Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Risk of cancer incidence before the age of 15 years after exposure to ionising radiation from computed tomography: results from a German cohort study

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Radiation and Environmental Biophysics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 13 June 2017

Abstract

The aim of this cohort study was to assess the risk of developing cancer, specifically leukaemia, tumours of the central nervous system and lymphoma, before the age of 15 years in children previously exposed to computed tomography (CT) in Germany. Data for children with at least one CT between 1980 and 2010 were abstracted from 20 hospitals. Cancer cases occurring between 1980 and 2010 were identified by stochastic linkage with the German Childhood Cancer Registry (GCCR). For all cases and a sample of non-cases, radiology reports were reviewed to assess the underlying medical conditions at time of the CT. Cases were only included if diagnosis occurred at least 2 years after the first CT and no signs of cancer were recorded in the radiology reports. Standardised incidence ratios (SIR) using incidence rates from the general population were estimated. The cohort included information on 71,073 CT examinations in 44,584 children contributing 161,407 person-years at risk with 46 cases initially identified through linkage with the GCCR. Seven cases had to be excluded due to signs possibly suggestive of cancer at the time of first CT. Overall, more cancer cases were observed (O) than expected (E), but this was mainly driven by unexpected and possibly biased results for lymphomas. For leukaemia, the SIR (SIR = O/E) was 1.72 (95 % CI 0.89–3.01, O = 12), and for CNS tumours, the SIR was 1.35 (95 % CI 0.54–2.78, O = 7). Despite careful examination of the medical information, confounding by indication or reverse causation cannot be ruled out completely and may explain parts of the excess. Furthermore, the CT exposure may have been underestimated as only data from the participating clinics were available. This should be taken into account when interpreting risk estimates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • BfS (Bundesamt für Strahlenschutz) (2013) Umweltradioaktivität und Strahlenbelastung im Jahr 2011: Unterrichtung durch die Bundesregierung. Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz und Reaktorsicherheit (BMU), Bonn. http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0221-2013060410695

  • Brasme J-F, Morfouace M, Grill J, Martinot A, Amalberti R, Bons-Letouzey C, Chalumeau M (2012) Delays in diagnosis of paediatric cancers: a systematic review and comparison with expert testimony in lawsuits. Lancet Oncol 13(10):e445–e459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brenner D, Elliston C, Hall E, Berdon W (2001) Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 176(2):289–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breslow E, Day E (1987) Statistical methods in cancer research—Volume II—the design and analysis of cohort studies. IARC, Lyon

    Google Scholar 

  • Daumke P, Schulz S, Müller ML, Dzeyk W, Prinzen L, Pacheco EJ, Cancian PS, Nohama P, Markó K (2010) Subword-based semantic retrieval of clinical and bibliographic documents. Methods Inf Med 49(2):141–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DESTATIS (Statistisches Bundesamt) (2012) Periodensterbetafeln für Deutschland—Allgemeine Sterbetafeln, abgekürzte Sterbetafeln und Sterbetafeln. Statistisches Bundesamt Wiesbaden. https://www.destatis.de/DE/Publikationen/Thematisch/Bevoelkerung/Bevoelkerungsbewegung/Periodensterbetafeln.html

  • Goske MJ, Applegate KE, Boylan J, Butler PF, Callahan MJ, Coley BD, Farley S, Frush DP, Hernanz-Schulman M, Jaramillo D, Johnson ND, Kaste SC, Morrison G, Strauss KJ, Tuggle N (2008) The “Image Gently” campaign: increasing CT radiation dose awareness through a national education and awareness program. Pediatr Radiol 38(3):265–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammer GP, Seidenbusch MC, Schneider K, Regulla DF, Zeeb H, Spix C, Blettner M (2009) A cohort study of childhood cancer incidence after postnatal diagnostic X-ray exposure. Radiat Res 171(4):504–512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hauptmann M, Meulepas JM (2012) CT scans in childhood and risk of leukaemia and brain tumours. Lancet 380(9855):1736–1737

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsu WL, Preston DL, Soda M, Sugiyama H, Funamoto S, Kodama K, Kimura A, Kamada N, Dohy H, Tomonaga M, Iwanaga M, Miyazaki Y, Cullings HM, Suyama A, Ozasa K, Shore RE, Mabuchi K (2013) The incidence of leukemia, lymphoma and multiple myeloma among atomic bomb survivors: 1950-2001. Radiat Res 179(3):361–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang WY, Muo CH, Lin CY, Jen YM, Yang MH, Lin JC, Sung FC, Kao CH (2014) Paediatric head CT scan and subsequent risk of malignancy and benign brain tumour: a nation-wide population-based cohort study. Br J Cancer 110(9):2354–2360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IARC (1999) Ionizing radiation, part 1: X-and gamma (g)-radiation, and neutrons. IARC, Lyon

    Google Scholar 

  • Journy N, Rehel JL, Le Pointe HD, Lee C, Brisse H, Chateil JF, Caer-Lorho S, Laurier D, Bernier MO (2014) Are the studies on cancer risk from CT scans biased by indication? Elements of answer from a large-scale cohort study in France. Br J Cancer. doi:10.1038/bjc.2014.526

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaatsch P, Spix C (2011) German childhood cancer registry—Annual Report 2010 (1980–2010) GCCR, Mainz

  • Kim KP, de González AB, Pearce MS, Salotti JA, Parker L, McHugh K, Craft AW, Lee C (2012) Development of a database of organ doses for paediatric and young adult Ct scans in the United Kingdom. Radiat Prot Dosim 150(4):415–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krille L, Jahnen A, Mildenberger P, Schneider K, Weisser G, Zeeb H, Blettner M (2011) Computed tomography in children: multicenter cohort study design for the evaluation of cancer risk. Eur J Epidemiol 26(3):249–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krille L, Zeeb H, Jahnen A, Mildenberger P, Seidenbusch M, Schneider K, Weisser G, Hammer G, Scholz P, Blettner M (2012) Computed tomographies and cancer risk in children: a literature overview of CT practices, risk estimations and an epidemiologic cohort study proposal. Radiat Environ Biophys 51(2):103–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathews JD, Forsythe AV, Brady Z, Butler MW, Goergen SK, Byrnes GB, Giles GG, Wallace AB, Anderson PR, Guiver TA, McGale P, Cain TM, Dowty JG, Bickerstaffe AC, Darby SC (2013) Cancer risk in 680 000 people exposed to computed tomography scans in childhood or adolescence: data linkage study of 11 million Australians. Br Med J 346:f2360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miglioretti DL, Johnson E, Williams A, Greenlee RT, Weinmann S, Solberg LI, Feigelson HS, Roblin D, Flynn MJ, Vanneman N, Smith-Bindman R (2013) The use of computed tomography in pediatrics and the associated radiation exposure and estimated cancer risk. JAMA Pediatr 167(8):700–707

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NCRP (National Council on Radiation Protection & Measurements) (2009) Ionizing radiation exposure of the population of the United States—NCRP REPORT No. 160 NCRP Publications, Bethesda

  • Pearce MS, Salotti J, Little M, McHugh K, Lee C, Kim KP, Howe NL, Ronckers CM, Rajaraman P, Sir Craft AW, Parker L, de González AB (2012a) Radiation exposure from CT scans in childhood and subsequent risk of leukaemia and brain tumours: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 6736(12):1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce MS, Salotti J, Howe NL, McHugh K, Kim KP, Lee C, Craft AW, de Gonzaléz AB, Parker L (2012b) CT scans in young people in Great Britain: temporal and descriptive patterns, 1993–2002. Radiol Res Pract 2012:594278

    Google Scholar 

  • Preston DL, Kusumi S, Tomonaga M, Izumi S, Ron E, Kuramoto A, Kamada N, Dohy H, Matsuo T, Matsuo T (1994) Cancer incidence in atomic bomb survivors. Part III. Leukemia, lymphoma and multiple myeloma, 1950–1987. Radiat Res 137(2 Suppl):S68–S97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preston DL, Ron E, Tokuoka S, Funamoto S, Nishi N, Soda M, Mabuchi K, Kodama K (2007) Solid cancer incidence in atomic bomb survivors: 1958–1998. Radiat Res 168(1):1–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schnell R, Bachteler T, Bender S (2004) A toolbox for record linkage. Austrian J Stat 33(1):125–133

    Google Scholar 

  • Shah NB, Platt SL (2008) ALARA: is there a cause for alarm? Reducing radiation risks from computed tomography scanning in children. Curr Opin Pediatr 20(3):243–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stein SC, Hurst RW, Sonnad SS (2008) Meta-analysis of cranial CT scans in children. A mathematical model to predict radiation-induced tumors. Pediatr Neurosurg 44(6):448–457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steliarova-Foucher E, Stiller C, Lacour B, Kaatsch P (2005) International classification of childhood cancer. Cancer 103(7):1457–1467 (third edition)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thierry-Chef I, Dabin J, Friberg E, Hermen J, Istad TS, Jahnen A, Krille L, Lee C, Maccia C, Nordenskjöld A, Olerud HM, Rani K, Rehel JL, Simon SL, Struelens L, Kesminiene A (2013) Assessing organ doses from paediatric CT scans: a novel approach for an epidemiology study (the EPI-CT study). Int J Environ Res Public Health 10(2):717–728

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNSCEAR (United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation) (2013) Sources, effects and risks of ionizing radiation, vol II. UNSCEAR, New York, p 265

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh L, Shore R, Auvinen A, Jung T, Wakeford R (2013) Re: cancer risk in 680 000 people exposed to computed tomography scans in childhood or adolescence: data linkage study of 11 million Australians. Br Med J 346:f2360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh L, Shore R, Auvinen A, Jung T, Wakeford R (2014) Risks from CT scans—what do recent studies tell us? J Radiol Prot 34(1):E1. doi:10.1088/0952-4746/34/1/E1

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank S Blomemkamp, C Bremensdorfer, J Hermen, I Jung, DM R Lange, C Lehmann, G Miritz, Dr. A Schiefer, Dr. G Stolz and K Taylor for their valuable technical and intellectual support during the conduct of the study. The study was funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research under grant numbers 02NUK016A, 02NUK016B and 02NUK016CX. Complementary funding was received from the European Community’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) under Grant Agreement Number 269912. The funding bodies had no role in the study design, data analysis or reporting.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Blettner.

Additional information

An erratum to this article is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00411-017-0694-5.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Krille, L., Dreger, S., Schindel, R. et al. Risk of cancer incidence before the age of 15 years after exposure to ionising radiation from computed tomography: results from a German cohort study. Radiat Environ Biophys 54, 1–12 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00411-014-0580-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00411-014-0580-3

Keywords

Navigation