Skip to main content
Erschienen in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease 1/2016

01.01.2016 | Original Article

Risk factors for anastomotic leak and postoperative morbidity and mortality after elective right colectomy for cancer: results from a prospective, multicentric study of 1102 patients

verfasst von: Matteo Frasson, Pablo Granero-Castro, José Luis Ramos Rodríguez, Blas Flor-Lorente, Mariela Braithwaite, Eva Martí Martínez, Jose Antonio Álvarez Pérez, Antonio Codina Cazador, Alejandro Espí, Eduardo Garcia-Granero, ANACO Study Group

Erschienen in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease | Ausgabe 1/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Studies focused on postoperative outcome after oncologic right colectomy are lacking. The main objective was to determine pre-/intraoperative risk factors for anastomotic leak after elective right colon resection for cancer. Secondary objectives were to determine risk factors for postoperative morbidity and mortality.

Methods

Fifty-two hospitals participated in this prospective, observational study (September 2011–September 2012), including 1102 patients that underwent elective right colectomy. Forty-two pre-/intraoperative variables, related to patient, tumor, surgical procedure, and hospital, were analyzed as potential independent risk factors for anastomotic leak and postoperative morbidity and mortality.

Results

Anastomotic leak was diagnosed in 93 patients (8.4 %), and 72 (6.5 %) of them needed radiological or surgical intervention. Morbidity, mortality, and wound infection rates were 29.0, 2.6, and 13.4 %, respectively. Preoperative serum protein concentration was the only independent risk factor for anastomotic leak (p < 0.0001, OR 0.6 per g/dL). When considering only clinically relevant anastomotic leaks, stapled technique (p = 0.03, OR 2.1) and preoperative serum protein concentration (p = 0.004, OR 0.6 g/dL) were identified as the only two independent risk factors. Age and preoperative serum albumin concentration resulted to be risk factors for postoperative mortality. Male gender, pulmonary or hepatic disease, and open surgical approach were identified as risk factors for postoperative morbidity, while male gender, obesity, intraoperative complication, and end-to-end anastomosis were risk factors for wound infection.

Conclusions

Preoperative nutritional status and the stapled anastomotic technique were the only independent risk factors for clinically relevant anastomotic leak after elective right colectomy for cancer. Age and preoperative nutritional status determined the mortality risk, while laparoscopic approach reduced postoperative morbidity.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Choi HK, Law WL, Ho JW (2006) Leakage after resection and intraperitoneal anastomosis for colorectal malignancy: analysis of risk factors. Dis Colon Rectum 49:1719–1725PubMedCrossRef Choi HK, Law WL, Ho JW (2006) Leakage after resection and intraperitoneal anastomosis for colorectal malignancy: analysis of risk factors. Dis Colon Rectum 49:1719–1725PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Sørensen LT, Jørgensen T, Kirkeby LT et al (1999) Smoking and alcohol abuse are major risk factors for anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 86:927–931PubMedCrossRef Sørensen LT, Jørgensen T, Kirkeby LT et al (1999) Smoking and alcohol abuse are major risk factors for anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 86:927–931PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Veyrie N, Ata T, Muscari F, Couchard AC, Msika S, Hay JM, Fingerhut A, Dziri C, French Associations for Surgical Research (2007) Anastomotic leakage after elective right versus left colectomy for cancer: prevalence and independent risk factors. J Am Coll Surg 205:785–793PubMedCrossRef Veyrie N, Ata T, Muscari F, Couchard AC, Msika S, Hay JM, Fingerhut A, Dziri C, French Associations for Surgical Research (2007) Anastomotic leakage after elective right versus left colectomy for cancer: prevalence and independent risk factors. J Am Coll Surg 205:785–793PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Anwar S, Hughes S, Eadie AJ, Scott NA (2004) Anastomotic technique and survival after right hemicolectomy for colorectal cancer. Surgeon 2:277–280PubMedCrossRef Anwar S, Hughes S, Eadie AJ, Scott NA (2004) Anastomotic technique and survival after right hemicolectomy for colorectal cancer. Surgeon 2:277–280PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Braga M, Frasson M, Vignali A, Zuliani W, Di Carlo V (2007) Open right colectomy is still effective compared to laparoscopy: results of a randomized trial. Ann Surg 246:1010–1014PubMedCrossRef Braga M, Frasson M, Vignali A, Zuliani W, Di Carlo V (2007) Open right colectomy is still effective compared to laparoscopy: results of a randomized trial. Ann Surg 246:1010–1014PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Bakker IS, Grossmann I, Henneman D, Havenga K, Wiggers T (2014) Risk factors for anastomotic leakage and leak-related mortality after colonic cancer surgery in a nationwide audit. Br J Surg 101:424–432PubMedCrossRef Bakker IS, Grossmann I, Henneman D, Havenga K, Wiggers T (2014) Risk factors for anastomotic leakage and leak-related mortality after colonic cancer surgery in a nationwide audit. Br J Surg 101:424–432PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Masoomi H, Buchberg B, Dang P et al (2011) Outcomes of right vs. left colectomy for colon cancer. J Gastrointest Surg 15:2023–2028PubMedCrossRef Masoomi H, Buchberg B, Dang P et al (2011) Outcomes of right vs. left colectomy for colon cancer. J Gastrointest Surg 15:2023–2028PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Choy PY, Bissett IP, Docherty JG, Parry BR, Merrie A, Fitzgerald A (2011) Stapled versus handsewn methods for ileocolic anastomoses. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 9, CD004320PubMed Choy PY, Bissett IP, Docherty JG, Parry BR, Merrie A, Fitzgerald A (2011) Stapled versus handsewn methods for ileocolic anastomoses. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 9, CD004320PubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Baker RP, Titu LV, Hartley JE, Lee PW, Monson JR (2004) A case-control study of laparoscopic right hemicolectomy vs. open right hemicolectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 47:1675–1679PubMedCrossRef Baker RP, Titu LV, Hartley JE, Lee PW, Monson JR (2004) A case-control study of laparoscopic right hemicolectomy vs. open right hemicolectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 47:1675–1679PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Gianotti L, Braga M, Nespoli L et al (2002) A randomized controlled trial of preoperative oral supplementation with a specialized diet in patients with gastrointestinal cancer. Gastroenterology 122:1763–1770PubMedCrossRef Gianotti L, Braga M, Nespoli L et al (2002) A randomized controlled trial of preoperative oral supplementation with a specialized diet in patients with gastrointestinal cancer. Gastroenterology 122:1763–1770PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Hüser N, Michalski CW, Erkan M et al (2008) Systematic review and meta-analysis of the role of defunctioning stoma in low rectal cancer surgery. Ann Surg 248:52–60PubMedCrossRef Hüser N, Michalski CW, Erkan M et al (2008) Systematic review and meta-analysis of the role of defunctioning stoma in low rectal cancer surgery. Ann Surg 248:52–60PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Frasson M, Flor-Lorente B, Ramos Rodríguez JL, Granero-Castro P, Hervás D, Alvarez Rico MA, Brao MJ, Sánchez González JM, Garcia-Granero E, ANACO Study Group (2015) Risk factors for anastomotic leak after colon resection for cancer: multivariate analysis and nomogram from a multicentric, prospective, national study with 3193 patients. Ann Surg 262:321–330PubMedCrossRef Frasson M, Flor-Lorente B, Ramos Rodríguez JL, Granero-Castro P, Hervás D, Alvarez Rico MA, Brao MJ, Sánchez González JM, Garcia-Granero E, ANACO Study Group (2015) Risk factors for anastomotic leak after colon resection for cancer: multivariate analysis and nomogram from a multicentric, prospective, national study with 3193 patients. Ann Surg 262:321–330PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Peel AL, Taylor EW (1991) Proposed definitions for the audit of postoperative infection: a discussion paper. Surgical Infection Study group. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 73:385–388PubMedPubMedCentral Peel AL, Taylor EW (1991) Proposed definitions for the audit of postoperative infection: a discussion paper. Surgical Infection Study group. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 73:385–388PubMedPubMedCentral
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD, de Santibañes E, Pekolj J, Slankamenac K, Bassi C, Graf R, Vonlanthen R, Padbury R, Cameron JL, Makuuchi M (2009) The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 250:187–196PubMedCrossRef Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD, de Santibañes E, Pekolj J, Slankamenac K, Bassi C, Graf R, Vonlanthen R, Padbury R, Cameron JL, Makuuchi M (2009) The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 250:187–196PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M et al (2007) The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet 370:1453–1457CrossRef Von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M et al (2007) The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet 370:1453–1457CrossRef
17.
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Telem DA, Chin EH, Nguyen SQ et al (2010) Risk factors for anastomotic leak following colorectal surgery: a case-control study. Arch Surg 145:371–376PubMedCrossRef Telem DA, Chin EH, Nguyen SQ et al (2010) Risk factors for anastomotic leak following colorectal surgery: a case-control study. Arch Surg 145:371–376PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Mäkelä JT, Kiviniemi H, Laitinen S (2003) Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after left-sided colorectal resection with rectal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 46:653–660PubMedCrossRef Mäkelä JT, Kiviniemi H, Laitinen S (2003) Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after left-sided colorectal resection with rectal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 46:653–660PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Golub R, Golub RW, Cantu R Jr et al (1997) A multivariate analysis of factors contributing to leakage of intestinal anastomoses. J Am Coll Surg 184:364–372PubMed Golub R, Golub RW, Cantu R Jr et al (1997) A multivariate analysis of factors contributing to leakage of intestinal anastomoses. J Am Coll Surg 184:364–372PubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Iancu C, Mocan LC, Todea-Iancu D et al (2008) Host-related predictive factors for anastomotic leakage following large bowel resections for colorectal cancer. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis 17:299–303PubMed Iancu C, Mocan LC, Todea-Iancu D et al (2008) Host-related predictive factors for anastomotic leakage following large bowel resections for colorectal cancer. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis 17:299–303PubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Akbarshahi H, Andersson B, Nordén M et al (2008) Perioperative nutrition in elective gastrointestinal surgery—potential for improvement? Dig Surg 25:165–174PubMedCrossRef Akbarshahi H, Andersson B, Nordén M et al (2008) Perioperative nutrition in elective gastrointestinal surgery—potential for improvement? Dig Surg 25:165–174PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Docherty JG, McGregor JR, Akyol AM, Murray GD, Galloway DJ, West of Scotland and Highland Anastomosis Study Group (1995) Comparison of manually constructed and stapled anastomoses in colorectal surgery. Ann Surg 221:176–184PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Docherty JG, McGregor JR, Akyol AM, Murray GD, Galloway DJ, West of Scotland and Highland Anastomosis Study Group (1995) Comparison of manually constructed and stapled anastomoses in colorectal surgery. Ann Surg 221:176–184PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Kracht M, Hay J-M, Fagniez P-L, Fingerhut A (1993) Ileocolonic anastomosis after right hemicolectomy for carcinoma: stapled or hand-sewn? Int J Color Dis 8:29–33CrossRef Kracht M, Hay J-M, Fagniez P-L, Fingerhut A (1993) Ileocolonic anastomosis after right hemicolectomy for carcinoma: stapled or hand-sewn? Int J Color Dis 8:29–33CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat MacRae HM, McLeod RS (1998) Handsewn vs. stapled anastomoses in colon and rectal surgery: a meta-analysis. Dis Colon Rectum 41(2):180–189PubMedCrossRef MacRae HM, McLeod RS (1998) Handsewn vs. stapled anastomoses in colon and rectal surgery: a meta-analysis. Dis Colon Rectum 41(2):180–189PubMedCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Simillis C, Purkayastha S, Yamamoto T, Strong SA, Darzi AW, Tekkis PP (2007) A meta-analysis comparing conventional end-to-end anastomosis vs. other anastomotic configurations after resection in Crohn’s disease. Dis Colon Rectum 50:1674–1687PubMedCrossRef Simillis C, Purkayastha S, Yamamoto T, Strong SA, Darzi AW, Tekkis PP (2007) A meta-analysis comparing conventional end-to-end anastomosis vs. other anastomotic configurations after resection in Crohn’s disease. Dis Colon Rectum 50:1674–1687PubMedCrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Marinello FG, Baguena G, Lucas E, Frasson M, Hervas D, Flor-Lorente B, Esclapez P, Espí A, Garcia Granero E (2015) Anastomotic leaks after colon cancer resections: does the individual surgeon matter?. Colorectal Dis in press Marinello FG, Baguena G, Lucas E, Frasson M, Hervas D, Flor-Lorente B, Esclapez P, Espí A, Garcia Granero E (2015) Anastomotic leaks after colon cancer resections: does the individual surgeon matter?. Colorectal Dis in press
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Panis Y, Maggiori L, Caranhac G, Bretagnol F, Vicaut E (2011) Mortality after colorectal cancer surgery: a French survey of more than 84,000 patients. Ann Surg 254:738–743PubMedCrossRef Panis Y, Maggiori L, Caranhac G, Bretagnol F, Vicaut E (2011) Mortality after colorectal cancer surgery: a French survey of more than 84,000 patients. Ann Surg 254:738–743PubMedCrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Alves A, Panis Y, Mathieu P, Mantion G, Kwiatkowski F, Slim K, Association Française de Chirurgie (2005) Postoperative mortality and morbidity in French patients undergoing colorectal surgery: results of a prospective multicenter study. Arch Surg 140:278–283PubMedCrossRef Alves A, Panis Y, Mathieu P, Mantion G, Kwiatkowski F, Slim K, Association Française de Chirurgie (2005) Postoperative mortality and morbidity in French patients undergoing colorectal surgery: results of a prospective multicenter study. Arch Surg 140:278–283PubMedCrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Tekkis PP, Kessaris N, Kocher HM, Poloniecki JD, Lyttle J, Windsor AC (2003) Evaluation of POSSUM and P-POSSUM scoring systems in patients undergoing colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 90:340–345PubMedCrossRef Tekkis PP, Kessaris N, Kocher HM, Poloniecki JD, Lyttle J, Windsor AC (2003) Evaluation of POSSUM and P-POSSUM scoring systems in patients undergoing colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 90:340–345PubMedCrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Leung E, McArdle K, Wong LS (2011) Risk-adjusted scoring systems in colorectal surgery. Int J Surg 9:130–135PubMedCrossRef Leung E, McArdle K, Wong LS (2011) Risk-adjusted scoring systems in colorectal surgery. Int J Surg 9:130–135PubMedCrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Braga M, Vignali A, Zuliani W, Frasson M, Di Serio C, Di Carlo V (2005) Laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery: cost-benefit analysis in a single-center randomized trial. Ann Surg 242:890–895PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Braga M, Vignali A, Zuliani W, Frasson M, Di Serio C, Di Carlo V (2005) Laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery: cost-benefit analysis in a single-center randomized trial. Ann Surg 242:890–895PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Lacy AM, García-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S, Castells A, Taurá P, Piqué JM, Visa J (2002) Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet 359:2224–2229PubMedCrossRef Lacy AM, García-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S, Castells A, Taurá P, Piqué JM, Visa J (2002) Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet 359:2224–2229PubMedCrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Abraham NS, Byrne CM, Young JM, Solomon MJ (2007) Meta-analysis of non-randomized comparative studies of the short-term outcomes of laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer. ANZ J Surg 77:508–516PubMedCrossRef Abraham NS, Byrne CM, Young JM, Solomon MJ (2007) Meta-analysis of non-randomized comparative studies of the short-term outcomes of laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer. ANZ J Surg 77:508–516PubMedCrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WC, Jeekel J, Kazemier G, Bonjer HJ, Haglind E, Påhlman L, Cuesta MA, Msika S, Morino M, Lacy AM, COlon cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection Study Group (COLOR) (2005) Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 6:477–484PubMedCrossRef Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WC, Jeekel J, Kazemier G, Bonjer HJ, Haglind E, Påhlman L, Cuesta MA, Msika S, Morino M, Lacy AM, COlon cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection Study Group (COLOR) (2005) Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 6:477–484PubMedCrossRef
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 350:2050–2059CrossRef Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 350:2050–2059CrossRef
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, Walker J, Jayne DG, Smith AM, Heath RM, Brown JM, MRC CLASICC trial group (2005) Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 365:1718–1726PubMedCrossRef Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, Walker J, Jayne DG, Smith AM, Heath RM, Brown JM, MRC CLASICC trial group (2005) Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 365:1718–1726PubMedCrossRef
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Bertelsen CA, Neuenschwander AU, Jansen JE et al (2015) Disease-free survival after complete mesocolic excision compared with conventional colon cancer surgery: a retrospective, population-based study. Lancet Oncol 16:161–168PubMedCrossRef Bertelsen CA, Neuenschwander AU, Jansen JE et al (2015) Disease-free survival after complete mesocolic excision compared with conventional colon cancer surgery: a retrospective, population-based study. Lancet Oncol 16:161–168PubMedCrossRef
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Kontovounisios C, Kinross J, Tan E, Brown G, Rasheed S, Tekkis P (2015) Complete mesocolic excision in colorectal cancer: a systematic review. Color Dis 17:7–16CrossRef Kontovounisios C, Kinross J, Tan E, Brown G, Rasheed S, Tekkis P (2015) Complete mesocolic excision in colorectal cancer: a systematic review. Color Dis 17:7–16CrossRef
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Rodriguez-Cuellar E, Nevado García C, Casanova Duran V, Romero Simó M, Duran Poveda M, Ruiz LP (2014) Analysis of the quality of care in surgical treatment of colorectal cancer: national study. Follow-up results. Cir Esp 92:410–414PubMedCrossRef Rodriguez-Cuellar E, Nevado García C, Casanova Duran V, Romero Simó M, Duran Poveda M, Ruiz LP (2014) Analysis of the quality of care in surgical treatment of colorectal cancer: national study. Follow-up results. Cir Esp 92:410–414PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Risk factors for anastomotic leak and postoperative morbidity and mortality after elective right colectomy for cancer: results from a prospective, multicentric study of 1102 patients
verfasst von
Matteo Frasson
Pablo Granero-Castro
José Luis Ramos Rodríguez
Blas Flor-Lorente
Mariela Braithwaite
Eva Martí Martínez
Jose Antonio Álvarez Pérez
Antonio Codina Cazador
Alejandro Espí
Eduardo Garcia-Granero
ANACO Study Group
Publikationsdatum
01.01.2016
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
International Journal of Colorectal Disease / Ausgabe 1/2016
Print ISSN: 0179-1958
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1262
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-015-2376-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2016

International Journal of Colorectal Disease 1/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.