Erschienen in:
01.07.2006 | Clinical Investigation
The Freiburg Visual Acuity Test-Variability unchanged by post-hoc re-analysis
verfasst von:
Michael Bach
Erschienen in:
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology
|
Ausgabe 7/2006
Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten
Abstract
Background
The Freiburg Visual Acuity and Contrast Test (FrACT) has been further developed; it is now available for Macintosh and Windows free of charge at
http://www.michaelbach.de/fract.html. The present study sought to reduce the test-retest variability of visual acuity on short runs (18 trials) by post-hoc re-analysis.
Methods
The FrACT employs advanced computer graphics to present Landolt Cs over the full range of visual acuity. The sequence of optotypes presented follows an adaptive staircase procedure, the Best-PEST algorithm. The Best-PEST threshold obtained after 18 trials was compared to the result of a post-hoc re-analysis of the acquired data, where both threshold and slope of the psychometric function were estimated via a maximum-likelihood fit.
Results
Testing time was 1.7 min per run on average. Test-retest reproducibility was ±2 lines (or ±0.2 logMAR) for a 95% confidence band (using 18 optotype presentations per test run). Post-hoc psychometric fitting reproduced the Best-PEST result within 1%, although the individual slopes varied widely; test-retest reproducibility was not improved.
Conclusions
The FrACT offers advantages over traditional chart testing with respect to objectivity and reliability. The similarity between the results of the Best-PEST vs. post-hoc analysis, fitting both slope and threshold, suggest that there is no disadvantage to the constant slope assumed by Best PEST. Furthermore, since variability was not reduced by post-hoc analysis, for high reliability more trials should be employed than the 18 trials per run used here.