nach oben

Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery

Erschienen in:

04.09.2018 | Knee Revision Surgery

Significant increase of pathogen detection rate by dry arthroscopic biopsies at suspected low-grade infection following total knee arthroplasty: a prospective observational study

verfasst von: Sebastian F. Baumbach, Wolf C. Prall, Andreas M. Scharpf, Viktoria Hererich, Maximilian Schmidt, Norbert P. Suedkamp, Amelie Stoehr, Hermann O. Mayr

Erschienen in: Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery | Ausgabe 11/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Introduction

The differentiation between stiff-knee and low-grade periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is the current diagnostic challenge in total knee (TKA) revision arthroplasty. The aim of this study was to investigate the additional value of dry biopsies, compared to wet biopsies, in patients presenting with knee stiffness following primary TKA.

Materials and methods

Single center, prospective observational study. Consecutive patients with joint stiffness of unknown origin following primary TKA were enrolled. Patient assessment followed the diagnostic standard algorithm. During diagnostic arthroscopy, synovial fluid (synovial WBC, PMN%) and five dry biopsies (dry) were collected. Then fluid was infused and another five microbiology (wet) and five histological biopsies gathered, all from identical locations. The primary outcome parameter was the difference between the pathogens in wet and dry biopsies.

Results

71 patients (61% females, 67 ± 10 years) were eligible. Preoperative blood serology mean CRP (0.7 ± 1.5 mg/dl; p = 0.852), WBC (6.6 ± 1.7 G/l; p = 0.056), and synovial fluid mean WBC (1639 ± 2111; p = 0.602), PMN% (38 ± 28; p = 0.738) did not differ between patients with negative, positive wet or dry biopsies. The histology was in 11% positive (p = 0.058). In 32% at least one pathogen was detected, 48% from wet, 44% from dry biopsies. An inhomogeneous distribution was found. Cutibacterium acnes (100%) was solely found in wet, Micrococcus luteus (75%), Staphylococcus capitis (67%), and Micrococcus lylae (100%) were predominantly found in dry biopsies. Additional dry biopsies increased the pathogen detection rate by 49%.

Conclusion

The addition of dry biopsies to the current standard diagnostic algorithm for PJI increased the pathogen detection rate by 49%.

Parvizi J, Tan TL, Goswami K, Higuera C, Della Valle C, Chen AF, Shohat N (2018) The 2018 definition of periprosthetic hip and knee infection: an evidence-based and validated criteria. J Arthroplast 33(5):1309.e2–1314.e2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2018.02.078 CrossRef

Djahani O, Rainer S, Pietsch M, Hofmann S (2013) Systematic analysis of painful total knee prosthesis, a diagnostic algorithm. Arch Bone Jt Surg 1(2):48–52. https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2017-315384 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Park CN, White PB, Meftah M, Ranawat AS, Ranawat CS (2016) Diagnostic algorithm for residual pain after total knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics 39(2):e246–e252. https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20160119-06 CrossRefPubMed

Esposito CI (2017) CORR Insights^®: periprosthetic joint infection is the main cause of failure for modern knee arthroplasty: an analysis of 11,134 knees. Clin Orthop Relat Res 475(9):2202–2204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-017-5436-0 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Koh IJ, Cho W-S, Choi NY, Kim TK, Group KKR (2014) Causes, risk factors, and trends in failures after TKA in Korea over the past 5 years: a multicenter study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 472(1):316–326. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-013-3252-8 CrossRefPubMed

Kanwar S, Al-Mansoori AA, Chand MR, Villa JM, Suarez JC, Patel PD (2018) What is the optimal criteria to use for detecting periprosthetic joint infections before total joint arthroplasty? J Arthroplast. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2018.02.072 CrossRef

Grau L, Gunder MA, Schneiderbauer M (2017) Difficult-to-detect low-grade infections responsible for poor outcomes in total knee arthroplasty. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) 46(3):E148–E153

Parvizi J, Zmistowski B, Berbari EF, Bauer TW, Springer BD, Della Valle CJ, Garvin KL, Mont MA, Wongworawat MD, Zalavras CG (2011) New definition for periprosthetic joint infection: from the workgroup of the Musculoskeletal Infection Society. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469(11):2992–2994. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-011-2102-9 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Parvizi J, Gehrke T, Chen AF (2013) Proceedings of the international consensus on periprosthetic joint infection. Bone Jt J 95-B(11):1450–1452. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.95B11.33135 CrossRef

10.

Cats-Baril W, Gehrke T, Huff K, Kendoff D, Maltenfort M, Parvizi J (2013) International consensus on periprosthetic joint infection: description of the consensus process. Clin Orthop Relat Res 471(12):4065–4075. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-013-3329-4 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

11.

Della Valle C, Parvizi J, Bauer TW, DiCesare PE, Evans RP, Segreti J, Spangehl M, Watters WC, Keith M, Turkelson CM, Wies JL, Sluka P, Hitchcock K, Surgeons AAoO (2011) American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons clinical practice guideline on: the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infections of the hip and knee. J Bone Jt Surg Am 93(14):1355–1357. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.9314ebo CrossRef

12.

Parvizi J, Jacovides C, Antoci V, Ghanem E (2011) Diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection: the utility of a simple yet unappreciated enzyme. J Bone Jt Surg Am 93(24):2242–2248. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.J.01413 CrossRef

13.

Massin P, Delory T, Lhotellier L, Pasquier G, Roche O, Cazenave A, Estellat C, Jenny JY (2016) Infection recurrence factors in one- and two-stage total knee prosthesis exchanges. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 24(10):3131–3139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-015-3884-1 CrossRefPubMed

14.

George DA, Haddad FS (2017) One-stage exchange arthroplasty: a surgical technique update. J Arthroplast 32(9S):S59–S62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2017.02.025 CrossRef

15.

Cury RdPL, Cinagawa EHT, Camargo OPA, Honda EK, Klautau GB, Salles MJC (2015) Treatment of infection after total knee arthroplasty. Acta Ortop Bras 23(5):239–243. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-785220152305138774 CrossRefPubMedCentral

16.

Nagra NS, Hamilton TW, Ganatra S, Murray DW, Pandit H (2016) One-stage versus two-stage exchange arthroplasty for infected total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 24(10):3106–3114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-015-3780-8 CrossRefPubMed

17.

Trampuz A, Zimmerli W (2005) Prosthetic joint infections: update in diagnosis and treatment. Swiss Med Wkly 135(17–18):243–251PubMed

18.

Pandey R, Berendt AR, Athanasou NA (2000) Histological and microbiological findings in non-infected and infected revision arthroplasty tissues. The OSIRIS Collaborative Study Group. Oxford skeletal infection research and intervention service. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 120(10):570–574CrossRef

19.

Dramis A, Aldlyami E, Grimer RJ, Dunlop DJ, O’Connell N, Elliott T (2009) What is the significance of a positive Propionibacterium acnes culture around a joint replacement? Int Orthop 33(3):829–833. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-008-0534-y CrossRefPubMed

20.

Balato G, Franceschini V, Ascione T, Lamberti A, Balboni F, Baldini A (2018) Diagnostic accuracy of synovial fluid, blood markers, and microbiological testing in chronic knee prosthetic infections. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 138(2):165–171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-017-2832-6 CrossRefPubMed

21.

Baré J, MacDonald SJ, Bourne RB (2006) Preoperative evaluations in revision total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 446:40–44. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.blo.0000218727.14097.d5 CrossRefPubMed

22.

Rothenberg AC, Wilson AE, Hayes JP, O’Malley MJ, Klatt BA (2017) Sonication of arthroplasty implants improves accuracy of periprosthetic joint infection cultures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 475(7):1827–1836. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-017-5315-8 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

23.

Melendez DP, Greenwood-Quaintance KE, Berbari EF, Osmon DR, Mandrekar JN, Hanssen AD, Patel R (2016) Evaluation of a genus- and group-specific rapid PCR assay panel on synovial fluid for diagnosis of prosthetic knee infection. J Clin Microbiol 54(1):120–126. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.02302-15 CrossRefPubMed

24.

de Saint Vincent B, Migaud H, Senneville E, Loiez C, Pasquier G, Girard J, Putman S (2018) Diagnostic accuracy of the alpha defensin lateral flow device (Synovasure™) for periprosthetic infections in microbiologically complex situations: a study of 42 cases in a French referral centre. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2018.01.018 CrossRefPubMed

25.

Trampuz A, Piper KE, Jacobson MJ, Hanssen AD, Unni KK, Osmon DR, Mandrekar JN, Cockerill FR, Steckelberg JM, Greenleaf JF, Patel R (2007) Sonication of removed hip and knee prostheses for diagnosis of infection. N Engl J Med 357(7):654–663. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa061588 CrossRefPubMed

26.

Volpe L, Indelli PF, Latella L, Poli P, Yakupoglu J, Marcucci M (2014) Periprosthetic joint infections: a clinical practice algorithm. Joints 2(4):169–174PubMed

27.

McDowell M, Park A, Gerlinger TL (2016) The painful total knee arthroplasty. Orthop Clin N Am 47(2):317–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocl.2015.09.008 CrossRef

28.

Fink B, Schäfer P, Frommelt L (2012) Logistic requirements and biopsy of periprosthetic infections: what should be taken into consideration?. Der Orthopäde 41(1):15–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00132-011-1836-0 CrossRefPubMed

29.

Fuerst M, Fink B, Rüther W (2005) The value of preoperative knee aspiration and arthroscopic biopsy in revision total knee arthroplasty. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 143(1):36–41. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2004-836252 CrossRefPubMed

30.

Kalson NS, Borthwick LA, Mann DA, Deehan DJ, Lewis P, Mann C, Mont MA, Morgan-Jones R, Oussedik S, Williams FM, Toms A, Argenson JN, Bellemans J, Bhave A, Furnes O, Gollwitzer H, Haddad FS, Hofmann S, Krenn V (2016) International consensus on the definition and classification of fibrosis of the knee joint. Bone Jt J 98-B(11):1479–1488. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.98B10.37957 CrossRef

31.

Mont MA, Waldman BJ, Hungerford DS (2000) Evaluation of preoperative cultures before second-stage reimplantation of a total knee prosthesis complicated by infection. A comparison-group study. J Bone Jt Surg Am 82-A(11):1552–1557CrossRef

32.

Burnett RSJ, Kelly MA, Hanssen AD, Barrack RL (2007) Technique and timing of two-stage exchange for infection in TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 464:164–178. https://doi.org/10.1097/BLO.0b013e318157eb1e CrossRefPubMed

33.

Math KR, Zaidi SF, Petchprapa C, Harwin SF (2006) Imaging of total knee arthroplasty. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 10(1):47–63. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2006-934216 CrossRefPubMed

34.

Claaßen L, Ettinger S, Pastor M-F, Budde S, Windhagen H, Floerkemeier T (2016) The value of arthroscopic neosynovium biopsies to diagnose periprosthetic knee joint low-grade infection. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-016-2574-x CrossRefPubMed

35.

Fink B, Makowiak C, Fuerst M, Berger I, Schäfer P, Frommelt L (2008) The value of synovial biopsy, joint aspiration and C-reactive protein in the diagnosis of late peri-prosthetic infection of total knee replacements. J Bone Jt Surg Br 90(7):874–878. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.90B7.20417 CrossRef

36.

Trampuz A, Hanssen AD, Osmon DR, Mandrekar J, Steckelberg JM, Patel R (2004) Synovial fluid leukocyte count and differential for the diagnosis of prosthetic knee infection. Am J Med 117(8):556–562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2004.06.022 CrossRefPubMed

37.

Chalmers PN, Walton D, Sporer SM, Levine BR (2015) Evaluation of the role for synovial aspiration in the diagnosis of aseptic loosening after total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Jt Surg Am 97(19):1597–1603. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.N.01249 CrossRef

38.

Della Valle CJ, Sporer SM, Jacobs JJ, Berger RA, Rosenberg AG, Paprosky WG (2007) Preoperative testing for sepsis before revision total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 22(6 Suppl 2):90–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2007.04.013 CrossRef

39.

Ghanem E, Antoci V Jr, Pulido L, Joshi A, Hozack W, Parvizi J (2009) The use of receiver operating characteristics analysis in determining erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein levels in diagnosing periprosthetic infection prior to revision total hip arthroplasty. Int J Infect Dis 13(6):e444–e449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2009.02.017 CrossRefPubMed

40.

Ghanem E, Parvizi J, Burnett RSJ, Sharkey PF, Keshavarzi N, Aggarwal A, Barrack RL (2008) Cell count and differential of aspirated fluid in the diagnosis of infection at the site of total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Jt Surg Am 90(8):1637–1643. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.G.00470 CrossRef

41.

McArthur BA, Abdel MP, Taunton MJ, Osmon DR, Hanssen AD (2015) Seronegative infections in hip and knee arthroplasty: periprosthetic infections with normal erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein level. Bone Jt J 97-B(7):939–944. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.97B7.35500 CrossRef

42.

Allum R (2002) Complications of arthroscopy of the knee. J Bone Jt Surg Br 84(7):937–945CrossRef

43.

Aggarwal VK, Bakhshi H, Ecker NU, Parvizi J, Gehrke T, Kendoff D (2014) Organism profile in periprosthetic joint infection: pathogens differ at two arthroplasty infection referral centers in Europe and in the United States. J Knee 27(5):399–406. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0033-1364102 CrossRef

44.

Holleyman RJ, Baker P, Charlett A, Gould K, Deehan DJ (2016) Microorganisms responsible for periprosthetic knee infections in England and Wales. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 24(10):3080–3087. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-015-3539-2 CrossRefPubMed

45.

Corvec S, Portillo ME, Pasticci BM, Borens O, Trampuz A (2012) Epidemiology and new developments in the diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection. Int J Artif Org 35(10):923–934. https://doi.org/10.5301/ijao.5000168 CrossRef

46.

Malhas AM, Lawton R, Reidy M, Nathwani D, Clift BA (2015) Causative organisms in revision total hip and knee arthroplasty for infection: Increasing multi-antibiotic resistance in coagulase-negative Staphylococcus and the implications for antibiotic prophylaxis. Surgeon 13(5):250–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surge.2014.04.002 CrossRefPubMed

47.

Martinez-Pastor JC (2013) Acute infection in total knee arthroplasty: diagnosis and treatment. Open Orthop J 7(1):197–204. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874325001307010197 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

48.

Ahmad SS, Shaker A, Saffarini M, Chen AF, Hirschmann MT, Kohl S (2016) Accuracy of diagnostic tests for prosthetic joint infection: a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 24(10):3064–3074. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-016-4230-y CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Significant increase of pathogen detection rate by dry arthroscopic biopsies at suspected low-grade infection following total knee arthroplasty: a prospective observational study
verfasst von: Sebastian F. Baumbach
Wolf C. Prall
Andreas M. Scharpf
Viktoria Hererich
Maximilian Schmidt
Norbert P. Suedkamp
Amelie Stoehr
Hermann O. Mayr
Publikationsdatum: 04.09.2018
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery / Ausgabe 11/2018
Print ISSN: 0936-8051
Elektronische ISSN: 1434-3916
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-018-3032-8

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen.
» Jetzt entdecken

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

25.04.2024 | Hypertonie | Nachrichten

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

Significant increase of pathogen detection rate by dry arthroscopic biopsies at suspected low-grade infection following total knee arthroplasty: a prospective observational study

Abstract

Introduction

Materials and methods

Results

Conclusion

Arthropedia

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Therapiestart mit Blutdrucksenkern erhöht Frakturrisiko

Ärztliche Empathie hilft gegen Rückenschmerzen

Stereotaktische Radiatio schlägt konventionelle Bestrahlung

Vorsicht mit hohen NSAR-Dosen bei ankylosierender Spondylitis!

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Introduction

Materials and methods

Results

Conclusion

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 11/2018

Mid-term clinical results of an arthroscopic glenoid rim reconstruction technique for recurrent anterior shoulder instability

Preliminary results of a novel spacer technique in the management of septic revision hip arthroplasty

A new minimally invasive method for anatomic reconstruction of the lateral ankle ligaments with a Tightrope system

Learning curve analysis of 3D-fluoroscopy image-guided pedicle screw insertions in lumbar single-level fusion procedures

Second-generation bi-cruciate stabilized total knee system has a lower reoperation and revision rate than its predecessor

Do patient-specific instruments (PSI) for UKA allow non-expert surgeons to achieve the same saw cut accuracy as expert surgeons?

Arthropedia

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Therapiestart mit Blutdrucksenkern erhöht Frakturrisiko

Ärztliche Empathie hilft gegen Rückenschmerzen

Stereotaktische Radiatio schlägt konventionelle Bestrahlung

Vorsicht mit hohen NSAR-Dosen bei ankylosierender Spondylitis!

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie