Skip to main content
Erschienen in: World Journal of Urology 6/2021

15.09.2020 | Original Article

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with spinal cord injury: should all these patients be automatically assigned a Guy’s stone score of 4?

verfasst von: Fabio C. M. Torricelli, Fabio C. Vicentini, Lucas Zanetti, Rodrigo Perrella, Giovanni S. Marchini, Alexandre Danilovic, Carlos A. Batagello, Claudio B. Murta, Joaquim F. A. Claro, Miguel Srougi, William C. Nahas, Eduardo Mazzucchi

Erschienen in: World Journal of Urology | Ausgabe 6/2021

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

To assess the complication and stone-free rates of PCNL in patients with spinal cord injury (SCI) and to evaluate whether this population should be assigned a Guy’s stone score (GSS) of 4.

Methods

A case–control study was conducted, and electronic charts were reviewed to search for patients with SCI, bladder dysfunction, and kidney stones who had undergone PCNL. Control cases were randomly selected from among patients with complete staghorn calculus (GSS = 4).

Results

One hundred and seventeen patients were included. Patients with SCI had a significant shorter operative time (119 vs. 141 min; p = 0.018). There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of the patients’ position, number of renal tracts, bleeding or transfusion rate; however, there was a significantly higher complication rate (23.1% vs. 7.8%; p = 0.009) and a longer hospital stay (5.8 vs. 3.1 days; p = 0.002) among patients with SCI. With regards to the stone-free rate in patients with different grades of GSS patients with SCI who had a GSS of 1 had a stone-free rate of 85.7%, while those with a GSS of 2, 3, or 4 had 50%, 50%, and 31.5%, respectively (p = 0.024). Only patients with a GSS of 4 in the SCI group had outcomes that were similar to those of control patients (31.5% vs. 31.6%).

Conclusion

Patients with SCI should not be automatically assigned GSS 4. Stone-free rate is related to stone burden in these patients, although they do show a higher complication rate and a longer hospital stay than non-neurological patients.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Scales CD Jr, Smith AC, Hanley JM, Saigal CS (2012) Urologic diseases in America P: prevalence of kidney stones in the united states. Eur Urol 62(1):160–165CrossRef Scales CD Jr, Smith AC, Hanley JM, Saigal CS (2012) Urologic diseases in America P: prevalence of kidney stones in the united states. Eur Urol 62(1):160–165CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Stamatelou KK, Francis ME, Jones CA, Nyberg LM, Curhan GC (2003) Time trends in reported prevalence of kidney stones in the united states: 1976–1994. Kidney Int 63(5):1817–1823CrossRef Stamatelou KK, Francis ME, Jones CA, Nyberg LM, Curhan GC (2003) Time trends in reported prevalence of kidney stones in the united states: 1976–1994. Kidney Int 63(5):1817–1823CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang HH, Wiener JS, Ferrandino MN, Lipkin ME, Routh JC (2015) Complications of surgical management of upper tract calculi in spina bifida patients: analysis of nationwide data. J Urol 193(4):1270–1274CrossRef Wang HH, Wiener JS, Ferrandino MN, Lipkin ME, Routh JC (2015) Complications of surgical management of upper tract calculi in spina bifida patients: analysis of nationwide data. J Urol 193(4):1270–1274CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Raj GV, Bennett RT, Preminger GM, King LR, Wiener JS (1999) The incidence of nephrolithiasis in patients with spinal neural tube defects. J Urol 162(3 Pt 2):1238–1242CrossRef Raj GV, Bennett RT, Preminger GM, King LR, Wiener JS (1999) The incidence of nephrolithiasis in patients with spinal neural tube defects. J Urol 162(3 Pt 2):1238–1242CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Turk C, Petrik A, Sarica K, Seitz C, Skolarikos A, Straub M, Knoll T (2016) EAU guidelines on interventional treatment for urolithiasis. Eur Urol 69(3):475–482CrossRef Turk C, Petrik A, Sarica K, Seitz C, Skolarikos A, Straub M, Knoll T (2016) EAU guidelines on interventional treatment for urolithiasis. Eur Urol 69(3):475–482CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Pradere B, Doizi S, Proietti S, Brachlow J, Traxer O (2018) Evaluation of guidelines for surgical management of urolithiasis. J Urol 199(5):1267–1271CrossRef Pradere B, Doizi S, Proietti S, Brachlow J, Traxer O (2018) Evaluation of guidelines for surgical management of urolithiasis. J Urol 199(5):1267–1271CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat de la Rosette J, Assimos D, Desai M, Gutierrez J, Lingeman J, Scarpa R, Tefekli A, Group CPS (2011) The clinical research office of the endourological society percutaneous nephrolithotomy global study: indications, complications, and outcomes in 5803 patients. J Endourol 25(1):11–17CrossRef de la Rosette J, Assimos D, Desai M, Gutierrez J, Lingeman J, Scarpa R, Tefekli A, Group CPS (2011) The clinical research office of the endourological society percutaneous nephrolithotomy global study: indications, complications, and outcomes in 5803 patients. J Endourol 25(1):11–17CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Alsinnawi M, Torreggiani WC, Flynn R, McDermott TE, Grainger R, Thornhill JA (2013) Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in adult patients with spina bifida, severe spinal deformity and large renal stones. Ir J Med Sci 182(3):357–361CrossRef Alsinnawi M, Torreggiani WC, Flynn R, McDermott TE, Grainger R, Thornhill JA (2013) Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in adult patients with spina bifida, severe spinal deformity and large renal stones. Ir J Med Sci 182(3):357–361CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Chaudhry R, Theisen KM, Stephany HA, Schneck FX, Cannon GM, Ost MC (2017) Percutaneous stone surgery in spina bifida patients-are stone-free rates worth the risk? J Endourol 31:S81–S86 (S1)CrossRef Chaudhry R, Theisen KM, Stephany HA, Schneck FX, Cannon GM, Ost MC (2017) Percutaneous stone surgery in spina bifida patients-are stone-free rates worth the risk? J Endourol 31:S81–S86 (S1)CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Nabbout P, Slobodov G, Mellis AM, Culkin DJ (2012) Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in spinal cord neuropathy patients: a single institution experience. J Endourol 26(12):1610–1613CrossRef Nabbout P, Slobodov G, Mellis AM, Culkin DJ (2012) Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in spinal cord neuropathy patients: a single institution experience. J Endourol 26(12):1610–1613CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Rubenstein JN, Gonzalez CM, Blunt LW, Clemens JQ, Nadler RB (2004) Safety and efficacy of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with neurogenic bladder dysfunction. Urology 63(4):636–640CrossRef Rubenstein JN, Gonzalez CM, Blunt LW, Clemens JQ, Nadler RB (2004) Safety and efficacy of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with neurogenic bladder dysfunction. Urology 63(4):636–640CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Symons S, Biyani CS, Bhargava S, Irvine HC, Ellingham J, Cartledge J, Lloyd SN, Joyce AD, Browning AJ (2006) Challenge of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with spinal neuropathy. Int J Urol 13(7):874–879CrossRef Symons S, Biyani CS, Bhargava S, Irvine HC, Ellingham J, Cartledge J, Lloyd SN, Joyce AD, Browning AJ (2006) Challenge of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with spinal neuropathy. Int J Urol 13(7):874–879CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Thomas K, Smith NC, Hegarty N, Glass JM (2011) The Guy’s stone score–grading the complexity of percutaneous nephrolithotomy procedures. Urology 78(2):277–281CrossRef Thomas K, Smith NC, Hegarty N, Glass JM (2011) The Guy’s stone score–grading the complexity of percutaneous nephrolithotomy procedures. Urology 78(2):277–281CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Vicentini FC, Marchini GS, Mazzucchi E, Claro JF, Srougi M (2014) Utility of the Guy’s stone score based on computed tomographic scan findings for predicting percutaneous nephrolithotomy outcomes. Urology 83(6):1248–1253CrossRef Vicentini FC, Marchini GS, Mazzucchi E, Claro JF, Srougi M (2014) Utility of the Guy’s stone score based on computed tomographic scan findings for predicting percutaneous nephrolithotomy outcomes. Urology 83(6):1248–1253CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Vicentini FC, Serzedello FR, Thomas K, Marchini GS, Torricelli FCM, Srougi M, Mazzucchi E (2017) What is the quickest scoring system to predict percutaneous nephrolithotomy outcomes? A comparative study among S.T.O.N.E score, guy’s stone score and croes nomogram. Int Braz J Urol 43(6):1102–1109CrossRef Vicentini FC, Serzedello FR, Thomas K, Marchini GS, Torricelli FCM, Srougi M, Mazzucchi E (2017) What is the quickest scoring system to predict percutaneous nephrolithotomy outcomes? A comparative study among S.T.O.N.E score, guy’s stone score and croes nomogram. Int Braz J Urol 43(6):1102–1109CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Labate G, Modi P, Timoney A, Cormio L, Zhang X, Louie M, Grabe M (2011) Rosette on behalf of the croes Pcnl study group j: the percutaneous nephrolithotomy global study: classification of complications. J Endourol 25(8):1275–1280CrossRef Labate G, Modi P, Timoney A, Cormio L, Zhang X, Louie M, Grabe M (2011) Rosette on behalf of the croes Pcnl study group j: the percutaneous nephrolithotomy global study: classification of complications. J Endourol 25(8):1275–1280CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Kumar S, Randhawa MS, Ganesamoni R, Singh SK (2013) Tranexamic acid reduces blood loss during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a prospective randomized controlled study. J Urol 189(5):1757–1761CrossRef Kumar S, Randhawa MS, Ganesamoni R, Singh SK (2013) Tranexamic acid reduces blood loss during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a prospective randomized controlled study. J Urol 189(5):1757–1761CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat de Souza Melo PA, Vicentini FC, Beraldi AA, Hisano M, Murta CB, de Almeida Claro JF (2018) Outcomes of more than 1 000 percutaneous nephrolithotomies and validation of Guy’s stone score. BJU Int 121(4):640–646CrossRef de Souza Melo PA, Vicentini FC, Beraldi AA, Hisano M, Murta CB, de Almeida Claro JF (2018) Outcomes of more than 1 000 percutaneous nephrolithotomies and validation of Guy’s stone score. BJU Int 121(4):640–646CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with spinal cord injury: should all these patients be automatically assigned a Guy’s stone score of 4?
verfasst von
Fabio C. M. Torricelli
Fabio C. Vicentini
Lucas Zanetti
Rodrigo Perrella
Giovanni S. Marchini
Alexandre Danilovic
Carlos A. Batagello
Claudio B. Murta
Joaquim F. A. Claro
Miguel Srougi
William C. Nahas
Eduardo Mazzucchi
Publikationsdatum
15.09.2020
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
World Journal of Urology / Ausgabe 6/2021
Print ISSN: 0724-4983
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-8726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-020-03443-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2021

World Journal of Urology 6/2021 Zur Ausgabe

Update Urologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.