Skip to main content
Erschienen in: World Journal of Urology 3/2017

12.07.2016 | Original Article

Prediction of stone-free status and complication rates after tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a comparative and retrospective study using three stone-scoring systems and preoperative parameters

verfasst von: Sae Woong Choi, Woong Jin Bae, U.-Syn Ha, Sung-Hoo Hong, Ji Youl Lee, Sae Woong Kim, Hyuk Jin Cho

Erschienen in: World Journal of Urology | Ausgabe 3/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate the factors predictive of surgical outcomes of tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy (TPCNL) and to compare the predictability and accuracy of the Guy’s stone score, S.T.O.N.E. nephrolithometry, and CROES nomogram.

Patients and methods

We reviewed retrospectively the surgical outcomes recorded consecutively and imaging data of preoperative computed tomography scans of 141 patients who had undergone TPCNL from June 2012 to October 2015. Guy’s, S.T.O.N.E., and CROES stone-scoring systems (SSSs) and other prognostic factors were assessed using univariate and multivariate statistical analyses.

Results

The initial stone-free and complication rates after TPCNL were 78.7 (111/141) and 17.0 % (24/141). On univariate analysis, all three scoring systems were identified as significant factors in terms of stone-free rate (SFR). The multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the Guy’s stone score and stone burden ≥385 mm2 had significant correlations with stone-free status [odds ratios (OR) = 3.220, p = 0.001 and OR = 6.451, p = 0.002, respectively]. Guy’s stone score (OR = 1.879, p = 0.013) was an independent risk factor for the development of complications. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for the Guy’s, S.T.O.N.E., and CROES SSSs and stone burden showed good results (0.821, 0.816, 0.820, and 0.800, respectively). Pairwise comparison of ROC curves showed that there was no significant difference between each final score and stone burden.

Conclusions

Of the three scoring systems, Guy’s stone score was the only significant predictive factor for SFR and complication rates after TPCNL in the multivariate logistic regression analysis. Stone burden was significantly associated with a postoperative stone-free status (SFS).
Literatur
2.
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Tefekli A, Altunrende F, Tepeler K, Tas A, Aydin S, Muslumanoglu AY (2007) Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy in selected patients: a prospective randomized comparison. Int Urol Nephrol 39:57–63. doi:10.1007/s11255-006-9040-6 CrossRefPubMed Tefekli A, Altunrende F, Tepeler K, Tas A, Aydin S, Muslumanoglu AY (2007) Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy in selected patients: a prospective randomized comparison. Int Urol Nephrol 39:57–63. doi:10.​1007/​s11255-006-9040-6 CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Choi SW, Kim KS, Kim JH, Park YH, Bae WJ, Hong SH, Lee JY, Kim SW, Hwang TK, Cho HJ (2014) Totally tubeless versus standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stones: analysis of clinical outcomes and cost. J Endourol 28:1487–1494. doi:10.1089/end.2014.0421 CrossRefPubMed Choi SW, Kim KS, Kim JH, Park YH, Bae WJ, Hong SH, Lee JY, Kim SW, Hwang TK, Cho HJ (2014) Totally tubeless versus standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stones: analysis of clinical outcomes and cost. J Endourol 28:1487–1494. doi:10.​1089/​end.​2014.​0421 CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Bozkurt IH, Aydogdu O, Yonguc T, Yarimoglu S, Sen V, Gunlusoy B, Degirmenci T (2015) Comparison of Guy and Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society Nephrolithometry scoring systems for predicting stone-free status and complication rates after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a single center study with 437 cases. J Endourol 29:1006–1010. doi:10.1089/end.2015.0199 CrossRefPubMed Bozkurt IH, Aydogdu O, Yonguc T, Yarimoglu S, Sen V, Gunlusoy B, Degirmenci T (2015) Comparison of Guy and Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society Nephrolithometry scoring systems for predicting stone-free status and complication rates after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a single center study with 437 cases. J Endourol 29:1006–1010. doi:10.​1089/​end.​2015.​0199 CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Labadie K, Okhunov Z, Akhavein A, Moreira DM, Moreno-Palacios J, Del Junco M, Okeke Z, Bird V, Smith AD, Landman J (2015) Evaluation and comparison of urolithiasis scoring systems used in percutaneous kidney stone surgery. J Urol 193:154–159. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2014.07.104 CrossRefPubMed Labadie K, Okhunov Z, Akhavein A, Moreira DM, Moreno-Palacios J, Del Junco M, Okeke Z, Bird V, Smith AD, Landman J (2015) Evaluation and comparison of urolithiasis scoring systems used in percutaneous kidney stone surgery. J Urol 193:154–159. doi:10.​1016/​j.​juro.​2014.​07.​104 CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Noureldin YA, Elkoushy MA, Andonian S (2015) Which is better? Guy’s versus S.T.O.N.E. nephrolithometry scoring systems in predicting stone-free status post-percutaneous nephrolithotomy. World J Urol 33:1821–1825. doi:10.1007/s00345-015-1508-5 CrossRefPubMed Noureldin YA, Elkoushy MA, Andonian S (2015) Which is better? Guy’s versus S.T.O.N.E. nephrolithometry scoring systems in predicting stone-free status post-percutaneous nephrolithotomy. World J Urol 33:1821–1825. doi:10.​1007/​s00345-015-1508-5 CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Lingeman JE, Coury TA, Newman DM, Kahnoski RJ, Mertz JH, Mosbaugh PG, Steele RE, Woods JR (1987) Comparison of results and morbidity of percutaneous nephrostolithotomy and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. J Urol 138:485–490PubMed Lingeman JE, Coury TA, Newman DM, Kahnoski RJ, Mertz JH, Mosbaugh PG, Steele RE, Woods JR (1987) Comparison of results and morbidity of percutaneous nephrostolithotomy and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. J Urol 138:485–490PubMed
17.
18.
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Akman T, Binbay M, Akcay M, Tekinarslan E, Kezer C, Ozgor F, Seyrek M, Muslumanoglu AY (2011) Variables that influence operative time during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: an analysis of 1897 cases. J Endourol 25:1269–1273. doi:10.1089/end.2011.0061 CrossRefPubMed Akman T, Binbay M, Akcay M, Tekinarslan E, Kezer C, Ozgor F, Seyrek M, Muslumanoglu AY (2011) Variables that influence operative time during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: an analysis of 1897 cases. J Endourol 25:1269–1273. doi:10.​1089/​end.​2011.​0061 CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Sfoungaristos S, Gofrit ON, Pode D, Landau EH, Duvdevani M (2015) Percutaneous nephrolithotomy for staghorn stones: which nomogram can better predict postoperative outcomes? World J Urol. doi:10.1007/s00345-015-1743-9 PubMed Sfoungaristos S, Gofrit ON, Pode D, Landau EH, Duvdevani M (2015) Percutaneous nephrolithotomy for staghorn stones: which nomogram can better predict postoperative outcomes? World J Urol. doi:10.​1007/​s00345-015-1743-9 PubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat de la Rosette JJ, Zuazu JR, Tsakiris P, Elsakka AM, Zudaire JJ, Laguna MP, de Reijke TM (2008) Prognostic factors and percutaneous nephrolithotomy morbidity: a multivariate analysis of a contemporary series using the Clavien classification. J Urol 180:2489–2493. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2008.08.025 CrossRefPubMed de la Rosette JJ, Zuazu JR, Tsakiris P, Elsakka AM, Zudaire JJ, Laguna MP, de Reijke TM (2008) Prognostic factors and percutaneous nephrolithotomy morbidity: a multivariate analysis of a contemporary series using the Clavien classification. J Urol 180:2489–2493. doi:10.​1016/​j.​juro.​2008.​08.​025 CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Sinha RK, Mukherjee S, Jindal T, Sharma PK, Saha B, Mitra N, Kumar J, Mukhopadhyay C, Ghosh N, Kamal MR, Mandal SN, Karmakar D (2015) Evaluation of stone-free rate using Guy’s Stone Score and assessment of complications using modified Clavien grading system for percutaneous nephro-lithotomy. Urolithiasis 43:349–353. doi:10.1007/s00240-015-0769-1 CrossRefPubMed Sinha RK, Mukherjee S, Jindal T, Sharma PK, Saha B, Mitra N, Kumar J, Mukhopadhyay C, Ghosh N, Kamal MR, Mandal SN, Karmakar D (2015) Evaluation of stone-free rate using Guy’s Stone Score and assessment of complications using modified Clavien grading system for percutaneous nephro-lithotomy. Urolithiasis 43:349–353. doi:10.​1007/​s00240-015-0769-1 CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Kumsar Ş, Aydemir H, Halis F, Kose O, Gökçe A, Adsan O (2015) Value of preoperative stone scoring systems in predicting the results of percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Cent Eur J Urol 68:353–357. doi:10.5173/ceju.2015.552 Kumsar Ş, Aydemir H, Halis F, Kose O, Gökçe A, Adsan O (2015) Value of preoperative stone scoring systems in predicting the results of percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Cent Eur J Urol 68:353–357. doi:10.​5173/​ceju.​2015.​552
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Ingimarsson JP, Dagrosa LM, Hyams ES, Pais VM Jr (2014) External validation of a preoperative renal stone grading system: reproducibility and inter-rater concordance of the Guy’s stone score using preoperative computed tomography and rigorous postoperative stone-free criteria. Urology 83:45–49. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2013.09.008 CrossRefPubMed Ingimarsson JP, Dagrosa LM, Hyams ES, Pais VM Jr (2014) External validation of a preoperative renal stone grading system: reproducibility and inter-rater concordance of the Guy’s stone score using preoperative computed tomography and rigorous postoperative stone-free criteria. Urology 83:45–49. doi:10.​1016/​j.​urology.​2013.​09.​008 CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Prediction of stone-free status and complication rates after tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a comparative and retrospective study using three stone-scoring systems and preoperative parameters
verfasst von
Sae Woong Choi
Woong Jin Bae
U.-Syn Ha
Sung-Hoo Hong
Ji Youl Lee
Sae Woong Kim
Hyuk Jin Cho
Publikationsdatum
12.07.2016
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
World Journal of Urology / Ausgabe 3/2017
Print ISSN: 0724-4983
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-8726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-016-1891-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2017

World Journal of Urology 3/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Update Urologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.