Skip to main content
Erschienen in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease 7/2007

01.07.2007 | Original Article

Anal inspection and digital rectal examination compared to anorectal physiology tests and endoanal ultrasonography in evaluating fecal incontinence

verfasst von: Annette C. Dobben, Maaike P. Terra, Marije Deutekom, Michael F. Gerhards, A. Bart Bijnen, Richelle J. F. Felt-Bersma, Lucas W. M. Janssen, Patrick M. M. Bossuyt, Jaap Stoker

Erschienen in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease | Ausgabe 7/2007

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Anal inspection and digital rectal examination are routinely performed in fecal incontinent patients but it is not clear to what extent they contribute to the diagnostic work-up. We examined if and how findings of anal inspection and rectal examination are associated with anorectal function tests and endoanal ultrasonography.

Methods

A cohort of fecal incontinent patients (n=312, 90% females; mean age 59) prospectively underwent anal inspection and rectal examination. Findings were compared with results of anorectal function tests and endoanal ultrasonography.

Results

Absent, decreased and normal resting and squeeze pressures at rectal examination correlated to some extent with mean (±SD) manometric findings: mean resting pressure 41.3 (±20), 43.8 (±20) and 61.6 (±23) Hg (p<0.001); incremental squeeze pressure 20.6 (±20), 38.4 (±31) and 62.4 (±34) Hg (p<0.001). External anal sphincter defects at rectal examination were confirmed with endoanal ultrasonography for defects <90 degrees in 36% (37/103); for defects between 90-150 degrees in 61% (20/33); for defects between 150-270 degrees in 100% (6/6). Patients with anal scar tissue at anal inspection had lower incremental squeeze pressures (p=0.04); patients with a gaping anus had lower resting pressures (p=0.013) at anorectal manometry. All other findings were not related to any anorectal function test or endoanal ultrasonography.

Conclusions

Anal inspection and digital rectal examination can give accurate information about internal and external anal sphincter function but are inaccurate for determining external anal sphincter defects <90 degrees. Therefore, a sufficient diagnostic work-up should comprise at least rectal examination, anal inspection and endoanal ultrasonography.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Osterberg A, Edebol Eeg-Olofsson K, Graf W (2000) Results of surgical treatment for faecal incontinence. Br J Surg 87:1546–1552PubMedCrossRef Osterberg A, Edebol Eeg-Olofsson K, Graf W (2000) Results of surgical treatment for faecal incontinence. Br J Surg 87:1546–1552PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Bharucha AE, Fletcher JG, Harper CM, Hough D, Daube JR, Stevens C, Seide B et al (2005) Relationship between symptoms and disordered continence mechanisms in women with idiopathic faecal incontinence. Gut 54:546–555PubMedCrossRef Bharucha AE, Fletcher JG, Harper CM, Hough D, Daube JR, Stevens C, Seide B et al (2005) Relationship between symptoms and disordered continence mechanisms in women with idiopathic faecal incontinence. Gut 54:546–555PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Madoff RD, Parker SC, Varma MG, Lowry AC (2004) Faecal incontinence in adults. Lancet 364:621–632PubMedCrossRef Madoff RD, Parker SC, Varma MG, Lowry AC (2004) Faecal incontinence in adults. Lancet 364:621–632PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Mavrantonis C, Wexner SD (1998) A clinical approach to fecal incontinence (review; 127 refs). J Clin Gastroenterol 27:108–121PubMedCrossRef Mavrantonis C, Wexner SD (1998) A clinical approach to fecal incontinence (review; 127 refs). J Clin Gastroenterol 27:108–121PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Prather CM (2004) Physiologic variables that predict the outcome of treatment for fecal incontinence. Gastroenterology 126:S135–S140PubMedCrossRef Prather CM (2004) Physiologic variables that predict the outcome of treatment for fecal incontinence. Gastroenterology 126:S135–S140PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Chiarioni G, Scattolini C, Bonfante F, Vantini I (1993) Liquid stool incontinence with severe urgency: anorectal function and effective biofeedback treatment. Gut 34:1576–1580PubMed Chiarioni G, Scattolini C, Bonfante F, Vantini I (1993) Liquid stool incontinence with severe urgency: anorectal function and effective biofeedback treatment. Gut 34:1576–1580PubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat MacMillan A (2004) Prevalence of fecal incontinence in community-dwelling adults: a systematic review of the literature. Dis Colon Rectum 47:1341–1349PubMedCrossRef MacMillan A (2004) Prevalence of fecal incontinence in community-dwelling adults: a systematic review of the literature. Dis Colon Rectum 47:1341–1349PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Rudolph W, Galandiuk S (2002) A practical guide to the diagnosis and management of fecal incontinence. Mayo Clin Proc 77:271–275PubMedCrossRef Rudolph W, Galandiuk S (2002) A practical guide to the diagnosis and management of fecal incontinence. Mayo Clin Proc 77:271–275PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Kouraklis G, Andromanakos N (2004) Evaluating patients with anorectal incontinence. Surg Today 34:304–312PubMedCrossRef Kouraklis G, Andromanakos N (2004) Evaluating patients with anorectal incontinence. Surg Today 34:304–312PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Bharucha AE (2004) Outcome measures for fecal incontinence: anorectal structure and function. Gastroenterology 126:S90–S98PubMedCrossRef Bharucha AE (2004) Outcome measures for fecal incontinence: anorectal structure and function. Gastroenterology 126:S90–S98PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Soffer EE, Hull T (2000) Fecal incontinence: a practical approach to evaluation and treatment. Am J Gastroenterol 95:1873–1880PubMedCrossRef Soffer EE, Hull T (2000) Fecal incontinence: a practical approach to evaluation and treatment. Am J Gastroenterol 95:1873–1880PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Rao SS (2004) Diagnosis and management of fecal incontinence. American College of Gastroenterology Practice Parameters Committee. Am J Gastroenterol 99:1585–1604PubMedCrossRef Rao SS (2004) Diagnosis and management of fecal incontinence. American College of Gastroenterology Practice Parameters Committee. Am J Gastroenterol 99:1585–1604PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Diamant NE, Kamm MA, Wald A, Whitehead WE (1999) AGA technical review on anorectal testing techniques. Gastroenterology 116:735–760PubMedCrossRef Diamant NE, Kamm MA, Wald A, Whitehead WE (1999) AGA technical review on anorectal testing techniques. Gastroenterology 116:735–760PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Rao SS, Patel RS (1997) How useful are manometric tests of anorectal function in the management of defecation disorders? Am J Gastroenterol 92:469–475PubMed Rao SS, Patel RS (1997) How useful are manometric tests of anorectal function in the management of defecation disorders? Am J Gastroenterol 92:469–475PubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Liberman H, Faria J, Ternent CA, Blatchford GJ, Christensen MA, Thorson AG (2001) A prospective evaluation of the value of anorectal physiology in the management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 44:1567–1574PubMedCrossRef Liberman H, Faria J, Ternent CA, Blatchford GJ, Christensen MA, Thorson AG (2001) A prospective evaluation of the value of anorectal physiology in the management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 44:1567–1574PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Salvioli B, Bharucha AE, Rath-Harvey D, Pemberton JH, Phillips SF (2001) Rectal compliance, capacity, and rectoanal sensation in fecal incontinence. Am J Gastroenterol 96:2158–2168PubMedCrossRef Salvioli B, Bharucha AE, Rath-Harvey D, Pemberton JH, Phillips SF (2001) Rectal compliance, capacity, and rectoanal sensation in fecal incontinence. Am J Gastroenterol 96:2158–2168PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Dobben AC, Terra MP, Deutekom M, Bossuyt PM, Felt-Bersma RJ, Stoker J (2005) Diagnostic work up of faecal incontinence in daily clinical practice in the Netherlands. Neth J Med 63:265–269PubMed Dobben AC, Terra MP, Deutekom M, Bossuyt PM, Felt-Bersma RJ, Stoker J (2005) Diagnostic work up of faecal incontinence in daily clinical practice in the Netherlands. Neth J Med 63:265–269PubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Nielsen MB, Hauge C, Rasmussen OO, Pedersen JF, Christiansen J (1992) Anal endosonographic findings in the follow-up of primarily sutured sphincteric ruptures. Br J Surg 79:104–106PubMedCrossRef Nielsen MB, Hauge C, Rasmussen OO, Pedersen JF, Christiansen J (1992) Anal endosonographic findings in the follow-up of primarily sutured sphincteric ruptures. Br J Surg 79:104–106PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Sultan AH, Kamm MA, Talbot IC, Nicholls RJ, Bartram CI (1994) Anal endosonography for identifying external sphincter defects confirmed histologically. Br J Surg 81:463–465PubMedCrossRef Sultan AH, Kamm MA, Talbot IC, Nicholls RJ, Bartram CI (1994) Anal endosonography for identifying external sphincter defects confirmed histologically. Br J Surg 81:463–465PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Romano G, Rotondano G, Esposito P, Pellecchia L, Novi A (1996) External anal sphincter defects: correlation between pre- operative anal endosonography and intraoperative findings. Br J Radiol 69:6–9PubMedCrossRef Romano G, Rotondano G, Esposito P, Pellecchia L, Novi A (1996) External anal sphincter defects: correlation between pre- operative anal endosonography and intraoperative findings. Br J Radiol 69:6–9PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Keating JP, Stewart PJ, Eyers AA, Warner D, Bokey EL (1997) Are special investigations of value in the management of patients with fecal incontinence? Dis Colon Rectum 40:896–901PubMedCrossRef Keating JP, Stewart PJ, Eyers AA, Warner D, Bokey EL (1997) Are special investigations of value in the management of patients with fecal incontinence? Dis Colon Rectum 40:896–901PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Hallan RI, Marzouk DEMM, Waldron DJ, Womack NR, Williams NS (1989) Comparison of digital and manometric assessment of anal sphincter function. Br J Surg 76:973–975PubMedCrossRef Hallan RI, Marzouk DEMM, Waldron DJ, Womack NR, Williams NS (1989) Comparison of digital and manometric assessment of anal sphincter function. Br J Surg 76:973–975PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Eckardt VF, Kanzler G (1993) How reliable is digital examination for the evaluation of anal sphincter tone? Int J Colorectal Dis 8:95–97PubMedCrossRef Eckardt VF, Kanzler G (1993) How reliable is digital examination for the evaluation of anal sphincter tone? Int J Colorectal Dis 8:95–97PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Hill J, Corson RJ, Brandon H, Redford J, Faragher EB, Kiff ES (1994) History and examination in the assessment of patients with idiopathic fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 37:473–477PubMedCrossRef Hill J, Corson RJ, Brandon H, Redford J, Faragher EB, Kiff ES (1994) History and examination in the assessment of patients with idiopathic fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 37:473–477PubMedCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Wexner SD, Jorge JM (1994) Colorectal physiological tests: use or abuse of technology? Eur J Surg 160:167–174PubMed Wexner SD, Jorge JM (1994) Colorectal physiological tests: use or abuse of technology? Eur J Surg 160:167–174PubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Buch E, Alos R, Solana A, Roig JV, Fernandez C, Diaz F (1998) Can digital examination substitute anorectal manometry for the evaluation of anal canal pressures? Rev Esp Enferm Dig 90:90–93 Buch E, Alos R, Solana A, Roig JV, Fernandez C, Diaz F (1998) Can digital examination substitute anorectal manometry for the evaluation of anal canal pressures? Rev Esp Enferm Dig 90:90–93
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Felt-Bersma RJ, Klinkenberg-Knol EC, Meuwissen SG (1988) Investigation of anorectal function. Br J Surg 75:53–55PubMedCrossRef Felt-Bersma RJ, Klinkenberg-Knol EC, Meuwissen SG (1988) Investigation of anorectal function. Br J Surg 75:53–55PubMedCrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Fink RL, Roberts LJ, Scott M (1992) The role of manometry, electromyography and radiology in the assessment of faecal incontinence. Aust N Z J Surg 62:951–958PubMed Fink RL, Roberts LJ, Scott M (1992) The role of manometry, electromyography and radiology in the assessment of faecal incontinence. Aust N Z J Surg 62:951–958PubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Cook TA, Mortensen NJM (1998) Management of faecal incontinence following obstetric injury. Br J Surg 85:293–299PubMedCrossRef Cook TA, Mortensen NJM (1998) Management of faecal incontinence following obstetric injury. Br J Surg 85:293–299PubMedCrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Herbst F, Teleky B (1994) Alteration of maximum anal resting pressure by digital rectal examination prior to manometry: analysis of agreement between repeat measurements. Int J Colorectal Dis 9:207–210PubMedCrossRef Herbst F, Teleky B (1994) Alteration of maximum anal resting pressure by digital rectal examination prior to manometry: analysis of agreement between repeat measurements. Int J Colorectal Dis 9:207–210PubMedCrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Kaushal JN, Goldner F (1991) Validation of the digital rectal examination as an estimate of anal sphincter squeeze pressure. Am J Gastroenterol 86:886–887PubMed Kaushal JN, Goldner F (1991) Validation of the digital rectal examination as an estimate of anal sphincter squeeze pressure. Am J Gastroenterol 86:886–887PubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Terra MP, Dobben AC, Berghmans B, Deutekom M, Baeten CG, Janssen LW, Boeckxstaens GE et al (2006) Electrical stimulation and pelvic floor muscle training with biofeedback in patients with fecal incontinence: a cohort study of 281 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 49:1149–1159PubMedCrossRef Terra MP, Dobben AC, Berghmans B, Deutekom M, Baeten CG, Janssen LW, Boeckxstaens GE et al (2006) Electrical stimulation and pelvic floor muscle training with biofeedback in patients with fecal incontinence: a cohort study of 281 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 49:1149–1159PubMedCrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Vaizey CJ, Carapeti E, Cahill JA, Kamm MA (1999) Prospective comparison of faecal incontinence grading systems. Gut 44:77–80PubMedCrossRef Vaizey CJ, Carapeti E, Cahill JA, Kamm MA (1999) Prospective comparison of faecal incontinence grading systems. Gut 44:77–80PubMedCrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Bartram CI, DeLancy JOL (eds) (2003) Imaging pelvic floor disorders. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York Bartram CI, DeLancy JOL (eds) (2003) Imaging pelvic floor disorders. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Altman DG (1999) Practical statistics for medical research. CRC Press LLC, Boca Raton, Florida Altman DG (1999) Practical statistics for medical research. CRC Press LLC, Boca Raton, Florida
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Felt-Bersma RJ, Poen AC, Cuesta MA, Meuwissen SG (1997) Anal sensitivity test: what does it measure and do we need it? Cause or derivative of anorectal complaints. Dis Colon Rectum 40:811–816PubMedCrossRef Felt-Bersma RJ, Poen AC, Cuesta MA, Meuwissen SG (1997) Anal sensitivity test: what does it measure and do we need it? Cause or derivative of anorectal complaints. Dis Colon Rectum 40:811–816PubMedCrossRef
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Rao SS (1997) Manometric evaluation of defecation disorders: part II. Fecal incontinence. Gastroenterologist 5:99–111PubMed Rao SS (1997) Manometric evaluation of defecation disorders: part II. Fecal incontinence. Gastroenterologist 5:99–111PubMed
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Jorge JM, Wexner SD (1993) Etiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 36:77–97PubMedCrossRef Jorge JM, Wexner SD (1993) Etiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 36:77–97PubMedCrossRef
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Azpiroz F, Enck P, Whitehead WE (2002) Anorectal functional testing: review of collective experience. Am J Gastroenterol 97:232–240PubMed Azpiroz F, Enck P, Whitehead WE (2002) Anorectal functional testing: review of collective experience. Am J Gastroenterol 97:232–240PubMed
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Felt-Bersma RJF, Klinkenberg-Knol EC, Meuwissen SGM (1990) Anorectal function investigations in incontinent and continent patients—differences and discriminatory value. Dis Colon Rectum 33:479–486PubMedCrossRef Felt-Bersma RJF, Klinkenberg-Knol EC, Meuwissen SGM (1990) Anorectal function investigations in incontinent and continent patients—differences and discriminatory value. Dis Colon Rectum 33:479–486PubMedCrossRef
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Felt-Bersma RJ, van Baren R, Koorevaar M, Strijers RL, Cuesta MA (1995) Unsuspected sphincter defects shown by anal endosonography after anorectal surgery. A prospective study. Dis Colon Rectum 38:249–253PubMedCrossRef Felt-Bersma RJ, van Baren R, Koorevaar M, Strijers RL, Cuesta MA (1995) Unsuspected sphincter defects shown by anal endosonography after anorectal surgery. A prospective study. Dis Colon Rectum 38:249–253PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Anal inspection and digital rectal examination compared to anorectal physiology tests and endoanal ultrasonography in evaluating fecal incontinence
verfasst von
Annette C. Dobben
Maaike P. Terra
Marije Deutekom
Michael F. Gerhards
A. Bart Bijnen
Richelle J. F. Felt-Bersma
Lucas W. M. Janssen
Patrick M. M. Bossuyt
Jaap Stoker
Publikationsdatum
01.07.2007
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
International Journal of Colorectal Disease / Ausgabe 7/2007
Print ISSN: 0179-1958
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1262
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-006-0217-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 7/2007

International Journal of Colorectal Disease 7/2007 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.