Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Long-term complications and definition of failure of neuroendoscopic procedures

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Child's Nervous System Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objects

A lot has been published about neuroendoscopic procedures over the last decade. Most of these publications are about the effectiveness of endoscopic third ventriculostomy, the most frequently performed neuroendoscopic procedure. Little is published about the effectiveness of other, less frequently performed neuroendoscopic procedures. Over the years more reports about the complications of endoscopic procedures are published, but again most of these publications are about endoscopic third ventriculostomy and only a little is presented about the complications of all other neuroendoscopic procedures. Furthermore, most reports are about intraoperative and immediate postoperative complications; only a few reports evaluated the long-term complications of neuroendoscopic procedures. There are also a few publications that analyse the failures of neuroendoscopic procedures but a good definition of failure is not given. The reports mention, again, mainly endoscopic third ventriculostomy procedures, and are mostly directed at the short-term failure rates, defined as the need for a shunt to be placed. Less attention is paid to the effects of the endoscopic procedures in the longer term. Looking at longer terms emphasises the need for a better definition of failure.

Methods

To get more insight into the long-term complications and failures of neuroendoscopic procedures, we reviewed the literature and evaluated our own series of 485 different cranial endoscopic procedures. With the information gathered we tried to answer the questions mentioned above.

Conclusions

Most of the complications of neuroendoscopic procedures are transient, either spontaneously or by medical intervention. Only a few permanent complications are known, in our series 1.6%, and most of them are not typically related to the endoscopic procedure itself but are due to the ventricular approach necessary for and the management of the endoscopy. Mortality rates are less than 1%. A uniform definition of failure cannot be given for all neuroendoscopic procedures, because the procedures are too heterogeneous and the indications are widespread. Failures are mainly diagnosed within a few months of the procedure but neurosurgeons must be aware of failure in the longer term, because if not diagnosed they can give rise to increased morbidity and probably mortality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abtin K, Thompson BG, Walker ML (1998) Basilar artery perforation as a complication of endoscopic third ventriculostomy. Pediatr Neurosurg 28:35–41

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Baskin JJ, Manwaring KH, Rekate HL (1998) Ventricular shunt removal: the ultimate treatment of the slit ventricle syndrome. J Neurosurg 88:478–484

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Brockmeyer D, Abtin K, Carey L et al (1998) Endoscopic third ventriculostomy: an outcome analysis. Pediatr Neurosurg 28:236–240

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Buxton N, Punt J (2000) Cerebral infarction after neuroendoscopic third ventriculostomy: case report. Neurosurgery 46:999–1002

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Buxton N, Macarthur D, Malluci C et al (1998) Neuroendoscopic third ventriculostomy in patients less than 1 year old. Pediatr Neurosurg 29:73–76

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Choi JU, Kim DS, Kim SH (1999) Endoscopic surgery for obstructive hydrocephalus. Yonsei Med J 40:600–607

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cinalli G, Salazar C, Malluci C et al (1998) The role of endoscopic third ventriculostomy in the management of shunt malfunction. Neurosurgery 43:1323–1329

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cinalli G, Sainte-Rose C, Chumas P, Zerah M, Brunelle F, Lot G, Pierre Kahn A, Renier D (1999) Failure of third ventriculostomy in the treatment of aqueductal stenosis in children. J Neurosurg 90:448–454

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Dandy WE (1922) Cerebral ventriculoscopy. Johns Hopkins Hosp Bull 33:189–190

    Google Scholar 

  10. Decq P, Le Guerinel C, Brugieres P et al (1998) Endoscopic management of colloid cysts. Neurosurgery 42:1288–1296

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Di Rocco C, Marchese E, Velardi F (1994) A survey of the first complication of newly implanted CSF shunt devices for the treatment of nontumoral hydrocephalus. Cooperative survey of the 1991–1992 Education Committee of the ISPN. Childs Nerv Syst 10:321–327

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Di Roio C, Mottolese C, Cayrel V et al (1999) Ventriculostomie du troisième ventricule et diabete insipide. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim 18:776–778

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Doczi T, Veto F, Horvath Z (1998) Clinical analysis of 89 consecutive 3rd ventriculostomies [abstract]. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 41:112

    Google Scholar 

  14. Enya S, Masuda Y, Terui K (1997) Respiratory arrest after a ventriculoscopic surgery in infants: two case reports. Masui 46:416–420

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Fay T, Grant FC (1923) Ventriculoscopy and intraventricular photography in internal hydrocephalus. JAMA 80:461–463

    Google Scholar 

  16. Freudenstein D, Wagner A, Ernemann U, Duufner F (2002) Subdural hygroma as a complication of endoscopic neurosurgery. Two case reports. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 42:554–559

    Google Scholar 

  17. Fukuhara T, Vorster SJ, Luciano MG (2000) Risk factors for failure of endoscopic third ventriculostomy for obstructive hydrocephalus. Neurosurgery 46:1100–1111

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Fukushima T, Ishijima B, Hirakawa K, Nakamura N, Sano K (1973) Ventriculofiberscope: a new technique for endoscopic diagnosis and operation. Technical note. J Neurosurg 38:251–256

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Gaab MR, Schroeder HW (1998) Neuroendoscopic approach to intraventricular lesions. J Neurosurg 88:496–505

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Griffith HB (1975) Technique of fontanelle and persutural ventriculoscopy and ventricular surgery in infants. Childs Brain 1:359–363

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Guiot G (1973) Ventriculo-cisternostomy for stenosis of the aqueduct of Sylvius. Puncture of the floor of the third ventricle with a leucotome under television control. Acta Neurochir 28:275–289

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hopf NJ, Grunert P, Fries G, Resch KD, Perneczky A (1999) Endoscopic third ventriculostomy: outcome analysis of 1000 consecutive procedures. Neurosurgery 44:795–806

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Jones RF, Kwok BC, Stening WA, Vonau M (1994) The current status of endoscopic third ventriculostomy in the management of non-communicating hydrocephalus. Minim Invas Neurosurg 37:28–36

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Jones RFC, Stening WA, Brydon M (1990) Endoscopic third ventriculostomy. Neurosurgery 26:86–92

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kehler U, Gliemroth J, Knopp U et al (1998) How to perforate safely a resistant floor of the 3rd ventricle? Technical note. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 41:198–199

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kumar R, Behari S, Wahi J et al (1999) Peduncular hallucinosis: an unusual sequel to surgical intervention in the suprasellar region. Br J Neurosurg 13:500–503

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kunz U, Goldmann A, Bader C et al (1994) Endoscopic fenestration of the 3rd ventricular floor in aqueductal stenosis. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 16:42–47

    Google Scholar 

  28. Lewis A, Crone KR (1994) Advances in neuroendoscopy. Contemp Neurosurg 16:1–6

    Google Scholar 

  29. McLaughlin MR, Wahlig JB, Kaufmann AM et al (1997) Traumatic basilar aneurysm after endoscopic third ventriculostomy: case report. Neurosurgery 41:1400–1404

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Mixter WJ (1923) Ventriculoscopy and puncture of the floor of the third ventricle. Preliminary report of a case. Boston Med Surg J 188:277–278

    Google Scholar 

  31. Oi S, Shibata M, Tominaga J, Honda Y, Shinoda M, Takei F, Tsugane R, Matsuzawa K, Sato O (2000) Efficacy of neuroendoscopic procedures in minimally invasive preferential management of pineal region tumours: a prospective study. J Neurosurg 93:245–253

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Oka K, Yamamoto M, Ikeda K et al (1993) Flexible endoneurosurgical therapy for aqueductal stenosis. Neurosurgery 33:236–243

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Pople IK, Athanasiou TC, Sandeman DR, Coakham HB (2001) The role of endoscopic biopsy and third ventriculostomy in management of pineal region tumours. Br J Neurosurg 15:305–311

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Putnam TJ (1934) Treatment of hydrocephalus by endoscopic coagulation of the choroid plexus. Description of a new instrument and preliminary report of results. N Engl J Med 210:1373–1376

    Google Scholar 

  35. Robinson S, Cohen AR (1997) The role of neuroendoscopy in the treatment of pineal region tumours. Surg Neurol 48:360–365

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Sainte-Rose C, Chumas P (1996) Endoscopic third ventriculostomy. Tech Neurosurg 1:167–184

    Google Scholar 

  37. Sainte-Rose C, Hoffman HJ, Hirsch JF (1989) Shunt failure. In: Marlin AE (ed) Concepts in pediatric neurosurgery. Karger, Basel, pp 7–20

  38. Scarff JE (1935) Third ventriculostomy as the rational treatment of obstructive hydrocephalus. J Pediatr 6:870–871

    Google Scholar 

  39. Schmidt RH (1999) Use of microvascular Doppler probe to avoid basilar artery injury during endoscopic third ventriculostomy. J Neurosurg 90:156–159

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Schroeder HWS, Warzok RW, Assaf JA et al (1999) Fatal subarachnoid hemorrhage after endoscopic third ventriculostomy. Case report. J Neurosurg 90:153–155

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Schroeder HWS, Niendorf WG, Gaab MR (2002) Complications of endoscopic third ventriculostomy. J Neurosurg 96:1032–1040

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Teo C (1998) Third ventriculostomy in the treatment of hydrocephalus: experience with more than 120 cases. In: Hellwig D, Bauer BL (eds) Minimally invasive techniques for neurosurgery. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 73–76

  43. Teo C, Rahman S, Boop F (1995) Complications of endoscopic surgery [abstract]. Childs Nerv Syst 11:539

    Google Scholar 

  44. Vandertop WP, Verdaasdonk RM, van Swol CFP (1998) Laser-assisted neuroendoscopy using a neodymium-yttrium aluminium garnet or diode contact laser with pretreated fiber tips. J Neurosurg 88:82–92

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Vries JK (1978) An endoscopic technique for third ventriculostomy. Surg Neurol 13:165–168

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Centre, St. Radboud, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

    Tjemme Beems & J. Andre Grotenhuis

Authors
  1. Tjemme Beems
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. J. Andre Grotenhuis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tjemme Beems.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Beems, T., Grotenhuis, J.A. Long-term complications and definition of failure of neuroendoscopic procedures. Childs Nerv Syst 20, 868–877 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-004-0945-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-004-0945-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation