Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 3/2016

07.01.2016 | Maternal-Fetal Medicine

Accuracy of sonographic fetal weight estimation: influence of the scan-to-delivery interval in combination with the applied weight estimation formula

verfasst von: F. Faschingbauer, E. Raabe, J. Heimrich, C. Faschingbauer, M. Schmid, A. Mayr, R. L. Schild, M. W. Beckmann, S. Kehl

Erschienen in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics | Ausgabe 3/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Introduction

To evaluate the influence of the time interval between examination and delivery on the accuracy of sonographic fetal weight estimation (WE).

Materials and methods

8723 singleton pregnancies were included in this retrospective cohort study. Fetuses were divided into eight groups with regard to the time interval between estimation and delivery (group 1: 0 days; group 2: 1–3 days; group 3: 4–7 days; group 4: 8–14 days; group 5: 15–21 days; group 6: 22–28 days; group 7: 29–35 days; group 8: 36–42 days). The accuracy of WE was compared between the different time interval groups and five commonly used formulas using means of percentage errors (MPE), medians of absolute percentage errors, and proportions of estimates within 10 % of actual birth weight.

Results

In group one, the Hadlock I and Warsof formula showed a systematic underestimation of fetal weight (negative MPEs). No systematic error was found with the Hadlock II formula and the equations of Merz and Shepard showed a systematic overestimation (positive MPEs). MPE values of the Hadlock I, II and Warsof formulas were closest to zero in WEs of group two. From group three to six, MPE values decreased continuously. With the Merz and Shepard equations MPEs were closest to zero in group four.

Discussion

The best accuracy of sonographic WE with most of the commonly used equations is achieved within a scan-to-delivery interval of 1 week.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Baschat AA, Cosmi E, Bilardo CM et al (2007) Predictors of neonatal outcome in early-onset placental dysfunction. Obstet Gynecol 109:253–261CrossRefPubMed Baschat AA, Cosmi E, Bilardo CM et al (2007) Predictors of neonatal outcome in early-onset placental dysfunction. Obstet Gynecol 109:253–261CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Katz J, Wu LA, Mullany LC et al (2014) Prevalence of small-for-gestational-age and its mortality risk varies by choice of birth-weight-for-gestation reference population. PLoS One 9:e92074CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Katz J, Wu LA, Mullany LC et al (2014) Prevalence of small-for-gestational-age and its mortality risk varies by choice of birth-weight-for-gestation reference population. PLoS One 9:e92074CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Boulet SL, Alexander GR, Salihu HM, Pass M (2003) Macrosomic births in the united states: determinants, outcomes, and proposed grades of risk. Am J Obstet Gynecol 188:1372–1378CrossRefPubMed Boulet SL, Alexander GR, Salihu HM, Pass M (2003) Macrosomic births in the united states: determinants, outcomes, and proposed grades of risk. Am J Obstet Gynecol 188:1372–1378CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Dudley NJ (2005) A systematic review of the ultrasound estimation of fetal weight. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 25:80–89CrossRefPubMed Dudley NJ (2005) A systematic review of the ultrasound estimation of fetal weight. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 25:80–89CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Hadlock FP, Harrist RB, Sharman RS, Deter RL, Park SK (1985) Estimation of fetal weight with the use of head, body, and femur measurements—a prospective study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 151:333–337CrossRefPubMed Hadlock FP, Harrist RB, Sharman RS, Deter RL, Park SK (1985) Estimation of fetal weight with the use of head, body, and femur measurements—a prospective study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 151:333–337CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Shepard MJ, Richards VA, Berkowitz RL, Warsof SL, Hobbins JC (1982) An evaluation of two equations for predicting fetal weight by ultrasound. Am J Obstet Gynecol 142:47–54PubMed Shepard MJ, Richards VA, Berkowitz RL, Warsof SL, Hobbins JC (1982) An evaluation of two equations for predicting fetal weight by ultrasound. Am J Obstet Gynecol 142:47–54PubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Faschingbauer F, Mayr A, Geipel A, Gembruch U, Dammer U, Raabe E, Beckmann MW, Kehl S, Schild RL, Siemer J, Schmid M (2015) A new sonographic weight estimation formula for fetuses with congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Ultraschall Med 36(3):284–289. doi:10.1055/s-0034-1366517 PubMed Faschingbauer F, Mayr A, Geipel A, Gembruch U, Dammer U, Raabe E, Beckmann MW, Kehl S, Schild RL, Siemer J, Schmid M (2015) A new sonographic weight estimation formula for fetuses with congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Ultraschall Med 36(3):284–289. doi:10.​1055/​s-0034-1366517 PubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Merz E, Lieser H, Schicketanz KH, Harle J (1988) Intrauterine fetal weight assessment using ultrasound. A comparison of several weight assessment methods and development of a new formula for the determination of fetal weight. Ultraschall Med 9:15–24CrossRefPubMed Merz E, Lieser H, Schicketanz KH, Harle J (1988) Intrauterine fetal weight assessment using ultrasound. A comparison of several weight assessment methods and development of a new formula for the determination of fetal weight. Ultraschall Med 9:15–24CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Siemer J, Egger N, Hart N et al (2008) Fetal weight estimation by ultrasound: comparison of 11 different formulae and examiners with differing skill levels. Ultraschall Med 29:159–164CrossRefPubMed Siemer J, Egger N, Hart N et al (2008) Fetal weight estimation by ultrasound: comparison of 11 different formulae and examiners with differing skill levels. Ultraschall Med 29:159–164CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Faschingbauer F, Voigt F, Goecke TW, Siemer J, Beckmann MW, Yazdi B, Schild RL (2012) Fetal weight estimation in extreme macrosomia (≥ 4,500 g): comparison of 10 formulas. Ultraschall Med 33(7):E62–E67. doi:10.1055/s-0031-1281833 PubMed Faschingbauer F, Voigt F, Goecke TW, Siemer J, Beckmann MW, Yazdi B, Schild RL (2012) Fetal weight estimation in extreme macrosomia (≥ 4,500 g): comparison of 10 formulas. Ultraschall Med 33(7):E62–E67. doi:10.​1055/​s-0031-1281833 PubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Hoopmann M, Abele H, Wagner N, Wallwiener D, Kagan KO (2010) Performance of 36 different weight estimation formulae in fetuses with macrosomia. Fetal Diagn Ther 27:204–213CrossRefPubMed Hoopmann M, Abele H, Wagner N, Wallwiener D, Kagan KO (2010) Performance of 36 different weight estimation formulae in fetuses with macrosomia. Fetal Diagn Ther 27:204–213CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Kurmanavicius J, Burkhardt T, Wisser J, Huch R (2004) Ultrasonographic fetal weight estimation: accuracy of formulas and accuracy of examiners by birth weight from 500 to 5000 g. J Perinat Med 32:155–161CrossRefPubMed Kurmanavicius J, Burkhardt T, Wisser J, Huch R (2004) Ultrasonographic fetal weight estimation: accuracy of formulas and accuracy of examiners by birth weight from 500 to 5000 g. J Perinat Med 32:155–161CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Melamed N, Yogev Y, Meizner I et al (2009) Sonographic fetal weight estimation: which model should be used? J Ultrasound Med 28:617–629PubMed Melamed N, Yogev Y, Meizner I et al (2009) Sonographic fetal weight estimation: which model should be used? J Ultrasound Med 28:617–629PubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Dammer U, Raabe E, Kehl S, Schmid M, Mayr A, Schild RL, Beckmann MW, Faschingbauer F (2015) Sonographic weight estimation in small-for-gestational-age fetuses. Ultraschall Med 36(6):630–636PubMed Dammer U, Raabe E, Kehl S, Schmid M, Mayr A, Schild RL, Beckmann MW, Faschingbauer F (2015) Sonographic weight estimation in small-for-gestational-age fetuses. Ultraschall Med 36(6):630–636PubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Faschingbauer F, Dammer U, Raabe E et al (2015) Intrapartum sonographic weight estimation. Arch Gynecol Obstet 292:805–811CrossRefPubMed Faschingbauer F, Dammer U, Raabe E et al (2015) Intrapartum sonographic weight estimation. Arch Gynecol Obstet 292:805–811CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Peregrine E, O’Brien P, Jauniaux E (2007) Clinical and ultrasound estimation of birth weight prior to induction of labor at term. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 29:304–309CrossRefPubMed Peregrine E, O’Brien P, Jauniaux E (2007) Clinical and ultrasound estimation of birth weight prior to induction of labor at term. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 29:304–309CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Divon MY, Chamberlain PF, Sipos L, Platt LD (1984) Underestimation of fetal weight in premature rupture of membranes. J Ultrasound Med 3:529–531PubMed Divon MY, Chamberlain PF, Sipos L, Platt LD (1984) Underestimation of fetal weight in premature rupture of membranes. J Ultrasound Med 3:529–531PubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Barel O, Maymon R, Vaknin Z, Tovbin J, Smorgick N (2014) Sonographic fetal weight estimation—is there more to it than just fetal measurements? Prenat Diagn 34:50–55CrossRefPubMed Barel O, Maymon R, Vaknin Z, Tovbin J, Smorgick N (2014) Sonographic fetal weight estimation—is there more to it than just fetal measurements? Prenat Diagn 34:50–55CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Mongelli M, Gardosi J (1996) Gestation-adjusted projection of estimated fetal weight. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 75:28–31CrossRefPubMed Mongelli M, Gardosi J (1996) Gestation-adjusted projection of estimated fetal weight. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 75:28–31CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Heer IM, Kumper C, Vogtle N et al (2008) Analysis of factors influencing the ultrasonic fetal weight estimation. Fetal Diagn Ther 23:204–210CrossRefPubMed Heer IM, Kumper C, Vogtle N et al (2008) Analysis of factors influencing the ultrasonic fetal weight estimation. Fetal Diagn Ther 23:204–210CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Chauhan SP, Hendrix NW, Magann EF et al (2005) A review of sonographic estimate of fetal weight: vagaries of accuracy. Journal Matern-Fetal Neonatal Med: Off J Eur Assoc Perinatal Med, Fed Asia Ocean Perinat Soc, Int Soc Perinat Obstet 18:211–220CrossRef Chauhan SP, Hendrix NW, Magann EF et al (2005) A review of sonographic estimate of fetal weight: vagaries of accuracy. Journal Matern-Fetal Neonatal Med: Off J Eur Assoc Perinatal Med, Fed Asia Ocean Perinat Soc, Int Soc Perinat Obstet 18:211–220CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Faschingbauer F, Dammer U, Raabe E et al (2015) Sonographic weight estimation in fetal macrosomia: influence of the time interval between estimation and delivery. Arch Gynecol Obstet 292:59–67CrossRefPubMed Faschingbauer F, Dammer U, Raabe E et al (2015) Sonographic weight estimation in fetal macrosomia: influence of the time interval between estimation and delivery. Arch Gynecol Obstet 292:59–67CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat ACOG (2009) ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 101: ultrasonography in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 113:451–461CrossRef ACOG (2009) ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 101: ultrasonography in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 113:451–461CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Eichhorn KH, Schramm T, Bald R, Hansmann M, Gembruch U (2006) DEGUM grade I quality standards in obstetric ultrasound diagnosis during the 19th–22nd week of pregnancy. Ultraschall Med 27:185–187CrossRefPubMed Eichhorn KH, Schramm T, Bald R, Hansmann M, Gembruch U (2006) DEGUM grade I quality standards in obstetric ultrasound diagnosis during the 19th–22nd week of pregnancy. Ultraschall Med 27:185–187CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Merz E, Eichhorn KH, Hansmann M, Meinel K (2002) Quality demands on continuing differential diagnostic sonography in prenatal diagnostics (DEGUM stage II) during the 18th to 22nd weeks of gestation. Ultraschall Med 23:11–12CrossRefPubMed Merz E, Eichhorn KH, Hansmann M, Meinel K (2002) Quality demands on continuing differential diagnostic sonography in prenatal diagnostics (DEGUM stage II) during the 18th to 22nd weeks of gestation. Ultraschall Med 23:11–12CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Warsof SL, Gohari P, Berkowitz RL, Hobbins JC (1977) The estimation of fetal weight by computer-assisted analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 128:881–892CrossRefPubMed Warsof SL, Gohari P, Berkowitz RL, Hobbins JC (1977) The estimation of fetal weight by computer-assisted analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 128:881–892CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Benacerraf BR, Gelman R, Frigoletto FD Jr (1988) Sonographically estimated fetal weights: accuracy and limitation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 159:1118–1121CrossRefPubMed Benacerraf BR, Gelman R, Frigoletto FD Jr (1988) Sonographically estimated fetal weights: accuracy and limitation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 159:1118–1121CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Accuracy of sonographic fetal weight estimation: influence of the scan-to-delivery interval in combination with the applied weight estimation formula
verfasst von
F. Faschingbauer
E. Raabe
J. Heimrich
C. Faschingbauer
M. Schmid
A. Mayr
R. L. Schild
M. W. Beckmann
S. Kehl
Publikationsdatum
07.01.2016
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics / Ausgabe 3/2016
Print ISSN: 0932-0067
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-0711
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-015-3989-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2016

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 3/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.