Skip to main content
Log in

Validation of an immunochromatographic D-dimer test to presumptively identify menstrual fluid in forensic exhibits

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
International Journal of Legal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Identifying the biological source of a crime scene stain can be crucial for police investigations in many scenarios. Blood is one of the most common fluids found, and accurate differentiation between peripheral blood and menstrual fluid could provide valuable information regarding the issue of consent in sexual assault cases. For the detection of menstrual fluid, no easy-to-use presumptive test is available to date. Therefore, this study aimed to validate a simple immunochromatographic test for the indication of menstrual fluid, focusing on a D-dimer assay. The Clearview® rapid D-dimer test provides a diagnostic assay for the detection of fibrin degradation products. We validated the sensitivity and robustness of the assay using fresh and dried menstrual fluid samples, body fluid mixtures, diluted samples, and casework swabs. Cross reactivity was tested for saliva, semen, vaginal fluid, and blood. No false positive results were obtained; it was possible to successfully analyze mixtures, highly diluted samples, and casework swabs. The results of this study indicate that the D-dimer assay reliably detects menstrual fluid in forensic exhibits and is easy to implement into the current workflow of body fluid identification.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  1. An JH, Shin KJ, Yang WI, Lee HY (2012) Body fluid identification in forensics. BMB Rep 45:545–553

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Baker DJ, Grimes EA, Hopwood AJ (2011) D-dimer assays for the identification of menstrual blood. Forensic Sci Int 212:210–214

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Roeder AD, Haas C (2013) mRNA profiling using a minimum of five mRNA markers per body fluid and a novel scoring method for body fluid identification. Int J Legal Med 127:707–721

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Juusola J, Ballantyne J (2005) Multiplex mRNA profiling for the identification of body fluids. Forensic Sci Int 152:1–12

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Haas C, Hanson E, Anjos MJ, Ballantyne KN, Banemann R, Bhoelai B, Borges E et al (2014) RNA/DNA co-analysis from human menstrual blood and vaginal secretion stains: results of a fourth and fifth collaborative EDNAP exercise. Forensic Sci Int Genet 8:203–212

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hanson EK, Lobenow H, Ballantyne J (2009) Identification of forensically relevant body fluids using a panel of differentially expressed microRNAs. Anal Biochem 387:303–314

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Zubakov D, Boersma AW, Choi Y, Van Kuijk PF, Wiemer EA, Kayser M (2010) MicroRNA markers for forensic body fluid identification obtained from microarray screening and quantitative RT-PCR confirmation. Int J Legal Med 124:217–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hanson EK, Mirza M, Rekab K (2014) The identification of menstrual blood in forensic samples by logistic regression modeling of miRNA expression. Electrophoresis. doi:10.1002/elps.201400171

  9. Hanson EK, Ballantyne J (2013) Rapid and inexpensive body fluid identification by RNA profiling-based multiplex High Resolution Melt (HRM) analysis. F1000Res 2:281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bauer M, Patzelt D (2002) Evaluation of mRNA markers for the identification of menstrual blood. J Forensic Sci 47:1278–1282

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Akutsu T, Watanabe K, Motani H, Iwase H, Sakurada K (2012) Evaluation of latex agglutination tests for fibrin-fibrinogen degradation products in the forensic identification of menstrual blood. Leg Med (Tokyo) 14:51–54

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Bauer M, Patzelt D (2008) Identification of menstrual blood by real time RT-PCR: technical improvements and the practical value of negative test results. Forensic Sci Int 174:55–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Geersing GJ, Janssen KJM, Oudega R, Bax L, Hoes AW, Reitsma JB, Moons KGM (2009) Excluding venous thromboembolism using point of care D-dimer tests in outpatients: a diagnostic meta-analysis. BMJ 339:b2990

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Gaffney PJ (1993) D-dimer history of discovery, characterization and utility of this and other fibrin fragments. Fibrinolysis 7:2–8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Miyaishi S, Kitao T, Yamamoto Y, Ishizu H, Matsumoto T, Mizutani Y, Heinemann A, Püschel K (1996) Identification of menstrual blood by the simultaneous determination of FDP-D dimer and myoglobin contents. Nihon Hoigaku Zasshi 50(6):400–403

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Vennemann M, Scott G, Curran L, Bittner F, Tobe SS (2014) Sensitivity and specificity of presumptive tests for blood, saliva and semen. Forensic Sci Med Pathol 10(1):69–75

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Schweers BA, Old J, Boonlayangoor PW, Reich KA (2008) Developmental validation of a novel lateral flow strip test for rapid identification of human blood (Rapid Stain Identification–Blood). Forensic Sci Int Genet 2(3):243–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Johnston E, Ames CE, Dagnall KE, Foster J, Daniel BE (2008) Comparison of presumptive blood test kits including hexagon OBTI. J Forensic Sci 53(3):687–689

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Lippi G, Favaloro EJ, Cervellin G (2014) A review of the value of D-dimer testing for prediction of recurrent venous thromboembolism with increasing age. Semin Thromb Hemost 40(6):634–639

  20. Kabrhel C, Mark Courtney D, Camargo CA Jr, Plewa MC, Nordenholz KE, Moore CL, Richman PB, Smithline HA, Beam DM, Kline JA (2010) Factors associated with positive D-dimer results in patients evaluated for pulmonary embolism. Acad Emerg Med 17(6):589–597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sakurada K, Sakai I, Sekiguchi K, Shiraishi T, Ikegaya H, Yoshida K (2005) Usefulness of a latex agglutination assay for FDP D-dimer to demonstrate the presence of postmortem blood. Int J Legal Med 119(3):167–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hernández-Cueto C, Vieira DN, Girela E, Marques E, Villanueva E, Sá FO (1995) Diagnostic ability of D-dimer in the establishment of the vitality of wounds. Forensic Sci Int 76(2):141–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Takeichi S, Wakasugi C, Shikata I (1984) Fluidity of cadaveric blood after sudden death: part I. Postmortem fibrinolysis and plasma catecholamine level. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 5(3):223–227

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank all donors for their kind participation in this study. We also appreciate the excellent technical assistance by Alina Glaub, BSc.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marielle Vennemann.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Holtkötter, H., Dierig, L., Schürenkamp, M. et al. Validation of an immunochromatographic D-dimer test to presumptively identify menstrual fluid in forensic exhibits. Int J Legal Med 129, 37–41 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-014-1097-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-014-1097-7

Keywords

Navigation