nach oben

Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery

Erschienen in:

29.06.2018 | Orthopaedic Surgery

What are the factors to affect outcome and healing of meniscus bucket handle tears?

verfasst von: Andreas Hupperich, G. M. Salzmann, P. Niemeyer, M. Feucht, H. Eberbach, N. P. Südkamp, J. Kühle

Erschienen in: Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery | Ausgabe 10/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Introduction

The purpose of this study is to identify patient, meniscus rupture and surgical characteristics that influence the outcome and clinical healing following operative repair of bucket handle tears.

Methods

Between 02/2006 and 10/2012, a total of 38 patients (14 women, 24 men) with bucket handle tears underwent surgical meniscus repair. There were 27 isolated repairs and 11 with concomitant anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) replacement. Patients were analyzed on an average of 44.4 months (range 15–96 months) after surgery by the use of standardized subjective scoring instruments [Lysholm, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and Tegner Activity Scale (TAS)]. To identify factors affecting the outcome and suture survival, patient-specific, trauma-specific as well as meniscus- and surgery-specific factors were collected. Patients were divided in two groups with healed menisci (group 1) and re-rupture subjects (group 2). Meniscus re-rupture was defined as a clinical failure.

Results

There were 25 patients with healed menisci and 13 (34.2%) that sustained re-rupture and underwent either partial meniscectomy (n = 8) or re-suture (n = 5). Group 1 achieved slightly higher outcome compared to group 2 [Lysholm: 87.8 vs. 84.3 (p = 0.35), IKDC: 86.9 vs. 85.7 (p = 0.67), KOOS: 91.3 vs. 90.5 (p = 0.74)]. TAS was better for group 2 [5.9 vs. 6.8 (p = 0.36)]. Strong impact to result in a significantly increased outcome was identified for higher age, subjective knee joint stability, high preoperative Lysholm Score, short trauma-to-repair time, previous ACL reconstruction and a smaller number of sutures to fulfill meniscus repair. Lower patient age, male gender and higher activity level had the strongest impact to provoke re-rupture.

Conclusion

Clinical outcome after meniscus bucket handle suture is satisfying. Re-rupture rate among this collective was 34.2%. Clear risk factors were identified for diminished clinical healing and outcome.

Abrams GD, Frank RM, Gupta AK, Harris JD, McCormick FM, Cole BJ (2013) Trends in meniscus repair and meniscectomy in the United States, 2005–2011. Am J Sports Med 41(10):2333–2339. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546513495641 CrossRefPubMed

Ahn JH, Kim K-I, Wang JH, Kyung BS, Seo MC, Lee SH (2013) Arthroscopic repair of bucket-handle tears of the lateral meniscus. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-013-2764-9 CrossRefPubMed

Allen CR, Wong EK, Livesay GA, Sakane M, Fu FH, Woo SL (2000) Importance of the medial meniscus in the anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee. J Orthop Res Off Publ Orthop Res Soc 18(1):109–115. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.1100180116 CrossRef

Aydingöz U, Firat AK, Atay OA, Doral MN (2003) MR imaging of meniscal bucket-handle tears: a review of signs and their relation to arthroscopic classification. Eur Radiol 13(3):618–625. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-002-1618-5 PubMedCrossRef

Bach BR, Dennis M, Balin J, Hayden J (2005) Arthroscopic meniscal repair: analysis of treatment failures. J Knee Surg 18(4):278–284CrossRefPubMed

Beaufils P, Becker R, Verdonk R, Aagaard H, Karlsson J (2015) Focusing on results after meniscus surgery. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Off J ESSKA 23(1):3–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-014-3471-x CrossRef

Bogunovic L, Kruse LM, Haas AK, Huston LJ, Wright RW (2014) Outcome of all-inside second-generation meniscal repair: minimum five-year follow-up. J Bone Jt Surg Am 96(15):1303–1307. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.M.00266 CrossRef

Boody BS, Omar IM, Hill JA (2015) Displaced medial and lateral bucket handle meniscal tears with intact ACL and PCL. Orthopedics 38(8):e738–e741. https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20150804-91 CrossRefPubMed

Boyd KT, Myers PT (2003) Meniscus preservation; rationale, repair techniques and results. Knee 10(1):1–11CrossRefPubMed

10.

Briggs KK, Kocher MS, Rodkey WG, Steadman JR (2006) Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the Lysholm knee score and Tegner activity scale for patients with meniscal injury of the knee. J Bone Jt Surg Am 88(4):698–705. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.E.00339 CrossRef

11.

Cannon WD, Vittori JM (1992) The incidence of healing in arthroscopic meniscal repairs in anterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed knees versus stable knees. Am J Sports Med 20(2):176–181. https://doi.org/10.1177/036354659202000214 CrossRefPubMed

12.

Chiang C-W, Chang C-H, Cheng C-Y, Chen AC-Y, Chan Y-S, Hsu K-Y, Chen W-J (2011) Clinical results of all-inside meniscal repair using the FasT-Fix meniscal repair system. Chang Gung Med J 34(3):298–305PubMed

13.

Eggli S, Wegmüller H, Kosina J, Huckell C, Jakob RP (1995) Long-term results of arthroscopic meniscal repair. An analysis of isolated tears. Am J Sports Med 23(6):715–720CrossRefPubMed

14.

Espejo-Reina A, Serrano-Fernandez JM, Martin-Castilla B, Estades-Rubio FJ, Briggs KK, Espejo-Baena A (2014) Outcomes after repair of chronic bucket-handle tears of medial meniscus. Arthrosc J Arthrosc Relat Surg Off Publ Arthrosc Assoc N Am Int Arthrosc Assoc 30(4):492–496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2013.12.020 CrossRef

15.

Fairbank TJ (1948) Knee joint changes after meniscectomy. J Bone Jt Surg Br 30B(4):664–670CrossRef

16.

Feng H, Hong L, Geng X, Zhang H, Wang X, Jiang X (2008) Second-look arthroscopic evaluation of bucket-handle meniscus tear repairs with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: 67 consecutive cases. Arthrosc J Arthrosc Relat Surg Off Publ Arthrosc Assoc N Am Int Arthrosc Assoc 24(12):1358–1366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2008.07.017 CrossRef

17.

Freedman KB, Nho SJ, Cole BJ (2003) Marrow stimulating technique to augment meniscus repair. Arthrosc J Arthrosc Relat Surg Off Publ Arthrosc Assoc N Am Int Arthrosc Assoc 19(7):794–798CrossRef

18.

Fukubayashi T, Kurosawa H (1980) The contact area and pressure distribution pattern of the knee. A study of normal and osteoarthrotic knee joints. Acta Orthop Scand 51(6):871–879CrossRefPubMed

19.

Girolamo L, Galliera E, Volpi P, Denti M, Dogliotti G, Quaglia A, Cabitza P, Corsi Romanelli MM, Randelli P (2013) Why menisci show higher healing rate when repaired during ACL reconstruction? Growth factors release can be the explanation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Off J ESSKA. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-013-2712-8 CrossRef

20.

Grant JA, Wilde J, Miller BS, Bedi A (2012) Comparison of inside-out and all-inside techniques for the repair of isolated meniscal tears: a systematic review. Am J Sports Med 40(2):459–468. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546511411701 CrossRefPubMed

21.

Haklar U, Donmez F, Basaran SH, Canbora MK (2013) Results of arthroscopic repair of partial- or full-thickness longitudinal medial meniscal tears by single or double vertical sutures using the inside-out technique. Am J Sports Med 41(3):596–602. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546512472046 CrossRefPubMed

22.

Henning CE, Lynch MA, Yearout KM, Vequist SW, Stallbaumer RJ, Decker KA (1990) Arthroscopic meniscal repair using an exogenous fibrin clot. Clin Orthop Relat Res 252:64–72

23.

Henning CE, Yearout KM, Vequist SW, Stallbaumer RJ, Decker KA (1991) Use of the fascia sheath coverage and exogenous fibrin clot in the treatment of complex meniscal tears. Am J Sports Med 19(6):626–631CrossRefPubMed

24.

Irrgang JJ, Anderson AF, Boland AL, Harner CD, Kurosaka M, Neyret P, Richmond JC, Shelborne KD (2001) Development and validation of the international knee documentation committee subjective knee form. Am J Sports Med 29(5):600–613CrossRefPubMed

25.

Kalliakmanis A, Zourntos S, Bousgas D, Nikolaou P (2008) Comparison of arthroscopic meniscal repair results using 3 different meniscal repair devices in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction patients. Arthrosc J Arthrosc Relat Surg Off Publ Arthrosc Assoc N Am Int Arthrosc Assoc 24(7):810–816. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2008.03.003 CrossRef

26.

Krych AJ, Pitts RT, Dajani KA, Stuart MJ, Levy BA, Dahm DL (2010) Surgical repair of meniscal tears with concomitant anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in patients 18 years and younger. Am J Sports Med 38(5):976–982. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546509354055 CrossRefPubMed

27.

Kubiak G, Fabiś J (2010) Clinical results of meniscus repair. Ortop Traumatol Rehabil 12(1):28–40PubMed

28.

Kurzweil PR, Lynch NM, Coleman S, Kearney B (2014) Repair of horizontal meniscus tears: a systematic review. Arthrosc J Arthrosc Relat Surg Off Publ Arthrosc Assoc N Am Int Arthrosc Assoc. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2014.05.038 CrossRef

29.

Logan M, Watts M, Owen J, Myers P (2009) Meniscal repair in the elite athlete: results of 45 repairs with a minimum 5-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med 37(6):1131–1134. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546508330138 CrossRefPubMed

30.

Lyman S, Hidaka C, Valdez AS, Hetsroni I, Pan TJ, Do H, Dunn WR, Marx RG (2013) Risk factors for meniscectomy after meniscal repair. Am J Sports Med 41(12):2772–2778. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546513503444 CrossRefPubMed

31.

Lysholm J, Gillquist J (1982) Evaluation of knee ligament surgery results with special emphasis on use of a scoring scale. Am J Sports Med 10(3):150–154. https://doi.org/10.1177/036354658201000306 CrossRefPubMed

32.

Macconaill MA (1932) The function of intra-articular fibrocartilages, with special reference to the knee and inferior radio-ulnar joints. J Anat 66(Pt 2):210–227PubMedPubMedCentral

33.

Majewski M, Stoll R, Widmer H, Müller W, Friederich NF (2006) Midterm and long-term results after arthroscopic suture repair of isolated, longitudinal, vertical meniscal tears in stable knees. Am J Sports Med 34(7):1072–1076. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546505284236 CrossRefPubMed

34.

Makris EA, Hadidi P, Athanasiou KA (2011) The knee meniscus: structure-function, pathophysiology, current repair techniques, and prospects for regeneration. Biomaterials 32(30):7411–7431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.06.037 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

35.

McDermott ID, Sharifi F, Bull AMJ, Gupte CM, Thomas RW, Amis AA (2004) An anatomical study of meniscal allograft sizing. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Off J ESSKA 12(2):130–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-003-0366-7 CrossRef

36.

Naimark MB, Kegel G, O’Donnell T, Lavigne S, Heveran C, Crawford DC (2014) Knee function assessment in patients with meniscus injury a preliminary study of reproducibility, response to treatment, and correlation with patient-reported questionnaire outcomes. Orthop J Sports Med 2(9):2325967114550987. https://doi.org/10.1177/2325967114550987 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

37.

Nepple JJ, Dunn WR, Wright RW (2012) Meniscal repair outcomes at greater than five years: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. J Bone Jt Surg Am 94(24):2222–2227. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.K.01584 CrossRef

38.

Nyland J, Campbell K, Kalloub A, Strauss EJ, Kuban K, Caborn DNM (2018) Medial meniscus grafting restores normal tibiofemoral contact pressures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 138(3):361–367. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-017-2849-x CrossRefPubMed

39.

Paxton ES, Stock MV, Brophy RH (2011) Meniscal repair versus partial meniscectomy: a systematic review comparing reoperation rates and clinical outcomes. Arthrosc J Arthrosc Relat Surg Off Publ Arthrosc Assoc N Am Int Arthrosc Assoc 27(9):1275–1288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2011.03.088 CrossRef

40.

Pengas IP, Assiotis A, Nash W, Hatcher J, Banks J, McNicholas MJ (2012) Total meniscectomy in adolescents: a 40-year follow-up. J Bone Jt Surg Br 94(12):1649–1654. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.94B12.30562 CrossRef

41.

Perdue PS, Hummer CD, Colosimo AJ, Heidt RS, Dormer SG (1996) Meniscal repair: outcomes and clinical follow-up. Arthrosc J Arthrosc Relat Surg Off Publ Arthrosc Assoc N Am Int Arthrosc Assoc 12(6):694–698CrossRef

42.

Rockborn P, Gillquist J (2000) Results of open meniscus repair. Long-term follow-up study with a matched uninjured control group. J Bone Jt Surg Br 82(4):494–498CrossRef

43.

Roos EM, Roos HP, Lohmander LS, Ekdahl C, Beynnon BD (1998) Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)-development of a self-administered outcome measure. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 28(2):88–96. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.1998.28.2.88 CrossRefPubMed

44.

Sallé de Chou, E, Pujol N, Rochcongar G, Cucurulo T, Potel J-F, Dalmay F, Ehkirch F-P, Laporte C, Le Henaff G, Seil R, Lutz C, Gunepin F-X, Sonnery-Cottet B, Société Française d’Arthroscopie (2015) Analysis of short and long-term results of horizontal meniscal tears in young adults. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 101(8 Suppl):S317–S322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2015.09.009 CrossRef

45.

Steadman JR, Matheny LM, Singleton SB, Johnson NS, Rodkey WG, Crespo B, Briggs KK (2015) Meniscus suture repair: minimum 10-year outcomes in patients younger than 40 years compared with patients 40 and older. Am J Sports Med 43(9):2222–2227. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546515591260 CrossRefPubMed

46.

Spahn G, Plettenberg H, Hoffmann M, Klemm HT, Brochhausen-Delius C (2017) The frequency of cartilage lesions in non-injured knees with symptomatic meniscus tears: results from an arthroscopic and NIR- (near-infrared) spectroscopic investigation. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 137(6):837–844. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-017-2672-4 CrossRefPubMed

47.

Tegner Y, Lysholm J (1985) Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries. Clin Orthop Relat Res 198:43–49

48.

Tenuta JJ, Arciero RA (1994) Arthroscopic evaluation of meniscal repairs. Factors that effect healing. Am J Sports Med 22(6):797–802CrossRefPubMed

49.

Tuckman DV, Bravman JT, Lee SS, Rosen JE, Sherman OH (2006) Outcomes of meniscal repair: minimum of 2-year follow-up. Bulletin (Hosp Jt Dis (N Y, N Y)) 63(3–4):100–104

50.

Uchio Y, Ochi M, Adachi N, Kawasaki K, Iwasa J (2003) Results of rasping of meniscal tears with and without anterior cruciate ligament injury as evaluated by second-look arthroscopy. Arthros J Arthrosc Relat Surg Off Publ Arthrosc Assoc N Am Int Arthrosc Assoc 19(5):463–469. https://doi.org/10.1053/jars.2003.50109 CrossRef

51.

Unay K, Akcal MA, Gokcen B, Akan K, Esenkaya I, Poyanlı O (2014) The relationship between intra-articular meniscal, chondral, and ACL lesions: finding from 1,774 knee arthroscopy patients and evaluation by gender. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol Orthop Traumatol 24(7):1255–1262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-013-1309-8 CrossRef

52.

Ververidis AN, Verettas DA, Kazakos KJ, Tilkeridis CE, Chatzipapas CN (2006) Meniscal bucket handle tears: a retrospective study of arthroscopy and the relation to MRI. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Off J ESSKA 14(4), 343–349. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-005-0678-x CrossRef

53.

Veth RP (1985) Clinical significance of knee joint changes after meniscectomy. Clin Orthop Relat Res 198:56–60

54.

Voloshin AS, Wosk J (1983) Shock absorption of meniscectomized and painful knees: a comparative in vivo study. J Biomed Eng 5(2):157–161CrossRefPubMed

55.

Wasserstein D, Dwyer T, Gandhi R, Austin PC, Mahomed N, Ogilvie-Harris D (2013) A matched-cohort population study of reoperation after meniscal repair with and without concomitant anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 41(2):349–355. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546512471134 CrossRefPubMed

56.

Westermann RW, Wright RW, Spindler KP, Huston LJ, Knee Group MOON, Wolf BR (2014) Meniscal repair with concurrent anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: operative success and patient outcomes at 6-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med 42(9):2184–2192. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546514536022 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

57.

Wilson AS, Legg PG, McNeur JC (1969) Studies on the innervation of the medial meniscus in the human knee joint. Anat Rec 165(4):485–491. https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.1091650404 CrossRefPubMed

58.

Zimny ML, Albright DJ, Dabezies E (1988) Mechanoreceptors in the human medial meniscus. Acta Anat 133(1):35–40CrossRefPubMed

Titel: What are the factors to affect outcome and healing of meniscus bucket handle tears?
verfasst von: Andreas Hupperich
G. M. Salzmann
P. Niemeyer
M. Feucht
H. Eberbach
N. P. Südkamp
J. Kühle
Publikationsdatum: 29.06.2018
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery / Ausgabe 10/2018
Print ISSN: 0936-8051
Elektronische ISSN: 1434-3916
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-018-2989-7

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen.
» Jetzt entdecken

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

18.04.2024 | Wirbelsäulenmetastase | Nachrichten

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Springer Medizin

What are the factors to affect outcome and healing of meniscus bucket handle tears?

Abstract

Introduction

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Arthropedia

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Stereotaktische Radiatio schlägt konventionelle Bestrahlung

Vorsicht mit hohen NSAR-Dosen bei ankylosierender Spondylitis!

Brustkrebs in der Vorgeschichte macht Gelenkersatz komplikationsträchtiger

Zwei neue Alternativen zu TNF-Inhibitoren bei axSpA

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Introduction

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 10/2018

Long-term survival of the cemented Müller CDH stem: a minimum follow-up of 10 years

Correlation of CT imaging and histology to guide bone graft selection in scaphoid non-union surgery

Ineffectiveness of lateral-wedge insoles on the improvement of pain and function for medial knee osteoarthritis: a meta-analysis of controlled randomized trials

Translation and validation of the Simplified Chinese version of International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form

Stability of supramalleolar osteotomies using different implants in a sawbone model

Increased medial and lateral tibial posterior slopes are independent risk factors for graft failure following ACL reconstruction

Arthropedia

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Stereotaktische Radiatio schlägt konventionelle Bestrahlung

Vorsicht mit hohen NSAR-Dosen bei ankylosierender Spondylitis!

Brustkrebs in der Vorgeschichte macht Gelenkersatz komplikationsträchtiger

Zwei neue Alternativen zu TNF-Inhibitoren bei axSpA

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie