nach oben

European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology

Erschienen in:

01.06.2014 | Head and Neck

Prophylactic percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in head and neck cancer patients: results of tertiary institute

verfasst von: Jaakko Pulkkinen, Jami Rekola, Mari Asanti, Reidar Grénman

Erschienen in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology | Ausgabe 6/2014

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

To evaluate the use and complications of a prophylactic percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) in head and cancer patients in our institute. A retrospective study of 194 consecutive patients with a newly diagnosed upper aero digestive tract malignancy who underwent mainly prophylactic PEG tube placement. The procedure is relatively safe: 15 (7.7 %) of the complications were considered serious; no deaths occurred. Of the patients 23 (12.5 %) did not use the PEG tube at all, but it was not possible to single out a group of patients in which this could be predicted. The majority of the patients were considered to benefit from the prophylactic PEG insertion.

Locher J, Bonner J, Carroll W, Caudell J, Keith J, Kilgore M, Ritchie C, Roth D, Tajeu G, Allison J (2011) Prophylactic percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube placement in treatment of head and neck cancer: a comprehensive review and call for evidence-based medicine. JPEN J Parenter Enter Nutr 35:365–374CrossRef

Mick R, Vokes EE, Weichselbaum RR, Panje WR (1991) Prognostic factors in advanced head and neck cancer patients undergoing multimodality therapy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 105:62–73PubMed

van Bokhorst-de van der Schueren MA, van Leeuwen PA, Kuik DJ, Klop WM, Sauerwein HP, Snow GB, Quak JJ (1999) The impact of nutritional status on the prognoses of patients with advanced head and neck cancer. Cancer 86:519–529

Langmore S, Krisciunas G, Miloro K, Evans S, Cheng D (2011) Does PEG use cause dysphagia in head and neck cancer patients? Dysphagia. doi:10.1007/s00455-011-9360-2 PubMedCentral

August DA, Huhmann MB, American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (A.S.P.E.N.) Board of Directors (2009) A.S.P.E.N. clinical guidelines: nutrition support therapy during adult antcancer treatment and in hematopoietic cell transplantation. JPEN J Parenter Enter Nutr 33:472–500CrossRef

Arends J, Bodoky G, Bozzetti F, Fearon K, Muscaritoli M, Selga G, van Bokhorst-de van der Schueren MAE, von Meyenfeldt M, DGEM, Zurcher G, Fietkau R, Aulbert E, Frick B, Holm M, Kneba M, Mestrom HJ, Zander A (2006) ESPEN Guidelines on enteral nutrition: Non-surgical oncology. Clin Nutr 25:245–259PubMedCrossRef

Grant D, Bradley P, Pothier D, Bailey D, Caldera S, Baldwin D, Birchall M (2009) Complications following gastrostomy tube insertion in patients with head and neck cancer: a prospective multi-institution study, systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Otolaryngol 34:103–112PubMedCrossRef

Richter-Schrag HJ, Richter S, Ruthmann O, Olschewski M, Hopt U, Fischer A (2011) Risk factors and complications following percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: a case series of 1041 patients. Can J Gastroenterol 25(4):201–206PubMedCentralPubMed

Zuercher B, Grosjean P, Monnier P (2011) Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in head and neck cancer patients: indications techniques, complications and results. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 268:623–629PubMedCrossRef

10.

Hujala K, Sipilä J, Pulkkinen J, Grénman R (2004) Early percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy nutrition in head and neck cancer patients. Acta Otolaryngol 124:847–850PubMedCrossRef

11.

Gauderer M, Ponsky J, Izant R (1980) Gastrostomy without laparotomy: a percutaneous endoscopic technique. J Pediatr Surg 15:872–875PubMedCrossRef

12.

Ponsky J (1998) Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: origin and evolution. Nutrition 14:736–738PubMedCrossRef

13.

Gomes CA Jr, Lustosa SA, Matos D, Andriolo RB, Waisberg DR, Waisberg J (2012) Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy versus nasogastric tube feeding for adults with swallowing disturbances. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 14(3):CD008096

Titel: Prophylactic percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in head and neck cancer patients: results of tertiary institute
verfasst von: Jaakko Pulkkinen
Jami Rekola
Mari Asanti
Reidar Grénman
Publikationsdatum: 01.06.2014
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology / Ausgabe 6/2014
Print ISSN: 0937-4477
Elektronische ISSN: 1434-4726
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-013-2699-2

Neu im Fachgebiet HNO

16.04.2024 | HNO-Chirurgie | Nachrichten

Update HNO

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

Prophylactic percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in head and neck cancer patients: results of tertiary institute

Abstract

Neu im Fachgebiet HNO

HNO-Op. auch mit über 90?

Intrakapsuläre Tonsillektomie gewinnt an Boden

Bilateraler Hörsturz hat eine schlechte Prognose

„Nur wer sich gut aufgehoben fühlt, kann auch für Patientensicherheit sorgen“

Update HNO

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2014

Pharyngo-cutaneous fistula complicating laryngectomy in the chemo-radiotherapy organ-preservation epoch

Regenerative and proliferative activities of chondrocyte based on the degree of perichondrial injury in rabbit auricular cartilage

Transoral robotic surgery of the central skull base: preclinical investigations

Assessment of adenosine deaminase (ADA) activity and oxidative stress in patients with chronic tonsillitis

Cetuximab in locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: generalizability of EMR 062202-006 trial results

Radiofrequency tonsillotomy in Sweden 2009–2012

Neu im Fachgebiet HNO

HNO-Op. auch mit über 90?

Intrakapsuläre Tonsillektomie gewinnt an Boden

Bilateraler Hörsturz hat eine schlechte Prognose

„Nur wer sich gut aufgehoben fühlt, kann auch für Patientensicherheit sorgen“

Update HNO