Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 4/2010

01.04.2010 | Orthopaedic Surgery

Effect of limb rotation on radiographic alignment in total knee arthroplasties

verfasst von: Kerstin Radtke, Christoph Becher, Yvonne Noll, Sven Ostermeier

Erschienen in: Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery | Ausgabe 4/2010

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Introduction

Even in a well-aligned total knee arthroplasty (TKA), limb rotation at the time of radiographic assessment will alter the measurement of alignment. This could influence the radiographic outcome of TKA. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of limb rotation on radiographic alignment after TKA and to establish a re-calculation of this rotation by using existing radiographic landmarks.

Materials and methods

Synthetic femur and tibia (Sawbones®, Inc. Vashon Island, WA) were used to create a TKA of the Triathlon® knee prosthesis system (Stryker®, Limerick, Ireland). The femoral alignment was 6.5° valgus. The model was fixed in an upright stand. Five series of nine anteroposterior (AP) long leg radiographs were taken on a 30 cm × 120 cm plates in full extension with the limb rotated, in 5° increments, from 20° external rotation to 20° internal rotation. After digitizing each radiograph (Scanner Hewlett Packard XJ 527), an observer measured the anatomic mechanical angle of the femur [AMA (°)], the mechanical lateral proximal femur angle [mLPFA (°)], the mechanical lateral distal femur angle [mLDFA (°)], the mechanical medial proximal tibia angle [mMPTA (°)] and the mechanical lateral distal tibia angle [mLDTA (°)] using a digital measurement software (MediCAD®, Hectec, Altfraunhofen, Germany). Besides, the observer measured the geometrical distances of the femoral component figured on the long leg radiograph. A ratio of one distance to another was measured (called femoral component distance ratio).

Results

The average radiographic anatomic alignment ranged from 6.827° AMA (SD = 0.22°) in 20° internal rotation to 4.627° AMA (SD = 0.22°) in 20° external rotation. Average mLPFA (°) ranged from 101.63° (SD = 0.63) in 20° internal rotation to 93.60° (SD = 0.74°) in 20° external rotation. Average mLDFA (°) ranged from 90.59° (SD = 3.01°) in 20° internal rotation to 86.76° (SD = 0.36°) in 20° external rotation. Average mMPTA (°) ranged from 90.35° (SD = 0.81°) in 20° internal rotation to 88.49° (SD = 0.52°) in 20° external rotation. Average mLDTA (°) ranged from 98.89° (SD = 2.3°) in 20° internal rotation to 90.53° (SD = 3.39°) in 20° external rotation. Without an application of limb rotation, the femoral component distance ratio was measured to be 0.89 (SD = 0.01), in 20° internal rotation 0.63 (SD = 0.01) and in 20° external rotation 1.16 (SD = 0.01).

Discussion

Limb rotation had a highly statistically significant effect on measured anatomic alignment and mechanical angles. A correlation between limb rotation, anatomic mechanical angle, mechanical angles measured at femur and tibia and the femoral component distance ratio was established. As the anatomic mechanical angle and the femoral component distance ratio change linearly in the range of 20° internal and external limb rotation, a calculation of the femoral component distance ratio could be used to re-calculate the limb rotation at the time of radiographic assessment to evaluate the evidence of a long leg radiograph.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Wright JG, Treble N, Feinstein AR (1991) Measurement of lower limb alignment using long radiographs. J Bone Joint Surg Br 73(5):721–723PubMed Wright JG, Treble N, Feinstein AR (1991) Measurement of lower limb alignment using long radiographs. J Bone Joint Surg Br 73(5):721–723PubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Anderson KC, Buehler KC, Markel DC (2005) Computer-assisted navigation in total knee arthroplasty: comparison with conventional methods. J Arthroplasty 20(7 Suppl 3):132–138CrossRefPubMed Anderson KC, Buehler KC, Markel DC (2005) Computer-assisted navigation in total knee arthroplasty: comparison with conventional methods. J Arthroplasty 20(7 Suppl 3):132–138CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Barrack RL, Schrader T, Bertot AJ, Wolfe MW, Myers L (2001) Component rotation and anterior knee pain after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 392:46–55CrossRefPubMed Barrack RL, Schrader T, Bertot AJ, Wolfe MW, Myers L (2001) Component rotation and anterior knee pain after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 392:46–55CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Oswald MH, Jakob RP, Schneider E, Hoogewoud HM (1993) Radiological analysis of normal axial alignment of femur and tibia in view of total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 8(4):419–426CrossRefPubMed Oswald MH, Jakob RP, Schneider E, Hoogewoud HM (1993) Radiological analysis of normal axial alignment of femur and tibia in view of total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 8(4):419–426CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Chauhan SK, Clark GW, Lloyd S, Scott RG, Breidahl W, Sikorski JM (2004) Computer-assisted total knee replacement. A controlled cadaver study using a multi-parameter quantitative CT assessment of alignment (the Perth CT Protocol). J Bone Joint Surg Br 86(6):818–823CrossRefPubMed Chauhan SK, Clark GW, Lloyd S, Scott RG, Breidahl W, Sikorski JM (2004) Computer-assisted total knee replacement. A controlled cadaver study using a multi-parameter quantitative CT assessment of alignment (the Perth CT Protocol). J Bone Joint Surg Br 86(6):818–823CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Moreland JR (1988) Mechanisms of failure in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 226:49–64PubMed Moreland JR (1988) Mechanisms of failure in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 226:49–64PubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Jiang CC, Insall JN (1989) Effect of rotation on the axial alignment of the femur. Pitfalls in the use of femoral intramedullary guides in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 248:50–56PubMed Jiang CC, Insall JN (1989) Effect of rotation on the axial alignment of the femur. Pitfalls in the use of femoral intramedullary guides in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 248:50–56PubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Lonner JH, Laird MT, Stuchin SA (1996) Effect of rotation and knee flexion on radiographic alignment in total knee arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res 331:102–106CrossRefPubMed Lonner JH, Laird MT, Stuchin SA (1996) Effect of rotation and knee flexion on radiographic alignment in total knee arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res 331:102–106CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Moreland JR, Bassett LW, Hanker GJ (1987) Radiographic analysis of the axial alignment of the lower extremity. J Bone Joint Surg Am 69(5):745–749PubMed Moreland JR, Bassett LW, Hanker GJ (1987) Radiographic analysis of the axial alignment of the lower extremity. J Bone Joint Surg Am 69(5):745–749PubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Hankemeier S, Gosling T, Richter M, Hufner T, Hochhausen C, Krettek C (2006) Computer-assisted analysis of lower limb geometry: higher intraobserver reliability compared to conventional method. Comput Aided Surg 11(2):81–86CrossRefPubMed Hankemeier S, Gosling T, Richter M, Hufner T, Hochhausen C, Krettek C (2006) Computer-assisted analysis of lower limb geometry: higher intraobserver reliability compared to conventional method. Comput Aided Surg 11(2):81–86CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Swanson KE, Stocks GW, Warren PD, Hazel MR, Janssen HF (2000) Does axial limb rotation affect the alignment measurements in deformed limbs? Clin Orthop Relat Res 371:246–252CrossRefPubMed Swanson KE, Stocks GW, Warren PD, Hazel MR, Janssen HF (2000) Does axial limb rotation affect the alignment measurements in deformed limbs? Clin Orthop Relat Res 371:246–252CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Hunt MA, Fowler PJ, Birmingham TB, Jenkyn TR, Giffin JR (2006) Foot rotational effects on radiographic measures of lower limb alignment. Can J Surg 49(6):401–406PubMed Hunt MA, Fowler PJ, Birmingham TB, Jenkyn TR, Giffin JR (2006) Foot rotational effects on radiographic measures of lower limb alignment. Can J Surg 49(6):401–406PubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Kawakami H, Sugano N, Yonenobu K, Yoshikawa H, Ochi T, Hattori A et al (2004) Effects of rotation on measurement of lower limb alignment for knee osteotomy. J Orthop Res 22(6):1248–1253CrossRefPubMed Kawakami H, Sugano N, Yonenobu K, Yoshikawa H, Ochi T, Hattori A et al (2004) Effects of rotation on measurement of lower limb alignment for knee osteotomy. J Orthop Res 22(6):1248–1253CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Sparmann M, Wolke B, Czupalla H, Banzer D, Zink A (2003) Positioning of total knee arthroplasty with and without navigation support. A prospective, randomised study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 85(6):830–835PubMed Sparmann M, Wolke B, Czupalla H, Banzer D, Zink A (2003) Positioning of total knee arthroplasty with and without navigation support. A prospective, randomised study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 85(6):830–835PubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Petersen TL, Engh GA (1988) Radiographic assessment of knee alignment after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 3(1):67–72CrossRefPubMed Petersen TL, Engh GA (1988) Radiographic assessment of knee alignment after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 3(1):67–72CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Paley D, Tetsworth K (1992) Mechanical axis deviation of the lower limbs. Preoperative planning of uniapical angular deformities of the tibia or femur. Clin Orthop Relat Res 280:48–64PubMed Paley D, Tetsworth K (1992) Mechanical axis deviation of the lower limbs. Preoperative planning of uniapical angular deformities of the tibia or femur. Clin Orthop Relat Res 280:48–64PubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Keppler P, Strecker W, Kinzl L (1998) Analysis of leg geometry-standard techniques and normal values. Chirurg 69(11):1141–1152CrossRefPubMed Keppler P, Strecker W, Kinzl L (1998) Analysis of leg geometry-standard techniques and normal values. Chirurg 69(11):1141–1152CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat McGrory JE, Trousdale RT, Pagnano MW, Nigbur M (2002) Preoperative hip-to-ankle radiographs in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 404:196–202CrossRefPubMed McGrory JE, Trousdale RT, Pagnano MW, Nigbur M (2002) Preoperative hip-to-ankle radiographs in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 404:196–202CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Odenbring S, Berggren AM, Peil L (1993) Roentgenographic assessment of the hip-knee-ankle axis in medial gonarthrosis. A study of reproducibility. Clin Orthop Relat Res 289:195–196PubMed Odenbring S, Berggren AM, Peil L (1993) Roentgenographic assessment of the hip-knee-ankle axis in medial gonarthrosis. A study of reproducibility. Clin Orthop Relat Res 289:195–196PubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Hsu RW, Himeno S, Coventry MB, Chao EY (1990) Normal axial alignment of the lower extremity and load-bearing distribution at the knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res 255:215–227PubMed Hsu RW, Himeno S, Coventry MB, Chao EY (1990) Normal axial alignment of the lower extremity and load-bearing distribution at the knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res 255:215–227PubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Effect of limb rotation on radiographic alignment in total knee arthroplasties
verfasst von
Kerstin Radtke
Christoph Becher
Yvonne Noll
Sven Ostermeier
Publikationsdatum
01.04.2010
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery / Ausgabe 4/2010
Print ISSN: 0936-8051
Elektronische ISSN: 1434-3916
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-009-0999-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2010

Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 4/2010 Zur Ausgabe

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen. 
» Jetzt entdecken

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.