Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 1/2012

01.07.2012 | Maternal-Fetal Medicine

Maternal request: a reason for rising rates of cesarean section?

verfasst von: Andrea Kottmel, Irene Hoesli, Rahel Traub, Corinne Urech, Dorothy Huang, Brigitte Leeners, Sibil Tschudin

Erschienen in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics | Ausgabe 1/2012

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objective

The rising rate of cesarean sections (CS), especially those on maternal request, is an important obstetric care issue. The aim of this two-point cross-sectional study was to evaluate the prevalence of CS and their indications.

Methods

We performed a retrospective chart review of the indications of all CS performed at a tertiary care clinic in Switzerland in 2002 and 2008. Chi-square, Student’s t and Mann–Whitney U tests were performed to identify significant differences.

Results

The number of CS rose from 23.3% (371 out of 1,594 total life births) in 2002 to 27.5% (513 out of 1,866) in 2008 (p = 0.005). Of all deliveries, the rate of CS on maternal request and, among these, especially those requested after previous CS, increased significantly (2.1 vs. 5.1% and 0.3 vs. 1.2%, respectively). The number of CS due to previous traumatic birth experience nearly doubled (0.7 vs. 1.2%, not significant). Maternal and fetal complications were rare but not negligible in the subset of low-risk patients requesting CS.

Conclusions

The study demonstrated a significant increase in CS on maternal request, especially in case of previous CS. The findings of this study support the need for specific counseling strategies for women requesting delivery by CS.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Joyce A. Martin, Paul D. Sutton, Stephanie J. Ventura, Fay Menacker, Sharon Kirmeyer, T.J. Mathews. M.S. (2009) Births: final data for 2006. D.o.V. Statistics. Natl Vital Stat Rep Joyce A. Martin, Paul D. Sutton, Stephanie J. Ventura, Fay Menacker, Sharon Kirmeyer, T.J. Mathews. M.S. (2009) Births: final data for 2006. D.o.V. Statistics. Natl Vital Stat Rep
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Laws PJ, Sullivan EA (2004) Australia’s mothers and babies 2002. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, National Perinatal Statistics Unit, Sydney Laws PJ, Sullivan EA (2004) Australia’s mothers and babies 2002. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, National Perinatal Statistics Unit, Sydney
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Caesarean sections. Postnote No. 184. Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology 2002, London Caesarean sections. Postnote No. 184. Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology 2002, London
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Zwimpfer A. (2007) Gebären in Schweizer Spitälern. Spitalaufenthalte während Schwangerschaft und Entbindung (Giving birth in Swiss Hospitals. Hospital stays during pregnancy and delivery). Eidgenössisches Bundesministerium für Statistik Zwimpfer A. (2007) Gebären in Schweizer Spitälern. Spitalaufenthalte während Schwangerschaft und Entbindung (Giving birth in Swiss Hospitals. Hospital stays during pregnancy and delivery). Eidgenössisches Bundesministerium für Statistik
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Hofmeyr GJ, Hannah ME (2003) Planned caesarean section for term breech delivery. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (Online) 3: p CD000166 Hofmeyr GJ, Hannah ME (2003) Planned caesarean section for term breech delivery. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (Online) 3: p CD000166
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Grobman WA (2010) Rates and prediction of successful vaginal birth after cesarean. Semin Perinatol 34(4):244–248PubMedCrossRef Grobman WA (2010) Rates and prediction of successful vaginal birth after cesarean. Semin Perinatol 34(4):244–248PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Place PJ, Taffel SM (1988) Vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) in the 1980s. Am J Public Health 78(5):512–515CrossRef Place PJ, Taffel SM (1988) Vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) in the 1980s. Am J Public Health 78(5):512–515CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat National Collaboration Center for Women’s and Children’s Health (2004) Caesarean section. Clinical guideline. Funded to produce guidelines for the NHS by NICE. RCOG Press, London National Collaboration Center for Women’s and Children’s Health (2004) Caesarean section. Clinical guideline. Funded to produce guidelines for the NHS by NICE. RCOG Press, London
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Clark SL, Miller DD, Belfort MA, Dildy GA, Frye DK, Meyers JA (2009) Neonatal and maternal outcomes associated with elective term delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 200(2):156.e1-4PubMedCrossRef Clark SL, Miller DD, Belfort MA, Dildy GA, Frye DK, Meyers JA (2009) Neonatal and maternal outcomes associated with elective term delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 200(2):156.e1-4PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Galyean AM, Lagrew DC, Bush MC, Kurtzman JT (2009) Previous cesarean section and the risk of postpartum maternal complications and adverse neonatal outcomes in future pregnancies. J perinatol 29(11):726–730PubMedCrossRef Galyean AM, Lagrew DC, Bush MC, Kurtzman JT (2009) Previous cesarean section and the risk of postpartum maternal complications and adverse neonatal outcomes in future pregnancies. J perinatol 29(11):726–730PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Schenker JG, Cain JM (1999) FIGO Committee Report. FIGO Committee for the Ethical Aspects of Human Reproduction and Women’s Health, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics. Int j gynaecol obstet 64(3):317–322PubMedCrossRef Schenker JG, Cain JM (1999) FIGO Committee Report. FIGO Committee for the Ethical Aspects of Human Reproduction and Women’s Health, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics. Int j gynaecol obstet 64(3):317–322PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Potter JE, Berquó E, Perpétuo IH, Leal OF, Hopkins K, Souza MR, Formiga MC (2001) Unwanted caesarean sections among public and private patients in Brazil: prospective study. BMJ (Clinical research ed) 323(7322):1155–1158CrossRef Potter JE, Berquó E, Perpétuo IH, Leal OF, Hopkins K, Souza MR, Formiga MC (2001) Unwanted caesarean sections among public and private patients in Brazil: prospective study. BMJ (Clinical research ed) 323(7322):1155–1158CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Mazzoni A, Althabe F, Liu NH, Bonotti AM, Gibbons L, Sánchez AJ, Belizán JM (2011) Women’s preference for caesarean section: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. BJOG 118(4):391–399PubMedCrossRef Mazzoni A, Althabe F, Liu NH, Bonotti AM, Gibbons L, Sánchez AJ, Belizán JM (2011) Women’s preference for caesarean section: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. BJOG 118(4):391–399PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Tschudin S, Alder J, Hendriksen S, Bitzer J, Popp KA, Zanetti R, Hösli I, Holzgreve W, Geissbühler V (2009) Pregnant women’s perception of cesarean section on demand. J Perinat Med 37(3):251–256PubMedCrossRef Tschudin S, Alder J, Hendriksen S, Bitzer J, Popp KA, Zanetti R, Hösli I, Holzgreve W, Geissbühler V (2009) Pregnant women’s perception of cesarean section on demand. J Perinat Med 37(3):251–256PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Gamble J, Creedy DK, McCourt C, Weaver J, Beake S (2007) A critique of the literature on women’s request for cesarean section. Birth (Berkeley, Calif) 34(4):331–340CrossRef Gamble J, Creedy DK, McCourt C, Weaver J, Beake S (2007) A critique of the literature on women’s request for cesarean section. Birth (Berkeley, Calif) 34(4):331–340CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat McCourt C, Weaver J, Statham H, Beake S, Gamble J, Creedy DK (2007) Elective cesarean section and decision making: a critical review of the literature. Birth 34(1):65–79PubMedCrossRef McCourt C, Weaver J, Statham H, Beake S, Gamble J, Creedy DK (2007) Elective cesarean section and decision making: a critical review of the literature. Birth 34(1):65–79PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Gamble JA, Creedy DK (2000) Women’s request for a cesarean section: a critique of the literature. Birth (Berkeley, Calif), 27(4):256–263CrossRef Gamble JA, Creedy DK (2000) Women’s request for a cesarean section: a critique of the literature. Birth (Berkeley, Calif), 27(4):256–263CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Robson MS (2001) Can we reduce the caesarean section rate? Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 15(1):179–194PubMedCrossRef Robson MS (2001) Can we reduce the caesarean section rate? Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 15(1):179–194PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Habiba M, Kaminski M, Da Frè M, Marsal K, Bleker O, Librero J et al (2006) Caesarean section on request: a comparison of obstetricians’ attitudes in eight European countries. BJOG 113(6):647–656PubMedCrossRef Habiba M, Kaminski M, Da Frè M, Marsal K, Bleker O, Librero J et al (2006) Caesarean section on request: a comparison of obstetricians’ attitudes in eight European countries. BJOG 113(6):647–656PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Joseph KS, Young DC, Dodds L, O’Connell CM, Allen VM, Chandra S, Allen AC (2003) Changes in maternal characteristics and obstetric practice and recent increases in primary cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 102(4):791–800PubMedCrossRef Joseph KS, Young DC, Dodds L, O’Connell CM, Allen VM, Chandra S, Allen AC (2003) Changes in maternal characteristics and obstetric practice and recent increases in primary cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 102(4):791–800PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Minkoff H, Chervenak FA (2003) Elective primary cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med 348(10):946–950PubMedCrossRef Minkoff H, Chervenak FA (2003) Elective primary cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med 348(10):946–950PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Laursen M, Hedegaard M, Johansen C (2008) Fear of childbirth: predictors and temporal changes among nulliparous women in the Danish National Birth Cohort. BJOG 115(3):354–360PubMedCrossRef Laursen M, Hedegaard M, Johansen C (2008) Fear of childbirth: predictors and temporal changes among nulliparous women in the Danish National Birth Cohort. BJOG 115(3):354–360PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Wiklund I et al (2008) Expectation and experiences of childbirth in primiparae with caesarean section. BJOG 115(3):324–331PubMedCrossRef Wiklund I et al (2008) Expectation and experiences of childbirth in primiparae with caesarean section. BJOG 115(3):324–331PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Berghella V, Baxter JK, Chauhan SP (2005) Evidence-based surgery for cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 193(5):1607–1617PubMedCrossRef Berghella V, Baxter JK, Chauhan SP (2005) Evidence-based surgery for cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 193(5):1607–1617PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat De Luca R, Boulvain M, Irion O, Berner M, Pfister RE (2009) Incidence of early neonatal mortality and morbidity after late-preterm and term cesarean delivery. Pediatrics 123(6):e1064–e1071PubMedCrossRef De Luca R, Boulvain M, Irion O, Berner M, Pfister RE (2009) Incidence of early neonatal mortality and morbidity after late-preterm and term cesarean delivery. Pediatrics 123(6):e1064–e1071PubMedCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Bailit JL, Gregory KD, Reddy UM, Gonzalez-Quintero VH, Hibbard JU, Ramirez MM et al (2010) Maternal and neonatal outcomes by labor onset type and gestational age. Am J Obstet Gynecol 202(3):245.e1–245.e12CrossRef Bailit JL, Gregory KD, Reddy UM, Gonzalez-Quintero VH, Hibbard JU, Ramirez MM et al (2010) Maternal and neonatal outcomes by labor onset type and gestational age. Am J Obstet Gynecol 202(3):245.e1–245.e12CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Maternal request: a reason for rising rates of cesarean section?
verfasst von
Andrea Kottmel
Irene Hoesli
Rahel Traub
Corinne Urech
Dorothy Huang
Brigitte Leeners
Sibil Tschudin
Publikationsdatum
01.07.2012
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics / Ausgabe 1/2012
Print ISSN: 0932-0067
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-0711
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-012-2273-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2012

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 1/2012 Zur Ausgabe

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.