Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Clinical Research in Cardiology 8/2018

08.03.2018 | Original Paper

Indication and short-term clinical outcomes of high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention with microaxial Impella® pump: results from the German Impella® registry

verfasst von: Stefan Baumann, Nikos Werner, Karim Ibrahim, Ralf Westenfeld, Fadi Al-Rashid, Jan-Malte Sinning, Dirk Westermann, Andreas Schäfer, Konstantinos Karatolios, Timm Bauer, Tobias Becher, Ibrahim Akin

Erschienen in: Clinical Research in Cardiology | Ausgabe 8/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is an alternative strategy to coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in patients with high perioperative risk. The microaxial Impella® pump (Abiomed, Danvers, MA, USA), used as prophylactic and temporary support, is currently the most common device for “protected high-risk PCI” to ensure hemodynamic stability during complex coronary intervention.

Methods

The study is an observational, retrospective multi-center registry. Patients from nine tertiary hospitals in Germany, who have undergone protected high-risk PCI, are included in the present study.

Results

A total of 154 patients (mean age 72.6–10.8 years, 75.3% male) were enrolled. The majority were at a high operative risk illustrated by a logistic EuroSCORE of 14.7–17.4. The initial SYNTAX score was 32.0–13.3, indicating very complex CAD and could be reduced to 14.1–14.3 (p < 0.0001) after PCI. The main reasons for protected PCI were complex coronary anatomy (70.8%), personal impression (56.5%), reduced ventricular ejection fraction (49.4%), comorbidities (47.4%), and surgical turndown (30.5%). Four patients (2.6%) experienced an intrahospital death.

Conclusions

Data from the study show that protected PCI is a safe and effective approach to revascularize high-risk patients with complex coronary anatomy and comorbidities.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Farooq V, van Klaveren D, Steyerberg EW et al (2013) Anatomical and clinical characteristics to guide decision making between coronary artery bypass surgery and percutaneous coronary intervention for individual patients: development and validation of SYNTAX score II. Lancet 381(9867):639–650CrossRefPubMed Farooq V, van Klaveren D, Steyerberg EW et al (2013) Anatomical and clinical characteristics to guide decision making between coronary artery bypass surgery and percutaneous coronary intervention for individual patients: development and validation of SYNTAX score II. Lancet 381(9867):639–650CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Dangas GD, Kini AS, Sharma SK et al (2014) Impact of hemodynamic support with Impella 2.5 versus intra-aortic balloon pump on prognostically important clinical outcomes in patients undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (from the PROTECT II randomized trial). Am J Cardiol 113(2):222–228CrossRefPubMed Dangas GD, Kini AS, Sharma SK et al (2014) Impact of hemodynamic support with Impella 2.5 versus intra-aortic balloon pump on prognostically important clinical outcomes in patients undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (from the PROTECT II randomized trial). Am J Cardiol 113(2):222–228CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Ferrari M, Kruzliak P, Spiliopoulos K (2015) An insight into short- and long-term mechanical circulatory support systems. Clin Res Cardiol 104(2):95–111CrossRefPubMed Ferrari M, Kruzliak P, Spiliopoulos K (2015) An insight into short- and long-term mechanical circulatory support systems. Clin Res Cardiol 104(2):95–111CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Burzotta F, Trani C, Doshi SN et al (2015) Impella ventricular support in clinical practice: collaborative viewpoint from a European expert user group. Int J Cardiol 201:684–691CrossRefPubMed Burzotta F, Trani C, Doshi SN et al (2015) Impella ventricular support in clinical practice: collaborative viewpoint from a European expert user group. Int J Cardiol 201:684–691CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Sauren LD, Accord RE, Hamzeh K et al (2007) Combined Impella and intra-aortic balloon pump support to improve both ventricular unloading and coronary blood flow for myocardial recovery: an experimental study. Artif Organs 31(11):839–842CrossRefPubMed Sauren LD, Accord RE, Hamzeh K et al (2007) Combined Impella and intra-aortic balloon pump support to improve both ventricular unloading and coronary blood flow for myocardial recovery: an experimental study. Artif Organs 31(11):839–842CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Authors/TaskFm, Windecker S, Kolh P, et al. (2014) 2014 ESC/EACTS guidelines on myocardial revascularization: the task force on myocardial revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS) developed with the special contribution of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI). Eur Heart J 35(37):2541–2619CrossRef Authors/TaskFm, Windecker S, Kolh P, et al. (2014) 2014 ESC/EACTS guidelines on myocardial revascularization: the task force on myocardial revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS) developed with the special contribution of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI). Eur Heart J 35(37):2541–2619CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Sinning JM, Asdonk T, Erlhofer C et al (2013) Combination of angiographic and clinical characteristics for the prediction of clinical outcomes in elderly patients undergoing multivessel PCI. Clin Res Cardiol 102(12):865–873CrossRefPubMed Sinning JM, Asdonk T, Erlhofer C et al (2013) Combination of angiographic and clinical characteristics for the prediction of clinical outcomes in elderly patients undergoing multivessel PCI. Clin Res Cardiol 102(12):865–873CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Bonzel T, Schachinger V, Dorge H (2016) Description of a heart team approach to coronary revascularization and its beneficial long-term effect on clinical events after PCI. Clin Res Cardiol 105(5):388–400CrossRefPubMed Bonzel T, Schachinger V, Dorge H (2016) Description of a heart team approach to coronary revascularization and its beneficial long-term effect on clinical events after PCI. Clin Res Cardiol 105(5):388–400CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat O’Neill WW, Kleiman NS, Moses J et al (2012) A prospective, randomized clinical trial of hemodynamic support with Impella 2.5 versus intra-aortic balloon pump in patients undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention: the PROTECT II study. Circulation 126(14):1717–1727CrossRefPubMed O’Neill WW, Kleiman NS, Moses J et al (2012) A prospective, randomized clinical trial of hemodynamic support with Impella 2.5 versus intra-aortic balloon pump in patients undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention: the PROTECT II study. Circulation 126(14):1717–1727CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Flaherty MP, Pant S, Patel SV et al (2017) Hemodynamic support with a microaxial percutaneous left ventricular assist device (Impella) protects against acute kidney injury in patients undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention. Circ Res 120(4):692–700CrossRefPubMed Flaherty MP, Pant S, Patel SV et al (2017) Hemodynamic support with a microaxial percutaneous left ventricular assist device (Impella) protects against acute kidney injury in patients undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention. Circ Res 120(4):692–700CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Becher T, Baumann S, Eder F et al. Comparison of peri and post-procedural complications in patients undergoing revascularisation of coronary artery multivessel disease by coronary artery bypass grafting or protected percutaneous coronary intervention with the Impella 2.5 device. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2017:2048872617717687 Becher T, Baumann S, Eder F et al. Comparison of peri and post-procedural complications in patients undergoing revascularisation of coronary artery multivessel disease by coronary artery bypass grafting or protected percutaneous coronary intervention with the Impella 2.5 device. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2017:2048872617717687
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Kovacic JC, Nguyen HT, Karajgikar R, Sharma SK, Kini AS (2013) The Impella Recover 2.5 and TandemHeart ventricular assist devices are safe and associated with equivalent clinical outcomes in patients undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 82(1):E28–E37CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kovacic JC, Nguyen HT, Karajgikar R, Sharma SK, Kini AS (2013) The Impella Recover 2.5 and TandemHeart ventricular assist devices are safe and associated with equivalent clinical outcomes in patients undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 82(1):E28–E37CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Venugopal V, Spiro J, Zaphiriou A et al (2015) Percutaneous mechanical ventricular support in acute cardiac care: a UK quaternary centre experience using 2.5L, 3.8L and 5.0L Impella catheters. Cardiol Ther 4(1):47–58CrossRefPubMed Venugopal V, Spiro J, Zaphiriou A et al (2015) Percutaneous mechanical ventricular support in acute cardiac care: a UK quaternary centre experience using 2.5L, 3.8L and 5.0L Impella catheters. Cardiol Ther 4(1):47–58CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Briasoulis A, Telila T, Palla M et al (2016) Meta-analysis of usefulness of percutaneous left ventricular assist devices for high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions. Am J Cardiol 118(3):369–375CrossRefPubMed Briasoulis A, Telila T, Palla M et al (2016) Meta-analysis of usefulness of percutaneous left ventricular assist devices for high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions. Am J Cardiol 118(3):369–375CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Indication and short-term clinical outcomes of high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention with microaxial Impella® pump: results from the German Impella® registry
verfasst von
Stefan Baumann
Nikos Werner
Karim Ibrahim
Ralf Westenfeld
Fadi Al-Rashid
Jan-Malte Sinning
Dirk Westermann
Andreas Schäfer
Konstantinos Karatolios
Timm Bauer
Tobias Becher
Ibrahim Akin
Publikationsdatum
08.03.2018
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Clinical Research in Cardiology / Ausgabe 8/2018
Print ISSN: 1861-0684
Elektronische ISSN: 1861-0692
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-018-1230-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 8/2018

Clinical Research in Cardiology 8/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Update Kardiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.