Skip to main content
Erschienen in: World Journal of Urology 2/2019

23.07.2018 | Topic Paper

Low-risk prostate cancer selected for active surveillance with negative MRI at entry: can repeat biopsies at 1 year be avoided? A pilot study

verfasst von: Jonathan Olivier, Veeru Kasivisvanathan, Elodie Drumez, Jean-Christophe Fantoni, Xavier Leroy, Philippe Puech, Arnauld Villers

Erschienen in: World Journal of Urology | Ausgabe 2/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

In patients considered for active surveillance (AS), the use of MRI and targeted biopsies (TB) at entry challenges the approach of routine “per protocol” repeat systematic biopsies (SB) at 1 year. This pilot study aimed to assess whether an approach of performing repeat biopsies only if PSA kinetics are abnormal would be safe and sufficient to detect progression.

Methods

Prospective single-centre study of 149 patients on AS with low-risk PCa, a negative MRI at entry, followed for a minimum of 12 months between 01/2007 and 12/2015. Group 1 (n = 78) patients had per-protocol 12-month repeat SB; group 2 (n = 71) patients did not. Surveillance tests for tumour progression were for both groups: for cause SB and MRI-TB biopsies if PSA velocity (PSA-V) > 0.75 ng/ml/year, or PSA doubling time (PSADT) < 3 years. The main objectives are to compare the 2-year rates of tumour progression and AS discontinuation between groups. The secondary objectives are to estimate the diagnostic power of PSA-V and PSA-DT, to predict the risk of tumour progression.

Results

Overall, 21 out of 149 patients (14.1%) showed tumour progression, 17.1% for group 1 and 12.3% for group 2, and 31 (21.2%) discontinued AS at 2 years. There was no difference between the 2 groups (p = 0.56). The area under the PSA-V and PSADT curves to predict tumour progression was 0.92 and 0.83, respectively.

Conclusions

We did not find any significant difference for progression and AS discontinuation rate between the 2 groups. The PSA kinetic seems accurate as a marker of tumour progression. These results support the conduct of a multi-centre prospective trial to confirm these findings.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Bul M, Zhu X, Valdagni R, Pickles T, Kakehi Y, Rannikko A et al (2013) Active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer worldwide: the PRIAS study. Eur Urol 63(4):597–603CrossRefPubMed Bul M, Zhu X, Valdagni R, Pickles T, Kakehi Y, Rannikko A et al (2013) Active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer worldwide: the PRIAS study. Eur Urol 63(4):597–603CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Klotz L (2010) Active surveillance for prostate cancer: patient selection and management. Curr Oncol Tor Ont 17(Suppl 2):S11–S17 Klotz L (2010) Active surveillance for prostate cancer: patient selection and management. Curr Oncol Tor Ont 17(Suppl 2):S11–S17
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Bruinsma SM, Bangma CH, Carroll PR, Leapman MS, Rannikko A, Petrides N et al (2016) Active surveillance for prostate cancer: a narrative review of clinical guidelines. Nat Rev Urol 13(3):151–167CrossRefPubMed Bruinsma SM, Bangma CH, Carroll PR, Leapman MS, Rannikko A, Petrides N et al (2016) Active surveillance for prostate cancer: a narrative review of clinical guidelines. Nat Rev Urol 13(3):151–167CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Ouzzane A, Renard-Penna R, Marliere F, Mozer P, Olivier J, Barkatz J et al (2015) Magnetic resonance imaging targeted biopsy improves selection of patients considered for active surveillance for clinically low risk prostate cancer based on systematic biopsies. J Urol 194(2):350–356CrossRefPubMed Ouzzane A, Renard-Penna R, Marliere F, Mozer P, Olivier J, Barkatz J et al (2015) Magnetic resonance imaging targeted biopsy improves selection of patients considered for active surveillance for clinically low risk prostate cancer based on systematic biopsies. J Urol 194(2):350–356CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Thurtle D, Barrett T, Thankappan-Nair V, Koo B, Warren A, Kastner C et al (2018) Progression and treatment rates using an active surveillance protocol incorporating image-guided baseline biopsies and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging monitoring for men with favourable-risk prostate cancer. BJU Int. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.14166 CrossRefPubMed Thurtle D, Barrett T, Thankappan-Nair V, Koo B, Warren A, Kastner C et al (2018) Progression and treatment rates using an active surveillance protocol incorporating image-guided baseline biopsies and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging monitoring for men with favourable-risk prostate cancer. BJU Int. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1111/​bju.​14166 CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Thoma C (2015) Prostate cancer: avoiding excess confirmatory biopsies. Nat Rev Urol 12(9):476CrossRefPubMed Thoma C (2015) Prostate cancer: avoiding excess confirmatory biopsies. Nat Rev Urol 12(9):476CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat McLaren DB, McKenzie M, Duncan G, Pickles T (1998) Watchful waiting or watchful progression? Prostate specific antigen doubling times and clinical behavior in patients with early untreated prostate carcinoma. Cancer 82(2):342–348CrossRefPubMed McLaren DB, McKenzie M, Duncan G, Pickles T (1998) Watchful waiting or watchful progression? Prostate specific antigen doubling times and clinical behavior in patients with early untreated prostate carcinoma. Cancer 82(2):342–348CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat van den Bergh RCN, Roemeling S, Roobol MJ, Aus G, Hugosson J, Rannikko AS et al (2009) Outcomes of men with screen-detected prostate cancer eligible for active surveillance who were managed expectantly. Eur Urol 55(1):1–8CrossRefPubMed van den Bergh RCN, Roemeling S, Roobol MJ, Aus G, Hugosson J, Rannikko AS et al (2009) Outcomes of men with screen-detected prostate cancer eligible for active surveillance who were managed expectantly. Eur Urol 55(1):1–8CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Vargas HA, Akin O, Afaq A, Goldman D, Zheng J, Moskowitz CS et al (2012) Magnetic resonance imaging for predicting prostate biopsy findings in patients considered for active surveillance of clinically low risk prostate cancer. J Urol 188(5):1732–1738CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Vargas HA, Akin O, Afaq A, Goldman D, Zheng J, Moskowitz CS et al (2012) Magnetic resonance imaging for predicting prostate biopsy findings in patients considered for active surveillance of clinically low risk prostate cancer. J Urol 188(5):1732–1738CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Fütterer JJ, Briganti A, De Visschere P, Emberton M, Giannarini G, Kirkham A et al (2015) Can clinically significant prostate cancer be detected with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging? A systematic review of the literature. Eur Urol 68(6):1045–1053CrossRef Fütterer JJ, Briganti A, De Visschere P, Emberton M, Giannarini G, Kirkham A et al (2015) Can clinically significant prostate cancer be detected with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging? A systematic review of the literature. Eur Urol 68(6):1045–1053CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Bruinsma SM, Bokhorst LP, Roobol MJ, Bangma CH (2016) How often is biopsy necessary in patients with prostate cancer on active surveillance? J Urol 195(1):11–12CrossRefPubMed Bruinsma SM, Bokhorst LP, Roobol MJ, Bangma CH (2016) How often is biopsy necessary in patients with prostate cancer on active surveillance? J Urol 195(1):11–12CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat D’amico AV, Hanks GE (1993) Linear regressive analysis using prostate-specific antigen doubling time for predicting tumor biology and clinical outcome in prostate cancer. Cancer 72(9):2638–2643CrossRefPubMed D’amico AV, Hanks GE (1993) Linear regressive analysis using prostate-specific antigen doubling time for predicting tumor biology and clinical outcome in prostate cancer. Cancer 72(9):2638–2643CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Soloway MS, Soloway CT, Williams S, Ayyathurai R, Kava B, Manoharan M (2008) Active surveillance; a reasonable management alternative for patients with prostate cancer: the Miami experience. BJU Int 101(2):165–169PubMed Soloway MS, Soloway CT, Williams S, Ayyathurai R, Kava B, Manoharan M (2008) Active surveillance; a reasonable management alternative for patients with prostate cancer: the Miami experience. BJU Int 101(2):165–169PubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Khatami A, Ali K, Aus G, Gunnar A, Damber J-E, Jan-Erik D et al (2007) PSA doubling time predicts the outcome after active surveillance in screening-detected prostate cancer: results from the European randomized study of screening for prostate cancer, Sweden section. Int J Cancer 120(1):170–174CrossRefPubMed Khatami A, Ali K, Aus G, Gunnar A, Damber J-E, Jan-Erik D et al (2007) PSA doubling time predicts the outcome after active surveillance in screening-detected prostate cancer: results from the European randomized study of screening for prostate cancer, Sweden section. Int J Cancer 120(1):170–174CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Venkitaraman R, Norman A, Woode-Amissah R, Fisher C, Dearnaley D, Horwich A et al (2007) Predictors of histological disease progression in untreated, localized prostate cancer. J Urol 178(3 Pt 1):833–837CrossRefPubMed Venkitaraman R, Norman A, Woode-Amissah R, Fisher C, Dearnaley D, Horwich A et al (2007) Predictors of histological disease progression in untreated, localized prostate cancer. J Urol 178(3 Pt 1):833–837CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Iremashvili V, Manoharan M, Lokeshwar SD, Rosenberg DL, Pan D, Soloway MS (2013) Comprehensive analysis of post-diagnostic prostate-specific antigen kinetics as predictor of a prostate cancer progression in active surveillance patients. BJU Int 111(3):396–403CrossRefPubMed Iremashvili V, Manoharan M, Lokeshwar SD, Rosenberg DL, Pan D, Soloway MS (2013) Comprehensive analysis of post-diagnostic prostate-specific antigen kinetics as predictor of a prostate cancer progression in active surveillance patients. BJU Int 111(3):396–403CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Iremashvili V, Kava BR, Manoharan M, Parekh DJ, Punnen S (2016) Is it time to revisit the role of prostate-specific antigen kinetics in active surveillance for prostate cancer? Urology 95:139–144CrossRefPubMed Iremashvili V, Kava BR, Manoharan M, Parekh DJ, Punnen S (2016) Is it time to revisit the role of prostate-specific antigen kinetics in active surveillance for prostate cancer? Urology 95:139–144CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Patel HD, Feng Z, Landis P, Trock BJ, Epstein JI, Carter HB (2014) Prostate specific antigen velocity risk count predicts biopsy reclassification for men with very low risk prostate cancer. J Urol 191(3):629–637CrossRefPubMed Patel HD, Feng Z, Landis P, Trock BJ, Epstein JI, Carter HB (2014) Prostate specific antigen velocity risk count predicts biopsy reclassification for men with very low risk prostate cancer. J Urol 191(3):629–637CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Low-risk prostate cancer selected for active surveillance with negative MRI at entry: can repeat biopsies at 1 year be avoided? A pilot study
verfasst von
Jonathan Olivier
Veeru Kasivisvanathan
Elodie Drumez
Jean-Christophe Fantoni
Xavier Leroy
Philippe Puech
Arnauld Villers
Publikationsdatum
23.07.2018
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
World Journal of Urology / Ausgabe 2/2019
Print ISSN: 0724-4983
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-8726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-018-2420-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2019

World Journal of Urology 2/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Update Urologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.