Skip to main content
Erschienen in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease 3/2016

01.03.2016 | Original Article

Management of postoperative bladder emptying after proctectomy in men for rectal cancer. A retrospective study of 190 consecutive patients

verfasst von: Cécile Bouchet-Doumenq, Jérémie H. Lefevre, Malika Bennis, Najim Chafai, Emmanuel Tiret, Yann Parc

Erschienen in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease | Ausgabe 3/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

Evaluation of urinary drainage after rectal resection and identification of criteria associated with postoperative urinary dysfunction (UD). UD remains a clinical problem for up to two thirds of patients after rectal resection. Currently, there are no guidelines concerning duration or type of drainage.

Methods

One hundred ninety consecutive rectal resections (abdomino-perineal resection (APR = 47), mechanical coloanal anastomosis (MechCAA = 48), manual coloanal anastomosis (ManCAA = 47), colorectal anastomosis (CRA = 48)) in male patients were included. In patients with a transurethral catheterization (TUC), the drainage was removed at day 5. Patients with a suprapubic catheterization (SPC) underwent drainage removal according to the results of a clamping test at day 5. UD was defined as drainage removal after day 6 and/or acute urinary retention (AUR).

Results

Drainage types were SPC (n = 136, 72 %) and TUC (n = 54, 28 %). SPC was used more frequently after total mesorectal excision (TME) (APR, ManCAA, MechCAA) (83–92 %). Complications rates of SPC and TUC were 20 and 9 %. The clamping test was positive for 61 patients (48 %), and SPC was removed before/on POD6 without any episode of AUR. After TUC removal, two patients (4 %) had AUR. Seventy-two (38 %) patients had UD: 11 (6 %) were discharged with an indwelling catheter, and in 61 (32 %), the catheter was removed after day6. Three independent factors were associated with UD: diabetes (OR = 2.9 (1.2–7.7)), urological history (OR = 2.9 (1.2–7.6)), and TME (OR = 5.2 (2.3–13.5)).

Conclusion

The UD rate after surgery for rectal cancer was 38 %. The clamping test is accurate to prevent AUR after SPC removal. The three risk factors may serve to select good candidates for early catheter removal.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Alfonsi P, Slim K, Chauvin M et al (2014) French guidelines for enhanced recovery after elective colorectal surgery. J Visc Surg 151:65–79CrossRefPubMed Alfonsi P, Slim K, Chauvin M et al (2014) French guidelines for enhanced recovery after elective colorectal surgery. J Visc Surg 151:65–79CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Beaussier M, El’ayoubi H, Schiffer E et al (2007) Continuous preperitoneal infusion of ropivacaine provides effective analgesia and accelerates recovery after colorectal surgery: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Anesthesiology 107:461–468CrossRefPubMed Beaussier M, El’ayoubi H, Schiffer E et al (2007) Continuous preperitoneal infusion of ropivacaine provides effective analgesia and accelerates recovery after colorectal surgery: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Anesthesiology 107:461–468CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Bennis M, Parc Y, Lefevre JH et al (2012) Morbidity risk factors after low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision and coloanal anastomosis: a retrospective series of 483 patients. Ann Surg 255:504–510CrossRefPubMed Bennis M, Parc Y, Lefevre JH et al (2012) Morbidity risk factors after low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision and coloanal anastomosis: a retrospective series of 483 patients. Ann Surg 255:504–510CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Benoist S, Panis Y, Denet C et al (1999) Optimal duration of urinary drainage after rectal resection: a randomized controlled trial. Surgery 125:135–141CrossRefPubMed Benoist S, Panis Y, Denet C et al (1999) Optimal duration of urinary drainage after rectal resection: a randomized controlled trial. Surgery 125:135–141CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Burgos FJ, Romero J, Fernandez E et al (1988) Risk factors for developing voiding dysfunction after abdominoperineal resection for adenocarcinoma of the rectum. Dis Colon Rectum 31:682–685CrossRefPubMed Burgos FJ, Romero J, Fernandez E et al (1988) Risk factors for developing voiding dysfunction after abdominoperineal resection for adenocarcinoma of the rectum. Dis Colon Rectum 31:682–685CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Changchien CR, Yeh CY, Huang ST et al (2007) Postoperative urinary retention after primary colorectal cancer resection via laparotomy: a prospective study of 2,355 consecutive patients. Dis Colon Rectum 50:1688–1696CrossRefPubMed Changchien CR, Yeh CY, Huang ST et al (2007) Postoperative urinary retention after primary colorectal cancer resection via laparotomy: a prospective study of 2,355 consecutive patients. Dis Colon Rectum 50:1688–1696CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Chaudhri S, Maruthachalam K, Kaiser A et al (2006) Successful voiding after trial without catheter is not synonymous with recovery of bladder function after colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 49:1066–1070CrossRefPubMed Chaudhri S, Maruthachalam K, Kaiser A et al (2006) Successful voiding after trial without catheter is not synonymous with recovery of bladder function after colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 49:1066–1070CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Doeksen A, Gooszen JA, Van Duijvendijk P et al (2011) Sexual and urinary functioning after rectal surgery: a prospective comparative study with a median follow-up of 8.5 years. Int J Color Dis 26:1549–1557CrossRef Doeksen A, Gooszen JA, Van Duijvendijk P et al (2011) Sexual and urinary functioning after rectal surgery: a prospective comparative study with a median follow-up of 8.5 years. Int J Color Dis 26:1549–1557CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Gerstenberg TC, Nielsen ML, Clausen S et al (1980) Bladder function after abdominoperineal resection of the rectum for anorectal cancer. Urodynamic investigation before and after operative in a consecutive series. Ann Surg 191:81–86CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Gerstenberg TC, Nielsen ML, Clausen S et al (1980) Bladder function after abdominoperineal resection of the rectum for anorectal cancer. Urodynamic investigation before and after operative in a consecutive series. Ann Surg 191:81–86CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Heald RJ (1995) Total mesorectal excision is optimal surgery for rectal cancer: a Scandinavian consensus. Br J Surg 82:1297–1299CrossRefPubMed Heald RJ (1995) Total mesorectal excision is optimal surgery for rectal cancer: a Scandinavian consensus. Br J Surg 82:1297–1299CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Jahn P, Beutner K, Langer G (2012) Types of indwelling urinary catheters for long-term bladder drainage in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 10:CD004997PubMed Jahn P, Beutner K, Langer G (2012) Types of indwelling urinary catheters for long-term bladder drainage in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 10:CD004997PubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Katsumi HK, Kalisvaart JF, Ronningen LD et al (2010) Urethral versus suprapubic catheter: choosing the best bladder management for male spinal cord injury patients with indwelling catheters. Spinal Cord 48:325–329CrossRefPubMed Katsumi HK, Kalisvaart JF, Ronningen LD et al (2010) Urethral versus suprapubic catheter: choosing the best bladder management for male spinal cord injury patients with indwelling catheters. Spinal Cord 48:325–329CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee SY, Kang SB, Kim DW et al (2015) Risk factors and preventive measures for acute urinary retention after rectal cancer surgery. World J Surg 39:275–282CrossRefPubMed Lee SY, Kang SB, Kim DW et al (2015) Risk factors and preventive measures for acute urinary retention after rectal cancer surgery. World J Surg 39:275–282CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Lim RS, Yang TX, Chua TC (2014) Postoperative bladder and sexual function in patients undergoing surgery for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus open resection of rectal cancer. Tech Coloproctol 18:993–1002CrossRefPubMed Lim RS, Yang TX, Chua TC (2014) Postoperative bladder and sexual function in patients undergoing surgery for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus open resection of rectal cancer. Tech Coloproctol 18:993–1002CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Maas CP, Moriya Y, Steup WH et al (1998) Radical and nerve-preserving surgery for rectal cancer in The Netherlands: a prospective study on morbidity and functional outcome. Br J Surg 85:92–97CrossRefPubMed Maas CP, Moriya Y, Steup WH et al (1998) Radical and nerve-preserving surgery for rectal cancer in The Netherlands: a prospective study on morbidity and functional outcome. Br J Surg 85:92–97CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat O’kelly TJ, Mathew A, Ross S et al (1995) Optimum method for urinary drainage in major abdominal surgery: a prospective randomized trial of suprapubic versus urethral catheterization. Br J Surg 82:1367–1368CrossRefPubMed O’kelly TJ, Mathew A, Ross S et al (1995) Optimum method for urinary drainage in major abdominal surgery: a prospective randomized trial of suprapubic versus urethral catheterization. Br J Surg 82:1367–1368CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Pocard M, Zinzindohoue F, Haab F et al (2002) A prospective study of sexual and urinary function before and after total mesorectal excision with autonomic nerve preservation for rectal cancer. Surgery 131:368–372CrossRefPubMed Pocard M, Zinzindohoue F, Haab F et al (2002) A prospective study of sexual and urinary function before and after total mesorectal excision with autonomic nerve preservation for rectal cancer. Surgery 131:368–372CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Ratnaval CD, Renwick P, Farouk R et al (1996) Suprapubic versus transurethral catheterisation of males undergoing pelvic colorectal surgery. Int J Color Dis 11:177–179CrossRef Ratnaval CD, Renwick P, Farouk R et al (1996) Suprapubic versus transurethral catheterisation of males undergoing pelvic colorectal surgery. Int J Color Dis 11:177–179CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Regenbogen SE, Read TE, Roberts PL et al (2011) Urinary tract infection after colon and rectal resections: more common than predicted by risk-adjustment models. J Am Coll Surg 213:784–792CrossRefPubMed Regenbogen SE, Read TE, Roberts PL et al (2011) Urinary tract infection after colon and rectal resections: more common than predicted by risk-adjustment models. J Am Coll Surg 213:784–792CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Sethia KK, Selkon JB, Berry AR et al (1987) Prospective randomized controlled trial of urethral versus suprapubic catheterization. Br J Surg 74:624–625CrossRefPubMed Sethia KK, Selkon JB, Berry AR et al (1987) Prospective randomized controlled trial of urethral versus suprapubic catheterization. Br J Surg 74:624–625CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Vandoni RE, Lironi A, Tschantz P (1994) Bacteriuria during urinary tract catheterization: suprapubic versus urethral route: a prospective randomized trial. Acta Chir Belg 94:12–16PubMed Vandoni RE, Lironi A, Tschantz P (1994) Bacteriuria during urinary tract catheterization: suprapubic versus urethral route: a prospective randomized trial. Acta Chir Belg 94:12–16PubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Zmora O, Madbouly K, Tulchinsky H et al (2010) Urinary bladder catheter drainage following pelvic surgery—is it necessary for that long? Dis Colon Rectum 53:321–326CrossRefPubMed Zmora O, Madbouly K, Tulchinsky H et al (2010) Urinary bladder catheter drainage following pelvic surgery—is it necessary for that long? Dis Colon Rectum 53:321–326CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Management of postoperative bladder emptying after proctectomy in men for rectal cancer. A retrospective study of 190 consecutive patients
verfasst von
Cécile Bouchet-Doumenq
Jérémie H. Lefevre
Malika Bennis
Najim Chafai
Emmanuel Tiret
Yann Parc
Publikationsdatum
01.03.2016
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
International Journal of Colorectal Disease / Ausgabe 3/2016
Print ISSN: 0179-1958
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1262
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-015-2471-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2016

International Journal of Colorectal Disease 3/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.