Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 3/2014

01.03.2014 | Review

The special role of ultrasound for screening, staging and surveillance of malignant ovarian tumors: distinction from other methods of diagnostic imaging

verfasst von: Gwendolin Manegold-Brauer, Anjeung Kang Bellin, Sevgi Tercanli, Olav Lapaire, Viola Heinzelmann-Schwarz

Erschienen in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics | Ausgabe 3/2014

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Ovarian cancer is the most aggressive gynecologic malignancy, with a 5-year survival rate ranging around 40 %. A crucial factor influencing the prognosis is early detection of a suspicious mass and referral to a gynecologic oncology center for further diagnosis, staging and debulking surgery. Here, we present the different imaging methods ultrasound (US), magnetic resonance imaging, computer tomography (CT) and 18F-fluoro-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography (PET)/CT that are used for the characterization, diagnosis, staging and surveillance of ovarian cancer. In this review, we focus on US and discuss in detail the advantages and the limitations, as well as the appropriate indications for each of the individual imaging techniques.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Ferlay J, Autier P, Boniol M, Heanue M, Colombet M, Boyle P (2007) Estimates of the cancer incidence and mortality in Europe in 2006. Ann Oncol 18(3):581–592PubMedCrossRef Ferlay J, Autier P, Boniol M, Heanue M, Colombet M, Boyle P (2007) Estimates of the cancer incidence and mortality in Europe in 2006. Ann Oncol 18(3):581–592PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Alsop K, Fereday S, Meldrum C, deFazio A, Emmanuel C, George J, Dobrovic A, Birrer MJ, Webb PM, Stewart C, Friedlander M, Fox S, Bowtell D, Mitchell G (2012) BRCA mutation frequency and patterns of treatment response in BRCA mutation-positive women with ovarian cancer: a report from the Australian ovarian cancer study group. J Clin Oncol 30(21):2654–2656PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Alsop K, Fereday S, Meldrum C, deFazio A, Emmanuel C, George J, Dobrovic A, Birrer MJ, Webb PM, Stewart C, Friedlander M, Fox S, Bowtell D, Mitchell G (2012) BRCA mutation frequency and patterns of treatment response in BRCA mutation-positive women with ovarian cancer: a report from the Australian ovarian cancer study group. J Clin Oncol 30(21):2654–2656PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Earle CC, Schrag D, Neville BA, Yabroff KR, Topor M, Fahey A, Trimble EL, Bodurka DC, Bristow RE, Carney M, Warren JL (2006) Effect of surgeon specialty on processes of care and outcomes for ovarian cancer patients. J Natl Cancer Inst 98(3):172–180PubMedCrossRef Earle CC, Schrag D, Neville BA, Yabroff KR, Topor M, Fahey A, Trimble EL, Bodurka DC, Bristow RE, Carney M, Warren JL (2006) Effect of surgeon specialty on processes of care and outcomes for ovarian cancer patients. J Natl Cancer Inst 98(3):172–180PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Engelen MJ, van der Zee AG, de Vries EG, Willemse PH (2006) Debulking surgery for ovarian epithelial cancer performed by a gynaecological oncologist improved survival compared with less specialised surgeons. Cancer Treat Rev 32(4):320–323PubMedCrossRef Engelen MJ, van der Zee AG, de Vries EG, Willemse PH (2006) Debulking surgery for ovarian epithelial cancer performed by a gynaecological oncologist improved survival compared with less specialised surgeons. Cancer Treat Rev 32(4):320–323PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Woo YL, Kyrgiou M, Bryant A, Everett T, Dickinson HO (2012) Centralisation of services for gynaecological cancers––a Cochrane systematic review. Gynecol Oncol 126(2):286–290PubMedCrossRef Woo YL, Kyrgiou M, Bryant A, Everett T, Dickinson HO (2012) Centralisation of services for gynaecological cancers––a Cochrane systematic review. Gynecol Oncol 126(2):286–290PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Valentin L, Ameye L, Testa A, Lécuru F, Bernard JP, Paladini D, Van Huffel S, Timmerman D (2006) Ultrasound characteristics of different types of adnexal malignancies. Gynecol Oncol 102(1):41–48PubMedCrossRef Valentin L, Ameye L, Testa A, Lécuru F, Bernard JP, Paladini D, Van Huffel S, Timmerman D (2006) Ultrasound characteristics of different types of adnexal malignancies. Gynecol Oncol 102(1):41–48PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Sharma A, Apostolidou S, Burnell M, Campbell S, Habib M, Gentry-Maharaj A, Amso N, Seif MW et al (2012) Risk of epithelial ovarian cancer in asymptomatic women with ultrasound-detected ovarian masses: a prospective cohort study within the UK collaborative trial of ovarian cancer screening (UKCTOCS). Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 40(3):338–344PubMedCrossRef Sharma A, Apostolidou S, Burnell M, Campbell S, Habib M, Gentry-Maharaj A, Amso N, Seif MW et al (2012) Risk of epithelial ovarian cancer in asymptomatic women with ultrasound-detected ovarian masses: a prospective cohort study within the UK collaborative trial of ovarian cancer screening (UKCTOCS). Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 40(3):338–344PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Timmerman D, Valentin L, Bourne TH, Collins WP, Verrelst H, Vergote I, International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) Group (2000) Terms, definitions and measurements to describe the sonographic features of adnexal tumors: a consensus opinion from the international ovarian tumor analysis (IOTA) group. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 16(5):500–505PubMedCrossRef Timmerman D, Valentin L, Bourne TH, Collins WP, Verrelst H, Vergote I, International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) Group (2000) Terms, definitions and measurements to describe the sonographic features of adnexal tumors: a consensus opinion from the international ovarian tumor analysis (IOTA) group. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 16(5):500–505PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Timmerman D, Testa AC, Bourne T, Ameye L, Jurkovic D, Van Holsbeke C, Paladini D, Van Calster B, Vergote I, Van Huffel S, Valentin L (2008) Simple ultrasound-based rules for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 31(6):681–690PubMedCrossRef Timmerman D, Testa AC, Bourne T, Ameye L, Jurkovic D, Van Holsbeke C, Paladini D, Van Calster B, Vergote I, Van Huffel S, Valentin L (2008) Simple ultrasound-based rules for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 31(6):681–690PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Geomini P, Kruitwagen R, Bremer GL, Cnossen J, Mol BW (2009) The accuracy of risk scores in predicting ovarian malignancy: a systemic review. Obstet Gynecol 113(2 Pt 1):384–394PubMedCrossRef Geomini P, Kruitwagen R, Bremer GL, Cnossen J, Mol BW (2009) The accuracy of risk scores in predicting ovarian malignancy: a systemic review. Obstet Gynecol 113(2 Pt 1):384–394PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Jacobs I, Oram D, Fairbanks J, Turner J, Frost C, Grudzinskas JG (1990) A risk of malignancy index incorporating CA 125, ultrasound and menopausal status for the accurate preoperative diagnosis of ovarian cancer. Br J Obstet Gynecol 97(10):922–929CrossRef Jacobs I, Oram D, Fairbanks J, Turner J, Frost C, Grudzinskas JG (1990) A risk of malignancy index incorporating CA 125, ultrasound and menopausal status for the accurate preoperative diagnosis of ovarian cancer. Br J Obstet Gynecol 97(10):922–929CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Chia YN, Marsden DE, Robertson G, Hacker NF (2008) Triage of ovarian masses. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 48(3):322–328PubMedCrossRef Chia YN, Marsden DE, Robertson G, Hacker NF (2008) Triage of ovarian masses. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 48(3):322–328PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Timmerman D, Testa AC, Bourne T, Ferrazzi E, Ameye L, Konstantinovic ML, Van Calster B, Collins WP, Vergote I, Van Huffel S, Valentin L (2005) Logistic regression model to distinguish between the benign and malignant adnexal mass before surgery: a multicenter study by the international ovarian tumor analysis group. J Clin Oncol 23(34):8794–8801PubMedCrossRef Timmerman D, Testa AC, Bourne T, Ferrazzi E, Ameye L, Konstantinovic ML, Van Calster B, Collins WP, Vergote I, Van Huffel S, Valentin L (2005) Logistic regression model to distinguish between the benign and malignant adnexal mass before surgery: a multicenter study by the international ovarian tumor analysis group. J Clin Oncol 23(34):8794–8801PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Valentin L, Hagen B, Tingulstad S, Eik-Nes S (2001) Comparison of ‘pattern recognition’ and logistic regression models for discrimination between benign and malignant pelvic masses: a prospective cross validation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 18(4):357–365PubMedCrossRef Valentin L, Hagen B, Tingulstad S, Eik-Nes S (2001) Comparison of ‘pattern recognition’ and logistic regression models for discrimination between benign and malignant pelvic masses: a prospective cross validation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 18(4):357–365PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Van Holsbeke C, Van Calster B, Bourne T, Ajossa S, Testa AC, Guerriero S, Fruscio R, Lissoni AA, Czerkierdowski A, Savelli L, Van Huffel S, Valentin L, Timmerman D (2012) External validation of diagnostic models to estimate the risk of malignancy in adnexal masses. Clin Cancer Res 18(3):815–825PubMedCrossRef Van Holsbeke C, Van Calster B, Bourne T, Ajossa S, Testa AC, Guerriero S, Fruscio R, Lissoni AA, Czerkierdowski A, Savelli L, Van Huffel S, Valentin L, Timmerman D (2012) External validation of diagnostic models to estimate the risk of malignancy in adnexal masses. Clin Cancer Res 18(3):815–825PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Van Calster B, Timmerman D, Valentin L, McIndoe A, Ghaem-Maghami S, Testa AC, Vergote I, Bourne T (2012) Triaging women with ovarian masses for surgery: observational diagnostic study to compare RCOG guidelines with an international ovarian tumour analysis (IOTA) group protocol. BJOG 119(6):662–671PubMedCrossRef Van Calster B, Timmerman D, Valentin L, McIndoe A, Ghaem-Maghami S, Testa AC, Vergote I, Bourne T (2012) Triaging women with ovarian masses for surgery: observational diagnostic study to compare RCOG guidelines with an international ovarian tumour analysis (IOTA) group protocol. BJOG 119(6):662–671PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Moore RG, McMeekin DS, Brown AK, DiSilvestro P, Miller MC, Allard WJ, Gajewski W, Kurman R, Bast RC Jr, Skates SJ (2009) A novel multiple marker bioassay utilizing HE4 and CA125 for the prediction of ovarian cancer in patients with a pelvic mass. Gynecol Oncol 112(1):40–46PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Moore RG, McMeekin DS, Brown AK, DiSilvestro P, Miller MC, Allard WJ, Gajewski W, Kurman R, Bast RC Jr, Skates SJ (2009) A novel multiple marker bioassay utilizing HE4 and CA125 for the prediction of ovarian cancer in patients with a pelvic mass. Gynecol Oncol 112(1):40–46PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Urban N, Thorpe JD, Bergan LA, Forrest RM, Kampani AV, Scholler N, O’Briant KC, Anderson GL, Cramer DW, Berg CD, McIntosh MW, Hartge P, Drescher CW (2011) Potential role of HE4 in multimodal screening for epithelial ovarian cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 103(21):1630–1634PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Urban N, Thorpe JD, Bergan LA, Forrest RM, Kampani AV, Scholler N, O’Briant KC, Anderson GL, Cramer DW, Berg CD, McIntosh MW, Hartge P, Drescher CW (2011) Potential role of HE4 in multimodal screening for epithelial ovarian cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 103(21):1630–1634PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Karlsen MA, Sandhu N, Høgdall C, Christensen IJ, Nedergaard L, Lundvall L, Engelholm SA, Pedersen AT, Hartwell D, Lydolph M, Laursen IA, Høgdall EV (2012) Evaluation of HE4, CA125, risk of ovarian malignancy algorithm (ROMA) and risk of malignancy index (RMI) as diagnostic tools of epithelial ovarian cancer in patients with a pelvic mass. Gynecol Oncol 127(2):379–383PubMedCrossRef Karlsen MA, Sandhu N, Høgdall C, Christensen IJ, Nedergaard L, Lundvall L, Engelholm SA, Pedersen AT, Hartwell D, Lydolph M, Laursen IA, Høgdall EV (2012) Evaluation of HE4, CA125, risk of ovarian malignancy algorithm (ROMA) and risk of malignancy index (RMI) as diagnostic tools of epithelial ovarian cancer in patients with a pelvic mass. Gynecol Oncol 127(2):379–383PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Jacob F, Meier M, Caduff R, Goldstein D, Pochechueva T, Hacker N, Fink D, Heinzelmann-Schwarz V (2011) No benefit from combining HE4 and CA125 as ovarian tumor markers in a clinical setting. Gynecol Oncol 121(3):487–491PubMedCrossRef Jacob F, Meier M, Caduff R, Goldstein D, Pochechueva T, Hacker N, Fink D, Heinzelmann-Schwarz V (2011) No benefit from combining HE4 and CA125 as ovarian tumor markers in a clinical setting. Gynecol Oncol 121(3):487–491PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Campbell S (2012) Ovarian cancer: role of ultrasound in preoperative diagnosis and population screening. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 40(3):245–254PubMedCrossRef Campbell S (2012) Ovarian cancer: role of ultrasound in preoperative diagnosis and population screening. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 40(3):245–254PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Reade CJ, Riva JJ, Busse JW, Goldsmith CH, Elit L (2013) Risks and benefits of screening asymptomatic women for ovarian cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gynecol Oncol 130(3):674–681PubMedCrossRef Reade CJ, Riva JJ, Busse JW, Goldsmith CH, Elit L (2013) Risks and benefits of screening asymptomatic women for ovarian cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gynecol Oncol 130(3):674–681PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Long KC, Kauff ND (2013) Screening for familial ovarian cancer: a ray of hope and a light to steer by. J Clin Oncol 31(1):8–10PubMedCrossRef Long KC, Kauff ND (2013) Screening for familial ovarian cancer: a ray of hope and a light to steer by. J Clin Oncol 31(1):8–10PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Mohaghegh P, Rockall AG (2012) Imaging strategy for early ovarian cancer: characterization of adnexal masses with conventional and advanced imaging techniques. Radiographics 32(6):1751–1773PubMedCrossRef Mohaghegh P, Rockall AG (2012) Imaging strategy for early ovarian cancer: characterization of adnexal masses with conventional and advanced imaging techniques. Radiographics 32(6):1751–1773PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Timmerman D, Schwärzler P, Collins WP, Claerhout F, Coenen M, Amant F, Vergote I, Bourne TH (1999) Subjective assessment of adnexal masses with the use of ultrasonography: an analysis of interobserver variability and experience. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 13:11–16 Timmerman D, Schwärzler P, Collins WP, Claerhout F, Coenen M, Amant F, Vergote I, Bourne TH (1999) Subjective assessment of adnexal masses with the use of ultrasonography: an analysis of interobserver variability and experience. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 13:11–16
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Dodge JE, Covens AL, Lacchetti C, Elit LM, Le T, Devries-Abound M, Fung-Kee-Fung M, Gynecology Cancer Disease Site Group (2012) Management of a suspicious adnexal mass: a clinical practice guideline. Curr Oncol 19(4):244–257CrossRef Dodge JE, Covens AL, Lacchetti C, Elit LM, Le T, Devries-Abound M, Fung-Kee-Fung M, Gynecology Cancer Disease Site Group (2012) Management of a suspicious adnexal mass: a clinical practice guideline. Curr Oncol 19(4):244–257CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Kinkel K, Lu Y, Mehdizade A, Pelte MF, Hricak H (2005) Indeterminate ovarian mass at US: incremental value of second imaging test for characterization–meta-analysis and Bayesian analysis. Radiology 236(1):85–94PubMedCrossRef Kinkel K, Lu Y, Mehdizade A, Pelte MF, Hricak H (2005) Indeterminate ovarian mass at US: incremental value of second imaging test for characterization–meta-analysis and Bayesian analysis. Radiology 236(1):85–94PubMedCrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Bharwani N, Reznek RH, Rockall AG (2011) Ovarian cancer management: the role of imaging and diagnostic challenges. Eur J Radiol 78(1):41–51PubMedCrossRef Bharwani N, Reznek RH, Rockall AG (2011) Ovarian cancer management: the role of imaging and diagnostic challenges. Eur J Radiol 78(1):41–51PubMedCrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Alt CD, Brockner KA, Eichbaum M, Sohn C, Arnegger FU, Kauczor HU, Hallscheidt P (2011) Imaging of female pelvic malignancies regarding MRI, CT, and PET/CT: part 2. Strahlenther Onkol 187(11):705–714PubMedCrossRef Alt CD, Brockner KA, Eichbaum M, Sohn C, Arnegger FU, Kauczor HU, Hallscheidt P (2011) Imaging of female pelvic malignancies regarding MRI, CT, and PET/CT: part 2. Strahlenther Onkol 187(11):705–714PubMedCrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Basu S, Kwee TC, Surti S, Akin EA, Yoo D, Alavi A (2011) Fundamentals of PET and PET/CT imaging. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1228:1–18PubMedCrossRef Basu S, Kwee TC, Surti S, Akin EA, Yoo D, Alavi A (2011) Fundamentals of PET and PET/CT imaging. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1228:1–18PubMedCrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Nishizawa S, Inubushi M, Ozawa F, Kido A, Okada H (2007) Physiological FDG uptake in the ovaries after hysterectomy. Ann Nucl Med 21(6):345–348PubMedCrossRef Nishizawa S, Inubushi M, Ozawa F, Kido A, Okada H (2007) Physiological FDG uptake in the ovaries after hysterectomy. Ann Nucl Med 21(6):345–348PubMedCrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhu ZH, Cheng WY, Cheng X, Dang YH (2007) Characteristics of physiological uptake of uterus and ovaries on 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography. Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao 29(1):124–129PubMed Zhu ZH, Cheng WY, Cheng X, Dang YH (2007) Characteristics of physiological uptake of uterus and ovaries on 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography. Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao 29(1):124–129PubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Iyer RB, Balachandran A, Devine CE (2007) PET/CT and cross sectional imaging of gynecologic malignancy. Cancer Imaging 7 (Spec No A):S130–S138CrossRef Iyer RB, Balachandran A, Devine CE (2007) PET/CT and cross sectional imaging of gynecologic malignancy. Cancer Imaging 7 (Spec No A):S130–S138CrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Castellucci P, Perrone AM, Picchio M, Ghi T, Farsad M, Nanni C, Messa C, Meriggiola MC, Pelusi G, Al-Nahhas A, Rubello D, Fazio F, Fanti S (2007) Diagnostic accuracy of 18F-FDG PET/CT in characterizing ovarian lesions and staging ovarian cancer: correlation with transvaginal ultrasonography, computed tomography, and histology. Nucl Med Commun 28(8):589–595PubMedCrossRef Castellucci P, Perrone AM, Picchio M, Ghi T, Farsad M, Nanni C, Messa C, Meriggiola MC, Pelusi G, Al-Nahhas A, Rubello D, Fazio F, Fanti S (2007) Diagnostic accuracy of 18F-FDG PET/CT in characterizing ovarian lesions and staging ovarian cancer: correlation with transvaginal ultrasonography, computed tomography, and histology. Nucl Med Commun 28(8):589–595PubMedCrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Risum S, Høgdall C, Loft A, Berthelsen AK, Høgdall E, Nedergaard L, Lundvall L, Engelholm SA (2007) The diagnostic value of PET/CT for primary ovarian cancer––a prospective study. Gynecol Oncol 105(1):145–149PubMedCrossRef Risum S, Høgdall C, Loft A, Berthelsen AK, Høgdall E, Nedergaard L, Lundvall L, Engelholm SA (2007) The diagnostic value of PET/CT for primary ovarian cancer––a prospective study. Gynecol Oncol 105(1):145–149PubMedCrossRef
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Yamamoto Y, Oguri H, Yamada R, Maeda N, Kohsaki S, Fukaya T (2008) Preoperative evaluation of pelvic masses with combined 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and computed tomography. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 102(2):124–127PubMedCrossRef Yamamoto Y, Oguri H, Yamada R, Maeda N, Kohsaki S, Fukaya T (2008) Preoperative evaluation of pelvic masses with combined 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and computed tomography. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 102(2):124–127PubMedCrossRef
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Nam EJ, Yun MJ, Oh YT, Kim JW, Kim JH, Kim S, Jung YW, Kim SW, Kim YT (2010) Diagnosis and staging of primary ovarian cancer: correlation between PET/CT, Doppler US, and CT or MRI. Gynecol Oncol 116(3):389–394PubMedCrossRef Nam EJ, Yun MJ, Oh YT, Kim JW, Kim JH, Kim S, Jung YW, Kim SW, Kim YT (2010) Diagnosis and staging of primary ovarian cancer: correlation between PET/CT, Doppler US, and CT or MRI. Gynecol Oncol 116(3):389–394PubMedCrossRef
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Vergote I, Tropé CG, Amant F, Kristensen GB, Ehlen T, Johnson N, Verheijen RH, van der Burg ME, Lacave AJ, Panici PB, Kenter GG, Casado A, Mendiola C, Coens C, Verleye L, Stuart GC, Pecorelli S, Reed NS, European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer-Gynaecological Cancer Group; NCIC Clinical Trials Group (2010) Neoadjuvant chemotherapy or primary surgery in stage IIIC or IV ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med 363(10):943–953PubMedCrossRef Vergote I, Tropé CG, Amant F, Kristensen GB, Ehlen T, Johnson N, Verheijen RH, van der Burg ME, Lacave AJ, Panici PB, Kenter GG, Casado A, Mendiola C, Coens C, Verleye L, Stuart GC, Pecorelli S, Reed NS, European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer-Gynaecological Cancer Group; NCIC Clinical Trials Group (2010) Neoadjuvant chemotherapy or primary surgery in stage IIIC or IV ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med 363(10):943–953PubMedCrossRef
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Forstner R (2007) Radiological staging of ovarian cancer: imaging findings and contribution of CT and MRI. Eur Radiol 17(12):3223–3235PubMedCrossRef Forstner R (2007) Radiological staging of ovarian cancer: imaging findings and contribution of CT and MRI. Eur Radiol 17(12):3223–3235PubMedCrossRef
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Fischerova D (2011) Ultrasound scanning of the pelvis and abdomen for staging of gynecological tumors: a review. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 38(3):246–266PubMedCrossRef Fischerova D (2011) Ultrasound scanning of the pelvis and abdomen for staging of gynecological tumors: a review. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 38(3):246–266PubMedCrossRef
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Testa AC, Bourne TH (2009) Characterising pelvic masses using ultrasound. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 23(5):725–738PubMedCrossRef Testa AC, Bourne TH (2009) Characterising pelvic masses using ultrasound. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 23(5):725–738PubMedCrossRef
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Fischerova D, Cibula D, Dundr P, Zikan M, Freitag P, Slama J, Calda P (2008) The role of ultrasound in prediction of optimal versus suboptimal cytoreductive surgery in advanced ovarian cancers OC 132: 18th World congress on ultrasound in obstetrics and gynecology. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 32:243–307 Fischerova D, Cibula D, Dundr P, Zikan M, Freitag P, Slama J, Calda P (2008) The role of ultrasound in prediction of optimal versus suboptimal cytoreductive surgery in advanced ovarian cancers OC 132: 18th World congress on ultrasound in obstetrics and gynecology. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 32:243–307
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Uzan C, Kane A, Rey A, Gouy S, Pautier P, Lhomme C, Duvillard P, Morice P (2011) How to follow up advanced-stage borderline tumours? Mode of diagnosis of recurrence in a large series stage II–III serious borderline tumours of the ovary. Ann Oncol 22(3):631–635PubMedCrossRef Uzan C, Kane A, Rey A, Gouy S, Pautier P, Lhomme C, Duvillard P, Morice P (2011) How to follow up advanced-stage borderline tumours? Mode of diagnosis of recurrence in a large series stage II–III serious borderline tumours of the ovary. Ann Oncol 22(3):631–635PubMedCrossRef
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Zanetta G, Rota S, Lissoni A, Meni A, Brancatelli G, Buda A (2001) Ultrasound, physical examination, and CA 125 measurement for the detection of recurrence after conservative surgery for early borderline ovarian tumors. Gynecol Oncol 81(1):63–66PubMedCrossRef Zanetta G, Rota S, Lissoni A, Meni A, Brancatelli G, Buda A (2001) Ultrasound, physical examination, and CA 125 measurement for the detection of recurrence after conservative surgery for early borderline ovarian tumors. Gynecol Oncol 81(1):63–66PubMedCrossRef
45.
Zurück zum Zitat Mitchell D, Javitt M, Glanc P, Bennett G, Brown D, Dubinsky T, Harisinghani M, Harris R, Horowitz N, Pandharipande P, Pannu H, Podrasky A, Royal H, Shipp T, Siegel C, Simpson L, Wong-You-Cheong J, Zelop C (2012) Staging and follow-up of ovarian cancer ACR appropriateness criteria® Mitchell D, Javitt M, Glanc P, Bennett G, Brown D, Dubinsky T, Harisinghani M, Harris R, Horowitz N, Pandharipande P, Pannu H, Podrasky A, Royal H, Shipp T, Siegel C, Simpson L, Wong-You-Cheong J, Zelop C (2012) Staging and follow-up of ovarian cancer ACR appropriateness criteria®
46.
Zurück zum Zitat Woodward PJ, Hosseinzadeh K, Saenger JS (2004) From the archives of the AFIP: radiologic staging of ovarian carcinoma with pathologic correlation. Radiographics 24(1):225–246PubMedCrossRef Woodward PJ, Hosseinzadeh K, Saenger JS (2004) From the archives of the AFIP: radiologic staging of ovarian carcinoma with pathologic correlation. Radiographics 24(1):225–246PubMedCrossRef
47.
Zurück zum Zitat Forstner R, Hricak H, Occhipinti KA, Powell CB, Frankel SD, Stern JL (1995) Ovarian cancer: staging with CT and MR imaging. Radiology 197(3):619–626PubMedCrossRef Forstner R, Hricak H, Occhipinti KA, Powell CB, Frankel SD, Stern JL (1995) Ovarian cancer: staging with CT and MR imaging. Radiology 197(3):619–626PubMedCrossRef
48.
Zurück zum Zitat Tempany CM, Zou KH, Silverman SG, Brown DL, Kurtz AB, McNeil BJ (2000) Staging of advanced ovarian cancer: comparison of imaging modalities––report from the radiological diagnostic oncology group. Radiology 215(3):761–767PubMedCrossRef Tempany CM, Zou KH, Silverman SG, Brown DL, Kurtz AB, McNeil BJ (2000) Staging of advanced ovarian cancer: comparison of imaging modalities––report from the radiological diagnostic oncology group. Radiology 215(3):761–767PubMedCrossRef
49.
Zurück zum Zitat Coakley FV, Choi PH, Gougoutas CA, Pothuri B, Venkatraman E, Chi D, Bergman A, Hricak H (2002) Peritoneal metastases: detection with spiral CT in patients with ovarian cancer. Radiology 223(2):495–499PubMedCrossRef Coakley FV, Choi PH, Gougoutas CA, Pothuri B, Venkatraman E, Chi D, Bergman A, Hricak H (2002) Peritoneal metastases: detection with spiral CT in patients with ovarian cancer. Radiology 223(2):495–499PubMedCrossRef
50.
Zurück zum Zitat Sebastian S, Lee SI, Horowitz NS, Scott JA, Fischman AJ, Simeone JF, Fulle AF, Hahn PF (2008) PET-CT versus CT alone in ovarian cancer recurrence. Source Abdomen Imaging 33(1):112–118CrossRef Sebastian S, Lee SI, Horowitz NS, Scott JA, Fischman AJ, Simeone JF, Fulle AF, Hahn PF (2008) PET-CT versus CT alone in ovarian cancer recurrence. Source Abdomen Imaging 33(1):112–118CrossRef
51.
Zurück zum Zitat Markman M (2009) Optimal management of recurrent ovarian cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 19(Suppl 2):S40–S43PubMedCrossRef Markman M (2009) Optimal management of recurrent ovarian cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 19(Suppl 2):S40–S43PubMedCrossRef
52.
Zurück zum Zitat Murakami M, Miyamoto T, Iida T, Tsukada H, Watanabe M, Shida M, Maeda H, Nasu S, Yasuda S, Yasuda M, Ide M (2006) Whole-body positron emission tomography and tumor marker CA125 for detection of recurrence in epithelial ovarian cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 16(1):99–107PubMedCrossRef Murakami M, Miyamoto T, Iida T, Tsukada H, Watanabe M, Shida M, Maeda H, Nasu S, Yasuda S, Yasuda M, Ide M (2006) Whole-body positron emission tomography and tumor marker CA125 for detection of recurrence in epithelial ovarian cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 16(1):99–107PubMedCrossRef
53.
Zurück zum Zitat Thrall MM, DeLoia JA, Gallion H, Avril N (2007) Clinical use of combined positron emission tomography and computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) in recurrent ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 105(1):17–22PubMedCrossRef Thrall MM, DeLoia JA, Gallion H, Avril N (2007) Clinical use of combined positron emission tomography and computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) in recurrent ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 105(1):17–22PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
The special role of ultrasound for screening, staging and surveillance of malignant ovarian tumors: distinction from other methods of diagnostic imaging
verfasst von
Gwendolin Manegold-Brauer
Anjeung Kang Bellin
Sevgi Tercanli
Olav Lapaire
Viola Heinzelmann-Schwarz
Publikationsdatum
01.03.2014
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics / Ausgabe 3/2014
Print ISSN: 0932-0067
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-0711
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-013-3081-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2014

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 3/2014 Zur Ausgabe

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.