Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 5/2016

15.03.2016 | Maternal-Fetal Medicine

Back to “once a caesarean: always a caesarean”? A trend analysis in Switzerland

verfasst von: Corina Christmann-Schmid, Luigi Raio, Katrin Scheibner, Martin Müller, Daniel Surbek

Erschienen in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics | Ausgabe 5/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

Caesarean sections (CS) have significantly increased worldwide and a previous CS is nowadays an important and increasingly reported indication to perform a repeat CS. There is a paucity of information in Switzerland on the incidence of repeat CS after previous CS and relationship between the rates of vaginal birth after CS (VBAC). The aim of this study was to analyse the actual trend in VBAC in Switzerland.

Methods

We performed a retrospective cohort study to analyse the proportion of VBAC among all pregnant women with previous sections which give birth during two time periods (group 1:1998/1999 vs. group 2:2004/2005) in our tertiary care referral hospital and in the annual statistics of Swiss Women’s Hospitals (ASF-Statistics). In addition, the proportion of induction of labour after a previous caesarean and its success was analysed.

Results

In both cohorts studied, we found a significant decrease of vaginal births (p < 0.05) and a significant increase of primary elective repeat caesarean section (p < 0.05) from the first to the second time period, while there was a decrease of secondary repeat caesarean sections. The prevalence of labour induction did not decrease.

Conclusion

Our study shows that vaginal birth after a prior caesarean section has decreased over time in Switzerland. There was no significant change in labour induction during the study period. While this trend might reflect an increasing demand for safety in pregnancy and childbirth, it concomitantly increases maternal risks of further pregnancies, and women need to be appropriately informed about long-term risks.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Hamilton BE, Martin JA, Sutton P (2003) Births: preliminary data 2002. Natl Vital Stat Rep 51:1–20 Hamilton BE, Martin JA, Sutton P (2003) Births: preliminary data 2002. Natl Vital Stat Rep 51:1–20
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Müller M, Kolly L, Baumann M, Imboden S, Surbek D (2014) Analysis of caesarean section rates over time in a single Swiss centre using a ten-group classification system. Swiss Med Wkly 144:13921w Müller M, Kolly L, Baumann M, Imboden S, Surbek D (2014) Analysis of caesarean section rates over time in a single Swiss centre using a ten-group classification system. Swiss Med Wkly 144:13921w
4.
Zurück zum Zitat ACOG Committee Opinion (2002) No.271. Induction of labour for vaginal birth after caesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 99:679–680 ACOG Committee Opinion (2002) No.271. Induction of labour for vaginal birth after caesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 99:679–680
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Menacker F, Declercq E, Macdorman MF (2006) Cesarean delivery, background, trends, and epidemiology. Semin Perinatol 30:235–241CrossRefPubMed Menacker F, Declercq E, Macdorman MF (2006) Cesarean delivery, background, trends, and epidemiology. Semin Perinatol 30:235–241CrossRefPubMed
6.
7.
Zurück zum Zitat RCOG Clinical Effectiveness Support unit (2001) Induction of labour. RCOG Press, London, pp 1–78 RCOG Clinical Effectiveness Support unit (2001) Induction of labour. RCOG Press, London, pp 1–78
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Surbek D, Rath W (2006) Vaginal birth after previous caesarean section—a risk? Geburtsh Frauenheilk 66:1131–1133CrossRef Surbek D, Rath W (2006) Vaginal birth after previous caesarean section—a risk? Geburtsh Frauenheilk 66:1131–1133CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Rath W, Surbek D (2006) Induction of labour after previous caesarean section. Geburtsh Frauenheilk 66:1143–1149CrossRef Rath W, Surbek D (2006) Induction of labour after previous caesarean section. Geburtsh Frauenheilk 66:1143–1149CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery. This document was developed jointly by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (the College) and the Society for Maternal and Fetal Medicine with the assistance of Aaron B. Caughey, MD, PhD; Alison G. Cahill, MD, MSCI; Jeanne-Marie Guise, MD, MPH; and Dwight J. Rouse, MD, MSPH Safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery. This document was developed jointly by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (the College) and the Society for Maternal and Fetal Medicine with the assistance of Aaron B. Caughey, MD, PhD; Alison G. Cahill, MD, MSCI; Jeanne-Marie Guise, MD, MPH; and Dwight J. Rouse, MD, MSPH
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Landon M, Hauth J, Leveno K (2004) Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med 351:2581–2589CrossRefPubMed Landon M, Hauth J, Leveno K (2004) Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med 351:2581–2589CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Mozurkewich E, Hutton K (2000) Elective repeat caesarean delivery versus trial of labour: a meta-analysis of literature from 1989 to 1999. Am J Obstet Gynecol 183:1187–1197CrossRefPubMed Mozurkewich E, Hutton K (2000) Elective repeat caesarean delivery versus trial of labour: a meta-analysis of literature from 1989 to 1999. Am J Obstet Gynecol 183:1187–1197CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Rageth J, Juzi C, Grossenbacher H (1999) Delivery after previous caesarean: a risk evaluation. Obstet Gynecol 93:332–337PubMed Rageth J, Juzi C, Grossenbacher H (1999) Delivery after previous caesarean: a risk evaluation. Obstet Gynecol 93:332–337PubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Hendler I, Bujold E (2004) Effect of prior vaginal delivery or prior vaginal birth after cesarean delivery on obstetric outcomes in women undergoing trial of labour. ACOG 104:273–277 Hendler I, Bujold E (2004) Effect of prior vaginal delivery or prior vaginal birth after cesarean delivery on obstetric outcomes in women undergoing trial of labour. ACOG 104:273–277
15.
Zurück zum Zitat McMahon MJ, Luther ER, Bowes W Jr, Olshan A (1996) Comparison of a trial of labour with an elective second caesarean section. N Engl J Med 335:689–695CrossRefPubMed McMahon MJ, Luther ER, Bowes W Jr, Olshan A (1996) Comparison of a trial of labour with an elective second caesarean section. N Engl J Med 335:689–695CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Delaney T, David C. Spontaneous versus induced labour after a previous caesarean delivery. ACOG 2003; 102 39–43 Delaney T, David C. Spontaneous versus induced labour after a previous caesarean delivery. ACOG 2003; 102 39–43
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Guise JM (2004) McDonagh, Osterweil P, Nygren P, Chan B, Helfand M. Systematic review of the incidence and consequences of uterine rupture in women with previous caesarean section. BMJ 329:19–26CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Guise JM (2004) McDonagh, Osterweil P, Nygren P, Chan B, Helfand M. Systematic review of the incidence and consequences of uterine rupture in women with previous caesarean section. BMJ 329:19–26CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Sanchez-Ramos L, Gagudier FL, Kaunitz AM (2000) Cervical ripening and induction of labour after previous caesarean delivery. Clin Obstet Gynecol 43:513–523CrossRefPubMed Sanchez-Ramos L, Gagudier FL, Kaunitz AM (2000) Cervical ripening and induction of labour after previous caesarean delivery. Clin Obstet Gynecol 43:513–523CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Flamm BL, Anton D, Goings JR, Newman J (1997) Prostaglandine E2 for cervical ripening: a multicenter study of patients with prior caesarean delivery. Am J Perinatol 70(5):709–712 Flamm BL, Anton D, Goings JR, Newman J (1997) Prostaglandine E2 for cervical ripening: a multicenter study of patients with prior caesarean delivery. Am J Perinatol 70(5):709–712
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Kotaba S, Volfson M, Tarazova L et al (2001) Induction of labour in women with previous caesarean section using the double balloon device. Acta Obst Gynecol Scand 80:1041–1042CrossRef Kotaba S, Volfson M, Tarazova L et al (2001) Induction of labour in women with previous caesarean section using the double balloon device. Acta Obst Gynecol Scand 80:1041–1042CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Miller T, Davis G. Use of the Atad catheter for the induction of labour in women who have had a previous caesarean section- a case series. ANZJOG 2005; 45 325–327 Miller T, Davis G. Use of the Atad catheter for the induction of labour in women who have had a previous caesarean section- a case series. ANZJOG 2005; 45 325–327
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Ben-Aroya Z, Hallak M, Segal D, Friger M, Katz M, Mazor M (2002) Ripening of the uterine cervix in a post-caesarean parturient: prostaglandin E2 versus Foley catheter. J maternal-fetal and neonatal medicine 12:42–45CrossRef Ben-Aroya Z, Hallak M, Segal D, Friger M, Katz M, Mazor M (2002) Ripening of the uterine cervix in a post-caesarean parturient: prostaglandin E2 versus Foley catheter. J maternal-fetal and neonatal medicine 12:42–45CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Smith G, Pell C, Cameron A, Dobbie R (2004) Factors predisposing to perinatal death related to uterine rupture during attempting vaginal birth after caesarean section: retrospective cohort study. BMJ 329:375CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Smith G, Pell C, Cameron A, Dobbie R (2004) Factors predisposing to perinatal death related to uterine rupture during attempting vaginal birth after caesarean section: retrospective cohort study. BMJ 329:375CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada, SOGC Clinical Practice Guidelines (2005) Guidelines for vaginal birth after previous caesarean birth. Number 155 (Replaces guideline Number 147), February 2005. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 89(3):319–331CrossRef Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada, SOGC Clinical Practice Guidelines (2005) Guidelines for vaginal birth after previous caesarean birth. Number 155 (Replaces guideline Number 147), February 2005. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 89(3):319–331CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Buhimschi C, Buhimschi I, Patel S (2005) Rupture of the uterine scar during term labour: contractilaty or biochemistry. BJOG 112:38–42CrossRefPubMed Buhimschi C, Buhimschi I, Patel S (2005) Rupture of the uterine scar during term labour: contractilaty or biochemistry. BJOG 112:38–42CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Zelop CM, Shipp TD, Repke J, Cohen A, Lieberman E (1999) Uterine rupture during induced or augmented labour in gravid women with prior caesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 181:882–886CrossRefPubMed Zelop CM, Shipp TD, Repke J, Cohen A, Lieberman E (1999) Uterine rupture during induced or augmented labour in gravid women with prior caesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 181:882–886CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Ravasia DJ, Wood SL, Pollard JK (2000) Uterine rupture during induced trial of labour among women with previous delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 183:1176–1179CrossRefPubMed Ravasia DJ, Wood SL, Pollard JK (2000) Uterine rupture during induced trial of labour among women with previous delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 183:1176–1179CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Lydon-Rochelle M, Holt VL, Easterling TR, Martin DP (2001) Risks of uterine rupture during labour among women with prior caesarean delivery. N Engl J Med 345:3–8CrossRefPubMed Lydon-Rochelle M, Holt VL, Easterling TR, Martin DP (2001) Risks of uterine rupture during labour among women with prior caesarean delivery. N Engl J Med 345:3–8CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat McDough, Osterweil P, Guise J. The benefits and risks of inducing labour in patients with prior caesarean delivery: a systematic review. BJOG 2005; 112:1007 McDough, Osterweil P, Guise J. The benefits and risks of inducing labour in patients with prior caesarean delivery: a systematic review. BJOG 2005; 112:1007
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Paré E, Quinones J, Macones G (2006) Vaginal birth after caesarean section versus elective repeat caesarean section: assessment of maternal downstream health outcomes. BJOG 113:75–85CrossRefPubMed Paré E, Quinones J, Macones G (2006) Vaginal birth after caesarean section versus elective repeat caesarean section: assessment of maternal downstream health outcomes. BJOG 113:75–85CrossRefPubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Nisenblat V, Barak S (2006) Maternal complications associated with multiple caesarean deliveries. ACOG 108:21–26 Nisenblat V, Barak S (2006) Maternal complications associated with multiple caesarean deliveries. ACOG 108:21–26
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Landon M, Spong C, Thom E, Hauth J et al (2006) Risk of uterine rupture with a trial of labour in women with multiple and single prior caesarean delivery. ACOG 108:12–19 Landon M, Spong C, Thom E, Hauth J et al (2006) Risk of uterine rupture with a trial of labour in women with multiple and single prior caesarean delivery. ACOG 108:12–19
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Landon M, Leindecker S, Spong C, Hauth J et al (2005) The MFMU Caesarean Registry: factors affecting the success of trial of labour after previous caesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 193:1016–1023CrossRefPubMed Landon M, Leindecker S, Spong C, Hauth J et al (2005) The MFMU Caesarean Registry: factors affecting the success of trial of labour after previous caesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 193:1016–1023CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Back to “once a caesarean: always a caesarean”? A trend analysis in Switzerland
verfasst von
Corina Christmann-Schmid
Luigi Raio
Katrin Scheibner
Martin Müller
Daniel Surbek
Publikationsdatum
15.03.2016
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics / Ausgabe 5/2016
Print ISSN: 0932-0067
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-0711
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-016-4055-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2016

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 5/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.