Skip to main content
Erschienen in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease 11/2009

01.11.2009 | Original Article

Laparoscopic versus open right hemicolectomy: a comparison of short-term outcomes

verfasst von: Wah-Siew Tan, Min-Hoe Chew, Boon-Swee Ooi, Kheng-Hong Ng, Jit-Fong Lim, Kok-Sun Ho, Choong-Leong Tang, Kong-Weng Eu

Erschienen in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease | Ausgabe 11/2009

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

The laparoscopic approach is increasingly becoming the gold standard for colorectal resections. While laparoscopic surgery of the left colon and rectum has been evaluated in many studies, laparoscopic resection of the right colon has not been as widely examined. The aim of this study was to examine the short-term outcomes after laparoscopic right hemicolectomies and to determine if they were superior when compared with those after open resection.

Patients and methods

Consecutive cases of laparoscopic right hemicolectomies performed between May 2005 and December 2007, in the Department of Colorectal Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, were compared with a matched series of patients who underwent open surgery.

Results

From a total of 37 laparoscopic cases, 36 patients successfully underwent laparoscopic right hemicolectomies. There was one conversion, giving a conversion rate of 2.7%. These 37 patients were compared with 40 patients who underwent open right hemicolectomies. The laparoscopic arm was characterised by shorter length of incisions (5.7 vs. 11.2 cm, p < 0.001) but longer operating times (110.8 vs. 71.6 min, p < 0.001). Mean number of lymph nodes harvested and length of proximal and distal margins were similar in both groups. There were also no significant differences between the groups in terms of narcotic use, recovery of bowel function, length of stay, post-operative morbidity and 30-day mortality.

Conclusion

Laparoscopic right hemicolectomies are as feasible and safe as the open technique. They confer improved cosmesis with smaller incisions but at the expense of longer operating time.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Reza MM, Blasco JA, Andradas E et al (2006) Systematic review of laparoscopic versus open surgery for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 93:921–8PubMedCrossRef Reza MM, Blasco JA, Andradas E et al (2006) Systematic review of laparoscopic versus open surgery for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 93:921–8PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Abraham NS, Byrne CM, Young JM et al (2007) Meta-analysis of non-randomized comparative studies of the short-term outcomes of laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer. ANZ J Surg 77:508–16PubMedCrossRef Abraham NS, Byrne CM, Young JM et al (2007) Meta-analysis of non-randomized comparative studies of the short-term outcomes of laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer. ANZ J Surg 77:508–16PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Abraham NS, Young JM, Solomon MJ (2004) Meta-analysis of short-term outcomes after laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 91:1111–24PubMedCrossRef Abraham NS, Young JM, Solomon MJ (2004) Meta-analysis of short-term outcomes after laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 91:1111–24PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Schwandner O, Schiedeck TH, Killaitis C et al (1999) A case-control-study comparing laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectosigmoidal and rectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis 14:158–63PubMedCrossRef Schwandner O, Schiedeck TH, Killaitis C et al (1999) A case-control-study comparing laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectosigmoidal and rectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis 14:158–63PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Falk PM, Beart RW Jr, Wexner SD et al (1993) Laparoscopic colectomy: a critical appraisal. Dis Colon Rectum 36:28–34PubMedCrossRef Falk PM, Beart RW Jr, Wexner SD et al (1993) Laparoscopic colectomy: a critical appraisal. Dis Colon Rectum 36:28–34PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WC et al (2005) Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 6:477–84PubMedCrossRef Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WC et al (2005) Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 6:477–84PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Wright RC, Kim CA, Horner I et al (2008) Superior lymph node resection is achievable with laparoscopic colectomy: even in initial 30 cases. Am Surg 74:243–9PubMed Wright RC, Kim CA, Horner I et al (2008) Superior lymph node resection is achievable with laparoscopic colectomy: even in initial 30 cases. Am Surg 74:243–9PubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Hartley JE, Mehigan BJ, MacDonald AW et al (2000) Patterns of recurrence and survival after laparoscopic and conventional resections for colorectal carcinoma. Ann Surg 232:181–6PubMedCrossRef Hartley JE, Mehigan BJ, MacDonald AW et al (2000) Patterns of recurrence and survival after laparoscopic and conventional resections for colorectal carcinoma. Ann Surg 232:181–6PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Sample CB, Watson M, Okrainec A et al (2006) Long-term outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer. Surg Endosc 20:30–4PubMedCrossRef Sample CB, Watson M, Okrainec A et al (2006) Long-term outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer. Surg Endosc 20:30–4PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Nakamura T, Mitomi H, Ohtani Y et al (2006) Comparison of long-term outcome of laparoscopic and conventional surgery for advanced colon and rectosigmoid cancer. Hepatogastroenterology 53:351–3PubMed Nakamura T, Mitomi H, Ohtani Y et al (2006) Comparison of long-term outcome of laparoscopic and conventional surgery for advanced colon and rectosigmoid cancer. Hepatogastroenterology 53:351–3PubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Jayne DG, Guillou PJ, Thorpe H et al (2007) Randomized trial of laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal carcinoma: 3-year results of the UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group. J Clin Oncol 25:3061–8PubMedCrossRef Jayne DG, Guillou PJ, Thorpe H et al (2007) Randomized trial of laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal carcinoma: 3-year results of the UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group. J Clin Oncol 25:3061–8PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Tinmouth J, Tomlinson G (2004) Laparoscopically assisted versus open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 351:933–4 author reply 933-4PubMedCrossRef Tinmouth J, Tomlinson G (2004) Laparoscopically assisted versus open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 351:933–4 author reply 933-4PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat American Joint Committee on Cancer (2002) AJCC cancer staging manual, 6th edn. Springer, New York American Joint Committee on Cancer (2002) AJCC cancer staging manual, 6th edn. Springer, New York
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Chan AC, Poon JT, Fan JK et al (2008) Impact of conversion on the long-term outcome in laparoscopic resection of colorectal cancer. Surg Endosc 22:2625–30PubMedCrossRef Chan AC, Poon JT, Fan JK et al (2008) Impact of conversion on the long-term outcome in laparoscopic resection of colorectal cancer. Surg Endosc 22:2625–30PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Scala A, Huang A, Dowson HM et al (2007) Laparoscopic colorectal surgery - results from 200 patients. Colorectal Dis 9:701–5PubMedCrossRef Scala A, Huang A, Dowson HM et al (2007) Laparoscopic colorectal surgery - results from 200 patients. Colorectal Dis 9:701–5PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Baker RP, Titu LV, Hartley JE et al (2004) A case-control study of laparoscopic right hemicolectomy vs. open right hemicolectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 47:1675–9PubMedCrossRef Baker RP, Titu LV, Hartley JE et al (2004) A case-control study of laparoscopic right hemicolectomy vs. open right hemicolectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 47:1675–9PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Ng SS, Lee JF, Yiu RY et al (2008) Emergency laparoscopic-assisted versus open right hemicolectomy for obstructing right-sided colonic carcinoma: a comparative study of short-term clinical outcomes. World J Surg 32:454–8PubMedCrossRef Ng SS, Lee JF, Yiu RY et al (2008) Emergency laparoscopic-assisted versus open right hemicolectomy for obstructing right-sided colonic carcinoma: a comparative study of short-term clinical outcomes. World J Surg 32:454–8PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Zheng MH, Feng B, Lu AG et al (2005) Laparoscopic versus open right hemicolectomy with curative intent for colon carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 11:323–6PubMed Zheng MH, Feng B, Lu AG et al (2005) Laparoscopic versus open right hemicolectomy with curative intent for colon carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 11:323–6PubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Tong DK, Law WL (2007) Laparoscopic versus open right hemicolectomy for carcinoma of the colon. Jsls 11:76–80PubMed Tong DK, Law WL (2007) Laparoscopic versus open right hemicolectomy for carcinoma of the colon. Jsls 11:76–80PubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Leung KL, Meng WC, Lee JF et al (1999) Laparoscopic-assisted resection of right-sided colonic carcinoma: a case-control study. J Surg Oncol 71:97–100PubMedCrossRef Leung KL, Meng WC, Lee JF et al (1999) Laparoscopic-assisted resection of right-sided colonic carcinoma: a case-control study. J Surg Oncol 71:97–100PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Braga M, Frasson M, Vignali A et al (2007) Open right colectomy is still effective compared to laparoscopy: results of a randomized trial. Ann Surg 246:1010–4 discussion 1014-5PubMedCrossRef Braga M, Frasson M, Vignali A et al (2007) Open right colectomy is still effective compared to laparoscopy: results of a randomized trial. Ann Surg 246:1010–4 discussion 1014-5PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Chung CC, Ng DC, Tsang WW et al (2007) Hand-assisted laparoscopic versus open right colectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 246:728–33PubMedCrossRef Chung CC, Ng DC, Tsang WW et al (2007) Hand-assisted laparoscopic versus open right colectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 246:728–33PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Lohsiriwat V, Lohsiriwat D, Chinswangwatanakul V et al (2007) Comparison of short-term outcomes between laparoscopically-assisted vs. transverse-incision open right hemicolectomy for right-sided colon cancer: a retrospective study. World J Surg Oncol 5:49PubMedCrossRef Lohsiriwat V, Lohsiriwat D, Chinswangwatanakul V et al (2007) Comparison of short-term outcomes between laparoscopically-assisted vs. transverse-incision open right hemicolectomy for right-sided colon cancer: a retrospective study. World J Surg Oncol 5:49PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Donati D, Brown SR, Eu KW et al (2002) Comparison between midline incision and limited right skin crease incision for right-sided colonic cancers. Tech Coloproctol 6:1–4PubMedCrossRef Donati D, Brown SR, Eu KW et al (2002) Comparison between midline incision and limited right skin crease incision for right-sided colonic cancers. Tech Coloproctol 6:1–4PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Inaba T, Okinaga K, Fukushima R et al (2004) Prospective randomized study of two laparotomy incisions for gastrectomy: midline incision versus transverse incision. Gastric Cancer 7:167–71PubMedCrossRef Inaba T, Okinaga K, Fukushima R et al (2004) Prospective randomized study of two laparotomy incisions for gastrectomy: midline incision versus transverse incision. Gastric Cancer 7:167–71PubMedCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Kam MH, Seow-Choen F, Peng XH et al (2004) Minilaparotomy left iliac fossa skin crease incision vs. midline incision for left-sided colorectal cancer. Tech Coloproctol 8:85–8PubMedCrossRef Kam MH, Seow-Choen F, Peng XH et al (2004) Minilaparotomy left iliac fossa skin crease incision vs. midline incision for left-sided colorectal cancer. Tech Coloproctol 8:85–8PubMedCrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Lindgren PG, Nordgren SR, Oresland T et al (2001) Midline or transverse abdominal incision for right-sided colon cancer-a randomized trial. Colorectal Dis 3:46–50PubMedCrossRef Lindgren PG, Nordgren SR, Oresland T et al (2001) Midline or transverse abdominal incision for right-sided colon cancer-a randomized trial. Colorectal Dis 3:46–50PubMedCrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Proske JM, Zieren J, Muller JM (2005) Transverse versus midline incision for upper abdominal surgery. Surg Today 35:117–21PubMedCrossRef Proske JM, Zieren J, Muller JM (2005) Transverse versus midline incision for upper abdominal surgery. Surg Today 35:117–21PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Laparoscopic versus open right hemicolectomy: a comparison of short-term outcomes
verfasst von
Wah-Siew Tan
Min-Hoe Chew
Boon-Swee Ooi
Kheng-Hong Ng
Jit-Fong Lim
Kok-Sun Ho
Choong-Leong Tang
Kong-Weng Eu
Publikationsdatum
01.11.2009
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
International Journal of Colorectal Disease / Ausgabe 11/2009
Print ISSN: 0179-1958
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1262
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-009-0743-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 11/2009

International Journal of Colorectal Disease 11/2009 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.