Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Interobserver agreement and predictive value for outcome of two rating scales for the amount of extravasated blood after aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage

  • ORIGINAL COMMUNICATION
  • Published:
Journal of Neurology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

In patients with SAH the amount of extravasated blood on the initial CT scan is related with delayed cerebral ischemia and clinical outcome. We investigated the interobserver variation of the Hijdra and Fisher scales for the amount of extravasated blood and the predictive values of these scales for delayed cerebral ischemia and outcome.

Methods

For 132 patients admitted within 48 hours after SAH three observers assessed the amount of blood on the initial CT scan by means of the Hijdra and Fisher scale. We analyzed interobserver agreement with kappa statistics and used multivariate logistic regression for the association with delayed cerebral ischemia and clinical outcome.

Results

The interobserver agreement of all three pairs of observers was good for the Hijdra scale (kappas for total sum scores ranging from 0.67 to 0.75) and mild to moderate for the Fisher scale (kappas ranging from 0.37 to 0.55). For the Hijdra scale the risk of DCI was higher for intermediate (OR 4.2; 95% CI 1.1–16.3) and large (OR 3.6; 95% CI 0.8–16.4) amounts of blood with small amount as reference. Fisher grade III (OR 1.0; 95% CI 0.2–5.2) and IV (OR 0.3; 95% CI 0.02–4.0) were not related with DCI. For the Hijdra scale and clinical outcome we found an increasing risk for poor outcome with intermediate (OR 3.9; 95% CI 1.0–15.9) and large (OR 10.7; 95% CI 2.3–50.1) amounts of blood. Such a relation was not found for Fisher grade III (OR 1.2; 95% CI 0.2–7.0) and IV (OR 0.2; 95% CI 0.01–3.4).

Conclusions

For the Hijdra scale we found a distinct better interobserver agreement than for the Fisher score. Moreover, the Hijdra scale was an independent prognosticator for DCI and clinical outcome, which was not the case for the Fisher score.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adams HP Jr, Kassell NF, Torner JC, Haley EC Jr (1987) Predicting cerebral ischemia after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: influences of clinical condition, CT results, and antifibrinolytic therapy. A report of the Cooperative Aneurysm Study. Neurology 37:1586–1591

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Claassen J, Bernardini GL, Kreiter K, Bates J, Du YE, Copeland D, Connolly ES, Mayer SA (2001) Effect of cisternal and ventricular blood on risk of delayed cerebral ischemia after subarachnoid hemorrhage. The Fisher scale revisited. Stroke 32:2012–2020

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Drake CG, Hunt WE, Sano K, Kasell N, Teasdale G, Pertviset B et al. (1988) Report of World Federation of Neurological Surgeons Comittee on a universal subarachnoid hemorrhage grading scale. J Neurosurg 68:985–986

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fisher CM, Kistler JP, Davis JM (1980) Relation of cerebral vasospasm to subarachnoid hemorrhage visualized by computerized tomographic scanning. Neurosurgery 6:1–9

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Fleiss JL (1981) Statistical methods for rates and proportions. 2nd ed. Wiley-Interscience, New York

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hijdra A, Brouwers PJ, Vermeulen M, van Gijn J (1990) Grading the amount of blood on computed tomograms after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Stroke 21:1156–1161

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hijdra A, van Gijn J, Nagelkerke NJ, Vermeulen M, van Crevel H (1988) Prediction of delayed cerebral ischemia, rebleeding, and outcome after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Stroke 19:1250–1256

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hop JW, Rinkel GJE, Algra A, van Gijn J (1997) Case-fatility rates and functional outcome after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Stroke 28:660–664

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Jennett B, Bond M (1975) Assessment of outcome after severe brain damage: a practical scale. Lancet 1:480–484

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Landis RJ, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Qureshi AI, Sung GY, Razumovsky AY, Lane K, Straw RN, Ulatowsky JA (2000) Early identification of patients at risk for symptomatic vasospasm after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Critl Care Med 28:984–990

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Rinkel GJE, Wijdicks EFM, Vermeulen M, Ramos LMP, Tanghe HL, Hasan D, Meiners LC, van Gijn J (1991) Nonaneurysmal perimescencephalic subarachnoid hemorrhage: CT and MR patterns that differ from aneurysmal rupture. Am J Neuroradiol 12:829–834

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Van der Jagt M, Hasan D, Bijvoet HWC, Pieterman H, Koudstaal PJ, Avezaat CJJ (2000) Interobserver variability of cisternal blood on CT after aneurysmal subarchnoid hemorrhage. Neurology 54:2156–2158

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anouk G.W. van Norden MD.

Additional information

Received in revised form: 9 February 2006

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

van Norden, A.G., van Dijk, G.W., van Huizen, M.D. et al. Interobserver agreement and predictive value for outcome of two rating scales for the amount of extravasated blood after aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage. J Neurol 253, 1217–1220 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-006-0205-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-006-0205-0

Keywords

Navigation