Introduction
Primitive neuroectodermal tumors of the central nervous system (CNS-PNET) are a heterogeneous group of pediatric neoplasms composed of poorly differentiated neuroepithelial cells with varying degrees of divergent neural, astrocytic and ependymal differentiation. According to the current WHO CNS tumor working classification, CNS-PNETs are grouped into several histologic categories: CNS neuroblastoma/ganglioneuroblastoma, medulloepithelioma (MEP), ependymoblastoma (EPB) and classical CNS-PNET (PNET-NOS) [
14]. In 2000, Eberhart et al. [
4] described a new CNS-PNET variant arising primarily in infancy, which displayed histological features of both neuroblastoma and EPB, and were distinguished by the presence of true and pseudo-rosettes on a background of abundant neuropil. These tumors, termed ‘embryonal tumors with abundant neuropil and true rosettes’ (ETANTRs), correlated with very poor patient prognosis with a mortality rate of 76 % and a median survival of 9 months [
1,
5,
21].
Li et al. [
13] first reported
C19MC amplification was enriched in cerebral CNS-PNETs with variant histologic features including tumors called ETANTR, MEP, EPB and PNETs with atypical features, thus suggesting that these conventional histologic sub-classes may represent closely related molecular entities. Indeed, Korshunov et al. [
10] reported
C19MC amplification in 37/40 tumors with a histologic diagnosis of ETANTR or EPB. In addition,
C19MC amplification has been reported in tumors with mixed features of ETANTR and MEP [
2,
16]. Subsequent studies demonstrated that up-regulation of the RNA-binding pluripotency gene,
LIN28 [
11,
17], correlated closely with
C19MC amplification thus suggesting that LIN28 may represent an attractive immuno-diagnostic marker for this distinct molecular sub-group of cerebral CNS-PNETs. However, the relative diagnostic significance of
C19MC and LIN28, and the molecular and therapeutic relationship of these different histologic sub-classes of CNS-PNETs remain to be completely elucidated.
To identify relevant therapeutic pathways for these tumors, we sought in this study to first evaluate the diagnostic specificity of C19MC amplification and LIN28 expression for CNS-PNETs, and define the histopathologic and clinical features of CNS-PNETs with C19MC amplification and/or LIN28 expression. We compared global gene expression and methylation data from C19MC amplified and/or LIN28+ CNS-PNETs with various histologic diagnostic labels and anatomic locations, and investigated pharmacologic inhibitors of LIN28/let-7/mTOR signaling and DNMT3B on growth of a novel cell line derived from a non-C19MC amplified group 1 CNS-PNET.
Materials and methods
Tumor and nucleic acid samples
Tumor specimens and clinical information were collected with consent as per protocols approved by Hospital Research Ethics Board at participating institutions. A total of 450 primary pediatric brain tumors with various histologic diagnoses—103 CNS-PNETs, 45 atypical rhabdoid teratoid tumors (ATRTs), 128 medulloblastomas (MBs), 105 ependymomas (EPNs), 50 high-grade gliomas (HGGs) and 20 choroid plexus carcinomas (CPCs) were examined in this study (Supplemental Table 1). All ATRTs diagnoses were confirmed for genetic alterations of
SMARCB1/INI1 by Multiplex Ligation mediated PCR and/or targeted gene sequencing and for loss of SMARCB1/INI1/BAF47 protein expression by immunostaining. Of the 54 group 1 CNS-PNETs examined for detailed histopathologic correlates (Table
1 and Supplemental Table 2), 33 were previously reported [
13,
17]; and 21 additional tumors with a diagnosis of CNS-PNET, ETANTR or embryonal tumor with multilayered rosettes (ETMR), MEP and EPB were collected for this study. Three tumors with an initial diagnosis of EPB were histologically reviewed and re-classified as ETANTR (PNET 5, 39 and 54). Tumor DNA and RNA were extracted by standard methods, quantified using NanoDrop Analyzer, and analyzed using the Illumina HT-12 v4 gene expression and 450 K Methylation arrays and OmniQuad 2.5 M SNP genotyping arrays (
http://www.illumina.com) to generate gene expression, methylation, and copy number profiles. Methylation profiling was performed at The Centre for Innovation at Genome Quebec; all other analyses were performed at The Centre of Applied Genomics (TCAG) at the Hospital for Sick Children.
Table 1
Histopathologic and clinical features of C19MC amplified/LIN28+ CNS-PNETs
| 54 | 22 | 12 | 11 | 9 |
C19MC statusc,d
|
Number analyzed | 51 | 21 | 12 | 9 | 9 |
Amplified/overexpressed | 43 (84 %) | 20 (95 %) | 9 (75 %) | 7 (78 %) | 7 (78 %) |
Not amplified/overexpressed | 8 (16 %) | 1 (5 %) | 3 (25 %) | 2 (22 %) | 2 (22 %) |
LIN28 IHCc,d
|
Number analyzed | 40 | 20 | 10 | 10 | 0 |
Positive | 40 | 20 | 10 | 10 | 0 |
C19MC/LIN28 statusc
|
Number analyzed | 37 | 19 | 10 | 8 | 0 |
C19MC not amplified/LIN28+ | 5 (14 %) | 1 (5 %) | 2 (20 %) | 2 (25 %) | 0 |
Locationc
|
Number analyzed | 54 | 22 | 12 | 11 | 9 |
Cerebral hemispheres | 41 (76 %) | 14 (62 %) | 8 (67 %) | 10 (91 %) | 9 (100 %) |
Non-cerebral | 13 (24 %) | 8 (38 %) | 4 (33 %) | 1 (9 %) | 0 (0 %) |
Genderc
|
Number analyzed | 53 | 22 | 12 | 10 | 9 |
Male:female | 24:29 | 12:10 | 6:6 | 4:6 | 2:7 |
Age at diagnosis (months)e
|
Number analyzed | 52 | 22 | 12 | 11 | 7 |
Median (range) | 29 (0.5–180) | 29 (7–60) | 23 (0.5–54) | 34 (10–107) | 32 (18–180) |
Metastatic statusc
|
Number analyzed | 37 | 13 | 10 | 10 | 4 |
M0:M+ | 24:13 | 8:5 | 6:4 | 7:3 | 3:1 |
Treatmentc
|
Number analyzed | 41 | 18 | 11 | 9 | 3 |
Chemotherapy only | 20 (49 %) | 11 (61 %) | 3 (27 %) | 5 (56 %) | 1 (33 %) |
Chemotherapy and Radiationf
| 11 (27 %) | 4 (22 %) | 4 (36 %) | 2 (22 %) | 1 (33 %) |
None | 10 (24 %) | 3 (17 %) | 4 (36 %) | 2 (22 %) | 1 (33 %) |
Survival statusc
|
Number analyzed | 46 | 17 | 12 | 11 | 6 |
Status (alive:dead) | 10:36 | 4:13 | 4:8 | 1:10 | 1:5 |
Survival (months) |
Histologic categoriesg
|
Number analyzed | 36 | 15 | 11 | 10 | n/a |
Median survival ± SD (95 % CI) | 13 ± 2.0 (9.0–17.0) | 10 ± 2.5 (5.1–15.0) | 13 ± 6.2 (0.9–25.1) | 19 ± 8.6 (2.2–35.8) | n/a |
Treatmentg
| | Treated | Untreated | | |
Number analyzed | 36 | 30 | 6 | | |
Median survival ± SD (95 % CI) | 12 ± 1.9 (8.3–15.7) | 0.1 ± 1.8 (0.0–3.7) | 13 ± 1.9 (9.3–16.7) | | |
Histology, immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization
Hematoxylin and eosin (H and E) staining was performed using standard protocols. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) were performed on 5-μm formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) sections for individual tumors or tissue microarrays (TMA). TMA construction was as previously detailed [
18]. Tumor tissue blocks and corresponding slides were reviewed by an experienced neuropathologist (CH) for diagnostic accuracy and adequacy of tissues; samples that had extensive necrosis or <60 % tumor content were discarded. Representative tumor areas were identified, and three 1-mm tissue cores were selected with the goal of obtaining a sampling accuracy >95 % for each tumor represented on the TMA [
6,
8]. A variety of tissues including liver, fetal cerebellum, placenta, breast carcinoma, and basal cell carcinoma were included on each array to serve as internal controls for various immuno-stains.
For FISH analyses, pre-labeled BAC probes (
http://www.tcag.ca/cytogenomics) mapping to chr19q13.42 (RP11-381E3: 162, 225 bp) and an internal control chr19p13.11 locus (RP11-451E20: 165,783 bp) were used as described previously [
13]. For IHC analyses, a heat-induced antigen retrieval process was used, followed by blocking endogenous peroxidase and biotin. Primary anti-LIN28 (#3978) and anti-phospho-S6 (Ser240/244) (#5364) antibodies were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology (Boston, MA, USA) and anti-DNMT3B (ab13604) was purchased from Abcam (Toronto, ON, CA). Antibody reactivity was visualized using the VectaStain ABC detection kit, Vector Laboratories (Burlingame, CA, USA).
For each protein, cytoplasmic and/or nuclear immunopositivity was visually scored based on both strength (0, 1, 2, 3–3+) and distribution (<25, 25–50, 51–75, and >75 % of tumor cells). Only tumors with strong staining (3–3+) in >25 % of tumor cells were considered to be positive. Tumors with FFPE slides were scored based on analyses of the whole tumor section, while tumors on TMAs were assessed on the basis of staining patterns in at least two of three tissue cores. Human testicular germ cell tumor tissue was used as a positive control for LIN28 staining, while sections processed in parallel without primary antibodies were used as negative controls. All immunohistochemical stains were scored independently by TS, DP, MB and NH, and reviewed by AH and CH.
Gene expression and methylation array data analyses
Gene expression data from 59 primary CNS-PNETs arising in different locations were generated using the Illumina HT-12v4 arrays and normalized as previously described [
17]. Methylation data generated using the Illumina human 450 k arrays for 45 primary CNS-PNETs were background-normalized in Genome Studio (v. 2011.1) to obtain beta values for downstream analyses. All X and Y chromosome probes (
n = 11,649), single-nucleotide polymorphisms (dbSNP,
n = 88,679), and unannotated probes (relative to hg19,
n = 65) were excluded leaving a total of 385,184 probes for methylation analyses. Genes and probes were ranked by largest coefficient of variation and standard deviation, respectively. Unsupervised hierarchical clustering (HCL; Partek Genomics Suite, v6.6) of gene expression and methylation data were, respectively, established using Pearson’s Dissimilarity performed iteratively on 200–2,000 genes and 200–10,000 probes to identify a minimal gene set associated with the most stable gene expression and methylation tumor cluster patterns (Supplemental Fig. 2).
Statistical analyses
Median age at diagnosis was compared using Kruskal–Wallis test and Log Rank (Mantel–Cox) analysis was used to assess survival. All other clinical and biological characteristics were compared using Pearson Chi-Square (χ
2). A p value of <0.05 was regarded as significant for all analyses. All statistical analyses were done using SPSS version 22.0.
Cell culture and growth assays
To generate stable tumor cell line, A664, a pre-treatment primary tumor from a non-C19MC amplified/LIN28+ CNS-PNET (PNET398) was dissociated by gentle manual trituration followed by passage through a 40-μm mesh filter. Cells were grown in low-adhesion tissue culture flasks (Sarstedt, Montreal, QC, CA) in defined serum-free media at 37 °C, 5 % CO2. Culture media consisted of human neural stem cell proliferation media (Stem Cell Technologies, Vancouver, BC, CA) supplemented with heparin, epidermal growth factor (EGF, 10 ng/ml, Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), and fibroblast growth factor (FGF, 10 ng/ml, Stem Cell Technologies, Vancouver, BC, CA). Cells were dissociated using Accumax (Millipore, MA, USA) by manual trituration and re-plated at ~40 % confluency (20,000 cells/ml) and maintained stably for >10 consecutive passages.
For drug treatment and growth assays, A664 cells were plated in 96-well dishes at 2,000 cells/well and incubated overnight. Cells were then treated with rapamycin (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), 5-azacytidine (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) or vorinostat (Selleckchem, Burlington, ON, CA) and evaluated for changes in cell proliferation assays at various days post-treatment using CellTiter 96® AQueous One Solution Cell Proliferation Assay kit (Promega, Madison WI, USA). Viable cell numbers were determined based on absorbance at 575 nm using a Versamax microplate reader (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA, USA).
Quantitative real-time (qRT-PCR), western blot and siRNA knockdown analyses
For LIN28 knockdown, A664 cells were plated at a density of 1.5 × 105 cells/ml in 6-well plates. Scrambled control or LIN28-specific siRNA (Fisher Scientific, Ottawa, ON, CA) was transiently transfected into cells using Lipofectamine 2000 (Life Technologies, Burlington, ON, CA) as per the manufacturer’s protocol. Cells were harvested at 48-h post-transfection for protein extraction and analysis by Western blotting. Western blot analysis and chemiluminescence detection were performed using standard protocols. Secondary HRP-linked donkey anti-Rabbit or HRP-linked sheep anti-Mouse (#NAV934, 931) was from GE Healthcare (Baie-d’Urfe, QC, CA).
For miRNA-specific qRT-PCR, single-stranded cDNA was synthesized from 10 ng of RNA using a miR-specific stem-loop reverse-transcription RT-primer and the TaqMan® MicroRNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Life Technologies, Burlington, ON, CA). qRT-PCR was performed using TaqMan® Universal PCR Master Mix, no AmpErase® UNG (Life Technologies, Burlington, ON, CA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions; miRNA expression levels were normalized relative to RNU6B using the ΔC
t method, and compared to that of 16-week-old whole human fetal brain control.
Discussion
In prior studies, we identified three transcriptional classes of CNS-PNETs arising in the cerebral hemispheres. Specifically, we reported that amplification of the oncogenic
C19MC miRNA locus and/or high expression of LIN28, a pluripotency gene, identified a distinctively aggressive sub-group of hemispheric tumors, which we called group 1 tumors [
17]. In this study, we demonstrate that
C19MC amplification and/or LIN28 expression are seen in CNS-PNETs with a spectrum of histology and location, and overlapping transcriptional and epigenomic signatures that are distinct from that of other molecular sub-types of CNS-PNETs arising in the cerebral hemispheres [
13,
17]. Specifically, our data suggest that current known histologic categories of CNS-PNETs which include ETANTRs, MEPs and EPBs which arise in different CNS locations comprise common molecular and therapeutic entities.
Our analyses of a large cohort and spectrum of malignant pediatric brain tumors indicate that
C19MC amplification is exclusively associated with group 1 CNS-PNETs. Specifically, we did not observe high-level DNA copy number changes of
C19MC in any other malignant pediatric brain tumors with confirmed histopathologic diagnostic features of MBs, ATRTs, EPNs, HGGs, and CPCs. The pathogenic and diagnostic importance of this locus in CNS-PNETs is further highlighted by recent identification of
TTYH1:
C19MC gene fusions which is associated with very high expression of specific
C19MC miRNAs and suggest
C19MC drives oncogenesis in part by facilitating maintenance and transformation of a very early, neural compartment [
9]. Notably, although we observed cytoplasmic LIN28 expression uniformly (100 %) in
C19MC amplified CNS-PNETs, our analyses also revealed cytoplasmic as well as nuclear LIN28 staining in a subset of MBs, ATRTs, EPNs and HGGs but not CPCs. Similar to prior reports of cytoplasmic LIN28 staining in 20–60 % of pediatric and adult gliomas [
15] and 64 % of ATRTs [
3], we observed strong LIN28 cytoplasmic staining in up to 20–25 % of ATRTs and HGGs analyzed (Supplemental Tables 1, 3), which contrasts with a report of cytoplasmic LIN28 immunostaining exclusively in ETANTRs [
11]. The reason underlying these discrepant observations is unclear and may be related to the limitations of tissue microarray analyses to comprehensively capture tumor heterogeneity. Thus we propose that a combination of tumor morphology, together with cytoplasmic LIN28 immunostaining and
C19MC genetic status, is needed to robustly distinguish group 1 CNS-PNETs or related embryonal tumors from other malignant pediatric brain tumors which may exhibit varying LIN28 expression.
Notably, as in our prior study [
17], we observed that
C19MC amplification or copy number gains together with high LIN28 expression identified CNS-PNETs that exhibited predominantly primitive neural histology with varying proportions of ependymoblastic rosettes, neural epithelium in papillary and pseudo-tubular formation, although such features were not necessarily identifiable in all
C19MC amplified/LIN28+ CNS-PNET samples examined. We also observed that the proportion of cells with
C19MC amplification and/or LIN28 expression varied across tumor samples that share group 1 CNS-PNETs molecular signatures, thus indicating that histopathologic analyses may be confounded by intra-tumoral heterogeneity which may reflect a varying, continuum of differentiation in the tumors. Indeed this may also apply to the histopathologic spectrum of ETANTRs, EPBs and MEPs seen in CNS-PNETs [
7]. Although each of these entities are reported to be extremely rare, our data suggest that a combination of
C19MC amplification and/or LIN28 expression together with careful morphologic assessment of tumor may identify up to 25 % of CNS-PNETs that make up this histogenetic tumor spectrum. As these tumors predominantly arise in children <4 years of age, they may represent an even higher proportion of brain and other CNS tumors diagnosed in infancy. Thus, a diagnostic approach which combines histopathologic assessment together with evaluation of
C19MC and LIN28 status will be important for capturing the true spectra of this disease. Therefore, we suggest that evaluation of
C19MC and LIN28 status should be considered for all malignant neuroepithelial tumors arising in young children, regardless of CNS locations, in a manner similar to the diagnostic work-up for ATRTs.
We did not observe significant differences in C19MC amplification and LIN28 expression status nor in global identifiers based on gene expression and methylation analyses between various histological sub-types of CNS-PNETs. In addition, though trends toward older age and lower incidence of metastasis at diagnosis were observed in tumors with a PNET or variant PNET diagnosis, no significant differences were evident between histological subgroups. These subtle distinctions may prove to be clinically relevant upon analysis of a larger tumor cohort. Our data suggest that the majority of these tumors are localized at presentation, however, interestingly a subset of patients exhibited unusual patterns of metastasis including dural invasion and spread to extra-neural sites (Supplemental Table 2). Comprehensive diagnostic evaluation of large unbiased cohorts will be important for revealing disease patterns to inform and unify diagnostic work-up and therapeutic approaches for these rare tumors.
Consistent with prior studies [
11,
17], we observed dismal overall survival in our study cohort with only 3/36 patients who remain alive 56–204 months after diagnosis. Our data suggest a survival benefit for a small proportion of patients treated with chemotherapeutic regimes, with or without radiotherapy and underscore the need for better therapies in this disease. Our recent [
19] and current study which demonstrates that rapamycin, a PI3K/mTOR inhibitor, significantly inhibits growth of cell lines derived from both
C19MC amplified and non-amplified primary group 1 tumors suggests targeting the P13K/mTOR pathway as a novel therapeutic avenue for this disease. In this study, we also demonstrated that 5-azacytidine, a pharmacological antagonist of DNMTs, and HDAC inhibitor, vorinostat, had significant effects on A664 cell growth. Together with recent demonstration that
C19MC regulates the RBL2-DNMT3B axis [
9], our data suggest epigenetic regulators as important new therapeutic targets in this disease.
In summary, our study, together with a recent similar report by Korshunov et al. [
12], indicate CNS-PNETs with
C19MC amplification and/or LIN28 expression span various histologies but comprise a single molecular disease that warrant common therapeutic strategies. Our study provide novel insights into potential targetable pathways for this frequently fatal but relatively uncommon disease and report on a unique cell line model that will be an invaluable resource for future therapeutic investigations.