Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 5/2015

01.05.2015 | General Gynecology

Transvaginal single-incision mesh reconstruction for recurrent or advanced anterior vaginal wall prolapse

verfasst von: J. Marschke, L. Hengst, N. Schwertner-Tiepelmann, K. Beilecke, R. Tunn

Erschienen in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics | Ausgabe 5/2015

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Aims

Single-incision transvaginal mesh for reconstruction of Level I and II prolapses in women with recurrent or advanced prolapse. We evaluated functional, anatomical, sonomorphological and quality-of-life outcome.

Methods

Data were collected retrospectively for preoperative parameters and at follow-up visits. Anatomical cure was assessed with vaginal examination using the ICS-POP-Q system; introital-ultrasound scan for postvoidal residual and description of mesh characteristics was performed. We applied a visual analogue scale (VAS) and the German Pelvic Floor Questionnaire to assess quality-of-life.

Results

Seventy women with cystocele (III: 61.3 %/IV: 16 %), all post-hysterectomy and in majority (81.4 %) after previous cystocele repair, were operated using a single-incision transvaginal technique. Overall anatomical success rate was 95.7 % with significant improvement in quality-of-life (p < 0.0001). Mesh erosion occurred in 5.7 %, one patient presented symptomatic vaginal vault prolapse. Postvoidal residual declined significantly (58 vs. 2.9 %). Sonographic mesh length was 55.7 % of implanted mesh with a wide range of mesh position, but no signs of mesh dislocation. There was no de novo dyspareunia reported, one case of preoperative existing dyspareunia worsened. No severe adverse event was observed.

Conclusions

We hereby present a trial of a high-risk group of patients requiring reconstruction of anterior and apical vaginal wall in mostly recurrent prolapse situation. Our data support the hypothesis of improved anatomical and functional results and less mesh shrinkage caused by the single-incision technique with fixation in sacrospinous ligament in combination with modification in mesh quality compared to former multi-incision techniques.
Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Jelovsek JE, Maher C, Barber MD (2007) Pelvic organ prolapse. Lancet 369(9566):1027–1038 (review)CrossRefPubMed Jelovsek JE, Maher C, Barber MD (2007) Pelvic organ prolapse. Lancet 369(9566):1027–1038 (review)CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Olsen AL, Smith VJ, Bergstrom JO, Colling JC, Clark AL (1997) Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 89(4):501–506CrossRefPubMed Olsen AL, Smith VJ, Bergstrom JO, Colling JC, Clark AL (1997) Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 89(4):501–506CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Maher CM, Feiner B, Baessler K, Glazener CM (2011) Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women: the updated summary version Cochrane review. Int Urogynecol J 22(11):1445–1457CrossRefPubMed Maher CM, Feiner B, Baessler K, Glazener CM (2011) Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women: the updated summary version Cochrane review. Int Urogynecol J 22(11):1445–1457CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Maher CM, Baessler K (2006) Surgical management of anterior vaginal wall prolapse. Urogyn J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 17(2):195–201 (review)CrossRef Maher CM, Baessler K (2006) Surgical management of anterior vaginal wall prolapse. Urogyn J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 17(2):195–201 (review)CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Peterson TV, Karp DR, Aguilar VC, Davila GW (2010) Primary versus recurrent prolapse surgery: differences in outcomes. Int Urogynecol J 21(4):483–488CrossRefPubMed Peterson TV, Karp DR, Aguilar VC, Davila GW (2010) Primary versus recurrent prolapse surgery: differences in outcomes. Int Urogynecol J 21(4):483–488CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Whiteside JL, Weber AM, Meyn LA, Walters MD (2004) Risk factors for prolapse recurrence after vaginal repair. Am J Obstet Gynecol 191(5):1533–1538CrossRefPubMed Whiteside JL, Weber AM, Meyn LA, Walters MD (2004) Risk factors for prolapse recurrence after vaginal repair. Am J Obstet Gynecol 191(5):1533–1538CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Moore RD, Mitchell GK, Miklos JR (2012) Single-incision vaginal approach to treat cystocele and vault prolapse with an anterior wall mesh anchored apically to the sacrospinous ligaments. Int Urogynecol J 23(1):85–91CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Moore RD, Mitchell GK, Miklos JR (2012) Single-incision vaginal approach to treat cystocele and vault prolapse with an anterior wall mesh anchored apically to the sacrospinous ligaments. Int Urogynecol J 23(1):85–91CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Moore RD, Miklos JR (2009) Vaginal repair of cystocele with anterior wall mesh via transobturator route: efficacy and complications with up to 3-year follow up. Adv Urol, 743831 Moore RD, Miklos JR (2009) Vaginal repair of cystocele with anterior wall mesh via transobturator route: efficacy and complications with up to 3-year follow up. Adv Urol, 743831
10.
Zurück zum Zitat FDA-Safety Communication (2011) UPDATE on serious complications associated with transvaginal placement of surgical mesh for pelvic organ prolapse (alerts and notices, medical devices) FDA-Safety Communication (2011) UPDATE on serious complications associated with transvaginal placement of surgical mesh for pelvic organ prolapse (alerts and notices, medical devices)
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Diwadkar GB, Barber MD, Feiner B, Maher C, Jelovsek JE (2009) Complication and reoperation rates after apical vaginal prolapse surgical repair: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol 113(2 Pt 1):367–373CrossRefPubMed Diwadkar GB, Barber MD, Feiner B, Maher C, Jelovsek JE (2009) Complication and reoperation rates after apical vaginal prolapse surgical repair: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol 113(2 Pt 1):367–373CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Murphy M, Holzberg A, van Raalte H, Kohli N, Goldman HB, Lucente V, Pelvic Surgeons Network (2012) Time to rethink: an evidence-based response from pelvic surgeons on the FDA safety communication: update on serious complications associated with transvaginal placement of surgical mesh for pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J 23(1):5–9CrossRefPubMed Murphy M, Holzberg A, van Raalte H, Kohli N, Goldman HB, Lucente V, Pelvic Surgeons Network (2012) Time to rethink: an evidence-based response from pelvic surgeons on the FDA safety communication: update on serious complications associated with transvaginal placement of surgical mesh for pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J 23(1):5–9CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Moore RD, Lukban JC (2012) Comparison of vaginal mesh extrusion rates between a lightweight type I polypropylene mesh versus heavier mesh in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J 23:1379–1386CrossRefPubMed Moore RD, Lukban JC (2012) Comparison of vaginal mesh extrusion rates between a lightweight type I polypropylene mesh versus heavier mesh in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J 23:1379–1386CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Hall AF, Theofrastous JP, Cundiff GW, Harris RL, Hamilton LF, Swift SE, Bump RC (1996) Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the proposed International Continence Society, Society of Gynecologic Surgeons, and American Urogynecologic Society pelvic organ prolapse classification system. Am J Obstet Gynecol 175(6):1467–1470CrossRefPubMed Hall AF, Theofrastous JP, Cundiff GW, Harris RL, Hamilton LF, Swift SE, Bump RC (1996) Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the proposed International Continence Society, Society of Gynecologic Surgeons, and American Urogynecologic Society pelvic organ prolapse classification system. Am J Obstet Gynecol 175(6):1467–1470CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Baessler K, Junginger B (2011) Validation of a pelvic floor questionnaire with improvement and satisfaction scales to assess symptom severity, bothersomeness and quality of life before and after pelvic floor therapy. Aktuelle Urol. 42(5):316–322CrossRefPubMed Baessler K, Junginger B (2011) Validation of a pelvic floor questionnaire with improvement and satisfaction scales to assess symptom severity, bothersomeness and quality of life before and after pelvic floor therapy. Aktuelle Urol. 42(5):316–322CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Azaïs H, Charles CJ, Delporte P, Debodinance P (2012) Prolapse repair using the Elevate™ kit: prospective study on 70 patients. Int Urogynecol J 23:1421–1428CrossRefPubMed Azaïs H, Charles CJ, Delporte P, Debodinance P (2012) Prolapse repair using the Elevate™ kit: prospective study on 70 patients. Int Urogynecol J 23:1421–1428CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Shippey S, Gutman RE, Quiroz LH, Handa VL (2008) Contemporary approaches to cystocele repair: a survey of AUGS members. J Reprod Med 53(11):832–836PubMed Shippey S, Gutman RE, Quiroz LH, Handa VL (2008) Contemporary approaches to cystocele repair: a survey of AUGS members. J Reprod Med 53(11):832–836PubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Feiner B, Maher C (2010) Vaginal mesh contraction: definition, clinical presentation and management. Obstet Gynecol 115:325–330CrossRefPubMed Feiner B, Maher C (2010) Vaginal mesh contraction: definition, clinical presentation and management. Obstet Gynecol 115:325–330CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat De Tayrac R, Deffieux X, Gervaise A, Chauveaud-Lambling A, Fernandez H (2006) Long-term anatomical and functional assessment of trans-vaginal cystocele repair using a tension-free polypropylene mesh. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 17(5):483–488CrossRefPubMed De Tayrac R, Deffieux X, Gervaise A, Chauveaud-Lambling A, Fernandez H (2006) Long-term anatomical and functional assessment of trans-vaginal cystocele repair using a tension-free polypropylene mesh. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 17(5):483–488CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Velemir L, Amblard J, Fatton B, Savary D, Jacquetin B (2010) Transvaginal mesh repair of anterior and posterior vaginal wall prolapse: a clinical and ultrasonographic study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 35(4):474–480CrossRefPubMed Velemir L, Amblard J, Fatton B, Savary D, Jacquetin B (2010) Transvaginal mesh repair of anterior and posterior vaginal wall prolapse: a clinical and ultrasonographic study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 35(4):474–480CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Tunn R, Picot A, Marschke J, Gauruder-Burmester A (2007) Sonomorphological evaluation of polypropylene mesh implants after vaginal mesh repair in women with cystocele or rectocele. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 29(4):449–452CrossRefPubMed Tunn R, Picot A, Marschke J, Gauruder-Burmester A (2007) Sonomorphological evaluation of polypropylene mesh implants after vaginal mesh repair in women with cystocele or rectocele. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 29(4):449–452CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Klinge U, Klosterhalfen B, Müller M, Schumpelick V (1999) Foreign body reaction to meshes used for the repair of abdominal wall hernias. Eur J Surg 165(7):665–673CrossRefPubMed Klinge U, Klosterhalfen B, Müller M, Schumpelick V (1999) Foreign body reaction to meshes used for the repair of abdominal wall hernias. Eur J Surg 165(7):665–673CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Klinge U, Junge K, Stumpf M, Klosterhalfen B (2002) Functional and morphological evaluation of a low-weight, monofilament polypropylene mesh for hernia repair. J Biomed Mater Res 63(2):129–136CrossRefPubMed Klinge U, Junge K, Stumpf M, Klosterhalfen B (2002) Functional and morphological evaluation of a low-weight, monofilament polypropylene mesh for hernia repair. J Biomed Mater Res 63(2):129–136CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Kapoor DS, Nemcova M, Pantazis K, Brockman P, Bombieri L, Freeman RM (2010) Reoperation rate for traditional anterior vaginal repair: analysis of 207 cases with a median 4-year follow-up. Int Urogynecol J 21(1):27–31CrossRefPubMed Kapoor DS, Nemcova M, Pantazis K, Brockman P, Bombieri L, Freeman RM (2010) Reoperation rate for traditional anterior vaginal repair: analysis of 207 cases with a median 4-year follow-up. Int Urogynecol J 21(1):27–31CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Altman D, Väyrynen T, Engh ME, Axelsen S, Falconer C, Nordic Transvaginal Mesh Group (2011) Anterior colporrhaphy versus transvaginal mesh for pelvic-organ prolapse. N Engl J Med 364(19):1826–1836CrossRefPubMed Altman D, Väyrynen T, Engh ME, Axelsen S, Falconer C, Nordic Transvaginal Mesh Group (2011) Anterior colporrhaphy versus transvaginal mesh for pelvic-organ prolapse. N Engl J Med 364(19):1826–1836CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Long CY, Lo TS, Wang CL, Wu CH, Liu CM, Su JH (2012) Risk factors of surgical failure following transvaginal mesh repair for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 161(2):224–227CrossRefPubMed Long CY, Lo TS, Wang CL, Wu CH, Liu CM, Su JH (2012) Risk factors of surgical failure following transvaginal mesh repair for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 161(2):224–227CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Firoozi F, Ingber MS, Moore CK, Vasavada SP, Rackley RR, Goldman HB (2012) Purely transvaginal/perineal management of complications from commercial prolapse kits using a new protheses/grafts complication classification system. J Urol 187(5):1674–1679CrossRef Firoozi F, Ingber MS, Moore CK, Vasavada SP, Rackley RR, Goldman HB (2012) Purely transvaginal/perineal management of complications from commercial prolapse kits using a new protheses/grafts complication classification system. J Urol 187(5):1674–1679CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat McLennan GP, Sirls LT, Killinger KA, Nikolavski D, Boura JA, Fischer MC, Peters KM (2013) Perioperative experience of pelvic organ prolapse with the Prolift® and Elevate® vaginal mesh procedures. Int Urogynecol J 24:287–294CrossRefPubMed McLennan GP, Sirls LT, Killinger KA, Nikolavski D, Boura JA, Fischer MC, Peters KM (2013) Perioperative experience of pelvic organ prolapse with the Prolift® and Elevate® vaginal mesh procedures. Int Urogynecol J 24:287–294CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Transvaginal single-incision mesh reconstruction for recurrent or advanced anterior vaginal wall prolapse
verfasst von
J. Marschke
L. Hengst
N. Schwertner-Tiepelmann
K. Beilecke
R. Tunn
Publikationsdatum
01.05.2015
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics / Ausgabe 5/2015
Print ISSN: 0932-0067
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-0711
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-014-3497-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2015

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 5/2015 Zur Ausgabe

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.