Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 3/2011

01.03.2011 | General Gynecology

Ultrasonographic assessment of cervix size and its correlation with female characteristics, pregnancy, BMI, and other anthropometric features

verfasst von: A. P. Londero, S. Bertozzi, A. Fruscalzo, L. Driul, D. Marchesoni

Erschienen in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics | Ausgabe 3/2011

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

Cervical length during the first trimester of pregnancy has not been completely investigated yet. The objective of our study is to compare cervical size in the first ten gestational weeks with that of non-pregnant women, and to determine its correlation with maternal factors, including age, anthropometric features, and reproductive history.

Methods

We collected retrospective data about women who applied to the Obstetrics and Gynecology Outpatients Facility of Udine between February and June 2009, selecting both pregnant and non-pregnant women possessing a transvaginal ultrasonographic measurement of their cervix, and focusing on their age, parity, BMI, cervical, and uterine size. Data were analyzed by R (version.2.8.0), considering significant P < 0.05.

Results

135 women were recruited. By multivariate linear regression, both cervical length and width result independently influenced by pregnancy status, and among non-pregnant nullipara, cervical length results to be significantly lower in women younger than 20 (P < 0.05).

Conclusions

During the first ten gestational weeks, cervix results to be longer and wider than in non-pregnant women, suggesting the possible existence of early gestational, morphological, uterine, and cervical modifications. Women under the age of 20 have a significantly shorter cervix, suggesting an incomplete cervix maturity in this group of women, which may justify the higher prevalence of pre-term births in teenage pregnancies.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Iams JD, Goldenberg RL, Meis PJ, Mercer BM, Moawad A, Das A et al (1996) The length of the cervix and the risk of spontaneous premature delivery National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal Fetal Medicine Unit Network. N Engl J Med 334(9):567–572CrossRefPubMed Iams JD, Goldenberg RL, Meis PJ, Mercer BM, Moawad A, Das A et al (1996) The length of the cervix and the risk of spontaneous premature delivery National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal Fetal Medicine Unit Network. N Engl J Med 334(9):567–572CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Adhikari K, Bagga R, Suri V, Arora S, Masih S (2009) Cervicovaginal HCG and cervical length for prediction of preterm delivery in asymptomatic women at high risk for preterm delivery. Arch Gynecol Obstet. doi:10.1007/s00404-009-0957-8 Adhikari K, Bagga R, Suri V, Arora S, Masih S (2009) Cervicovaginal HCG and cervical length for prediction of preterm delivery in asymptomatic women at high risk for preterm delivery. Arch Gynecol Obstet. doi:10.​1007/​s00404-009-0957-8
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Urbaniak T, Tomaszewska K, Klejewski A (2005) Transvaginal ultrasonography of the cervix length and the prediction of preterm delivery. Ginekol Pol 76(7):543–547PubMed Urbaniak T, Tomaszewska K, Klejewski A (2005) Transvaginal ultrasonography of the cervix length and the prediction of preterm delivery. Ginekol Pol 76(7):543–547PubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat yan Shi C, yan Zhang Y, zhi Jin Y, Dong Y (2003) Study of the cervix of normal pregnancy and threatened preterm delivery using transvaginal sonography. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi 38(5):264–266 yan Shi C, yan Zhang Y, zhi Jin Y, Dong Y (2003) Study of the cervix of normal pregnancy and threatened preterm delivery using transvaginal sonography. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi 38(5):264–266
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Theron G, Schabort C, Norman K, Thompson M, Geerts L (2008) Centile charts of cervical length between 18 and 32 weeks of gestation. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 103:144–148CrossRefPubMed Theron G, Schabort C, Norman K, Thompson M, Geerts L (2008) Centile charts of cervical length between 18 and 32 weeks of gestation. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 103:144–148CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Holcomb WL, Smeltzer JS (1991) Cervical effacement: variation in belief among clinicians. Obstet Gynecol 78(1):43–45PubMed Holcomb WL, Smeltzer JS (1991) Cervical effacement: variation in belief among clinicians. Obstet Gynecol 78(1):43–45PubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Yost NP, Bloom SL, Twickler DM, Leveno KJ (1999) Pitfalls in ultrasonic cervical length measurement for predicting preterm birth. Obstet Gynecol 93(4):510–516CrossRefPubMed Yost NP, Bloom SL, Twickler DM, Leveno KJ (1999) Pitfalls in ultrasonic cervical length measurement for predicting preterm birth. Obstet Gynecol 93(4):510–516CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Sonek JD, Iams JD, Blumenfeld M, Johnson F, Landon M, Gabbe S (1990) Measurement of cervical length in pregnancy: comparison between vaginal ultrasonography and digital examination. Obstet Gynecol 76(2):172–175PubMed Sonek JD, Iams JD, Blumenfeld M, Johnson F, Landon M, Gabbe S (1990) Measurement of cervical length in pregnancy: comparison between vaginal ultrasonography and digital examination. Obstet Gynecol 76(2):172–175PubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Andersen HF (1991) Transvaginal and transabdominal ultrasonography of the uterine cervix during pregnancy. J Clin Ultrasound 19(2):77–83CrossRefPubMed Andersen HF (1991) Transvaginal and transabdominal ultrasonography of the uterine cervix during pregnancy. J Clin Ultrasound 19(2):77–83CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Berghella V, Tolosa JE, Kuhlman K, Weiner S, Bolognese RJ, Wapner RJ (1997) Cervical ultrasonography compared with manual examination as a predictor of preterm delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 177(4):723–730CrossRefPubMed Berghella V, Tolosa JE, Kuhlman K, Weiner S, Bolognese RJ, Wapner RJ (1997) Cervical ultrasonography compared with manual examination as a predictor of preterm delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 177(4):723–730CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Guzman ER, Mellon C, Vintzileos AM, Ananth CV, Walters C, Gipson K (1998) Longitudinal assessment of endocervical canal length between 15 and 24 weeks’ gestation in women at risk for pregnancy loss or preterm birth. Obstet Gynecol 92(1):31–37CrossRefPubMed Guzman ER, Mellon C, Vintzileos AM, Ananth CV, Walters C, Gipson K (1998) Longitudinal assessment of endocervical canal length between 15 and 24 weeks’ gestation in women at risk for pregnancy loss or preterm birth. Obstet Gynecol 92(1):31–37CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Saul LL, Kurtzman JT, Hagemann C, Ghamsary M, Wing DA (2008) Is transabdominal sonography of the cervix after voiding a reliable method of cervical length assessment? J Ultrasound Med 27(9):1305–1311PubMed Saul LL, Kurtzman JT, Hagemann C, Ghamsary M, Wing DA (2008) Is transabdominal sonography of the cervix after voiding a reliable method of cervical length assessment? J Ultrasound Med 27(9):1305–1311PubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Davies G, Ottenhof C, Woodman M, Farley A, Julien N, Vugt DV et al (2008) Cervix length and relaxin as predictors of preterm birth. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 30(12):1124–1131PubMed Davies G, Ottenhof C, Woodman M, Farley A, Julien N, Vugt DV et al (2008) Cervix length and relaxin as predictors of preterm birth. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 30(12):1124–1131PubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Meijer-Hoogeveen M, Holsbeke CV, Tweel IVD, Stoutenbeek P, Visser GHA (2008) Sonographic longitudinal cervical length measurements in nulliparous women at term: prediction of spontaneous onset of labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 32(5):652–656. doi:10.1002/uog.5291 CrossRefPubMed Meijer-Hoogeveen M, Holsbeke CV, Tweel IVD, Stoutenbeek P, Visser GHA (2008) Sonographic longitudinal cervical length measurements in nulliparous women at term: prediction of spontaneous onset of labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 32(5):652–656. doi:10.​1002/​uog.​5291 CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Erasmus I, Nicolaou E, van Gelderen CJ, Nicolaides KH (2005) Cervical length at 23 weeks’ gestation—relation to demographic characteristics and previous obstetric history in South African women. S Afr Med J 95(9):691–695PubMed Erasmus I, Nicolaou E, van Gelderen CJ, Nicolaides KH (2005) Cervical length at 23 weeks’ gestation—relation to demographic characteristics and previous obstetric history in South African women. S Afr Med J 95(9):691–695PubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Meijer-Hoogeveen M, Roos C, Arabin B, Stoutenbeek P, Visser GHA (2009) Transvaginal ultrasound measurement of cervical length in the supine and upright positions versus Bishop score in predicting successful induction of labor at term. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 33(2):213–220. doi:10.1002/uog.6219 CrossRefPubMed Meijer-Hoogeveen M, Roos C, Arabin B, Stoutenbeek P, Visser GHA (2009) Transvaginal ultrasound measurement of cervical length in the supine and upright positions versus Bishop score in predicting successful induction of labor at term. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 33(2):213–220. doi:10.​1002/​uog.​6219 CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Smith GCS, Celik E, To M, Khouri O, Nicolaides KH, Group FMFSTS (2008) Cervical length at mid-pregnancy and the risk of primary cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med 358(13):1346–1353CrossRefPubMed Smith GCS, Celik E, To M, Khouri O, Nicolaides KH, Group FMFSTS (2008) Cervical length at mid-pregnancy and the risk of primary cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med 358(13):1346–1353CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Rao A, Celik E, Poggi S, Poon L, Nicolaides KH, Group FMFPP (2008) Cervical length and maternal factors in expectantly managed prolonged pregnancy: prediction of onset of labor and mode of delivery. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 32(5):646–651. doi:10.1002/uog.6211 CrossRefPubMed Rao A, Celik E, Poggi S, Poon L, Nicolaides KH, Group FMFPP (2008) Cervical length and maternal factors in expectantly managed prolonged pregnancy: prediction of onset of labor and mode of delivery. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 32(5):646–651. doi:10.​1002/​uog.​6211 CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Chao AS, Chao A, Hsieh PCC (2008) Ultrasound assessment of cervical length in pregnancy. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 47(3):291–295CrossRefPubMed Chao AS, Chao A, Hsieh PCC (2008) Ultrasound assessment of cervical length in pregnancy. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 47(3):291–295CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Uyar Y, Erbay G, Demir B, Baytur Y (2009) Comparison of the Bishop score, body mass index and transvaginal cervical length in predicting the success of labor induction. Arch Gynecol Obstet. doi:10.1007/s00404-008-0915-x Uyar Y, Erbay G, Demir B, Baytur Y (2009) Comparison of the Bishop score, body mass index and transvaginal cervical length in predicting the success of labor induction. Arch Gynecol Obstet. doi:10.​1007/​s00404-008-0915-x
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Ennen CS, Bofill JA, Magann EF, Bass JD, Chauhan SP, Morrison JC (2009) Risk factors for cesarean delivery in preterm, term and post-term patients undergoing induction of labor with an unfavorable cervix. Gynecol Obstet Invest 67(2):113–117. doi:10.1159/000166307 CrossRefPubMed Ennen CS, Bofill JA, Magann EF, Bass JD, Chauhan SP, Morrison JC (2009) Risk factors for cesarean delivery in preterm, term and post-term patients undergoing induction of labor with an unfavorable cervix. Gynecol Obstet Invest 67(2):113–117. doi:10.​1159/​000166307 CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Eggebø TM, Økland I, Heien C, Gjessing LK, Romundstad P, Salvesen KA (2009) Can ultrasound measurements replace digitally assessed elements of the Bishop score? Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 88(3):325–331. doi:10.1080/00016340902730417 CrossRefPubMed Eggebø TM, Økland I, Heien C, Gjessing LK, Romundstad P, Salvesen KA (2009) Can ultrasound measurements replace digitally assessed elements of the Bishop score? Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 88(3):325–331. doi:10.​1080/​0001634090273041​7 CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Petrovic D, Novakov-Miki A, Mandi V (2008) Socio-demographic factors and cervical length in pregnancy. Med Pregl 61(9–10):443–451CrossRefPubMed Petrovic D, Novakov-Miki A, Mandi V (2008) Socio-demographic factors and cervical length in pregnancy. Med Pregl 61(9–10):443–451CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Stevens-Simon C, Barrett J, McGregor JA, French J, Persutte W (2000) Short cervix: a cause of preterm delivery in young adolescents? J Matern Fetal Med 9(6):342–347CrossRefPubMed Stevens-Simon C, Barrett J, McGregor JA, French J, Persutte W (2000) Short cervix: a cause of preterm delivery in young adolescents? J Matern Fetal Med 9(6):342–347CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Badouraki M, Christoforidis A, Economou I, Dimitriadis AS, Katzos G (2008) Sonographic assessment of uterine and ovarian development in normal girls aged 1–12 years. J Clin Ultrasound 36(9):539–544. doi:10.1002/jcu.20522 CrossRefPubMed Badouraki M, Christoforidis A, Economou I, Dimitriadis AS, Katzos G (2008) Sonographic assessment of uterine and ovarian development in normal girls aged 1–12 years. J Clin Ultrasound 36(9):539–544. doi:10.​1002/​jcu.​20522 CrossRefPubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Lao TT, Ho LF (1997) The obstetric implications of teenage pregnancy. Hum Reprod 12(10):2303–2305CrossRefPubMed Lao TT, Ho LF (1997) The obstetric implications of teenage pregnancy. Hum Reprod 12(10):2303–2305CrossRefPubMed
31.
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Usta IM, Zoorob D, Abu-Musa A, Naassan G, Nassar AH (2008) Obstetric outcome of teenage pregnancies compared with adult pregnancies. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 87(2):178–183CrossRefPubMed Usta IM, Zoorob D, Abu-Musa A, Naassan G, Nassar AH (2008) Obstetric outcome of teenage pregnancies compared with adult pregnancies. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 87(2):178–183CrossRefPubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Guzman E, Mellon C, Vintzileos A, Ananth C, Walters C, Gibson A (1998) Longitudinal assessment of endocervical canal length between 15 and 24 weeks’ in women at risk for pregnancy loss or preterm birth. Obstet Gynecol 92:31–37CrossRefPubMed Guzman E, Mellon C, Vintzileos A, Ananth C, Walters C, Gibson A (1998) Longitudinal assessment of endocervical canal length between 15 and 24 weeks’ in women at risk for pregnancy loss or preterm birth. Obstet Gynecol 92:31–37CrossRefPubMed
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Ozdemir I, Demirci F, Yucel O, Erkorkmaz U (2007) Ultrasonographic cervical length measurement at 10–14 and 20–24 weeks gestation and the risk of preterm delivery. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 130:176–179CrossRefPubMed Ozdemir I, Demirci F, Yucel O, Erkorkmaz U (2007) Ultrasonographic cervical length measurement at 10–14 and 20–24 weeks gestation and the risk of preterm delivery. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 130:176–179CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Ultrasonographic assessment of cervix size and its correlation with female characteristics, pregnancy, BMI, and other anthropometric features
verfasst von
A. P. Londero
S. Bertozzi
A. Fruscalzo
L. Driul
D. Marchesoni
Publikationsdatum
01.03.2011
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics / Ausgabe 3/2011
Print ISSN: 0932-0067
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-0711
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-010-1377-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2011

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 3/2011 Zur Ausgabe

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.