Introduction
Patients and methods
Patients
Statistical analysis
Results
Patient cohort
Age <75 years n = 410 (%) | Age ≥75 years n = 159 (%) | All patients n = 569 (%) |
p
| |
---|---|---|---|---|
Gender | ||||
Male | 259 (63) | 83 (52) | 342 (60) | 0.02 |
Female | 151 (37) | 76 (48) | 227 (40) | |
Tumor location | ||||
Coecum — splenic flexure | 114 (28) | 67 (42) | 181(32) | <0.001 |
Descending colon — sigmoid | 137 (55) | 55 (35) | 192 (34) | |
Rectum | 159 (37) | 37 (23) | 196 (34) | |
ASA | ||||
I | 51 (12) | 3 (2) | 54 (10) | <0.001 |
II | 254 (62) | 66 (42) | 320 (56) | |
III | 77 (19) | 77 (48) | 154 (27) | |
IV | 5 (1) | 6 (4) | 11 (2) | |
missing | 23 (6) | 7 (4) | 30 (5) | |
Comorbidities | ||||
No | 179 (44) | 24 (15) | 203 (36) | <0.001 |
Yes | 231 (56) | 135 (85) | 336 (64) | |
Tumor obstrucion | ||||
No | 318 (78) | 124 (78) | 442 (78) | 0.99 |
Yes | 21 (5) | 8 (5) | 29 (5) | |
Missing | 71 (17) | 27 (17) | 98 (17) | |
Presurgical treatment | ||||
No | 313 (76) | 143 (90) | 456 (80) | <0.001 |
Yes | 97 (24) | 16 (10) | 113 (20) | |
Surgery | ||||
Elective | 384 (94) | 147 (92) | 531 (93) | 0.61 |
Emergency | 26 (6) | 12 (8) | 38 (7) | |
Surgery: PRBC (mean ± SD) | 0.5 ± 1 | 1 ± 4 | 0.7 ± 2 | 0.07 |
Surgery: duration (min, mean ± SD) | 220 ± 90 | 199 ± 88 | 214 ± 90 | 0.02 |
Multivisceral surgery | ||||
No | 335 (82) | 135 (85) | 47 (83) | 0.37 |
Yes | 75 (18) | 24 (15) | 99 (17) | |
Intraoperative complications | ||||
No | 397 (97) | 150 (94) | 547 (96) | 0.17 |
Yes | 13 (3) | 9 (6) | 22 (4) | |
General complications | ||||
No | 319 (78) | 108 (68) | 427 (75) | 0.02 |
Yes | 91 (22) | 51 (32) | 142 (25) | |
Surgical complications | ||||
No | 250 (61) | 9 (61) | 347 (61) | 0.99 |
Yes | 160 (39) | 62 (39) | 222 (39) | |
Anastomotic leakage | ||||
No | 394 (96) | 15 (96) | 546 (96) | 0.79 |
Yes | 16 (4) | 7 (4) | 23 (4) | |
Length of hosp. stay (days, mean ± SD) | 20 ± 13 | 24 ± 12 | 21 ± 12 | 0.002 |
Length of ICU stay (days, mean ± SD) | 2 ± 3 | 4 ± 7 | 2 ± 5 | 0.003 |
Perioperative mortality | ||||
No | 11 (3) | 8 (5) | 19 (3) | 0.03 |
Yes | 399 (97) | 151 (95) | 550 (97) | |
Postsurgical treatment | ||||
No | 233 (57) | 120 (76) | 353 (62) | <0.001 |
Chemotherapy | 170 (41) | 37 (23) | 207 (36) | |
(Chemo-)radiation | 7 (2) | 2 (1) | 9 (2) | |
T | ||||
T1 | 61 (15) | 12 (8) | 73 (13) | 0.06 |
T2 | 72 (18) | 26 (16) | 98 (17) | |
T3 | 203 (49) | 95 (60) | 298 (52) | |
T4 | 74 (18) | 26 (16) | 100 (18) | |
N | ||||
N0 | 222 (54) | 100 (63) | 322 (57) | 0.17 |
N1 | 107 (26) | 34 (21) | 141 (25) | |
N2 | 81 (20) | 25 (16) | 106 (19) | |
Lymph nodes resected (mean ± SD) | 19 ± 9 | 18 ± 7 | 18 ± 9 | 0.16 |
Lymph nodes positive (mean ± SD) | 3 ± 5 | 2 ± 6 | 2 ± 5 | 0.47 |
Lymph node ratio | 0.121 | 0.104 | 0.117 | 0.38 |
M | ||||
M0 | 314 (77) | 136 (86) | 450 (79) | 0.02 |
M1 | 96 (23) | 23 (14) | 119 (21) | |
Stage (UICC/AJCC) | ||||
I | 109 (27) | 34 (21) | 143 (25) | 0.004 |
II | 92 (22) | 57 (36) | 149 (26) | |
III | 113 (28) | 45 (28) | 158 (28) | |
IV | 96 (23) | 23 (15) | 119 (21) | |
Histological grading | ||||
G1/2 | 273 (67) | 117 (74) | 390 (68) | 0.14 |
G3/4 | 132 (32) | 42 (26) | 174 (31) | |
Missing | 5 (1) | 0 | 5 (1) | |
Lymphatic invasion | ||||
L0 | 310 (76) | 128 (81) | 438 (77) | 0.21 |
L1 | 100 (24) | 31 (19) | 131 (23) | |
Angioinvasion | ||||
V0 | 359 (88) | 140 (88) | 499 (88) | 0.87 |
V1 | 51 (12) | 19 (12) | 70 (12) | |
Perineural invasion | ||||
Pn0 | 390 (95) | 153 (96) | 546 (95) | 0.57 |
Pn1 | 20 (5) | 6 (4) | 26 (5) | |
Tumor type | ||||
Adenocarcinoma | 364 (89) | 144 (91) | 508 (89) | 0.42 |
Mucinous adenocarcinoma | 44 (11) | 13 (8) | 57 (10) | |
Signet ring cell carcinoma | 2 (0.5) | 2 (1) | 4 (1) | |
R (local) | ||||
R0 | 381 (93) | 151 (95) | 532 (93) | 0.42 |
R1 | 17 (4) | 3 (2) | 20 (4) | |
R2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
RX | 12 (3) | 5 (3) | 17 (3) | |
R (systemic) | ||||
R0 | 336 (82) | 141 (89) | 477 (84) | 0.22 |
R1 | 19 (5) | 3 (2) | 22 (4) | |
R2 | 42 (10) | 11 (7) | 53 (9) | |
RX | 13 (3) | 4 (2) | 17 (3) |
Differences between younger and elderly patients at presentation
Perioperative differences between younger and elderly patients
Differences between younger and elderly patients during follow-up
p
| HR | 95 % CI | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Lower | Upper | |||
Young | 1 | |||
vs. elderly | 0.79 | 1.9 | 0.58 | 2.05 |
Men | 1 | |||
vs. women | 0.03 | 1.72 | 1.06 | 2.79 |
Colon | 1 | |||
vs. rectum | 0.86 | 0.95 | 0.56 | 1.62 |
ASA I | 1 | |||
vs. ASA II | 0.14 | 1.98 | 0.80 | 4.89 |
vs. ASA III | 0.002 | 5.01 | 1.85 | 13.6 |
vs. ASA IV | <0.001 | 49.2 | 10.8 | 224 |
Stage I | 1 | |||
vs. stage II | 0.40 | 1.56 | 0.59 | 4.34 |
vs. stage III | 0.07 | 2.48 | 0.94 | 6.53 |
vs. stage IV | 0.004 | 5.06 | 1.68 | 15.2 |
G1/2 | 1 | |||
vs. G3/4 | 0.001 | 2.32 | 1.39 | 3.90 |
R0 | 1 | |||
vs. R1 | 0.02 | 3.65 | 1.26 | 10.6 |
vs. R2 | <0.001 | 4.76 | 2.07 | 10.9 |