Skip to main content
Erschienen in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease 9/2014

01.09.2014 | Original Article

Robot-assisted rectal cancer surgery: short-term outcomes for 113 consecutive patients

verfasst von: Akio Shiomi, Yusuke Kinugasa, Tomohiro Yamaguchi, Hiroyuki Tomioka, Hiroyasu Kagawa

Erschienen in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease | Ausgabe 9/2014

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to assess the short-term outcome of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery (RALS) for rectal cancer, including robotic, autonomic nerve-preserving, lateral lymph node dissection (RALLD), a new, technically challenging procedure.

Methods

Between December 2011 and August 2013, 113 consecutive patients underwent RALS for rectal cancer. Surgical outcomes, pathological results, and postoperative complications were prospectively collected.

Results

There were 78 males and 35 females; 30 patients (26.5 %) had cT1 tumor, 14 (12.4 %) had cT2, 56 (49.6 %) had cT3, and 12 (10.6 %) had cT4 tumor. The types of procedures performed were 82 anterior resections, 23 intersphincteric resections, and 8 abdominoperineal resections. RALLD was performed in 38 patients (33.6 %). The overall median operative time was 302 (135–683) min. In cases without RALLD, the median operative time was 242 (135–529) min, while median operative time was 486 (320–683) min with RALLD. None of the cases was converted to an open or laparoscopic procedure. There was no surgical mortality. The overall complication rate for Clavien-Dindo classification grade III–IV was 2.7 %. Ten patients who developed urinary retention recovered completely within 30 days after the operation.

Conclusions

RALS for rectal cancer is a technically feasible, less invasive procedure. This procedure can be performed with low morbidity and a low conversion rate, even for cases with advanced rectal cancer requiring complicated, robot-assisted, lateral lymph node dissection.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Weeks JC, Nelson H, Gelber S, Sargent D, Schroeder G (2002) Short-term quality-of-life outcomes following laparoscopic-assisted colectomy vs open colectomy for colon cancer: a randomized trial. JAMA 287:321–328PubMedCrossRef Weeks JC, Nelson H, Gelber S, Sargent D, Schroeder G (2002) Short-term quality-of-life outcomes following laparoscopic-assisted colectomy vs open colectomy for colon cancer: a randomized trial. JAMA 287:321–328PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Lacy AM, Garcia-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S, Castells A, Taura P, Pique JM et al (2002) Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet 359:2224–2229PubMedCrossRef Lacy AM, Garcia-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S, Castells A, Taura P, Pique JM et al (2002) Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet 359:2224–2229PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, Walker J, Jayne DG, Smith AM et al (2005) Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 365:1718–1726PubMedCrossRef Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, Walker J, Jayne DG, Smith AM et al (2005) Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 365:1718–1726PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Shiomi A, Kinugasa Y, Yamaguchi T, Tsukamoto S, Tomioka H, Kagawa H (2013) Feasibility of laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for patients with cT1-T2 low rectal cancer. Dig Surg 30:272–277PubMedCrossRef Shiomi A, Kinugasa Y, Yamaguchi T, Tsukamoto S, Tomioka H, Kagawa H (2013) Feasibility of laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for patients with cT1-T2 low rectal cancer. Dig Surg 30:272–277PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Moriya Y, Sugihara K, Akasu T, Fujita S (1995) Nerve-sparing surgery with lateral node dissection for advanced lower rectal cancer. Eur J Cancer 31A:1229–1232PubMedCrossRef Moriya Y, Sugihara K, Akasu T, Fujita S (1995) Nerve-sparing surgery with lateral node dissection for advanced lower rectal cancer. Eur J Cancer 31A:1229–1232PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Watanabe T, Itabashi M, Shimada Y, Tanaka S, Ito Y, Ajioka Y et al (2012) Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (JSCCR) guidelines 2010 for the treatment of colorectal cancer. Int J Clin Oncol 17:1–29PubMed Watanabe T, Itabashi M, Shimada Y, Tanaka S, Ito Y, Ajioka Y et al (2012) Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (JSCCR) guidelines 2010 for the treatment of colorectal cancer. Int J Clin Oncol 17:1–29PubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Heald RJ, Husband EM, Ryall RD (1982) The mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery—the clue to pelvic recurrence? Br J Surg 69:613–616PubMedCrossRef Heald RJ, Husband EM, Ryall RD (1982) The mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery—the clue to pelvic recurrence? Br J Surg 69:613–616PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Lowry AC, Simmang CL, Boulos P, Farmer KC, Finan PJ, Hyman N et al (2001) Consensus statement of definitions for anorectal physiology and rectal cancer: report of the Tripartite Consensus Conference on Definitions for Anorectal Physiology and Rectal Cancer, Washington, D.C., May 1, 1999. Dis Colon Rectum 44:915–919PubMedCrossRef Lowry AC, Simmang CL, Boulos P, Farmer KC, Finan PJ, Hyman N et al (2001) Consensus statement of definitions for anorectal physiology and rectal cancer: report of the Tripartite Consensus Conference on Definitions for Anorectal Physiology and Rectal Cancer, Washington, D.C., May 1, 1999. Dis Colon Rectum 44:915–919PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Kinugasa Y, Murakami G, Suzuki D, Sugihara K (2007) Histological identification of fascial structures posterolateral to the rectum. Br J Surg 94:620–626PubMedCrossRef Kinugasa Y, Murakami G, Suzuki D, Sugihara K (2007) Histological identification of fascial structures posterolateral to the rectum. Br J Surg 94:620–626PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Memon S, Heriot AG, Murphy DG, Bressel M, Lynch AC (2012) Robotic versus laparoscopic proctectomy for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol Memon S, Heriot AG, Murphy DG, Bressel M, Lynch AC (2012) Robotic versus laparoscopic proctectomy for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Yang Y, Wang F, Zhang P, Shi C, Zou Y, Qin H et al (2012) Robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for colorectal disease, focusing on rectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol Yang Y, Wang F, Zhang P, Shi C, Zou Y, Qin H et al (2012) Robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for colorectal disease, focusing on rectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Trastulli S, Farinella E, Cirocchi R, Cavaliere D, Avenia N, Sciannameo F et al (2012) Robotic resection compared with laparoscopic rectal resection for cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis of short-term outcome. Color Dis 14:e134–e156CrossRef Trastulli S, Farinella E, Cirocchi R, Cavaliere D, Avenia N, Sciannameo F et al (2012) Robotic resection compared with laparoscopic rectal resection for cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis of short-term outcome. Color Dis 14:e134–e156CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Baek SJ, Kim SH, Cho JS, Shin JW, Kim J (2012) Robotic versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: a cost analysis from a single institute in Korea. World J Surg 36:2722–2729PubMedCrossRef Baek SJ, Kim SH, Cho JS, Shin JW, Kim J (2012) Robotic versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: a cost analysis from a single institute in Korea. World J Surg 36:2722–2729PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Park JS, Choi GS, Lim KH, Jang YS, Jun SH (2011) S052: a comparison of robot-assisted, laparoscopic, and open surgery in the treatment of rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 25:240–248PubMedCrossRef Park JS, Choi GS, Lim KH, Jang YS, Jun SH (2011) S052: a comparison of robot-assisted, laparoscopic, and open surgery in the treatment of rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 25:240–248PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Fujita S, Akasu T, Mizusawa J, Saito N, Kinugasa Y, Kanemitsu Y et al (2012) Postoperative morbidity and mortality after mesorectal excision with and without lateral lymph node dissection for clinical stage II or stage III lower rectal cancer (JCOG0212): results from a multicentre, randomised controlled, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Oncol 13:616–621PubMedCrossRef Fujita S, Akasu T, Mizusawa J, Saito N, Kinugasa Y, Kanemitsu Y et al (2012) Postoperative morbidity and mortality after mesorectal excision with and without lateral lymph node dissection for clinical stage II or stage III lower rectal cancer (JCOG0212): results from a multicentre, randomised controlled, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Oncol 13:616–621PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Park JS, Choi GS, Lim KH, Jang YS, Jun SH (2010) Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic surgery for low rectal cancer: case-matched analysis of short-term outcomes. Ann Surg Oncol 17:3195–3202PubMedCrossRef Park JS, Choi GS, Lim KH, Jang YS, Jun SH (2010) Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic surgery for low rectal cancer: case-matched analysis of short-term outcomes. Ann Surg Oncol 17:3195–3202PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Shiomi A, Ito M, Saito N, Hirai T, Ohue M, Kubo Y et al (2011) The indications for a diverting stoma in low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a prospective multicentre study of 222 patients from Japanese cancer centers. Color Dis Off J Assoc Coloproctology G B Irel 13:1384–1389 Shiomi A, Ito M, Saito N, Hirai T, Ohue M, Kubo Y et al (2011) The indications for a diverting stoma in low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a prospective multicentre study of 222 patients from Japanese cancer centers. Color Dis Off J Assoc Coloproctology G B Irel 13:1384–1389
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Kwak JM, Kim SH, Kim J, Son DN, Baek SJ, Cho JS (2011) Robotic vs laparoscopic resection of rectal cancer: short-term outcomes of a case–control study. Dis Colon Rectum 54:151–156PubMedCrossRef Kwak JM, Kim SH, Kim J, Son DN, Baek SJ, Cho JS (2011) Robotic vs laparoscopic resection of rectal cancer: short-term outcomes of a case–control study. Dis Colon Rectum 54:151–156PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Baik SH, Kwon HY, Kim JS, Hur H, Sohn SK, Cho CH et al (2009) Robotic versus laparoscopic low anterior resection of rectal cancer: short-term outcome of a prospective comparative study. Ann Surg Oncol 16:1480–1487PubMedCrossRef Baik SH, Kwon HY, Kim JS, Hur H, Sohn SK, Cho CH et al (2009) Robotic versus laparoscopic low anterior resection of rectal cancer: short-term outcome of a prospective comparative study. Ann Surg Oncol 16:1480–1487PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Akasu T, Sugihara K, Moriya Y (2009) Male urinary and sexual functions after mesorectal excision alone or in combination with extended lateral pelvic lymph node dissection for rectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 16:2779–2786PubMedCrossRef Akasu T, Sugihara K, Moriya Y (2009) Male urinary and sexual functions after mesorectal excision alone or in combination with extended lateral pelvic lymph node dissection for rectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 16:2779–2786PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Akiyoshi T, Kuroyanagi H, Oya M, Konishi T, Fukuda M, Fujimoto Y et al (2009) Factors affecting the difficulty of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with double stapling technique anastomosis for low rectal cancer. Surgery 146:483–489PubMedCrossRef Akiyoshi T, Kuroyanagi H, Oya M, Konishi T, Fukuda M, Fujimoto Y et al (2009) Factors affecting the difficulty of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with double stapling technique anastomosis for low rectal cancer. Surgery 146:483–489PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Quirke P, Durdey P, Dixon MF, Williams NS (1986) Local recurrence of rectal adenocarcinoma due to inadequate surgical resection. Histopathological study of lateral tumour spread and surgical excision. Lancet 2:996–999PubMedCrossRef Quirke P, Durdey P, Dixon MF, Williams NS (1986) Local recurrence of rectal adenocarcinoma due to inadequate surgical resection. Histopathological study of lateral tumour spread and surgical excision. Lancet 2:996–999PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Robot-assisted rectal cancer surgery: short-term outcomes for 113 consecutive patients
verfasst von
Akio Shiomi
Yusuke Kinugasa
Tomohiro Yamaguchi
Hiroyuki Tomioka
Hiroyasu Kagawa
Publikationsdatum
01.09.2014
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
International Journal of Colorectal Disease / Ausgabe 9/2014
Print ISSN: 0179-1958
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1262
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-014-1921-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 9/2014

International Journal of Colorectal Disease 9/2014 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.