Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 1/2013

01.01.2013 | Maternal-Fetal Medicine

A study on personal mode of delivery among Chinese obstetrician-gynecologists, midwives and nurses

verfasst von: Yan Qiong Ouyang, Qing Zhang

Erschienen in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics | Ausgabe 1/2013

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Medical staff, especially those working in the Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, have been considered to mostly influence pregnant women on the decision making of delivery mode.

Objective

To investigate mode of delivery among Chinese female obstetrician-gynecologists, midwives and nurses and to explore reasons why they choose cesarean section (CS) for themselves and their advice on mode of delivery.

Methods

Questionnaires including demographic characteristics, their mode of delivery and the reason as well as their suggestion when consulted by pregnant women were administered to 293 participants.

Results

69.7 % was the overall CS rate and 49.0 % without any medical indications. The main reasons for CS were safety for both fetus and mother, easier and quicker labor, fear of injury to the fetus in vaginal delivery (VD), worrying about various unpredicted risk problems in VD and disbelief of VD skills. Those who had experienced CS were more likely to agree with the maternal request for CS or even gave a suggestion straightly for CS.

Conclusions

There is a high rate of CS among Chinese medical staff working in the Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics. Future efforts to reduce the national CS rate would focus on the delivery practice of medical staff, modification of national policies including the one-child policy and promotion of VD skills.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Lumbiganon P, Laopaiboon M, Gülmezoglu AM et al (2010) Method of delivery and pregnancy outcomes in Asia: the WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health 2007–08. Lancet 375:490–499PubMedCrossRef Lumbiganon P, Laopaiboon M, Gülmezoglu AM et al (2010) Method of delivery and pregnancy outcomes in Asia: the WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health 2007–08. Lancet 375:490–499PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Xinhua H (2003) Thought of cesarean section. Chin. J of Pract Obstet Gynecol 19:385 Xinhua H (2003) Thought of cesarean section. Chin. J of Pract Obstet Gynecol 19:385
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Hong Y (2011) The cesarean section rate in Shenyang is far beyond the tipping point. Health News 3:31 Hong Y (2011) The cesarean section rate in Shenyang is far beyond the tipping point. Health News 3:31
4.
Zurück zum Zitat McGurgan P, Coulter-Smith S, O’ Donovan PJ (2001) A national confidential survey of obstetrician’s personal preferences regarding mode of delivery. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Bio 97:17–19CrossRef McGurgan P, Coulter-Smith S, O’ Donovan PJ (2001) A national confidential survey of obstetrician’s personal preferences regarding mode of delivery. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Bio 97:17–19CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Lehmann S, Børdahl PE, Rasmussen SA, Irgens LM (2007) Norwegian midwives and doctors have increased cesarean section rates. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 86:1087–1089PubMedCrossRef Lehmann S, Børdahl PE, Rasmussen SA, Irgens LM (2007) Norwegian midwives and doctors have increased cesarean section rates. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 86:1087–1089PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Hemminki E, Klemetti R, Gissler M (2009) Cesarean section rates among health professionals in Finland, 1990–2006. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 88:1138–1144PubMedCrossRef Hemminki E, Klemetti R, Gissler M (2009) Cesarean section rates among health professionals in Finland, 1990–2006. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 88:1138–1144PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Mungrue K, Nixon C, David Y et al (2010) Trinidadian women’s knowledge, perceptions, and preferences regarding cesarean section: how do they make choices? Int J Women’s Health 2:387–391CrossRef Mungrue K, Nixon C, David Y et al (2010) Trinidadian women’s knowledge, perceptions, and preferences regarding cesarean section: how do they make choices? Int J Women’s Health 2:387–391CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Lin HC, Xirasagar S, Tung YC (2006) Impact of a cultural belief about ghost month on delivery mode in Taiwan. J Epidemiol Community Health I(60):522–526CrossRef Lin HC, Xirasagar S, Tung YC (2006) Impact of a cultural belief about ghost month on delivery mode in Taiwan. J Epidemiol Community Health I(60):522–526CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Carver RH, Nash JG (2005) Doing data analysis with SPSS version 12.0. Thomson/Brooks/Cole, Belmont, CA Carver RH, Nash JG (2005) Doing data analysis with SPSS version 12.0. Thomson/Brooks/Cole, Belmont, CA
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Jacquemyn Y, Ahankour F, Martens G (2003) Flemish obstetricians’ personal preference regarding mode of delivery and attitude towards caesarean section on demand. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 111:164–166PubMedCrossRef Jacquemyn Y, Ahankour F, Martens G (2003) Flemish obstetricians’ personal preference regarding mode of delivery and attitude towards caesarean section on demand. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 111:164–166PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Groom KM, Paterson-Brown S, Fisk NM (2002) Temporal and geographical variation in UK obstetricians’ personal preference regarding mode of delivery. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 100:185–188CrossRef Groom KM, Paterson-Brown S, Fisk NM (2002) Temporal and geographical variation in UK obstetricians’ personal preference regarding mode of delivery. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 100:185–188CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Land R, Parry E, Rane A, Wilson D (2001) Personal preferences of obstetricians towards childbirth. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 41:249–252PubMedCrossRef Land R, Parry E, Rane A, Wilson D (2001) Personal preferences of obstetricians towards childbirth. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 41:249–252PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Monari F, Di Mario S, Facchinetti F, Basevi V (2008) Obstetricians’ and midwives’ attitudes toward cesarean section. Birth 35:129–135PubMedCrossRef Monari F, Di Mario S, Facchinetti F, Basevi V (2008) Obstetricians’ and midwives’ attitudes toward cesarean section. Birth 35:129–135PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Tang S, Xiaoyan L, Zhuochun W (2006) Rising cesarean delivery rate in primiparous women in urban China: evidence from three nationwide household surveys. Am J Obstet Gynecol 195:1527–1532PubMedCrossRef Tang S, Xiaoyan L, Zhuochun W (2006) Rising cesarean delivery rate in primiparous women in urban China: evidence from three nationwide household surveys. Am J Obstet Gynecol 195:1527–1532PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Klemetti R, Che X, Gao Y et al (2010) Cesarean section delivery among primiparous women in rural China: an emerging epidemic. Am J Obstet Gynecol 202:e1–e6PubMedCrossRef Klemetti R, Che X, Gao Y et al (2010) Cesarean section delivery among primiparous women in rural China: an emerging epidemic. Am J Obstet Gynecol 202:e1–e6PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Weaver JJ, Statham H, Richards M (2007) Are there “unnecessary” cesarean sections? Perceptions of women and obstetricians about cesarean sections for nonclinical indications. Birth 34:32–41PubMedCrossRef Weaver JJ, Statham H, Richards M (2007) Are there “unnecessary” cesarean sections? Perceptions of women and obstetricians about cesarean sections for nonclinical indications. Birth 34:32–41PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Fuglenes D, Oian P, Kristiansen IS (2009) Obstetricians’ choice of caesarean delivery in ambiguous cases: is it influenced by risk attitude or fear of complaints and litigation? Am J Obstet Gyncol 200:48CrossRef Fuglenes D, Oian P, Kristiansen IS (2009) Obstetricians’ choice of caesarean delivery in ambiguous cases: is it influenced by risk attitude or fear of complaints and litigation? Am J Obstet Gyncol 200:48CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Savage W (2007) The rising caesarean section rate: a loss of obstetric skill? J Obstet Gynaecol 27:339–346PubMedCrossRef Savage W (2007) The rising caesarean section rate: a loss of obstetric skill? J Obstet Gynaecol 27:339–346PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Waldenstrom U, Hildingsson I, Rubertsson C, Radestad I (2004) A negative birth experience: prevalence and risk factors in a national sample. Birth 31:17–27PubMedCrossRef Waldenstrom U, Hildingsson I, Rubertsson C, Radestad I (2004) A negative birth experience: prevalence and risk factors in a national sample. Birth 31:17–27PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Walker R, Turnbull D, Wilkinson C (2004) Increasing cesarean section rates: exploring the role of culture in an Australian community. Birth 31:117–124PubMedCrossRef Walker R, Turnbull D, Wilkinson C (2004) Increasing cesarean section rates: exploring the role of culture in an Australian community. Birth 31:117–124PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Lamb F, Pasquier JC (2010) Cesarean delivery by maternal request: surveys of obstetricians. Birth 37:178–179PubMedCrossRef Lamb F, Pasquier JC (2010) Cesarean delivery by maternal request: surveys of obstetricians. Birth 37:178–179PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Tschudin S, Alder J, Hendriksen S et al (2009) Previous birth experience and birth anxiety: predictors of caesarean section on demand? J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol 30:175–180PubMedCrossRef Tschudin S, Alder J, Hendriksen S et al (2009) Previous birth experience and birth anxiety: predictors of caesarean section on demand? J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol 30:175–180PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Gamble JA, Health M, Creedy DK (2000) Women’s request for a cesarean section: a critique of the literature. Birth 27:256–263PubMedCrossRef Gamble JA, Health M, Creedy DK (2000) Women’s request for a cesarean section: a critique of the literature. Birth 27:256–263PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Bergholt T, Østberg B, Legarth J, Weber T (2004) Danish obstetricians’ personal preference and general attitude to elective cesarean section on maternal request: a nation-wide postal survey. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 83:262–266PubMed Bergholt T, Østberg B, Legarth J, Weber T (2004) Danish obstetricians’ personal preference and general attitude to elective cesarean section on maternal request: a nation-wide postal survey. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 83:262–266PubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Potter J, Berquo’ E, Perpe’tuo H et al (2001) Unwanted cesarean sections among public and private patients in Brazil: prospective study. BMJ 323:1155–1158PubMedCrossRef Potter J, Berquo’ E, Perpe’tuo H et al (2001) Unwanted cesarean sections among public and private patients in Brazil: prospective study. BMJ 323:1155–1158PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
A study on personal mode of delivery among Chinese obstetrician-gynecologists, midwives and nurses
verfasst von
Yan Qiong Ouyang
Qing Zhang
Publikationsdatum
01.01.2013
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics / Ausgabe 1/2013
Print ISSN: 0932-0067
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-0711
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-012-2517-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2013

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 1/2013 Zur Ausgabe

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.