Skip to main content
Log in

Neugebrauch von Benzodiazepinen und das Risiko einer proximalen Femurfraktur

Eine Case-crossover-Studie

New use of benzodiazepines and the risk of hip fracture: A case-crossover study

  • ORIGINALARBEIT
  • Published:
Zeitschrift für Gerontologie und Geriatrie Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Benzodiazepine scheinen mit einer erhöhten Inzidenz proximaler Femurfrakturen assoziiert zu sein. Ihre Rolle als zeitabhängiger Risikofaktor bleibt unklar. Diese Case-crossover-Studie wurde durchgeführt, um zu prüfen, ob der Neugebrauch von Benzodiazepinen mit einer Steigerung des Risikos proximaler Femurfrakturen assoziiert ist. Hierzu wurden die Routinedaten der Gmünder Ersatzkasse (GEK) genutzt und in einem Studienzeitraum von 49 Monaten alle Erstereignisse erfasst. Als Indexdatum wurde der Tag der stationären Aufnahme gewählt. Die Exposition zum Neugebrauch von Benzodiazepinen wurde in fünf Perioden vor dem Ereignis verglichen. Von insgesamt 1630 Personen erhielten 223 (13,7%) mindestens eine Benzodiazepinverordnung in den letzten 150 Tagen vor Indexdatum, davon 74 (4,5%) als Erstverordnung. Das Durchschnittsalter des Kollektivs lag bei 79,8 Jahren (SD: 7,7). Das Odds Ratio (OR) einer proximalen Femurfraktur war in den ersten 5 Tagen eines neuen Gebrauchs am höchsten (OR: 3,43; 95% KI 1,15–10,20) und fiel nach 30 Tagen auf nicht signifikante 1,59 (95% KI 0,96–2,63). Zusammenfassend bleibt festzuhalten, dass eine beginnende Benzodiazepintherapie mit einem erhöhten Risiko proximaler Femurfrakturen assoziiert ist. Mit einem populationsattributablen Risiko (PAR) von 0,55% (95% KI 0,05–1,06%) ist der Anteil darauf zurückzuführender Ereignisse allerdings gering.

Summary

Benzodiazepines appear to increase the incidence of hip fractures. Their role as a time-dependent risk factor remains unclear. We therefore conducted a case-crossover study to determine whether the new use of benzodiazepines is associated with a rise in hip fractures. We analysed 49 months of the statutory health insurance Gmünder Ersatzkasse (GEK) and enrolled all first hip fractures. The index date was the day of hospital admission. Exposure to new use of benzodiazepines was compared within the five periods preceding the index date. Out of 1630 subjects, 223 (13.7%) had at least one prescription of benzodiazepines in the preceding 150 days before the index date, 74 (4.5%) of them as a first prescription. The average age of the population was 79.8 years (SD: 7.7). Odds ratio (OR) of hip fracture was highest during the initial 5 days of new use (OR: 3.43; 95% CI 1.15–10.20) and then declined to a non-significant OR of 1.59 (95% CI 0.96–2.63) after 30 days. In conclusion, the start of a new benzodiazepine is associated with an increased risk of hip fractures. However, the population attributable risk (PAR) and, therefore, the percentage of preventable events is small (PAR: 0.55%; 95% CI 0.05–1.06%).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  1. Barlett G, Abrahamowicz M, Tamblyn R, Grad R, Capek R, du Berger R (2004) Longitudinal patterns of new benzodiazepine use in the elderly. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 13(8):669–682

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cumming RG, Le Couteur DG (2003) Benzodiazepines and risk of hip fractures in older people: a review of the evidence. CNS Drugs 7(11):825–837

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fialova D, Topinkova E, Gambassi G et al. For the AdHOC Project Research Group (2005) Potentially inappropriate medication use among elderly home care patients in Europe. JAMA 293(11):1348–1358

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Garbe E, Suissa S (2004) Pharmacoepidemiology. In: Ahrens W, Pigeot I (Eds) Handbook of epidemiology. Springer, Berlin, pp 1225–1266

  5. Herings RM, Stricker BH, de Boer A, Bakker A, Sturmans F (1995) Benzodiazepines and the risk of falling leading to femur fractures. Dosage more important than elimination half-life. Arch Intern Med 155(16):1801–1807

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hoffmann F (2005) Benzodiazepine: Verordnungstrend erkennbar. In: Glaeske G, Janhsen K (Eds) GEK-Arzneimittel-Report 2005. Asgard, St. Augustin, pp 152–170

  7. Kahn HA, Sempos CT (1989) Statistical methods in epidemiology. Oxford University Press, New York

  8. Leipzig RM, Cumming RG, Tinetti ME (1999) Drugs and falls in older people: a systematic review and meta-analysis: I. Psychotropic drugs. J Am Geriatr Soc 47(1):30–39

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Maclure M (1991) The case-crossover design: a method for studying transient effects on the risk of acute events. Am J Epidemiol 133(2):144–153

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Maclure M, Mittleman MA (2000) Should we use a case-crossover design? Annu Rev Public Health 21:193–221

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Madhusoodanan S, Bogunovic OJ (2004) Safety of benzodiazepines in the geriatric population. Expert Opin Drug Saf 3(5):485–493

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Mort JR, Aparasu RR (2002) Prescribing of psychotropics in the elderly: why is it so often inappropriate? CNS Drugs 16(2):99–109

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Neutel CI, Hirdes JP, Maxwell CJ, Patten SB (1996) New evidence on benzodiazepine use and falls: the time factor. Age Ageing 25(4):273–278

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Pierfitte C, Macouillard G, Thicoipe M, Chaslerie A, Pehourcq F, Aissou M, Martinez B, Lagnaoui R, Fourrier A, Begaud B, Dangoumau J, Moore N (2001) Benzodiazepines and hip fractures in elderly people: case-control study. BMJ 322(7288):704–708

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ray WA, Griffin MR, Downey W (1989) Benzodiazepines of long and short elimination half-life and the risk of hip fracture. JAMA 262(23):3303–3307

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. SAS Institute (2001) SAS. Statistical software, Version 8.2. Carry (NC), SAS Institute Inc

  17. Schneeweiss S, Wang PS (2004) Association between SSRI use and hip fractures and the effect of residual confounding bias in claims database studies. J Clin Psychopharmacol 24(6):632–638

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Schneeweiss S, Wang PS (2005) Claims data studies of sedative-hypnotics and hip fractures in older people: exploring residual confounding using survey information. J Am Geriatr Soc 53(6):948–954

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sgadari A, Lapane KL, Mor V, Landi F, Bernabei R, Gambassi G (2000) Oxidative and nonoxidative benzodiazepines and the risk of femur fracture. J Clin Psychopharmacol 20(2):234–239

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Stevens A, Mulrow C (1989) Drugs affecting postural stability and other risk factors in the hip fracture epidemic-case-control study. Community Med 11(1):27–34

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Wagner AK, Zhang F, Soumerai SB, Walker AM, Gurwitz JH, Glynn RJ, Ross-Degnan D (2004) Benzodiazepine use and hip fractures in the elderly: who is at greatest risk? Arch Intern Med 164(14):1567–1572

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Wang PS, Bohn RL, Glynn RJ, Mogun H, Avorn J (2001) Hazardous benzodiazepine regimens in the elderly: effects of half-life, dosage, and duration on risk of hip fracture. Am J Psychiatry 158(6):892–898

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Wolter-Henseler DK (1999) Benzodiazepine: Verordnung, Einnahme, Missbrauch und Abhängigkeit im Alter. Z Gerontopsych Gerontopsychiatr 12(2):115–128

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. Hoffmann.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hoffmann, F., Glaeske, G. Neugebrauch von Benzodiazepinen und das Risiko einer proximalen Femurfraktur. Z Gerontol Geriatr 39, 143–148 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00391-006-0337-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00391-006-0337-y

Schlüsselwörter

Key words

Navigation