Skip to main content
Erschienen in: International Journal of Legal Medicine 1/2009

01.01.2009 | Original Article

Sex determination from the foramen magnum: discriminant function analysis in an eighteenth and nineteenth century British sample

verfasst von: René Gapert, Sue Black, Jason Last

Erschienen in: International Journal of Legal Medicine | Ausgabe 1/2009

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

The successful identification of the deceased is vital to the progress of any forensic investigation. One of the principal biological traits to be established from skeletal remains is the sex of the individual. This becomes more difficult if only parts of a skeleton are found or if the bones are compromised by physical insults such as fire, explosions or violence. The basal region of the occipital bone is covered by a large volume of soft tissue and is therefore in a relatively well-protected anatomical position, and as such, classification of sex using the occipital bone may prove useful in cases of significantly disrupted remains. The aim of this paper is to evaluate manually recorded morphometric variables of the region of the foramen magnum using both discriminant function analysis and linear regression. The skulls utilised in this study were selected from the eighteenth to nineteenth century documented skeletal collection of St. Bride’s Church, Fleet Street, London. Adult human skulls n = 158 (♂82/♀76) were measured to derive statistical functions. The results demonstrated that significant sexual dimorphism is present in the cranial base of the St. Bride’s material. The correctly classified crania within this population ranged from 65.8% for univariate functions to 70.3% for multivariate functions within the cranial sample. Males were correctly classified at 70.7% and females at 69.7% using multivariate functions. The linear regression equations predicted sex in the cranial sample correctly for 76% of the males and 70% for the females using different variables; however, overall highest correct prediction percentage was only 68%. Cross-validation brought the percentage down in some cases, but it was concluded that, overall, the expression of sexual dimorphism in the foramen magnum region within the St. Bride’s population is significantly demonstrable, and therefore, this area of the skull should be considered useful in the identification of sex.
Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Catalina-Herrera CJ (1987) Study of the anatomic metric values of the foramen magnum and its relation to sex. Acta Anat 130:344–347PubMedCrossRef Catalina-Herrera CJ (1987) Study of the anatomic metric values of the foramen magnum and its relation to sex. Acta Anat 130:344–347PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Fisher RA (1936) The use of multiple measurements in taxonomic problems. Ann Eugen 7:179–188 Fisher RA (1936) The use of multiple measurements in taxonomic problems. Ann Eugen 7:179–188
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Franklin D, Freedman L, Milne N (2005) Sexual dimorphism and discriminant function sexing in indigenous South African crania. Homo 55:213–228PubMedCrossRef Franklin D, Freedman L, Milne N (2005) Sexual dimorphism and discriminant function sexing in indigenous South African crania. Homo 55:213–228PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Gapert R, Last J (2005) The adult human occipital bone: measurement variance and observer error. In: Zakrzewski SR, Clegg M (eds) Proceedings of the Fifth Annual Conference of the British Association for Biological Anthropology and Osteoarchaeology. BAR International Series. Archaeopress, Oxford, pp 119–122 Gapert R, Last J (2005) The adult human occipital bone: measurement variance and observer error. In: Zakrzewski SR, Clegg M (eds) Proceedings of the Fifth Annual Conference of the British Association for Biological Anthropology and Osteoarchaeology. BAR International Series. Archaeopress, Oxford, pp 119–122
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Giles E (1964) Sex determination by discriminant function analysis of the mandible. Am J Phys Anthropol 22:129–136PubMedCrossRef Giles E (1964) Sex determination by discriminant function analysis of the mandible. Am J Phys Anthropol 22:129–136PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Giles E, Elliot O (1963) Sex determination by discriminant function analysis of crania. Am J Phys Anthropol 21:53–68PubMedCrossRef Giles E, Elliot O (1963) Sex determination by discriminant function analysis of crania. Am J Phys Anthropol 21:53–68PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Graw M (2001) Morphometrische und morphognostische Geschlechtsdiagnostik an der menschlichen Schädelbasis. In: Oehmichen M, Geserick G (eds) Osteologische Identifikation und Altersschätzung. Schmidt-Römhild, Lübeck, pp 103–121 Graw M (2001) Morphometrische und morphognostische Geschlechtsdiagnostik an der menschlichen Schädelbasis. In: Oehmichen M, Geserick G (eds) Osteologische Identifikation und Altersschätzung. Schmidt-Römhild, Lübeck, pp 103–121
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Günay Y, Altinkök M (2000) The value of the size of foramen magnum in sex determination. J Clin Forensic Med 7:147–149PubMedCrossRef Günay Y, Altinkök M (2000) The value of the size of foramen magnum in sex determination. J Clin Forensic Med 7:147–149PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Hamilton ME (1982) Sexual dimorphism in skeletal samples. In: Hall RL (ed) Sexual dimorphism in homo sapiens—a question of size. Praeger Publishers, New York, pp 107–163 Hamilton ME (1982) Sexual dimorphism in skeletal samples. In: Hall RL (ed) Sexual dimorphism in homo sapiens—a question of size. Praeger Publishers, New York, pp 107–163
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Henke W (1972) Zur Methode der diskriminanzanalytischen Geschlechtsbestimmung am Schädel. Homo 24:99–117 Henke W (1972) Zur Methode der diskriminanzanalytischen Geschlechtsbestimmung am Schädel. Homo 24:99–117
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Henke W (1977) On the method of discriminant function analysis for sex determination of the skull. J Hum Evol 6:95–100CrossRef Henke W (1977) On the method of discriminant function analysis for sex determination of the skull. J Hum Evol 6:95–100CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Hermann B, Grupe G, Hummel S, Piepenbrink H, Schutkowski H (1990) Prähistorische Anthropologie—Leitfaden der Feld- und Labormethoden. Springer, Berlin Hermann B, Grupe G, Hummel S, Piepenbrink H, Schutkowski H (1990) Prähistorische Anthropologie—Leitfaden der Feld- und Labormethoden. Springer, Berlin
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Holland TD (1986) Sex determination of fragmentary crania by analysis of the cranial base. Am J Phys Anthropol 70:203–208PubMedCrossRef Holland TD (1986) Sex determination of fragmentary crania by analysis of the cranial base. Am J Phys Anthropol 70:203–208PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Kajanoja P (1969) Sex determination of Finnish crania by discriminant function analysis. Am J Phys Anthropol 24:29–34CrossRef Kajanoja P (1969) Sex determination of Finnish crania by discriminant function analysis. Am J Phys Anthropol 24:29–34CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Keen JA (1950) A Study of the differences between male and female skulls. Am J Phys Anthropol 8:65–78PubMedCrossRef Keen JA (1950) A Study of the differences between male and female skulls. Am J Phys Anthropol 8:65–78PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Knussmann R (1996) Vergleichende Biologie des Menschen—Lehrbuch der Anthropologie und Humangenetik, 2. Auflage. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart Knussmann R (1996) Vergleichende Biologie des Menschen—Lehrbuch der Anthropologie und Humangenetik, 2. Auflage. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Krogman WM (1978) The human skeleton in forensic medicine, 3rd Printing. Charles C. Thomas, Springfield, IL Krogman WM (1978) The human skeleton in forensic medicine, 3rd Printing. Charles C. Thomas, Springfield, IL
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Marino EA (1995) Sex estimation using the first cervical vertebra. Am J Phys Anthropol 97:127–133PubMedCrossRef Marino EA (1995) Sex estimation using the first cervical vertebra. Am J Phys Anthropol 97:127–133PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Mays S, Cox M (2002) Sex determination in skeletal remains. In: Cox M, Mays S (eds) Human osteology in archaeology and forensic science. Greenwich Medical Media, London, pp 117–130 Mays S, Cox M (2002) Sex determination in skeletal remains. In: Cox M, Mays S (eds) Human osteology in archaeology and forensic science. Greenwich Medical Media, London, pp 117–130
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Murshed KA, Cicekcibasi AE, Tuncer I (2003) Morphometric evaluation of the foramen magnum and variations in its shape: a study on computerized tomographic images of normal adults. Turk J Med Sci 33:301–306 Murshed KA, Cicekcibasi AE, Tuncer I (2003) Morphometric evaluation of the foramen magnum and variations in its shape: a study on computerized tomographic images of normal adults. Turk J Med Sci 33:301–306
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Pötsch-Schneider L, Endris R, Schmidt H (1985) Diskriminanzanalyse zur Geschlechtsbestimmung an Unterkieferknochen. Z Rechtsmed 94:21–30PubMedCrossRef Pötsch-Schneider L, Endris R, Schmidt H (1985) Diskriminanzanalyse zur Geschlechtsbestimmung an Unterkieferknochen. Z Rechtsmed 94:21–30PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Ramsthaler F, Kreutz K, Verhoff MA (2007) Accuracy of metric sex analysis of skeletal remains using Fordisc® based on a recent skull collection. Int J Legal Med 121:477–482PubMedCrossRef Ramsthaler F, Kreutz K, Verhoff MA (2007) Accuracy of metric sex analysis of skeletal remains using Fordisc® based on a recent skull collection. Int J Legal Med 121:477–482PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Rösing FW, Graw M, Marré B, Ritz-Timme S, Rothschild MA, Rötzscher K, Schmeling A, Schröder I, Geserick G (2007) Recommendations for the forensic diagnosis of sex and age from skeletons. Homo 58:75–89PubMedCrossRef Rösing FW, Graw M, Marré B, Ritz-Timme S, Rothschild MA, Rötzscher K, Schmeling A, Schröder I, Geserick G (2007) Recommendations for the forensic diagnosis of sex and age from skeletons. Homo 58:75–89PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Rösing FW, Paul G, Schnutenhaus S (1995) Sexing skeletons by tooth size. In: Radlanski RJ, Renz RJ (eds) Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on Dental Morphology, Berlin. M-Marketing Services, Berlin, pp 373–376 Rösing FW, Paul G, Schnutenhaus S (1995) Sexing skeletons by tooth size. In: Radlanski RJ, Renz RJ (eds) Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on Dental Morphology, Berlin. M-Marketing Services, Berlin, pp 373–376
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Routal RR, Pal GP, Bhagwat SS, Tamankar BP (1984) Metrical studies with sexual dimorphism in foramen magnum of human crania. J Anat Soc India 2(33):85–89 Routal RR, Pal GP, Bhagwat SS, Tamankar BP (1984) Metrical studies with sexual dimorphism in foramen magnum of human crania. J Anat Soc India 2(33):85–89
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Saunders SR, Yang D (1999) Sex determination: XX or XY from the human skeleton. In: Fairgrieve SI (ed) Forensic osteological analysis. Charles C. Thomas, Springfield, IL, pp 36–59 Saunders SR, Yang D (1999) Sex determination: XX or XY from the human skeleton. In: Fairgrieve SI (ed) Forensic osteological analysis. Charles C. Thomas, Springfield, IL, pp 36–59
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Scheuer L, Black S (2000) Developmental juvenile osteology. Academic, London Scheuer L, Black S (2000) Developmental juvenile osteology. Academic, London
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Scheuer L, Black S (2004) The juvenile skeleton. Elsevier, London Scheuer L, Black S (2004) The juvenile skeleton. Elsevier, London
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Stewart TD (1979) Essentials of forensic anthropology—especially as developed in the United States. Charles C. Thomas, Springfield, IL Stewart TD (1979) Essentials of forensic anthropology—especially as developed in the United States. Charles C. Thomas, Springfield, IL
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Teixeira WRG (1982) Sex identification utilizing the size of the foramen magnum. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 3(3):203–206PubMedCrossRef Teixeira WRG (1982) Sex identification utilizing the size of the foramen magnum. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 3(3):203–206PubMedCrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Uysal SRM, Gokharman D, Kacar M, Tuncbilek I, Kosar U (2005) Estimation of sex by 3D CT measurements of the foramen magnum. J Forensic Sci 50:1310–1314PubMed Uysal SRM, Gokharman D, Kacar M, Tuncbilek I, Kosar U (2005) Estimation of sex by 3D CT measurements of the foramen magnum. J Forensic Sci 50:1310–1314PubMed
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Wahl J, Graw M (2001) Metric sex differentiation of the pars petrosa ossis temporalis. Int J Legal Med 114:215–223PubMedCrossRef Wahl J, Graw M (2001) Metric sex differentiation of the pars petrosa ossis temporalis. Int J Legal Med 114:215–223PubMedCrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Westcott DJ (2000) Sex variation in the second cervical vertebra. J Forensic Sci 45:462–466 Westcott DJ (2000) Sex variation in the second cervical vertebra. J Forensic Sci 45:462–466
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Westcott D, Moore-Jansen P (2001) Metric variation in the human occipital bone: forensic anthropological applications. J Forensic Sci 5(46):1159–1163 Westcott D, Moore-Jansen P (2001) Metric variation in the human occipital bone: forensic anthropological applications. J Forensic Sci 5(46):1159–1163
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Williams MM (1987) Sex determination of fragmentary crania by analysis of the cranial base: applications for the study of an Arikara skeletal sample. Thesis, University of Tennessee Williams MM (1987) Sex determination of fragmentary crania by analysis of the cranial base: applications for the study of an Arikara skeletal sample. Thesis, University of Tennessee
Metadaten
Titel
Sex determination from the foramen magnum: discriminant function analysis in an eighteenth and nineteenth century British sample
verfasst von
René Gapert
Sue Black
Jason Last
Publikationsdatum
01.01.2009
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
International Journal of Legal Medicine / Ausgabe 1/2009
Print ISSN: 0937-9827
Elektronische ISSN: 1437-1596
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-008-0256-0

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2009

International Journal of Legal Medicine 1/2009 Zur Ausgabe

Neu im Fachgebiet Rechtsmedizin