Skip to main content
Erschienen in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease 5/2009

01.05.2009 | Review

Loop ileostomy versus loop colostomy for fecal diversion after colorectal or coloanal anastomosis: a meta-analysis

verfasst von: F. Rondelli, P. Reboldi, A. Rulli, F. Barberini, A. Guerrisi, L. Izzo, A. Bolognese, P. Covarelli, C. Boselli, C. Becattini, G. Noya

Erschienen in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease | Ausgabe 5/2009

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Sphincter-saving surgery for the treatment of middle and low rectal cancer has spread considerably when total mesorectal excision became standard treatment. In order to reduce leakage-related complications, surgeons often perform a derivative stoma, a loop ileostomy (LI), or a loop colostomy (LC), but to date, there is no evidence on which is the better technique to adopt.

Methods

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of all randomized controlled trials until 2007 and observational studies comparing temporary LI and LC for temporary decompression of colorectal and/or coloanal anastomoses.
Clinically relevant events were grouped into four study outcomes:
  • general outcome measures: dehydratation and wound infection GOM
  • construction of the stoma outcome measures: parastomal hernia, stenosis, sepsis, prolapse, retraction, necrosis, and hemorrhage
  • closure of the stoma outcome measures: anastomotic leak or fistula, wound infection COM, occlusion and hernia
  • functioning of the stoma outcome measures: occlusion and skin irritation.

Results

Twelve comparative studies were included in this analysis, five randomized controlled trials and seven observational studies. Overall, the included studies reported on 1,529 patients, 894 (58.5%) undergoing defunctioning LI. LI reduced the risk of construction of the stoma outcome measure (odds ratio, OR = 0.47). Specifically, patients undergoing LI had a lower risk of prolapse (OR = 0.21) and sepsis (OR = 0.54). LI was associated with an excess risk of occlusion after stoma closure (OR = 2.13) and dehydratation (OR = 4.61). No other significant difference was found for outcomes.

Conclusion

Our overview shows that LI is associated with a lower risk of construction of the stoma outcome measures.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Heald RJ, Ryall RD (1986) Recurrence and survival after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Lancet 28:1479–1482CrossRef Heald RJ, Ryall RD (1986) Recurrence and survival after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Lancet 28:1479–1482CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Marusch F, Koch A, Schmidt U et al (2002) Value of a protective stoma in low anterior resections for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 45:1164–1171PubMedCrossRef Marusch F, Koch A, Schmidt U et al (2002) Value of a protective stoma in low anterior resections for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 45:1164–1171PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Peeters KC, Tollenaar RA, Marijnen CA et al (2005) Risk factors for anastomotic failure after total mesorectal excision of rectal cancer. Br J Surg 92:211–216PubMedCrossRef Peeters KC, Tollenaar RA, Marijnen CA et al (2005) Risk factors for anastomotic failure after total mesorectal excision of rectal cancer. Br J Surg 92:211–216PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Giuliani D, Willemsen P, Van Elst F, Vanderveken M (2006) A defunctioning stoma in the treatment of lower third rectal carcinoma. Acta Chir Belg 106:40–43PubMed Giuliani D, Willemsen P, Van Elst F, Vanderveken M (2006) A defunctioning stoma in the treatment of lower third rectal carcinoma. Acta Chir Belg 106:40–43PubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Gastinger I, Marusch F, Steinert R et al (2005) Protective defunctioning stoma in low anterior resection for rectal carcinoma. Br J Surg 92:1137–1142PubMedCrossRef Gastinger I, Marusch F, Steinert R et al (2005) Protective defunctioning stoma in low anterior resection for rectal carcinoma. Br J Surg 92:1137–1142PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Dehni N, Schlegel RD, Cunningham C, Guiguet M, Tiret E, Parc R (1998) Influence of a defunctioning stoma on leakage rates after low colorectal anastomosis and colonic J pouch-anal anastomosis. Br J Surg 85:1114–1117PubMedCrossRef Dehni N, Schlegel RD, Cunningham C, Guiguet M, Tiret E, Parc R (1998) Influence of a defunctioning stoma on leakage rates after low colorectal anastomosis and colonic J pouch-anal anastomosis. Br J Surg 85:1114–1117PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Matthiessen P, Hallbook O, Rutegard J, Simert G, Sjodahl R (2007) Defunctioning stoma reduces symptomatic anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection of the rectum for cancer. A randomized multicenter trial. Ann Surg 246:207–214PubMedCrossRef Matthiessen P, Hallbook O, Rutegard J, Simert G, Sjodahl R (2007) Defunctioning stoma reduces symptomatic anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection of the rectum for cancer. A randomized multicenter trial. Ann Surg 246:207–214PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Lertsithichai P, Rattanapichart P (2004) Temporary ileostomy versus temporary colostomy: a meta-analysis of complications. Asian J Surg 27:202–210PubMed Lertsithichai P, Rattanapichart P (2004) Temporary ileostomy versus temporary colostomy: a meta-analysis of complications. Asian J Surg 27:202–210PubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Guenaga KF, Lustosa SA, Saad SS, Saconato H, Matos D (2007) Ileostomy or colostomy for temporary decompression of colorectal anastomosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 24:CD004647. Review Guenaga KF, Lustosa SA, Saad SS, Saconato H, Matos D (2007) Ileostomy or colostomy for temporary decompression of colorectal anastomosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 24:CD004647. Review
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Tilney HS, Sains PS, Lovegrove RE, Reese GE, Heriot AG, Tekkis PP (2007) Comparison of outcome following ileostomy versus colostomy for defunctioning colorectal anastomoses. World J Surg 3:1142–1151. Review Tilney HS, Sains PS, Lovegrove RE, Reese GE, Heriot AG, Tekkis PP (2007) Comparison of outcome following ileostomy versus colostomy for defunctioning colorectal anastomoses. World J Surg 3:1142–1151. Review
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Norris SL, Atkins D (2005) Challenges in using nonrandomized studies in systematic reviews of treatment interventions. Ann Intern Med 142:1112–1119. ReviewPubMed Norris SL, Atkins D (2005) Challenges in using nonrandomized studies in systematic reviews of treatment interventions. Ann Intern Med 142:1112–1119. ReviewPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, Olkin I, Williamson GD, Rennie D et al (2000) Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA 283:2008–2012PubMedCrossRef Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, Olkin I, Williamson GD, Rennie D et al (2000) Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA 283:2008–2012PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Athanasiou T, Al-Ruzzeh S, Kumar P et al (2004) Off-pump myocardial revascularization is associated with less incidence of stroke in elderly patients. Ann Thorac Surg 77:745–753PubMedCrossRef Athanasiou T, Al-Ruzzeh S, Kumar P et al (2004) Off-pump myocardial revascularization is associated with less incidence of stroke in elderly patients. Ann Thorac Surg 77:745–753PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M et al (1997) Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 315:629–634PubMed Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M et al (1997) Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 315:629–634PubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Egger M, Smith GD (1995) Misleading meta-analysis. BMJ 311:753–754PubMed Egger M, Smith GD (1995) Misleading meta-analysis. BMJ 311:753–754PubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Higgins JP, Thompson SG (2002) Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med 21:1539–1558PubMedCrossRef Higgins JP, Thompson SG (2002) Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med 21:1539–1558PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Popovic M, Petrovic M, Matic S, Milovanovic A (2001) Protective colostomy or ileostomy. Acta Chir Iugosl 48:39–42PubMed Popovic M, Petrovic M, Matic S, Milovanovic A (2001) Protective colostomy or ileostomy. Acta Chir Iugosl 48:39–42PubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Lassalle FAB, Benati M, Quintana GO, Moscone CJ (1990) Loop ileostomy as alternative to transverse colostomy to protect distal anastomosis. Rev Argent Chirurg 58:160–164 Lassalle FAB, Benati M, Quintana GO, Moscone CJ (1990) Loop ileostomy as alternative to transverse colostomy to protect distal anastomosis. Rev Argent Chirurg 58:160–164
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Nordstrom G, Hulten L (1983) Loop ileostomy as an alternative to transverse loop ileostomy. J Enterostomal Ther 10:92–94PubMed Nordstrom G, Hulten L (1983) Loop ileostomy as an alternative to transverse loop ileostomy. J Enterostomal Ther 10:92–94PubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Edwards DP, Leppington-Clarke A, Sexton R, Heald RJ, Moran BJ (2001) Stoma-related complications are more frequent after transverse colostomy than loop ileostomy: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Br J Surg 88:360–363PubMedCrossRef Edwards DP, Leppington-Clarke A, Sexton R, Heald RJ, Moran BJ (2001) Stoma-related complications are more frequent after transverse colostomy than loop ileostomy: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Br J Surg 88:360–363PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Khoury GA, Lewis MC, Meleagros L, Lewis AA (1987) Colostomy or ileostomy after colorectal anastomosis?: a randomised trial. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 69:5–7PubMed Khoury GA, Lewis MC, Meleagros L, Lewis AA (1987) Colostomy or ileostomy after colorectal anastomosis?: a randomised trial. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 69:5–7PubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Law WL, Chu KW, Choi HK (2002) Randomized clinical trial comparing loop ileostomy and loop transverse colostomy for faecal diversion following total mesorectal excision. Br J Surg 89:704–708PubMedCrossRef Law WL, Chu KW, Choi HK (2002) Randomized clinical trial comparing loop ileostomy and loop transverse colostomy for faecal diversion following total mesorectal excision. Br J Surg 89:704–708PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Rullier E, Le Toux N, Laurent C, Garrelon JL, Parneix M, Saric J (2001) Loop ileostomy versus loop colostomy for defunctioning low anastomoses during rectal cancer surgery. World J Surg 25:274–277; discussion 277–278PubMedCrossRef Rullier E, Le Toux N, Laurent C, Garrelon JL, Parneix M, Saric J (2001) Loop ileostomy versus loop colostomy for defunctioning low anastomoses during rectal cancer surgery. World J Surg 25:274–277; discussion 277–278PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Rutegard J, Dahlgren S (1987) Transverse colostomy or loop ileostomy as diverting stoma in colorectal surgery. Acta Chir Scand 153:229–232PubMed Rutegard J, Dahlgren S (1987) Transverse colostomy or loop ileostomy as diverting stoma in colorectal surgery. Acta Chir Scand 153:229–232PubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Tocchi A, Mazzoni G, Piccini M et al (2002) Use of ileostomy and colostomy as temporal derivation in colorectal surgery. G Chir 23:48–52PubMed Tocchi A, Mazzoni G, Piccini M et al (2002) Use of ileostomy and colostomy as temporal derivation in colorectal surgery. G Chir 23:48–52PubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Gohring U, Lehner B, Schlag P (1988) Ileostomy versus colostomy as temporary deviation stoma in relation to stoma closure. Chirurg 59:842–844PubMed Gohring U, Lehner B, Schlag P (1988) Ileostomy versus colostomy as temporary deviation stoma in relation to stoma closure. Chirurg 59:842–844PubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Williams NS, Nasmyth DG, Jones D, Smith AH (1986) De-functioning stomas: a prospective controlled trial comparing loop ileostomy with loop transverse colostomy. Br J Surg 73:566–570PubMedCrossRef Williams NS, Nasmyth DG, Jones D, Smith AH (1986) De-functioning stomas: a prospective controlled trial comparing loop ileostomy with loop transverse colostomy. Br J Surg 73:566–570PubMedCrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Gooszen AW, Geelkerken RH, Hermans J, Lagaay MB, Gooszen HG (1998) Temporary decompression after colorectal surgery: randomized comparison of loop ileostomy and loop colostomy. Br J Surg 85:76–79PubMedCrossRef Gooszen AW, Geelkerken RH, Hermans J, Lagaay MB, Gooszen HG (1998) Temporary decompression after colorectal surgery: randomized comparison of loop ileostomy and loop colostomy. Br J Surg 85:76–79PubMedCrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Fasth S, Hulten L, Palselius I (1980) Loop ileostomy—an attractive alternative to a temporary transverse colostomy. Acta Chir Scand 146:203–207PubMed Fasth S, Hulten L, Palselius I (1980) Loop ileostomy—an attractive alternative to a temporary transverse colostomy. Acta Chir Scand 146:203–207PubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Sakai Y, Nelson H, Larson D, Maidl L, Young-Fadok T, Ilstrup D (2001) Temporary transverse colostomy vs loop ileostomy in diversion. Arch Surg 136:338–342PubMedCrossRef Sakai Y, Nelson H, Larson D, Maidl L, Young-Fadok T, Ilstrup D (2001) Temporary transverse colostomy vs loop ileostomy in diversion. Arch Surg 136:338–342PubMedCrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat McArdle CS, McMillan DC, Hole DJ (2005) Impact of anastomotic leakage on long-term survival of patients undergoing curative resection for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 92:1150–1154PubMedCrossRef McArdle CS, McMillan DC, Hole DJ (2005) Impact of anastomotic leakage on long-term survival of patients undergoing curative resection for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 92:1150–1154PubMedCrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Bell SW, Walker KJ, Richard MJ, Sinclair G, Dent OF, Chapuis PH, Bokey EL (2003) Anastomotic leakage after curative anterior resection results in a higher prevalence of local recurrence. Br J Surg 90:1261–1266PubMedCrossRef Bell SW, Walker KJ, Richard MJ, Sinclair G, Dent OF, Chapuis PH, Bokey EL (2003) Anastomotic leakage after curative anterior resection results in a higher prevalence of local recurrence. Br J Surg 90:1261–1266PubMedCrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Walker KG, Bell SW, Richard MJ, Mehanna D, Dent OF, Chapuis PH, Bokey EL (2004) Anastomotic leakage is predictive of diminished survival after potentially curative resection for colorectal cancer. Ann Surg 240:255–259PubMedCrossRef Walker KG, Bell SW, Richard MJ, Mehanna D, Dent OF, Chapuis PH, Bokey EL (2004) Anastomotic leakage is predictive of diminished survival after potentially curative resection for colorectal cancer. Ann Surg 240:255–259PubMedCrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Wong KS, Remzi FH, Gorgun E, Arrigain S, Church JM, Preen M, Fazio WF (2005) Loop ileostomy closure after restorative proctocolectomy: outcome in 1504 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 48:243–250PubMedCrossRef Wong KS, Remzi FH, Gorgun E, Arrigain S, Church JM, Preen M, Fazio WF (2005) Loop ileostomy closure after restorative proctocolectomy: outcome in 1504 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 48:243–250PubMedCrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Barrier A, Martel P, Dugue L, Gallot D, Malafosse M (2001) Direct and reservoir colonic-anal anastomoses. Short and long term results. Ann Chir 126:18–25PubMedCrossRef Barrier A, Martel P, Dugue L, Gallot D, Malafosse M (2001) Direct and reservoir colonic-anal anastomoses. Short and long term results. Ann Chir 126:18–25PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Loop ileostomy versus loop colostomy for fecal diversion after colorectal or coloanal anastomosis: a meta-analysis
verfasst von
F. Rondelli
P. Reboldi
A. Rulli
F. Barberini
A. Guerrisi
L. Izzo
A. Bolognese
P. Covarelli
C. Boselli
C. Becattini
G. Noya
Publikationsdatum
01.05.2009
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
International Journal of Colorectal Disease / Ausgabe 5/2009
Print ISSN: 0179-1958
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1262
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-009-0662-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2009

International Journal of Colorectal Disease 5/2009 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.