Introduction
In the last two decades, endoscopic third ventriculocisternostomy (ETV) via a precoronal burr hole and transfrontal approach became a good therapeutic alternative to shunt placing and in non-communicating hydrocephalus, ETV has become the first choice of treatment [
29]. Also, ETV is more and more offered to patients with shunt at the time of shunt malfunction or in case of slit-ventricle syndrome (SVS) as a means to become shunt independent. However, in a subpopulation of patients, ETV is technically not feasible due to small ventricular system or slit ventricles. Patients with such small ventricles and multiple shunt malfunctions possess a highly therapeutic challenge.
Other means of internal shunting, as an alternative to ventriculoperitoneal or ventriculoatrial shunting, have been described in the decades before ETV became a routine procedure. Third ventriculocisternostomy (TVS) has been performed by subtemporal craniotomy [
5], anterior subfrontal approach [
6,
7,
24], Torkildsen ventriculocisternostomy [
26,
27], microsurgical ventriculocisternostomy [
17,
20], stereotactic ventriculocisternostomy [
4,
13,
19], fluoroscopic ventriculocisternostomy [
10‐
12], microsurgical opening of the lamina terminalis [
21], reconstruction of or stent placement in the aqueduct [
15], and endoscopic aqueductoplasty [
22].
TVS by lamina terminalis fenestration is still a routine procedure in aneurysm surgery for subarachnoid hemorrhage, especially in case of anterior communicating artery aneurysms. However, the possibility of a microsurgical TVS (MTV) for obstructive hydrocephalus seems to be lost to oblivion by the widespread use of ETV.
In this report, we describe two patients in whom an ETV could not be performed because of slit ventricles and who became shunt independent after MTV by a minimally invasive supraorbital approach.
Discussion
There are many complications related to shunt dependency. In 10.9–29% of cases complications (other than mechanical obstruction) occur, the majority of which is a shunt infection [
9,
14,
18]. Mechanical complications in shunts including late shunt malfunction may even occur in up to 45.9% in the first postoperative year and up to 81% of patients at 12 years follow-up [
8,
9,
18]. Also, the long-term shunt-related mortality rate of the shunt-treated patient, despite many improvements in shunt technique, diagnostics, and follow-up, remains high (2.9% to 12.4% at 10 years follow-up) [
10,
16,
30]. Therefore, the ultimate goal in hydrocephalus therapy is to get the patient shunt free.
Since the first experience by Guiot [
10], transcortical or transventricular endoscopic third ventriculocisternostomy has proved to be a valid alternative in the treatment of obstructive hydrocephalus. Also, several studies have shown that ETV is an effective treatment in patients with obstructive hydrocephalus who had undergone previous shunting procedures [
1,
23,
25]. It can provide a definitive cure for patients with difficult-to-manage shunt dysfunction.
The potential advantages of ETV over conventional shunting are clear. However, ETV requires a certain degree of lateral and third ventricle dilatation to be performed safely. In case of small ventricles, the potential risks of this procedure (injuring fornix, thalamostriate or internal cerebral veins, hypothalamus) outweigh the advantages. One might consider to enlarge the ventricles and, thus, to facilitate an ETV. This has been safely and successfully performed by Butler and Khan [
2] with an external ventricular drain and by Chernov et al. [
3] by using a programmable valve of which the pressure was increased in a stepwise fashion. In our department, we have practised both techniques for ventricular dilatation successfully, but we also encountered serious complications from this strategy.
In both cases described here, we already knew from previous shunt malfunctions that the ventricles hardly dilate with increased intracranial pressure. A shunt revision in case 1 for proximal catheter obstruction only several months before the MTV revealed an intracranial pressure of 50 cm H2O with only minimal ventricular dilatation. Therefore, in our two patients, we opted to perform an open microsurgical TVS by opening the lamina terminalis via a small supraorbital craniotomy and did not consider achieving ventricular expansion. Both patients became shunt independent.
Open surgical TVS once was a popular therapeutic technique for the treatment of obstructive hydrocephalus before the advent of VP shunt systems. The idea of third ventricular communication into the chiasmatic cisterns was initially proposed by Dandy [
7] in 1922 as a surgical procedure to alleviate obstructive hydrocephalus. It was first performed by Dandy via a subfrontal approach and frequently required the sacrifice of one optic nerve and elevating the chiasm. Later, Dandy [
5] described the alternative subtemporal approach.
In 1936, Stookey and Scarff [
24] described a subfrontal anterior approach for TVS through the lamina terminalis and the hypothalamus to the lumen of the third ventricle. Scarff [
21] published a review of 527 patients subjected to this operation by both the subfrontal and subtemporal procedures, as reported by many authors. The over-all operative mortality was 15% and the permanent arrest of the hydrocephalus was obtained in 70% of the survivors.
Open surgical TVS for obstructive hydrocephalus was then abandoned due to better and reliable shunting systems and because the advent of endoscopic techniques of this procedure is not reported to be in widespread use. Nevertheless, it remained a routine procedure during aneurysm surgery in order to get more slack ventricles and to prevent, or decrease the number of, posthemorrhagic hydrocephalus. To the best of our knowledge, MTV, by opening the lamina terminalis for the treatment of hydrocephalus, was last reported in 1988. In this report from Reddy et al. [
17], five shunted patients with aqueduct stenosis and slit ventricle syndrome described are treated successfully with MTV via opening of the lamina terminalis. The lamina terminalis was approached in all patients via a classic pterional craniotomy. Since then, reports on ETV dominate the literature.
Operative technique
Many neurosurgeons consider craniotomy and MTV too large and risky a procedure. However, the procedure described in this report is a truly minimally invasive procedure. The operation time is about 1 h, the wound and scar are minimal, recuperation is very fast, and the potential risks are very low. One might even suggest that this procedure is safer than an ETV because it has an extracerebral approach, in contrast to ETV, and that surgery is better controlled with more opportunities for hemostasis.
The supraorbital craniotomy with eyebrow incision has been described previously [
28]. The Sylvian fissure needs not to be dissected. The ipsilateral optic nerve and the optic chiasm, the ICA and the ipsilateral ACA as well as the ACoA are exposed after which the lamina terminalis is reached. Lamina terminals fenestration is a standard procedure easily performed with the bipolar forceps or an arachnoid diamond knife. This, however, is not sufficient. It is essential to open Liliequist’s membrane to allow free and sufficient CSF communication between the posterior fossa and the suprasellar and frontobasal cisterns.
Recovery of this operative procedure is fast and without major side-effects. Usually, hospitalization time is 2 to 3 days.