nach oben

World Journal of Urology

Erschienen in:

06.12.2019 | Topic Paper

The evolution and resurgence of perineal prostatectomy in the robotic surgical era

verfasst von: Juan Garisto, Riccardo Bertolo, Clark A. Wilson, Jihad Kaouk

Erschienen in: World Journal of Urology | Ausgabe 4/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

To review the recent advances in terms of surgical technique and new robotic platforms applied to radical perineal prostatectomy (RPP).

Methods

A literature review was performed focusing on original articles on perineal prostatectomy searching via Medline/Pubmed and Embase. The entire spectrum was covered such as development of surgical technique including pelvic lymphadenectomy, adoption of novel surgical platforms, learning curve and future directions.

Results

Surgical removal of the prostate plays a significant role on the treatment of localized prostate cancer (PCa). RPP was the first surgical approach described for radical prostatectomy. This technique declined in popularity secondary to the development of the retropubic approach. Recently, the appearance of novel robotic technology has generated renewed interest in the perineal approach.

Conclusion

There has been a recent resurgence on the interest of radical perineal prostatectomy for the treatment of localized PCa driven by the advent of new robotic surgical technologies into the field. Future studies are needed to better determine the learning curve of the perineal approach and its current role in the treatment of prostate cancer.

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A (2018) CA Cancer J Clin 68(6):394–424PubMed

Wallis CJD, Saskir R, Choo R et al (2016) Surgery versus radiotherapy for clinically-localized prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol 70(1):21–30PubMed

Sanda MG, CAdeddu JA, Kirkby E et al (2018) Clinically localized prostate cancer: AUA/ASTRO/SUO Guideline. Part I: risk stratification, shared decision making, and care options. J Urol 199(3):684–690

Mottet N, Bellmunt J, Bolla M et al (2017) EAU-ESTRO-SIOG guidelines on prostate cancer. Part 1: screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent. Eur Urol 71(4):618–629PubMed

Young HH (1945) The cure of cancer of the prostate by radical perineal prostatectomy (prostate-seminal vesiculectomy): history, literature and statistics of Young’s operation. J Urol 53:188–256

Walsh PC, Lepor H, Eggleston JD (1983) Radical prostatectomy with preservation of sexual function: anatomical and pathological considerations. Prostate 4:473PubMed

Gouley JWS (1885) Some points in the surgery of the hypertrophied prostate. Trans Meet Am Surg Assoc 3:163–192

Billroth T. Carcinoma der prostate. Chir Erfahrungen, Zurich 1860-67. Langenbecks Arch Klin Chir Ver Dtsch Z Chir 1869; Bd X, S:548

Young HH (1940) A surgeon’s autobiography. Harcourt, Brace and Co, New York, pp 104–134

10.

Young HH (1905) Conservative perineal prostatectomy: the results of two years experience and report of seventy-five cases. Ann Surg 41(4):549–557PubMedPubMedCentral

11.

Belt E (1942) Radical perineal prostatectomy in early carcinoma of the prostate. J Urol 78:28

12.

Millin T (1958) The surgery of the malignant prostate. Br J Urol 30:407–410PubMed

13.

Reiner WB, Walsh PC (1987) An anatomical approach to the surgical management of the dorsal vein and Santorini’s plexus during radical retropubic prostatectomy: the apical dissection. J Urol 138(3):543–550

14.

Weldon VE, Tavel FR (1988) Potency sparing radical perineal prostatectomy: anatomy, surgical technique and initial results. J Urol 140:559–562PubMed

15.

Saito S, Murakami G (2003) Radical perineal prostatectomy: a novel approach for lymphadenectomy from perineal incision. J Urol 170:1298–1300PubMed

16.

Abbou CC, Hoznek A, Salomon L et al (2000) Remote laparoscopic radical prostatectomy carried out with a robot. Report of a case. Prog Urol 10:520–523PubMed

17.

Binder J, Kramer W (2001) Robotically-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 87:408–410PubMed

18.

Lowrance WT, Eastham JA, Savage C et al (2012) Contemporary open and robotic radical prostatectomy practice patterns among urologist in the United States. J Urol 187:2087–2092PubMedPubMedCentral

19.

Resnick MI (2003) Radical perineal prostatectomy. BJU 92(6):522–523

20.

Janoff DM, Parra RO (2005) Contemporary appraisal of radical perineal prostatectomy. J Urol 173:1863–1870PubMed

21.

Laydner H, Akca O, Autorino R, Eyraud R, Zargar H, Brandao LF, Khalifeh A, Panumatrassamee K, Long JA, Isac W, Stein RJ, Kaouk JH (2014) J Endourol 28(12):1479–1486PubMed

22.

Kaouk JH, Akca O, Zargar H, Caputo P, Ramirez D, Andrade H, Albayrak S, Laydner H, Angermeir K (2016) Descriptive technique and initial results for robotic radical perineal prostatectomy. Urology 94:129–138PubMed

23.

Akca O, Zargar H, Kaouk JH (2015) Robotic surgery revives radical perineal prostatectomy. Eur Urol 68(2):340–341PubMed

24.

Tugku, Akca O, Simsek A et al (2017) Robot-assisted radical perineal prostatectomy: first experience of 15 cases. Turk J Urol 43(4):476–483

25.

Tugcu V, Akca O, Simsek A et al (2019) Robot-assisted perineal versus transperitoneal radical prostatectomy: a matched-pair analysis. Turk J Urol. https://doi.org/10.5152/tud.2019.98254 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

26.

Ramirez D, Maurice MJ, Kaouk JH (2016) Robotic perineal radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection using a purpose-built single-port robotic platform. BJU Int 118(5):829–833PubMed

27.

Bertolo R, Garisto J, Gettman M, Kaouk J (2018) Novel system for robot single-port surgery: feasibility and state of the art in urology. Eur Urol Focus. 4(5):669–673PubMed

28.

Kaouk J, Garisto J, Bertolo R (2019) Robotic urologic surgical interventions performed with the single port dedicated platform: first clinical investigation. Eur Urol 123(4):733–739

29.

Gillitzer R, Thuroff JW (2002) Relatavie advantages and disadvantages of radical perineal prostatectomy versus radical retropubic prostatectomy. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 43(2):167–190PubMed

30.

Sullivan LD, Weir MJ, Kinahan JF, Taylor DL (2000) A comparison of the relative merits of radical perineal and radical retropubic prostatectomy. BJU Int 85(1):95–100PubMed

31.

Gillitzer R, Thomas C, Wiesner C, Jones J et al (2010) Single Center comparison of anastomotic strictures after radical perineal and radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology 76(2):417–422PubMed

32.

Matsubara A, Yoneta T, Nakamoto T et al (2007) Inguinal Hernia after radical perineal prostatectomy: comparison with the retropubic approach. Urology 70(6):1152–1156PubMed

33.

Frazier HA, Robertson JE, Paulson DF (1992) Radical prostatectomy: the pros and cons of the perineal versus retropubic approach. J Urol 147:888–890PubMed

34.

Haab F, Boocon-Gibod L, Delmas V, Toublanc M (1994) Perineal versus retropubic radical prostatectomy for T1, T2 prostate cancer. Br J Urol 74:626–629PubMed

35.

Zippe CD, Rackley RR (1996) Non-nerve sparing radical prostatectomy in the elderly patient: perineal vs retropubic approach. J Urol 155(Suppl):284

36.

Lassen PM, Kearse WS (1995) Rectal injuries during radical perineal prostatectomy. Urology 45:266–269PubMed

37.

Bishoff JT, Motley G, Optenberg SA et al (1998) Incidence of fecal and urinary incontinence following radical perineal and retropubic prostatectomy in a national population. J Urol 160(2):454–458PubMed

38.

Briganti A, Blute ML, Eastham JH et al (2009) Pelvic lymph node dissection in prostate cancer. Eur Urol 55:1251–1265PubMed

39.

Partin AW, Mangold LA, Lamm DM et al (2001) Contemporary update of prostate cancer staging nomogram (Partin Tables) for new millennium. Urology 58:843–848PubMed

40.

Keller H, Lehmann J, Beier J (2007) Radical perineal prostatectomy and simultaneous extended pelvic lymph node dissection via the same incision. Eur Urol 52:384–388PubMed

41.

Matsubara A, Murakami G, Arakawa T et al (2003) Topographic anatomy of the male perineal structures with special reference to perineal approaches for radical prostatectomy. Int Urol 10:141–148

42.

Hsu RL, Kaye AD, Urman RD (2013) Anesthetic challenges in Robotic-assisted urologic surgery. Rev Urol 15:178–184PubMedPubMedCentral

43.

Wiltz AL, Shikanov S, Eggener SE et al (2009) Robotic radical prostatectomy in overweight and obese patients: oncological and validated-functional outcomes. Urology 73:316–322PubMed

44.

Chavali JS, Garisto J, Bertolo R, Agudelo J, Dagenais J, Kaouk J (2018) Robotic radical prostatectomy after aborted prostatectomy: still feasible? The experience from a tertiary care center. J Robot Surg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-018-0870-x CrossRefPubMed

45.

Harris MJ (2007) The anatomic perineal prostatectomy: an outcomes-based evolution. Eur Urol 52:81–88PubMed

46.

Sullivan LD, Weir MJ et al (2000) A comparison of the relative merits of radical perineal and radical retropubic prostatectomy. BJU Int 85:95–100PubMed

47.

Comploj E, Palermo S, Trenti E et al (2001) Radical perineal prostatectomy: an outdated procedure? Int J Surg 9:400–403

48.

Vickers A, Bianco F, Serio AM (2007) The surgical learning curve for prostate cancer control after radical prostatectomy. J Natl Cancer Inst 99(15):1171–1177PubMed

49.

Mokulis J, Thompson I (1997) Radical Prostatectomy: is the perineal approach more difficult to learn? J Urol 157(1):230–232PubMed

50.

Eliya F, Kernen K, Gonzalez J, Peters K et al (2011) Radical perineal prostatectomy: a learning curve? Int Urol Nephrol 43(1):139–142PubMed

51.

Wronski S, Slupski P, Wisniewski P (2012) A Single institution study on patient’s self-reporting appraisal and functional outcomes of the first set of men following radical perineal prostatectomy. Cent Eur J Urol 65(3):124–129

52.

Kaouk J, Garisto J, Etlemamy M, Bertolo R (2019) Pure-single site robot-assisted partial nephrectomy using the sp surgical system: initial clinical experience. Urology 124:282–285PubMed

53.

Kaouk J, Bertolo R, Eltemamy M, Garisto J (2019) Single-port robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: first clinical experience using the sp surgical system. Urology 124:309PubMed

54.

Kaouk J, Garisto J, Eltemamy M, Bertolo R (2019) Step-by-Step technique for single-port robot-assisted radical cystectomy and pelvic lymph nodes dissection using the da Vinci SP surgical system. BJU Int. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.14744 CrossRefPubMed

55.

Kaouk J, Garisto J, Eltemamy M, Bertolo R (2019) Single-port robotic intracorporeal ileal conduit urinary diversion during radical cystectomy using the SP surgical system: step-by-step tecnique. Urology 130:196–200PubMed

56.

Bertolo R, Garisto J, Eltemamy M, Kaouk J (2019) Pure single-site transperineal robotic radical prostatectomy: first clinical report using the SP surgical system. Eur Urol Suppl 18:e2282

57.

Martis G, Diana M, Ombres M (2007) Retropubic versus perineal radical prostatectomy in early prostate cancer: eight-year experience. J Surg Oncol 95(6):513–518PubMed

Titel: The evolution and resurgence of perineal prostatectomy in the robotic surgical era
verfasst von: Juan Garisto
Riccardo Bertolo
Clark A. Wilson
Jihad Kaouk
Publikationsdatum: 06.12.2019
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: World Journal of Urology / Ausgabe 4/2020
Print ISSN: 0724-4983
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-8726
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-019-03004-1

Neu im Fachgebiet Urologie

24.04.2024 | DGIM 2024 | Nachrichten

Update Urologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

The evolution and resurgence of perineal prostatectomy in the robotic surgical era

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Neu im Fachgebiet Urologie

Bei Senioren mit Prostatakarzinom auf Anämie achten!

Stufenschema weist Prostatakarzinom zuverlässig nach

Harnwegsinfektprophylaxe: Es geht auch ohne Antibiotika

Varikozelen bei Jugendlichen: Das Für und Wider der Operation

Update Urologie

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2020

Feasibility and safety of laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy in case of right kidney and multiple-renal artery kidney: a systematic review of the literature

One-Stop MRI and MRI/transrectal ultrasound fusion-guided biopsy: an expedited pathway for prostate cancer diagnosis

EMS Lithoclast Trilogy™: an effective single-probe dual-energy lithotripter for mini and standard PCNL

Robotic enucleation of adrenal masses: technique and outcomes

Multicenter analysis of posterior urethroplasty complexity and outcomes following pelvic fracture urethral injury

Feasibility of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate as a 1-day surgery

Neu im Fachgebiet Urologie

Bei Senioren mit Prostatakarzinom auf Anämie achten!

Stufenschema weist Prostatakarzinom zuverlässig nach

Harnwegsinfektprophylaxe: Es geht auch ohne Antibiotika

Varikozelen bei Jugendlichen: Das Für und Wider der Operation

Update Urologie