive series of 80 cases (discussion 194). Eur Urol 44(2):190–194PubMedCrossRef

48.

Hara I, Kawabata G, Miyake H et al (2002) Feasibility and usefulness of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Kobe University experience. Int J Urol 9(11):635–640PubMedCrossRef

49.

Turk I, Deger S, Winkelmann B, Schonberger B, Loening SA (2001) Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Technical aspects and experience with 125 cases (discussion 53). Eur Urol 40(1):46–52PubMedCrossRef

50.

Menon M, Tewari A (2003) Robotic radical prostatectomy and the Vattikuti Urology Institute technique: an interim analysis of results and technical points. Urology 61(4 Suppl 1):15–20PubMedCrossRef

51.

Wolfram M, Brautigam R, Engl T et al (2003) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the Frankfurt technique. World J Urol 21(3):128–132PubMedCrossRef

52.

Remzi M, Klingler HC, Tinzl MV et al (2005) Morbidity of laparoscopic extraperitoneal versus transperitoneal radical prostatectomy versus open retropubic radical prostatectomy (discussion 89). Eur Urol 48(1):83–89PubMedCrossRef

53.

Joseph JV, Vicente I, Madeb R, Erturk E, Patel HR (2005) Robot-assisted vs pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: are there any differences? BJU Int 96(1):39–42PubMedCrossRef

54.

Guillonneau B, Cathelineau X, Doublet JD, Baumert H, Vallancien G (2002) Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: assessment after 550 procedures. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 43(2):123–133PubMedCrossRef

55.

Cathelineau X, Cahill D, Widmer H, Rozet F, Baumert H, Vallancien G (2004) Transperitoneal or extraperitoneal approach for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a false debate over a real challenge. J Urol 171(2 Pt 1):714–716PubMedCrossRef

56.

Trabulsi EJ, Guillonneau B (2005) Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Urol 173(4):1072–1079PubMedCrossRef

Titel: Robot-assisted versus pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
verfasst von: Francois Rozet
Justin Harmon
Xavier Cathelineau
Eric Barret
Guy Vallancien
Publikationsdatum: 01.06.2006
Verlag: Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in: World Journal of Urology / Ausgabe 2/2006
Print ISSN: 0724-4983
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-8726
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-006-0065-3

Neu im Fachgebiet Urologie

18.04.2024 | Infertilität | Nachrichten

Update Urologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Springer Medizin

Robot-assisted versus pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy

Abstract

Neu im Fachgebiet Urologie

Viele Ärzte haben Probleme mit der Zeugungsfähigkeit

Hochrisiko-Eingriffe für postoperative Übelkeit

Einladung zum PSA-Screening senkt die Krebssterblichkeit

Wie toxische Männlichkeit der Gesundheit von Männern schadet

Update Urologie

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2006

Anatomy of autonomic nerve component in the male pelvis: the new concept from a perspective for robotic nerve sparing radical prostatectomy

Robotic radical prostatectomy: the Vattikuti Urology Institute training experience

Status of robotic cystectomy in 2005

Development of robotic program: an Asian experience

Robotic urologic surgery: is this the way of the future?

Robotic extended pyelolithotomy for treatment of renal calculi: a feasibility study

Neu im Fachgebiet Urologie

Viele Ärzte haben Probleme mit der Zeugungsfähigkeit

Hochrisiko-Eingriffe für postoperative Übelkeit

Einladung zum PSA-Screening senkt die Krebssterblichkeit

Wie toxische Männlichkeit der Gesundheit von Männern schadet

Update Urologie