Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 11/2018

26.09.2018 | Miscellaneous

Posterior pillar mucosal suspension technique for posttonsillectomy pain and wound healing: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial

verfasst von: Fatih Alper Akcan, Yusuf Dündar

Erschienen in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology | Ausgabe 11/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objectives/hypothesis

To investigate the efficacy of a simple and feasible suturing technique on posttonsillectomy pain control and wound healing.

Methods

A prospective, randomized, controlled trial was conducted on a sample of 121 children between 3 and 10 years of age. Group A comprised children undergoing surgery with bipolar cautery and the posterior pillar mucosal suspension technique. Bipolar alone (Group B) and cold dissection tonsillectomy (Group C) were used as control groups. Pain was assessed at 1, 3, 5, 7, and 10 days postoperatively via visual analog scale scores. Peritonsillar edema, erythema, and granulation tissue in the tonsillar fossa were evaluated by direct visual examination for wound healing on days 1, 3, 5, 7, and 10.

Results

There were consecutive 121 patients which were included, with mean ages being 6.2 ± 2.5, 6.1 ± 2.4, and 6.1 ± 2.6 in groups A, B, and C, respectively. Postoperative pain scores on days 1 and 3 were significantly lower in Group A than Group B and C (P < .001) and scores were 0.87 ± 1.1, 3.83 ± 2.29, and 4.29 ± 2.48 on day 1 and 0.38 ± 0.88, 2.25 ± 2.13, and 2.76 ± 2.12 on day 3 respectively. The wound-healing scores on postoperative 1st, 3rd, 5th, and 7th days were significantly lower in Group A than control groups (P < .001). The wound-healing score on postoperative day 10 was only different than Group C (P = .020).

Conclusions

The posterior pillar mucosal suspension technique is an effective and comparable method in terms of wound healing, maintains the preoperative anatomical structures, and enables a better pain control with reduced analgesic/opioid usage.
Literatur
12.
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang X, Su Y, Li P (2014) Effects of bupivacaine versus lidocaine infiltration on postoperative analgesia in pediatric tonsillectomy patients. Lin Chung Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi 28:148–150PubMed Zhang X, Su Y, Li P (2014) Effects of bupivacaine versus lidocaine infiltration on postoperative analgesia in pediatric tonsillectomy patients. Lin Chung Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi 28:148–150PubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Roth JA, Pincock T, Sacks R, Forer M, Boustred N, Johnston W et al (2008) Harmonic scalpel tonsillectomy versus monopolar diather study. Ear Nose Throat J 87:346–349PubMed Roth JA, Pincock T, Sacks R, Forer M, Boustred N, Johnston W et al (2008) Harmonic scalpel tonsillectomy versus monopolar diather study. Ear Nose Throat J 87:346–349PubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Collison PJ, Weiner R (2004) Harmonic scalpel versus conventional tonsillectomy: a double-blind clinical trial. Ear Nose Throat J 83:707–710PubMed Collison PJ, Weiner R (2004) Harmonic scalpel versus conventional tonsillectomy: a double-blind clinical trial. Ear Nose Throat J 83:707–710PubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Posterior pillar mucosal suspension technique for posttonsillectomy pain and wound healing: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial
verfasst von
Fatih Alper Akcan
Yusuf Dündar
Publikationsdatum
26.09.2018
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology / Ausgabe 11/2018
Print ISSN: 0937-4477
Elektronische ISSN: 1434-4726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-018-5148-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 11/2018

European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 11/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Update HNO

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.