Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 3/2011

01.03.2011 | Cornea

Repeatability of intra-ocular pressure and central corneal thickness measurements provided by a non-contact method of tonometry and pachymetry

verfasst von: Domenico Schiano Lomoriello, Marco Lombardo, Laura Tranchina, Francesco Oddone, Sebastiano Serrao, Pietro Ducoli

Erschienen in: Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology | Ausgabe 3/2011

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

To examine the repeatability of intra-ocular pressure (IOP) and central corneal thickness (CCT) measurements provided by the Tono-Pachymeter NT530P (Nidek, Japan), and to assess agreement of the device with Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) and ultrasound pachymetry (UP).

Methods

Sixty-two normal eyes of 62 subjects were included in the study. Three sessions of measurements, each consisting of three sets of measurements, were completed with each device. Repeatability was determined with the coefficient of variation (CoV) and the coefficient of repeatability (CoR) values. Agreement between devices was examined by Bland–Altman analysis and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) analyses.

Results

The CoV and CoR for IOP values were 18.4% and 5.5 mmHg with the NT530P and 16.6% and 4.3 mmHg with the GAT respectively. On average, NT530P overestimated the IOP compared with GAT by 1.3 mmHg. The 95% limits of agreement between the methods ranged from −5.9 to +3.3 mmHg, and the ICC for average IOP measures between devices was 0.64 (P < 0.001). The CoV and CoR for CCT measurements were 5.5% and 59.8 μm with the NT530P and 5.5% and 60.5 μm with UP. NT530P CCT readings were on average 13 μm thinner than those obtained with UP. The 95% limits of agreement (LoA) ranged from −7.4 to +33.1 μm, and the ICC for average CCT measures between devices was 0.93 (P < 0.001).

Conclusion

The NT530P demonstrated high IOP and CCT measurement repeatability in the normal population studied. The device tended to slightly overestimate IOP compared to GAT. CCT values provided by NT530P were interchangeable with those of UP.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Sudesh S, Moseley MJ, Thompson JR (1993) Accuracy of Goldmann tonometry in clinical practice. Acta Ophthalmol 71(2):185–188 Sudesh S, Moseley MJ, Thompson JR (1993) Accuracy of Goldmann tonometry in clinical practice. Acta Ophthalmol 71(2):185–188
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Dielemans I, Vingerling JR, Hofman A, Grobbee DE, de Jong PT (1994) Reliability of intraocular pressure measurement with the Goldmann applanation tonometer in epidemiological studies. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 232(3):141–144PubMedCrossRef Dielemans I, Vingerling JR, Hofman A, Grobbee DE, de Jong PT (1994) Reliability of intraocular pressure measurement with the Goldmann applanation tonometer in epidemiological studies. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 232(3):141–144PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Whitacre MM, Stein R (1993) Sources of error with use of Goldmann-type tonometers. Surv Ophthalmol 38(1):1–30PubMedCrossRef Whitacre MM, Stein R (1993) Sources of error with use of Goldmann-type tonometers. Surv Ophthalmol 38(1):1–30PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Ehlers N, Bramsen T, Sperling S (1975) Applanation tonometry and central corneal thickness. Acta Ophthalmol 53(1):34–43 Ehlers N, Bramsen T, Sperling S (1975) Applanation tonometry and central corneal thickness. Acta Ophthalmol 53(1):34–43
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Mollan SP, Wolffsohn JS, Nessim M, Laiquzzaman M, Sivakumar S, Hartley S, Shah S (2008) Accuracy of Goldmann, ocular response analyser, Pascal and TonoPen XL tonometry in keratoconic and normal eyes. Br J Ophthalmol 92(12):1661–1665PubMedCrossRef Mollan SP, Wolffsohn JS, Nessim M, Laiquzzaman M, Sivakumar S, Hartley S, Shah S (2008) Accuracy of Goldmann, ocular response analyser, Pascal and TonoPen XL tonometry in keratoconic and normal eyes. Br J Ophthalmol 92(12):1661–1665PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Kanngiesser HE, Kniestedt C, Robert YC (2005) Dynamic contour tonometry: presentation of a new tonometer. J Glaucoma 14(5):344–350PubMedCrossRef Kanngiesser HE, Kniestedt C, Robert YC (2005) Dynamic contour tonometry: presentation of a new tonometer. J Glaucoma 14(5):344–350PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Silverman RH, Patel MS, Gal O, Sarup A, Deobhakta A, Dababneh H, Reinstein DZ, Feleppa EJ, Coleman DJ (2009) Effect of corneal hydration on ultrasound velocity and backscatter. Ultrasound Med Biol 35(5):839–846PubMedCrossRef Silverman RH, Patel MS, Gal O, Sarup A, Deobhakta A, Dababneh H, Reinstein DZ, Feleppa EJ, Coleman DJ (2009) Effect of corneal hydration on ultrasound velocity and backscatter. Ultrasound Med Biol 35(5):839–846PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Modis L Jr, Langenbucher A, Seitz B (2001) Corneal thickness measurements with contact, non contact specular microscopic and ultrasonic pachymetry. Am J Ophthalmol 132(4):517–521PubMedCrossRef Modis L Jr, Langenbucher A, Seitz B (2001) Corneal thickness measurements with contact, non contact specular microscopic and ultrasonic pachymetry. Am J Ophthalmol 132(4):517–521PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Forbes M, Pico G Jr, Grolman B (1974) A non-contact applanation tonometer. Description and clinical evaluation. Arch Ophthalmol 91(2):134–140PubMed Forbes M, Pico G Jr, Grolman B (1974) A non-contact applanation tonometer. Description and clinical evaluation. Arch Ophthalmol 91(2):134–140PubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Cho P, Lui T (1997) Comparison of the performance of the Nidek NT-2000 noncontact tonometer with the Keeler Pulsair 2000 and the Goldmann applanation tonometer. Optom Vis Sci 74(1):51–58PubMedCrossRef Cho P, Lui T (1997) Comparison of the performance of the Nidek NT-2000 noncontact tonometer with the Keeler Pulsair 2000 and the Goldmann applanation tonometer. Optom Vis Sci 74(1):51–58PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat O’Donnell C, Maldonado-Codina C (2005) Agreement and repeatability of central thickness measurement in normal corneas using ultrasound pachymetry and the OCULUS Pentacam. Cornea 24(8):920–924PubMedCrossRef O’Donnell C, Maldonado-Codina C (2005) Agreement and repeatability of central thickness measurement in normal corneas using ultrasound pachymetry and the OCULUS Pentacam. Cornea 24(8):920–924PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Lackner B, Schmidinger G, Pieh S, Funovics MA, Skorpik C (2005) Repeatability and reproducibility of central corneal thickness measurement with Pentacam, Orbscan, and ultrasound. Optom Vis Sci 82(10):892–899PubMedCrossRef Lackner B, Schmidinger G, Pieh S, Funovics MA, Skorpik C (2005) Repeatability and reproducibility of central corneal thickness measurement with Pentacam, Orbscan, and ultrasound. Optom Vis Sci 82(10):892–899PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Barkana Y, Gerber Y, Elbaz U, Schwartz S, Ken-Dror G, Avni I, Zadok D (2005) Central corneal thickness measurement with the Pentacam Scheimpflug system, optical low-coherence reflectometry pachymeter, and ultrasound pachymetry. J Cataract Refract Surg 31(9):1729–1735PubMedCrossRef Barkana Y, Gerber Y, Elbaz U, Schwartz S, Ken-Dror G, Avni I, Zadok D (2005) Central corneal thickness measurement with the Pentacam Scheimpflug system, optical low-coherence reflectometry pachymeter, and ultrasound pachymetry. J Cataract Refract Surg 31(9):1729–1735PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Ucakhan OO, Ozkan M, Kanpolat A (2006) Corneal thickness measurements in normal and keratoconic eyes: Pentacam comprehensive eye scanner versus noncontact specular microscopy and ultrasound pachymetry. J Cataract Refract Surg 32(6):970–977PubMedCrossRef Ucakhan OO, Ozkan M, Kanpolat A (2006) Corneal thickness measurements in normal and keratoconic eyes: Pentacam comprehensive eye scanner versus noncontact specular microscopy and ultrasound pachymetry. J Cataract Refract Surg 32(6):970–977PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Bland JM, Altmann DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1(8476):307–310PubMed Bland JM, Altmann DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1(8476):307–310PubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Almubrad TM, Ogbuehi KC (2010) On repeated corneal applanation with the Goldmann and two non-contact tonometers. Clin Exp Optom 93(2):77–82PubMedCrossRef Almubrad TM, Ogbuehi KC (2010) On repeated corneal applanation with the Goldmann and two non-contact tonometers. Clin Exp Optom 93(2):77–82PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Grolman B (1972) A new tonometer system. Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom 49(8):646–660PubMed Grolman B (1972) A new tonometer system. Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom 49(8):646–660PubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Kotecha A, Elsheikh A, Roberts CR, Zhu H, Garway-Heath DF (2006) Corneal thickness and age-related biomechanical properties of the cornea measured with the ocular response analyzer. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 47(12):5337–5347PubMedCrossRef Kotecha A, Elsheikh A, Roberts CR, Zhu H, Garway-Heath DF (2006) Corneal thickness and age-related biomechanical properties of the cornea measured with the ocular response analyzer. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 47(12):5337–5347PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Tonnu PA, Ho T, Sharma K, White E, Bunce C, Garway-Heath D (2005) A comparison of four methods of tonometry: method agreement and interobserver variability. Br J Ophthalmol 89(7):847–850PubMedCrossRef Tonnu PA, Ho T, Sharma K, White E, Bunce C, Garway-Heath D (2005) A comparison of four methods of tonometry: method agreement and interobserver variability. Br J Ophthalmol 89(7):847–850PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Kotecha A, White E, Schlottmann PG, Garway-Heath DF (2010) Intraocular pressure measurement precision with the Goldmann applanation, dynamic contour, and ocular response analyzer tonometers. Ophthalmology 117(4):730–737PubMedCrossRef Kotecha A, White E, Schlottmann PG, Garway-Heath DF (2010) Intraocular pressure measurement precision with the Goldmann applanation, dynamic contour, and ocular response analyzer tonometers. Ophthalmology 117(4):730–737PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Martinez-de-la-Casa JM, Garcia-Feijoo J, Fernandez-Vidal A, Mendez-Hernandez C, Garcia-Sanchez J (2006) Ocular response analyzer versus Goldmann applanation tonometry for intraocular pressure measurements. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 47(10):4410–4414PubMedCrossRef Martinez-de-la-Casa JM, Garcia-Feijoo J, Fernandez-Vidal A, Mendez-Hernandez C, Garcia-Sanchez J (2006) Ocular response analyzer versus Goldmann applanation tonometry for intraocular pressure measurements. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 47(10):4410–4414PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Jorge J, Diaz-Rey JA, Gonzalez-Meijome JM, Almeida JB, Parafita MA (2002) Clinical performance of the Reichert AT550: a new noncontact tonometer. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 22(6):560–564PubMedCrossRef Jorge J, Diaz-Rey JA, Gonzalez-Meijome JM, Almeida JB, Parafita MA (2002) Clinical performance of the Reichert AT550: a new noncontact tonometer. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 22(6):560–564PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat García-Resúa C, Giráldez Fernández MJ, Yebra-Pimentel E, García-Montero S (2010) Clinical evaluation of the Canon TX-10 noncontact tonometer in healthy eyes. Eur J Ophthalmol 20(3):523–530PubMed García-Resúa C, Giráldez Fernández MJ, Yebra-Pimentel E, García-Montero S (2010) Clinical evaluation of the Canon TX-10 noncontact tonometer in healthy eyes. Eur J Ophthalmol 20(3):523–530PubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Brencher HL, Kohl P, Reinke AR, Yolton RL (1991) Clinical comparison of air-puff and Goldmann tonometers. J Am Optom Assoc 62(5):395–402PubMed Brencher HL, Kohl P, Reinke AR, Yolton RL (1991) Clinical comparison of air-puff and Goldmann tonometers. J Am Optom Assoc 62(5):395–402PubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Carbonaro F, Andrew T, Mackey DA, Spector TD, Hammond CJ (2010) Comparison of three methods of intraocular pressure measurement and their relation to central corneal thickness. Eye (Lond) 24(7):1165–1170 Carbonaro F, Andrew T, Mackey DA, Spector TD, Hammond CJ (2010) Comparison of three methods of intraocular pressure measurement and their relation to central corneal thickness. Eye (Lond) 24(7):1165–1170
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Al-Mezaine HS, Al-Amro SA, Kangave D, Sadaawy A, Wehaib TA, Al-Obeidan S (2008) Comparison between central corneal thickness measurements by oculus pentacam and ultrasonic pachymetry. Int Ophthalmol 28(5):333–338PubMedCrossRef Al-Mezaine HS, Al-Amro SA, Kangave D, Sadaawy A, Wehaib TA, Al-Obeidan S (2008) Comparison between central corneal thickness measurements by oculus pentacam and ultrasonic pachymetry. Int Ophthalmol 28(5):333–338PubMedCrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Amano S, Honda N, Amano Y, Yamagami S, Miyai T, Samejima T, Ogata M, Miyata K (2006) Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements by rotating Scheimpflug camera, ultrasonic pachymetry, and scanning slit-corneal topography. Ophthalmology 113(6):937–941PubMedCrossRef Amano S, Honda N, Amano Y, Yamagami S, Miyai T, Samejima T, Ogata M, Miyata K (2006) Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements by rotating Scheimpflug camera, ultrasonic pachymetry, and scanning slit-corneal topography. Ophthalmology 113(6):937–941PubMedCrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat De Sanctis U, Missolungi A, Mutani B, Richiardi L, Grignolo FM (2007) Reproducibility and repeatability of central corneal thickness measurement in keratoconus using the rotating Scheimpflug camera and ultrasound pachymetry. Am J Ophthalmol 144(5):712–718PubMedCrossRef De Sanctis U, Missolungi A, Mutani B, Richiardi L, Grignolo FM (2007) Reproducibility and repeatability of central corneal thickness measurement in keratoconus using the rotating Scheimpflug camera and ultrasound pachymetry. Am J Ophthalmol 144(5):712–718PubMedCrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Ciolino JB, Khachikian SS, Belin MW (2008) Comparison of corneal thickness measurements by ultrasound and Scheimpflug photography in eyes that have undergone laser in situ keratomileusis. Am J Ophthalmol 145(1):75–80PubMedCrossRef Ciolino JB, Khachikian SS, Belin MW (2008) Comparison of corneal thickness measurements by ultrasound and Scheimpflug photography in eyes that have undergone laser in situ keratomileusis. Am J Ophthalmol 145(1):75–80PubMedCrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Prospero Ponce CM, Rocha KM, Smith SD, Krueger RR (2009) Central and peripheral corneal thickness measured with optical coherence tomography, Scheimpflug imaging, and ultrasound pachymetry in normal, keratoconus-suspect, and post-laser in situ keratomileusis eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg 35(6):1055–1062PubMedCrossRef Prospero Ponce CM, Rocha KM, Smith SD, Krueger RR (2009) Central and peripheral corneal thickness measured with optical coherence tomography, Scheimpflug imaging, and ultrasound pachymetry in normal, keratoconus-suspect, and post-laser in situ keratomileusis eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg 35(6):1055–1062PubMedCrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Stabuc Silih M, Hawlina M (2003) Influence of corneal thickness on comparative intraocular pressure measurements with Goldmann and non-contact tonometers in keratoconus. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 220(12):843–847PubMedCrossRef Stabuc Silih M, Hawlina M (2003) Influence of corneal thickness on comparative intraocular pressure measurements with Goldmann and non-contact tonometers in keratoconus. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 220(12):843–847PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Repeatability of intra-ocular pressure and central corneal thickness measurements provided by a non-contact method of tonometry and pachymetry
verfasst von
Domenico Schiano Lomoriello
Marco Lombardo
Laura Tranchina
Francesco Oddone
Sebastiano Serrao
Pietro Ducoli
Publikationsdatum
01.03.2011
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology / Ausgabe 3/2011
Print ISSN: 0721-832X
Elektronische ISSN: 1435-702X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-010-1550-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2011

Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 3/2011 Zur Ausgabe

Neu im Fachgebiet Augenheilkunde

Update Augenheilkunde

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.