Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Lung 1/2015

01.02.2015

Community Low-Dose CT Lung Cancer Screening: A Prospective Cohort Study

verfasst von: Vincent K. Lam, Mary Miller, Lynn Dowling, Shyamali Singhal, Robert P. Young, Elwyn C. Cabebe

Erschienen in: Lung | Ausgabe 1/2015

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

The National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) in 2011 showed that low-dose CT (LDCT) screening in high-risk groups reduces lung cancer deaths. Major professional organizations, as well as the U.S. Preventative Services Task Force, have endorsed LDCT screening in these select populations. However, major questions remain about whether widespread deployment of CT screening can achieve results similar to the NLST, especially in the community setting.

Methods

A prospective cohort study was initiated in November 2010. Participants at least 50 years old and with at least 20 pack-years of smoking history underwent LDCT screening in a community setting.

Results

One hundred and fifty four participants underwent LDCT screening with median follow-up of 2.7 years. Compared with the NLST, there was a higher rate of positive screening tests (35.7 vs. 27.3 %), higher false positive rate (100 vs. 96.4 %), and poor adherence (43 vs. 95 %). Invasive diagnostic follow-up was uncommon and uncomplicated. No interval lung cancer was detected. Late follow-up was mostly attributed to participant or primary care provider preference (67.5 %), participants lost to follow-up (17.5 %), and lack of insurance (10 %).

Conclusions

These findings highlight the potential challenges of generalizing the NLST mortality benefits in the broad deployment of CT screening. Our results support current recommendations that LDCT screening be performed in a highly structured and integrated setting.
Literatur
1.
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Centers for Disease C, Prevention (2009) Cigarette smoking among adults and trends in smoking cessation—United States, 2008. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 58(44):1227–1232 Centers for Disease C, Prevention (2009) Cigarette smoking among adults and trends in smoking cessation—United States, 2008. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 58(44):1227–1232
3.
Zurück zum Zitat National Lung Screening Trial Research T, Aberle DR, Adams AM et al (2011) Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening. N Engl J Med 365(5):395–409 National Lung Screening Trial Research T, Aberle DR, Adams AM et al (2011) Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening. N Engl J Med 365(5):395–409
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Moyer VA, Force USPST (2014) Screening for lung cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med 160(5):330–338PubMedCrossRef Moyer VA, Force USPST (2014) Screening for lung cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med 160(5):330–338PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Bach PB (2013) Perilous potential: the chance to save lives, or lose them, through low dose computed tomography screening for lung cancer. J Surg Oncol 108(5):287–288PubMedCrossRef Bach PB (2013) Perilous potential: the chance to save lives, or lose them, through low dose computed tomography screening for lung cancer. J Surg Oncol 108(5):287–288PubMedCrossRef
7.
8.
Zurück zum Zitat McKee BJ, McKee AB, Flacke S et al (2013) Initial experience with a free, high-volume, low-dose CT lung cancer screening program. J Am Coll Radiol 10(8):586–592PubMedCrossRef McKee BJ, McKee AB, Flacke S et al (2013) Initial experience with a free, high-volume, low-dose CT lung cancer screening program. J Am Coll Radiol 10(8):586–592PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Young RP, Hopkins RJ, Hay BA et al (2009) A gene-based risk score for lung cancer susceptibility in smokers and ex-smokers. Postgrad Med J 85(1008):515–524PubMedCrossRef Young RP, Hopkins RJ, Hay BA et al (2009) A gene-based risk score for lung cancer susceptibility in smokers and ex-smokers. Postgrad Med J 85(1008):515–524PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat International Early Lung Cancer Action Program I, Henschke CI, Yankelevitz DF et al (2006) Survival of patients with stage I lung cancer detected on CT screening. N Engl J Med 355(17):1763–1771 International Early Lung Cancer Action Program I, Henschke CI, Yankelevitz DF et al (2006) Survival of patients with stage I lung cancer detected on CT screening. N Engl J Med 355(17):1763–1771
11.
Zurück zum Zitat de Koning HJ, Meza R, Plevritis SK et al (2014) Benefits and harms of computed tomography lung cancer screening strategies: a comparative modeling study for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med 160(5):311–320PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef de Koning HJ, Meza R, Plevritis SK et al (2014) Benefits and harms of computed tomography lung cancer screening strategies: a comparative modeling study for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med 160(5):311–320PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Elmore JG, Miglioretti DL, Reisch LM et al (2002) Screening mammograms by community radiologists: variability in false-positive rates. J Natl Cancer Inst 94(18):1373–1380PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Elmore JG, Miglioretti DL, Reisch LM et al (2002) Screening mammograms by community radiologists: variability in false-positive rates. J Natl Cancer Inst 94(18):1373–1380PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Montes U, Seijo LM, Campo A et al (2007) Factors determining early adherence to a lung cancer screening protocol. Eur Respir J 30(3):532–537PubMedCrossRef Montes U, Seijo LM, Campo A et al (2007) Factors determining early adherence to a lung cancer screening protocol. Eur Respir J 30(3):532–537PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Burack RC, Simon MS, Stano M et al (2000) Follow-up among women with an abnormal mammogram in an HMO: is it complete, timely, and efficient? Am J Manag Care 6(10):1102–1113PubMed Burack RC, Simon MS, Stano M et al (2000) Follow-up among women with an abnormal mammogram in an HMO: is it complete, timely, and efficient? Am J Manag Care 6(10):1102–1113PubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat McCarthy BD, Yood MU, Janz NK et al (1996) Evaluation of factors potentially associated with inadequate follow-up of mammographic abnormalities. Cancer 77(10):2070–2076PubMedCrossRef McCarthy BD, Yood MU, Janz NK et al (1996) Evaluation of factors potentially associated with inadequate follow-up of mammographic abnormalities. Cancer 77(10):2070–2076PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Yabroff KR, Breen N, Vernon SW et al (2004) What factors are associated with diagnostic follow-up after abnormal mammograms? Findings from a U.S. National Survey. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 13(5):723–732 Yabroff KR, Breen N, Vernon SW et al (2004) What factors are associated with diagnostic follow-up after abnormal mammograms? Findings from a U.S. National Survey. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 13(5):723–732
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Young RP, Hopkins RJ (2012) Increasing smokers’ risk perception improves CT screening participation. Thorax 67(9):834–835; author reply 835 Young RP, Hopkins RJ (2012) Increasing smokers’ risk perception improves CT screening participation. Thorax 67(9):834–835; author reply 835
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Patel D, Akporobaro A, Chinyanganya N et al (2012) Attitudes to participation in a lung cancer screening trial: a qualitative study. Thorax 67(5):418–425PubMedCrossRef Patel D, Akporobaro A, Chinyanganya N et al (2012) Attitudes to participation in a lung cancer screening trial: a qualitative study. Thorax 67(5):418–425PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Freund KM, Battaglia TA, Calhoun E, et al (2014) Impact of patient navigation on timely cancer care: the Patient Navigation Research Program. J Natl Cancer Inst 106(6):dju115 Freund KM, Battaglia TA, Calhoun E, et al (2014) Impact of patient navigation on timely cancer care: the Patient Navigation Research Program. J Natl Cancer Inst 106(6):dju115
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Raich PC, Whitley EM, Thorland W et al (2012) Patient navigation improves cancer diagnostic resolution: an individually randomized clinical trial in an underserved population. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 21(10):1629–1638CrossRef Raich PC, Whitley EM, Thorland W et al (2012) Patient navigation improves cancer diagnostic resolution: an individually randomized clinical trial in an underserved population. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 21(10):1629–1638CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Community Low-Dose CT Lung Cancer Screening: A Prospective Cohort Study
verfasst von
Vincent K. Lam
Mary Miller
Lynn Dowling
Shyamali Singhal
Robert P. Young
Elwyn C. Cabebe
Publikationsdatum
01.02.2015
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Lung / Ausgabe 1/2015
Print ISSN: 0341-2040
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1750
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00408-014-9671-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2015

Lung 1/2015 Zur Ausgabe

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.