Skip to main content
Erschienen in: International Journal of Legal Medicine 4/2004

01.08.2004 | Original Article

Segmental vertebral motion in the assessment of neck range of motion in whiplash patients

verfasst von: Filadelfio Puglisi, Renzo Ridi, Francesca Cecchi, Aurelio Bonelli, Robert Ferrari

Erschienen in: International Journal of Legal Medicine | Ausgabe 4/2004

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to obtain comparative data concerning the relative contribution of segmental cervical vertebral motion to the cervical range of motion (ROM) in whiplash and healthy subjects in an effort to evaluate the usefulness of X-ray analysis in future forensic and research efforts. Each subject’s neck ROM was measured with an optoelectronic system and also by X-ray measurements of the angular rotation in flexion and extension. The X-rays were examined to calculate the angular movement in the sagittal plane of each of the functional units C2–C3 to C6–C7. The chronic whiplash subjects showed reduced total neck range in all directions as compared to healthy subjects (p<0.001). There was a reduced total angular rotation from flexion to extension between these two groups (p<0.01), but no significant difference, however, between chronic whiplash subjects and controls in the percentage contribution of each of the functional units C2–C3 to C6–C7 to this rotation. This data will now allow a design of trials where healthy subjects are asked to simulate restricted neck ROM while undergoing optokinetic and X-ray evaluation of segmental vertebral motion. We will be able to determine if simulators produce a similar pattern to chronic whiplash and healthy, non-simulating subjects, and thus determine if, at least for forensic and research purposes, this technique is useful in validating reported restricted neck range.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Dvir Z, Penso-Zabludowski E (2003) The effects of protocol and test situation on maximal vs. submaximal cervical motion: medicolegal implications. Int J Legal Med 117:350–355CrossRefPubMed Dvir Z, Penso-Zabludowski E (2003) The effects of protocol and test situation on maximal vs. submaximal cervical motion: medicolegal implications. Int J Legal Med 117:350–355CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Spitzer WO, Skovron ML, Salmi LR, Cassidy JD, Duranceau J, Suissa S, Zeiss E (1995) Scientific monograph of the Quebec Task Force on whiplash-associated disorders. Spine 20 [Suppl 8]:1S–73S Spitzer WO, Skovron ML, Salmi LR, Cassidy JD, Duranceau J, Suissa S, Zeiss E (1995) Scientific monograph of the Quebec Task Force on whiplash-associated disorders. Spine 20 [Suppl 8]:1S–73S
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Kristjansson E, Leivseth G, Brinckmann P, Frobin W (2003) Increased sagittal plane segmental motion in the lower cervical spine in women with chronic whiplash-associated disorders, grades I–II. A case-control study using a new measurement protocol. Spine 28:2215–2221CrossRefPubMed Kristjansson E, Leivseth G, Brinckmann P, Frobin W (2003) Increased sagittal plane segmental motion in the lower cervical spine in women with chronic whiplash-associated disorders, grades I–II. A case-control study using a new measurement protocol. Spine 28:2215–2221CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Dinmet J, Pasquet A, Krag MH, Panjabi MM (1982) Cervical spine motion in the sagittal plane: kinematic and geometric parameters. J Biomech 15:959–969CrossRefPubMed Dinmet J, Pasquet A, Krag MH, Panjabi MM (1982) Cervical spine motion in the sagittal plane: kinematic and geometric parameters. J Biomech 15:959–969CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Shaffer WO, Spratt KF, Weinstein J, Lehmann TR, Goel V (1990) The consistency and accuracy of roentgenograms for measuring sagittal translation in the lumbar vertebral motion segment—an experimental model. Spine 15:741–750PubMed Shaffer WO, Spratt KF, Weinstein J, Lehmann TR, Goel V (1990) The consistency and accuracy of roentgenograms for measuring sagittal translation in the lumbar vertebral motion segment—an experimental model. Spine 15:741–750PubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Panjabi MM, Chang D, Dvorak J (1992) An analysis of errors in kinematic parameters associated with in vivo functional radiographs. Spine 17:200–205PubMed Panjabi MM, Chang D, Dvorak J (1992) An analysis of errors in kinematic parameters associated with in vivo functional radiographs. Spine 17:200–205PubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Dvorak J, Froelich D, Penning L, Baumgartner H, Panjabi MM (1988) Functional radiographic diagnosis of the cervical spine flexion/extension. Spine 13:748–755PubMed Dvorak J, Froelich D, Penning L, Baumgartner H, Panjabi MM (1988) Functional radiographic diagnosis of the cervical spine flexion/extension. Spine 13:748–755PubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Frobin W, Leivseth G, Biggemann M, Brinckmann P (2001) Sagittal plane segmental motion of the cervical spine. A new precision measurement protocol and normal motion data of healthy adults. Clin Biomech 17:21–31CrossRef Frobin W, Leivseth G, Biggemann M, Brinckmann P (2001) Sagittal plane segmental motion of the cervical spine. A new precision measurement protocol and normal motion data of healthy adults. Clin Biomech 17:21–31CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Capaccioli L, Montigiani L, Donati P, Puglisi AT, Giurovich E, Puglisi F (1998) Measurement reliability of dynamic x-rays of the cervical spine: an experimental model. Ital J Anat Embryol 103:13–25 Capaccioli L, Montigiani L, Donati P, Puglisi AT, Giurovich E, Puglisi F (1998) Measurement reliability of dynamic x-rays of the cervical spine: an experimental model. Ital J Anat Embryol 103:13–25
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Castro WHM, Meyer SJ, Becke MER et al. (2001) No stress—no whiplash? Prevalence of “whiplash” symptoms following exposure to a placebo rear-end collision. Int J Legal Med 114:316–322PubMed Castro WHM, Meyer SJ, Becke MER et al. (2001) No stress—no whiplash? Prevalence of “whiplash” symptoms following exposure to a placebo rear-end collision. Int J Legal Med 114:316–322PubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Kwan O, Friel J (2002) Whiplash sine whiplash. Int J Legal Med 116:249–250PubMed Kwan O, Friel J (2002) Whiplash sine whiplash. Int J Legal Med 116:249–250PubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Siegmund GP, Brault JR, Wheeler JB (2002) Placebo whiplash data need cautious interpretation. Int J Legal Med 116:251PubMed Siegmund GP, Brault JR, Wheeler JB (2002) Placebo whiplash data need cautious interpretation. Int J Legal Med 116:251PubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Casto W (2002) Reply to Siegmund et al. Int J Legal Med 116:252 Casto W (2002) Reply to Siegmund et al. Int J Legal Med 116:252
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Bonelli A, Donati P, Maltoni G, Puglisi F, Norelli GA (2000) Neck motion evaluation after whiplash: a radiographic and kinematic protocol. Ital J Anat Embryol 105:51–62 Bonelli A, Donati P, Maltoni G, Puglisi F, Norelli GA (2000) Neck motion evaluation after whiplash: a radiographic and kinematic protocol. Ital J Anat Embryol 105:51–62
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Antonaci F, Bulgheroni M, Ghirmai S, Lanfranchi S, Dalla Toffola E, Sandrini G, Nappi G (2002) 3D kinematic analysis and clinical evaluation of neck movements in patients with whiplash injury. Cephalalgia 22:533–542CrossRefPubMed Antonaci F, Bulgheroni M, Ghirmai S, Lanfranchi S, Dalla Toffola E, Sandrini G, Nappi G (2002) 3D kinematic analysis and clinical evaluation of neck movements in patients with whiplash injury. Cephalalgia 22:533–542CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Segmental vertebral motion in the assessment of neck range of motion in whiplash patients
verfasst von
Filadelfio Puglisi
Renzo Ridi
Francesca Cecchi
Aurelio Bonelli
Robert Ferrari
Publikationsdatum
01.08.2004
Erschienen in
International Journal of Legal Medicine / Ausgabe 4/2004
Print ISSN: 0937-9827
Elektronische ISSN: 1437-1596
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-004-0462-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2004

International Journal of Legal Medicine 4/2004 Zur Ausgabe

Neu im Fachgebiet Rechtsmedizin