nach oben

Erschienen in:

03.09.2019 | Review

Expert consensus document on the assessment of the severity of aortic valve stenosis by echocardiography to provide diagnostic conclusiveness by standardized verifiable documentation

verfasst von: Andreas Hagendorff, Fabian Knebel, Andreas Helfen, Jan Knierim, Christoph Sinning, Stephan Stöbe, Wolfgang Fehske, Sebastian Ewen

Erschienen in: Clinical Research in Cardiology | Ausgabe 3/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

According to recent recommendations on echocardiographic assessment of aortic valve stenosis direct measurement of transvalvular peak jet velocity, calculation of transvalvular mean gradient from the velocities using the Bernoulli equation and calculation of the effective aortic valve area by continuity equation are the appropriate primary key instruments for grading severity of aortic valve stenosis. It is obvious that no gold standard can be declared for grading the severity of aortic stenosis. Thus, conclusions of the exclusive evaluation of aortic stenosis by Doppler echocardiography seem to be questionable due to the susceptibility to errors caused by methodological limitations, mathematical simplifications and inappropriate documentation. The present paper will address practical issues of echocardiographic documentation to satisfy the needs to analyze different scenarios of aortic stenosis due to various flow conditions and pressure gradients. Transesophageal and multidimensional echocardiography should be implemented for reliable measurement of geometric aortic valve area and of cardiac dimensions at an early stage of the diagnostic procedure to avoid misinterpretation due to inconsistent results.

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Baumgartner H, Falk V, Bax JJ, De Bonis M, Hamm C, Holm PJ, Iung B, Lancellotti P, Lansac E, Rodriguez Muñoz D, Rosenhek R, Sjögren J, Tornos Mas P, Vahanian A, Walther T, Wendler O, Windecker S, Zamorano JL (2017) 2017 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease. Eur Heart J 38:2739–2791. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehx391 CrossRefPubMed

Baumgartner HC, Hung JC-C, Bermejo J, Chambers JB, Edvardsen T, Goldstein S, Lancellotti P, LeFevre M, Miller F, Otto CM (2017) Recommendations on the echocardiographic assessment of aortic valve stenosis: a focused update from the European association of cardiovascular imaging and the American society of echocardiography. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 18(3):254–275. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jew335 CrossRef

Lang RM, Badano LP, Mor-Avi V, Afilalo J, Armstrong A, Ernande L, Flachskampf FA, Foster E, Goldstein SA, Kuznetsova T, Lancellotti P, Muraru D, Picard MH, Rietzschel ER, Rudski L, Spencer KT, Tsang W, Voigt JU (2015) Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: an update from the American society of echocardiography and the European association of cardiovascular imaging. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 16:233–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2014.10.003 CrossRefPubMed

Mitchell C, Rahko PS, Blauwet LA, Canaday B, Finstuen JA, Foster MC, Horton K, Ogunyankin KO, Palma RA, Velazquez EJ (2019) Guidelines for performing a comprehensive transthoracic echocardiographic examination in adults: recommendations from the American society of echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 32:1–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2018.06.004 CrossRefPubMed

Zoghbi WA, Adams D, Bonow RO, Enriquez-Sarano M, Foster E, Grayburn PA, Hahn RT, Han Y, Hung J, Lang RM, Little SH, Shah DJ, Shernan S, Thavendiranathan P, Thomas JD, Weissman NJ (2017) Recommendations for noninvasive evaluation of native valvular regurgitation: a report from the American society of echocardiography developed in collaboration with the society for cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 30:303–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2017.01.007 CrossRefPubMed

Baumgartner H, Kratzer H, Helmreich G, Kuehn P (1990) Determination of aortic valve area by Doppler echocardiography using the continuity equation: a critical evaluation. Cardiology 77:101–111. https://doi.org/10.1159/000174590 CrossRefPubMed

Griffith MJ, Carey C, Coltart DJ, Jenkins BS, Webb-Peploe MM (1989) Inaccuracies in using aortic valve gradients alone to grade severity of aortic stenosis. Br Heart J 62:372–378. https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.62.5.372 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Harrison MR, Gurley JC, Smith MD, Grayburn PA, DeMaria AN (1988) A practical application of Doppler echocardiography for the assessment of severity of aortic stenosis. Am Heart J 115:622–628CrossRefPubMed

Michelena HI, Margaryan E, Miller FA, Eleid M, Maalouf J, Suri R, Messika-Zeitoun D, Pellikka PA, Enriquez-Sarano M (2013) Inconsistent echocardiographic grading of aortic stenosis: is the left ventricular outflow tract important? Heart 99:921–931. https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2012-302881 CrossRefPubMed

10.

Baumgartner H, Otto CM (2009) Aortic stenosis severity: do we need a new concept? J Am Coll Cardiol 54:1012–1013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2009.05.040 CrossRefPubMed

11.

Iribarne A, Easterwood RM, Bostock IC, McCullough JN (2017) Outcomes with moderate aortic stenosis and impaired left ventricular function: prelude to a randomized trial? J Thorac Dis 9:3529–3532. https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd.2017.09.16 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

12.

Lancellotti P, Magne J, Donal E, Davin L, O'Connor K, Rosca M, Szymanski C, Cosyns B, Piérard LA (2012) Clinical outcome in asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis: insights from the new proposed aortic stenosis grading classification. J Am Coll Cardiol 59:235–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2011.08.072 CrossRefPubMed

13.

Zoghbi WA, Farmer KL, Soto JG, Nelson JG, Quinones MA (1986) Accurate noninvasive quantification of stenotic aortic valve area by Doppler echocardiography. Circulation 73:452–459CrossRefPubMed

14.

Gaede L, Blumenstein J, Liebetrau C, Dörr O, Kim WK, Nef H, Husser O, Gülker J, Elsässer A, Hamm CW, Achenbach S, Möllmann H (2019) Transvascular transcatheter aortic valve implantation in 2017. Clin Res Cardiol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-019-01509-8(Epub ahead of print) CrossRefPubMed

15.

Kim WK, Hamm CW (2018) Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in Germany. Clin Res Cardiol 107(Suppl 2):81–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-018-1297-0 CrossRefPubMed

16.

Frank D, Abdel-Wahab M, Gilard M, Digne F, Souteyrand G, Caussin C, Collart F, Letocart V, Wöhrle J, Kuhn C, Hovorka T, Baumgartner H (2019) Characteristics and outcomes of patients ≤ 75 years who underwent transcatheter aortic valve implantation: insights from the SOURCE 3 registry. Clin Res Cardiol 108(7):763–771. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-018-1404-2PMID: 30552511 CrossRefPubMed

17.

Ito S, Miranda WR, Nkomo VT, Connolly HM, Pislaru SV, Greason KL, Pellikka PA, Lewis BR, Oh JK (2018) Reduced left ventricular ejection fraction in patients with aortic stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 71:1313–1321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2018.01.045 CrossRefPubMed

18.

Kadem L, Dumesnil JG, Rieu R, Durand LG, Garcia D, Pibarot P (2005) Impact of systemic hypertension on the assessment of aortic stenosis. Heart 91(3):354–361. https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.2003.030601 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

19.

Little SH, Chan KL, Burwash IG (2007) Impact of blood pressure on the Doppler echocardiographic assessment of severity of aortic stenosis. Heart 93:848–855. https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.2006.098392 CrossRefPubMed

20.

Gotzmann M, Hauptmann S, Hogeweg M, Choudhury DS, Schiedat F, Dietrich JW, Westhoff TH, Bergbauer M, Mügge A (2019) Hemodynamics of paradoxical severe aortic stenosis: insight from a pressure-volume loop analysis. Clin Res Cardiol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-019-01423-z(Epub ahead of print) CrossRefPubMed

21.

Bach DS (2010) Echo/Doppler evaluation of hemodynamics after aortic valve replacement: principles of interrogation and evaluation of high gradients. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 3:296–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2009.11.009 CrossRefPubMed

22.

Bahlmann E, Cramariuc D, Gerdts E, Gohlke-Baerwolf C, Nienaber CA, Eriksen E, Wachtell K, Chambers J, Kuck KH, Ray S (2010) Impact of pressure recovery on echocardiographic assessment of asymptomatic aortic stenosis: a SEAS substudy. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 3:555–562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2009.11.019 CrossRefPubMed

23.

Baumgartner H, Stefenelli T, Niederberger J, Schima H, Maurer G (1999) "Overestimation" of catheter gradients by Doppler ultrasound in patients with aortic stenosis: a predictable manifestation of pressure recovery. J Am Coll Cardiol 33:1655–1661CrossRefPubMed

24.

Chin CWL, Khaw HJ, Luo E, Tan S, BSc, White AC, Newby DE, Dweck MR, (2014) Echocardiography underestimates stroke volume and aortic valve area: implications for patients with small-area low-gradient aortic stenosis. Can J Cardiol 30:1064–1072. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjca.2014.04.021 CrossRefPubMed

25.

Laskey WK, Kussmaul WG (1994) Pressure recovery in aortic valve stenosis. Circulation 89:116–121CrossRefPubMed

26.

Altiok E, Koos R, Schröder J, Brehmer K, Hamada S, Becker M, Mahnken AH, Almalla M, Dohmen G, Autschbach R, Marx N, Hoffmann R (2011) Comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional imaging techniques for measurement of aortic annulus diameters before transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Heart 97:1578–1584. https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.2011.223974 CrossRefPubMed

27.

Clavel M-A, Malouf J, Messika-Zeitoun D, Araoz PA, Michelena HI, Enriquez-Sarano M (2015) Aortic valve area calculation in aortic stenosis by CT and Doppler echocardiography. JACC 8:248–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2015.01.009 CrossRefPubMed

28.

LaBounty TM, Miyasaka R, Chetcuti S, Grossman PM, Deeb GM, Patel HJ, Booher A, Patel S, Bach DS (2014) Annulus instead of LVOT diameter improves agreement between echocardiography effective orifice area and invasive aortic valve area. JACC 7:1065–1066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2014.03.021 CrossRefPubMed

29.

Leye M, Brochet E, Lepage L, Cueff C, Boutron I, Detaint D, Hyafil F, Iung B, Vahanian A, Messika-Zeitoun D (2009) Size-adjusted left ventricular outflow tract diameter reference values: a safeguard for the evaluation of the severity of aortic stenosis. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 22:445–451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2009.02.007 CrossRefPubMed

30.

Nakai H, Takeuchi M, Yoshitani H, Kaku K, Haruki N, Otsuji Y (2010) Pitfalls of anatomical aortic valve area measurements using two-dimensional transoesophageal echocardiography and the potential of three-dimensional transoesophageal echocardiography. Eur J Echocardiogr 11:369–376. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejechocard/jep220 CrossRefPubMed

31.

Poh KK, Levine RA, Solis J, Shen L, Flaherty M, Kang YJ, Guerrero JL, Hung J (2008) Assessing aortic valve area in aortic stenosis by continuity equation: a novel approach using real-time three-dimensional echocardiography. Eur Heart J 29:2526–2535. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehn022 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

32.

Biner S, Rafique AM, Goykhman P, Morrissey RP, Naghi J, Siegel RJ (2010) Prognostic value of E/E' ratio in patients with unoperated severe aortic stenosis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 3:899–907. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2010.07.005-10 CrossRefPubMed

33.

Melby SJ, Moon MR, Lindman BR, Bailey MS, Hill LL, Damiano RJ Jr (2011) Impact of pulmonary hypertension on outcomes after aortic valve replacement for aortic valve stenosis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 141:1424–1430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.02.028 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

34.

Rader F, Sachdev E, Arsanjani R, Siegel RJ (2015) Left ventricular hypertrophy in valvular aortic stenosis: mechanisms and clinical implications. Am J Med. 128:344–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2014.10.054 CrossRefPubMed

35.

Rosenhek R, Klaar U, Schemper M, Scholten C, Heger M, Gabriel H, Binder T, Maurer G, Baumgartner H (2004) Mild and moderate aortic stenosis. Natural history and risk stratification by echocardiography. Eur Heart J 25:199–205CrossRefPubMed

36.

Zuern CS, Eick C, Rizas K, Stoleriu C, Woernle B, Wildhirt S, Herdeg C, Stock U, Gawaz M, Bauer A (2012) Prognostic value of mild-to-moderate pulmonary hypertension in patients with severe aortic valve stenosis undergoing aortic valve replacement. Clin Res Cardiol 101:81–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-011-0367-3 CrossRefPubMed

37.

Hachicha Z, Dumesnil JG, Pibarot P (2009) Usefulness of the valvuloarterial impedance to predict adverse outcome in asymptomatic aortic stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 54:1003–1011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2009.04.079 CrossRefPubMed

38.

Lancellotti P, Magne J (2011) Valvuloarterial impedance in aortic stenosis: look at the load, but do not forget the flow. Eur J Echocardiogr 12:354–357. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejechocard/jer044 CrossRefPubMed

39.

Hu K, Liu D, Herrmann S, Niemann M, Gaudron PD, Voelker W, Ertl G, Bijnens B, Weidemann F (2013) Clinical implication of mitral annular plane systolic excursion for patients with cardiovascular disease. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 14:205–212. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jes240 CrossRefPubMed

40.

Matos JD, Kiss JE, Locke AH, Goldberg RI, Mukamal K, Manning WJ (2017) Relation of the mitral mitral annular plane systolic excursion to risk for intervention in initially asymptomatic patients with aortic stenosis and preserved systolic function. Am J Cardiol 120(11):2031–2034. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.08.021 CrossRefPubMed

41.

Rydberg E, Gudmundsson P, Kennedy L, Erhardt L, Willenheimer R (2004) Left atrioventricular plane displacement but not left ventricular ejection fraction is influenced by the degree of aortic stenosis. Heart 90(10):1151–1155. https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.2003.020628 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

42.

Weidemann F, Herrmann S, Störk S, Niemann M, Frantz S, Lange V, Beer M, Gattenlöhner S, Voelker W, Ertl G, Strotmann JM (2009) Impact of myocardial fibrosis in patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis. Circulation 120:577–584. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.847772 CrossRefPubMed

43.

Eleid MF, Sorajja P, Michelena HI, Malouf JF, Scott CG, Pellikka PA (2013) Flow-gradient patterns in severe aortic stenosis with preserved ejection fraction: clinical characteristics and predictors of survival. Circulation 128:1781–1789. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.003695 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

44.

Rosenhek R, Zilberszac R, Schemper M, Czerny M, Mundigler G, Graf S, Bergler-Klein J, Grimm M, Gabriel H, Maurer G (2010) Natural history of very severe aortic stenosis. Circulation 121:151–156. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.894170 CrossRefPubMed

45.

Ross J Jr, Braunwald E (1968) Aortic stenosis. Circulation 38(1 Suppl):61–67PubMed

46.

Tribouilloy C, Lévy F, Rusinaru D, Guéret P, Petit-Eisenmann H, Baleynaud S, Jobic Y, Adams C, Lelong B, Pasquet A, Chauvel C, Metz D, Quéré JP, Monin JL (2009) Outcome after aortic valve replacement for low-flow/low-gradient aortic stenosis without contractile reserve on dobutamine stress echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 53:1865–1873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2009.02.026 CrossRefPubMed

47.

Jander N, Minners J, Holme I, Gerdts E, Boman K, Brudi P, Chambers JB, Egstrup K, Kesäniemi YA, Malbecq W, Nienaber CA, Ray S, Rossebø A, Pedersen TR, Skjærpe T, Willenheimer R, Wachtell K, Neumann FJ, Gohlke-Bärwolf C (2011) Outcome of patients with low-gradient "severe" aortic stenosis and preserved ejection fraction. Circulation 123:887–895. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.983510 CrossRefPubMed

48.

Lancellotti P, Magne J, Dulgheru R, Clavel MA, Donal E, Vannan MA, Chambers J, Rosenhek R, Habib G, Lloyd G, Nistri S, Garbi M, Marchetta S, Fattouch K, Coisne A, Montaigne D, Modine T, Davin L, Gach O, Radermecker M, Liu S, Gillam L, Rossi A, Galli E, Ilardi F, Tastet L, Capoulade R, Zilberszac R, Vollema EM, Delgado V, Cosyns B, Lafitte S, Bernard A, Pierard LA, Bax JJ, Pibarot P, Oury C (2018) Outcomes of patients with asymptomatic aortic stenosis followed up in heart valve clinics. JAMA Cardiol 3:1060–1068. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamacardio.2018.3152 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

49.

Monin JL, Quéré JP, Monchi M, Petit H, Baleynaud S, Chauvel C, Pop C, Ohlmann P, Lelguen C, Dehant P, Tribouilloy C, Guéret P (2003) Low-gradient aortic stenosis: operative risk stratification and predictors for long-term outcome: a multicenter study using dobutamine stress hemodynamics. Circulation 108:319–324. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.0000079171.43055.46 CrossRefPubMed

50.

Rosenhek R, Binder T, Porenta G, Lang I, Christ G, Schemper M, Maurer G, Baumgartner H (2000) Predictors of outcome in severe, asymptomatic aortic stenosis. N Engl J Med 343:611–617CrossRefPubMed

51.

Clavel MA, Dumesnil JG, Capoulade R, Mathieu P, Sénéchal M, Pibarot P (2012) Outcome of patients with aortic stenosis, small valve area, and low-flow, low-gradient despite preserved left ventricular ejection fraction. J Am Coll Cardiol 60:1259–1267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2011.12.054 CrossRefPubMed

52.

Dumesnil JG, Pibarot P, Carabello B (2010) Paradoxical low flow and/or low gradient severeaortic stenosis despite preserved left ventricularejection fraction: implications for diagnosisand treatment. Eur Heart J 31: 281–289. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehp361 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

53.

Herrmann S, Stork S, Niemann M, Lange V, Strotmann JM, Frantz S, Beer M, Gattenlohner S, Voelker W, Ertl G, Weidemann F (2011) Low-gradient aortic valve stenosis myocardial fibrosis and its influence on function and outcome. J Am Coll Cardiol 58:402–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2011.02.059 CrossRefPubMed

54.

Doenst T, Kirov H, Moschovas A, Gonzalez-Lopez D, Safarov R, Diab M, Bargenda S, Faerber G (2018) Cardiac surgery 2017 reviewed. Clin Res Cardiol 107(12):1087–1102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-018-1280-9PMID: 29777372 CrossRefPubMed

55.

Doenst T, Bargenda S, Kirov H, Moschovas A, Tkebuchava S, Safarov R, Diab M, Faerber G (2019) Cardiac surgery 2018 reviewed. Clin Res Cardiol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-019-01470-6(Epub ahead of print) CrossRefPubMed

56.

Barone-Rochette G, Piérard S, Seldrum S, de Meester de Ravenstein C, Melchior J, Maes F, Pouleur AC, Vancraeynest D, Pasquet A, Vanoverschelde JL, Gerber BL, (2013) Aortic valve area, stroke volume, left ventricular hypertrophy, remodeling, and fibrosis in aortic stenosis assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: comparison between high and low gradient and normal and low flow aortic stenosis. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 6:1009–1017. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.113.000515 CrossRefPubMed

57.

Clavel MA, Burwash IG, Pibarot P (2017) Cardiac imaging for assessing low-gradient severe aortic stenosis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 10:185–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2017.01.002 CrossRefPubMed

58.

Milano AD, Faggian G, Dodonov M, Golia G, Tomezzoli A, Bortolotti U, Mazzucco A (2012) Prognostic value of myocardial fibrosis in patients with severe aortic valve stenosis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 144:830–837. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.11.024 CrossRefPubMed

59.

Ng AC, Delgado V, Bertini M, Antoni ML, van Bommel RJ, van Rijnsoever EP, van der Kley F, Ewe SH, Witkowski T, Auger D, Nucifora G, Schuijf JD, Poldermans D, Leung DY, Schalij MJ, Bax JJ (2011) Alterations in multidirectional myocardial functions in patients with aortic stenosis and preserved ejection fraction: a two-dimensional speckle tracking analysis. Eur Heart J 32:1542–1550. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehr084 CrossRefPubMed

60.

Magne J, Cosyns B, Popescu BA, Carstensen HG, Dahl J, Desai MY, Kearney L, Lancellotti P, Marwick TH, Sato K, Takeuchi M, Zito C, Casalta AC, Mohty D, Piérard L, Habib G, Donal E (2019) Distribution and prognostic significance of left ventricular global longitudinal strain in asymptomatic significant aortic stenosis: an individual participant data meta-analysis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 12:84–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.11.005 CrossRefPubMed

61.

de Marchi SF, Windecker S, Aeschbacher BC, Seiler C (1999) Influence of left ventricular relaxation on the pressure half time of aortic regurgitation. Heart 82:607–613. https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.82.5.607 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

62.

Egbe AC, Luis SA, Padang R, Warnes CA (2016) Outcomes in moderate mixed aortic valve disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 67:2321–2329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2016.03.509-17 CrossRefPubMed

63.

Zilberszac R, Gabriel H, Schemper M, Zahler D, Czerny M, Maurer G, Rosenhek R (2013) Outcome of combined stenotic and regurgitant aortic valve disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 61:1489–1495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2012.11.070 CrossRefPubMed

64.

Ewen S, Karliova I, Weber P, Schirmer SH, Abdul-Khaliq H, Schope J, Mahfoud F, Schafers HJ (2019) Echocardiographic criteria to detect unicuspid aortic valve morphology. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 20:40–44. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jex344 CrossRefPubMed

65.

Loukas M, Bilinsky E, Bilinsky S, Blaak C, Tubbs RS, Anderson RH (2014) The anatomy of the aortic root. Clin Anat 27:748–756. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.22295 CrossRefPubMed

66.

Minners J, Allgeier M, Gohlke-Baerwolf C, Kienzle RP, Neumann FJ, Jander N (2008) Inconsistencies of echocardiographic criteria for the grading of aortic valve stenosis. Eur Heart J 29:1043–1048. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehm543 CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Expert consensus document on the assessment of the severity of aortic valve stenosis by echocardiography to provide diagnostic conclusiveness by standardized verifiable documentation
verfasst von: Andreas Hagendorff
Fabian Knebel
Andreas Helfen
Jan Knierim
Christoph Sinning
Stephan Stöbe
Wolfgang Fehske
Sebastian Ewen
Publikationsdatum: 03.09.2019
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: Clinical Research in Cardiology / Ausgabe 3/2020
Print ISSN: 1861-0684
Elektronische ISSN: 1861-0692
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-019-01539-2

Neu im Fachgebiet Kardiologie

24.04.2024 | DGIM 2024 | Kongressbericht | Nachrichten

Update Kardiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

Expert consensus document on the assessment of the severity of aortic valve stenosis by echocardiography to provide diagnostic conclusiveness by standardized verifiable documentation

Abstract

Neu im Fachgebiet Kardiologie

Myokarditis nach Infekt – richtig schwierig wird es bei Profisportlern

Wie erfolgreich ist eine Re-Ablation nach Rezidiv?

Europäische Ernährungsgewohnheiten: Das sind die häufigsten Fehler

Parodontalbehandlung verbessert Prognose bei Katheterablation

Update Kardiologie

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2020

A challenging case of severe pulmonary bleeding in a patient with congenital ventricular septal defect (VSD) and Eisenmenger syndrome: extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support and weaning strategies

Correction to: Relation of lowering door-to-balloon time and mortality in ST segment elevation myocardial infarction patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention

Long- and short-term association of low-grade systemic inflammation with cardiovascular mortality in the LURIC study

Myeloperoxidase in atrial fibrillation: association with progression, origin and influence of renin–angiotensin system antagonists

Association of heart failure duration with clinical prognosis in advanced heart failure

Ablation of premature ventricular contractions in a transplanted human heart suffering from graft vasculopathy

Neu im Fachgebiet Kardiologie

Myokarditis nach Infekt – richtig schwierig wird es bei Profisportlern

Wie erfolgreich ist eine Re-Ablation nach Rezidiv?

Europäische Ernährungsgewohnheiten: Das sind die häufigsten Fehler

Parodontalbehandlung verbessert Prognose bei Katheterablation

Update Kardiologie