Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Clinical tumour size and nodal status predict pathologic complete response following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Colorectal Disease Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Pathologic complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant treatment for rectal cancer has been associated with improved local control, reduced distant disease and a survival advantage when compared with non-complete responders. Approximately 10–25 % of patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer achieve pCR; however, predictors for its occurrence are inadequately defined. This study aimed to identify clinical and tumour factors that predict pCR in patients receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer.

Methods

Consecutive rectal cancer patients diagnosed and treated in the Auckland region between 1 January 2002 and 1 February 2013 were retrospectively identified. Cases were stratified by the occurrence of pCR or non-pCR. Predictive capacity of several patient, tumour and treatment-related variables were then assessed by univariate and regression analyses.

Results

Two hundred ninety-seven patients received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, of whom 34 (11.4 %) achieved pCR. There were no significant differences in age, gender, ethnicity, BMI, pretreatment clinical T or N stage, tumour distance from the anal verge, tumour differentiation, chemoradiotherapy regimen and time interval to surgery between the pCR and non-pCR groups. Univariate analysis identified pretreatment serum CEA levels, a reduction in pre- to post-treatment serum CEA and smaller tumours as significant correlates of pCR. Logistic regression analysis found smaller tumour size and pretreatment clinical N stage as independent clinical predictors for achieving pCR.

Conclusions

Smaller tumour size and pretreatment clinical N stage were independent clinical predictors for achieving pCR. Prospective analysis is recommended for more rigorous risk factor assessment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ministry of Health (2012) Cancer: new registrations and deaths 2009. Ministry of Health, Wellington

    Google Scholar 

  2. Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D (2011) Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 61:69–90

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bosset J-F, Calais G, Mineur L, Maingon P, Radosevic-Jelic L, Daban A et al (2005) Enhanced tumorocidal effect of chemotherapy with preoperative radiotherapy for rectal cancer: preliminary results—EORTC 22921. J Clin Oncol 23:5620–5627

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bosset J-F, Collette L, Calais G, Mineur L, Maingon P, Radosevic-Jelic L et al (2006) Chemotherapy with preoperative radiotherapy in rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 355:1114–1123

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gérard J-P, Conroy T, Bonnetain F, Bouché O, Chapet O, Closon-Dejardin M-T et al (2006) Preoperative radiotherapy with or without concurrent fluorouracil and leucovorin in T3-4 rectal cancers: results of FFCD 9203. J Clin Oncol 24:4620–4625

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sauer R, Becker H, Hohenberger W, Rodel C, Wittekind C, Fietkau R et al (2004) Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 351:1731–1740

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Aklilu M, Eng C (2011) The current landscape of locally advanced rectal cancer. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 8:649–659

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sanghera P, Wong DWY, McConkey CC, Geh JI, Hartley A (2008) Chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer: an updated analysis of factors affecting pathological response. Clin Oncol 20:176–183

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Martin ST, Heneghan HM, Winter DC (2012) Systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes following pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 99:918–928

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Habr-Gama A, Perez RO, Juliao GPS, Proscurshim I, Gama-Rodrigues J (2011) Nonoperative approaches to rectal cancer: a critical evaluation. Semin Radiat Oncol 21:234–239

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. MacGregor TP, Maughan TS, Sharma RA (2012) Pathological grading of regression following neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy: the clinical need is now. J Clin Pathol 65:867–871

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Das P, Skibber JM, Rodriguez-Bigas MA, Feig BW, Change GJ, Wolff RA et al (2007) Predictors of tumour response and downstaging in patients who receive preoperative chemoradiation for rectal cancer. Cancer 109:1750–1755

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kalady MF, Felipe de Campos-Lobato L, Stocchi L, Geisler DP, Dietz D, Lavery IC et al (2009) Predictive factors of pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant chemoradiation for rectal cancer. Ann Surg 250:582–589

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Park CH, Kim HC, Cho YB, Yun SH, Lee WY, Park YS et al (2011) Predicting tumor response after preoperative chemoradiation using clinical parameters in rectal cancer. World J Gastroenterol 17:5310–5316

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Rodel C, Martus P, Papadoupolos T, Fuzesi L, Klimpfinger M, Fietkau R et al (2005) Prognostic significance of tumor regression after preoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 23:8688–8696

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Chan A, Wong A, Jenken D, Heine J, Buie D, Johnson D (2005) Posttreatment TNM staging is a prognostic indicator of survival and recurrence in tethered or fixed rectal carcinoma after preoperative chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 61:665–677

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Rodel C, Hofheinz R, Liersch T (2012) Rectal cancer: state of the art in 2012. Curr Opin Oncol 24:441–447

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Tulchinsky H, Shmueli E, Figer A, Klausner JM, Rabau M (2008) An interval >7 weeks between Neoadjuvant therapy and surgery improves pathologic complete response and disease-free survival in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 15:2661–2667

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Stein DE, Mahmoud NN, Anne PR, Rose DG, Isenberg GA, Goldstein SD et al (2003) Longer time interval between completion of neoadjuvant chemoradiation and surgical resection does not improve downstaging of rectal carcinoma. Dis Colon Rectum 46:448–453

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lim S-B, Choi SH, Jeong S-Y, Kim DY, Jung KH, Hong YS et al (2008) Optimal surgery time after preoperative chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancers. Ann Surg 248:243–251

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Garcia-Aguilar J, Smith DD, Avila K, Bergsland EK, Chu P, Krieg RM (2011) Optimal timing of surgery after chemoradiation for advanced rectal cancer: preliminary results of a multi-center, non- randomized phase II prospective trial. Ann Surg 254:97–102

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Song S, Hong JC, McDonnell SE, Koong AC, Minsky BD, Chang DT et al (2012) Combined modality therapy for rectal cancer: the relative value of posttreatment versus pretreatment CEA as a prognostic marker for disease recurrence. Ann Surg Oncol 19:2471–2476

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Jang NY, Kang S-B, Kim D-W, Kim JH, Lee K-W, Kim IA et al (2011) The role of carcinoembryonic antigen after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 54:245–252

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kirat HT, Ozturk E, Lavery IC, Kiran RP (2012) The predictive value of preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen level in the prognosis of colon cancer. Am J Surg 204:447–452

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Klessen C, Rogalla P, Taupitz M (2007) Local staging of rectal cancer: the current role of MRI. Eur Radiol 17:370–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Habr-Gama A, Perez RO, Wynn G, Marks J, Kessler H, Gama-Rodrigues J (2010) Complete clinical response after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy for distal rectal cancer: characterization of clinical and endoscopic findings for standardization. Dis Colon Rectum 53:1692–1698

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Habr-Gama A, Perez RO, Nadalin W, Sabbaga J, Ribeiro U Jr, Silva e Sousa AH Jr et al (2004) Operative versus nonoperative treatment for stage 0 distal rectal cancer following chemoradiation therapy. Ann Surg 240:711–718

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Hughes R, Harrison M, Glynne-Jones R (2010) Could a wait and see policy be justified in T3/4 rectal cancers after chemo-radiotherapy? Acta Oncol 49:378–381

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Mikaela Garland and Noah Bunkley are summer students funded by the University of Auckland. The authors would like to thank Avinesh Pillai (Department of Statistics, University of Auckland) for consulting as a specialist biostatistician.

Conflict of interest

The authors have no potential conflicts of interest to declare.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ian P. Bissett.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Garland, M.L., Vather, R., Bunkley, N. et al. Clinical tumour size and nodal status predict pathologic complete response following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis 29, 301–307 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-013-1821-7

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-013-1821-7

Keywords

Navigation