Skip to main content
Log in

Inappropriate ICD discharge induced by electrical interference from a physio-therapeutic muscle stimulation device

Inadäquate ICD-Schockabgabe durch elektromagnetische Interferenz mit einem physiotherapeutischen Muskelstimulator

  • CASE REPORT
  • Published:
Herzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Dieser Bericht stellt den Fall eines Patienten dar, der während einer Reizstromanwendung im Lendenbereich im Rahmen einer Physiotherapie eine Schocktherapie durch seinen implantierten Cardioverter-Defibrillator (ICD) erhalten hat. Die Analyse des gespeicherten Elektrogramms zeigt, dass es sich um eine inadäquate Therapie durch elektromagnetische Interferenz mit dem Reizstrom gehandelt hat. Auf diese mögliche Interaktion sollten sowohl Patienten mit einem ICD, als auch Physiotherapeuten im Vorfeld hingewiesen werden.

Summary

This report illustrates the case of a patient with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) who during physiotherapy with transcutaneous electrical stimulation of the lumbar musculature perceived a shock discharge by the ICD. Analysis of the stored electrogram showed inappropriate therapy due to electromagnetic interference with the external stimulation. Patients as well as physiotherapists should be informed about this potential interaction to avoid such iatrogenic, inappropriate ICD therapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Kolb C, Zrenner B, Schmitt C (2001) Incidence of electromagnetic interference in implantable cardioverter defibrillators. PACE 24:465–468

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Siu CW, Tse HF, Lau CP (2005) Inappropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator shock from a transcutaneous muscle stimulation device therapy. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 13(1):73–75

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gradaus R, Block M, Brachmann J, Breithardt G et al on behalf of the German EURID registry (2003) Mortality, morbidity, and complications in 3344 patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators. PACE 26:1511–1518

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Vlay SC (2002) Fish pond electromagnetic interference resulting in an inappropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator shock. PACE 25:1532

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Vlay SC (1998) Electromagnetic interference and ICD discharge related to chiropractic treatment. PACE 21:2009

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Volkmann H (2004) Interference of implanted pacemaker in medical practice. Herzschr Electrophys 15:65–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sabate X, Moure C, Nicolas J, Sedo M, Navarro X (2001) Washing machine associated 50 Hz detected as ventricular fibrillation by an implanted cardioverter defibrillator. PACE 24:1281–1283

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Irnich W (1994) A serious case of radiofrequency EMI, when an ICD wearer manipulated a remote control of a toy car. PACE 17:685

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Fetter JG, Ivans V, Benditt DG, Collins J (1998) Digital cellular telephone interaction with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators. J Am Coll Cardiol. 31:623–628

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nägele, H., Azizi, M. Inappropriate ICD discharge induced by electrical interference from a physio-therapeutic muscle stimulation device. Herzschr. Elektrophys. 17, 137–139 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00399-006-0527-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00399-006-0527-8

Schlüsselwörter

Key words

Navigation