Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 9/2019

15.06.2019 | Oculoplastics and Orbit

Cryolite glass prosthetic eyes—the response of the anophthalmic socket

verfasst von: Alexander C. Rokohl, Werner Adler, Konrad R. Koch, Joel M. Mor, Renbing Jia, Marc Trester, Nicola S. Pine, Keith R. Pine, Ludwig M. Heindl

Erschienen in: Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology | Ausgabe 9/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate mucoid discharge and the inflammatory response of anophthalmic sockets to cryolite glass prosthetic eye wear.

Patients and methods

A total of 101 cryolite glass prosthetic eye wearers used visual analog scales (0–10) to measure frequency, color, volume, and viscosity of mucoid discharge associated with their prosthesis. Standardized photographs of the conjunctiva of their anophthalmic sockets were taken and conjunctival inflammation was semi-quantitatively graded (0–4). All characteristics of discharge and conjunctival inflammation were correlated to eye loss cause, hand washing behavior, and cleaning regimes as explanatory variables.

Results

Mean mucoid discharge characteristics (0–10 scale) were frequency 5.3 ± 2.8, color 4.8 ± 3.2, volume 4.9 ± 3.0, and viscosity 5.1 ± 3.2. The mean conjunctival inflammation score (0–4 scale) was 2.1 ± 1.0. There was a positive correlation between the grade of conjunctival inflammation and the frequency (p = 0.018), color (p = 0.001), volume (p = 0.003), and the viscosity of mucoid discharge (p = 0.005). More conjunctival inflammation was associated with higher frequency of cleaning (p < 0.001) and lower frequency of hand washing before removal (p = 0.001). Higher frequency, color, volume, and viscosity of discharge were associated with higher frequency of cleaning (p ≤ 0.001).

Conclusions

Discharge severity associated with prosthetic eye wear was positively correlated with more conjunctival inflammation, higher cleaning frequency, and less hand washing before handling. The results suggest that cryolite glass eyes should not be removed daily for cleaning and that further research should be undertaken to develop a standardized treatment protocol for managing inflammation and mucoid discharge. This protocol would advise hand washing before handling cryolite glass eyes and recommend a minimum period of wear between cleaning sessions.
Literatur
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Rokohl AC, Koch KR, Adler W, Trester M, Trester W, Pine NS, Pine KR, Heindl LM (2018) Concerns of anophthalmic patients-a comparison between cryolite glass and polymethyl methacrylate prosthetic eye wearers. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-018-3942-8 Rokohl AC, Koch KR, Adler W, Trester M, Trester W, Pine NS, Pine KR, Heindl LM (2018) Concerns of anophthalmic patients-a comparison between cryolite glass and polymethyl methacrylate prosthetic eye wearers. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s00417-018-3942-8
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Jones CA, Collin JR (1983) A classification and review the causes of discharging sockets. Trans Ophthalmol Soc U K 103(Pt 3):351–353PubMed Jones CA, Collin JR (1983) A classification and review the causes of discharging sockets. Trans Ophthalmol Soc U K 103(Pt 3):351–353PubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Paranhos RM, Batalhao CH, Semprini M, Regalo SC, Ito IY, de Mattos Mda G (2007) Evaluation of ocular prosthesis biofilm and anophthalmic cavity contamination after use of three cleansing solutions. J Appl Oral Sci 15:33–38CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Paranhos RM, Batalhao CH, Semprini M, Regalo SC, Ito IY, de Mattos Mda G (2007) Evaluation of ocular prosthesis biofilm and anophthalmic cavity contamination after use of three cleansing solutions. J Appl Oral Sci 15:33–38CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Christensen JN, Fahmy JA (1974) The bacterial flora of the conjunctival anophthalmic socket in glass prosthesis-carriers. Acta Ophthalmol 52:801–809CrossRef Christensen JN, Fahmy JA (1974) The bacterial flora of the conjunctival anophthalmic socket in glass prosthesis-carriers. Acta Ophthalmol 52:801–809CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Allansmith MR, Korb DR, Greiner JV, Henriquez AS, Simon MA, Finnemore VM (1977) Giant papillary conjunctivitis in contact lens wearers. Am J Ophthalmol 83:697–708CrossRefPubMed Allansmith MR, Korb DR, Greiner JV, Henriquez AS, Simon MA, Finnemore VM (1977) Giant papillary conjunctivitis in contact lens wearers. Am J Ophthalmol 83:697–708CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Vasquez RJ, Linberg JV (1989) The anophthalmic socket and the prosthetic eye. A clinical and bacteriologic study. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 5:277–280CrossRefPubMed Vasquez RJ, Linberg JV (1989) The anophthalmic socket and the prosthetic eye. A clinical and bacteriologic study. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 5:277–280CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Cryolite glass prosthetic eyes—the response of the anophthalmic socket
verfasst von
Alexander C. Rokohl
Werner Adler
Konrad R. Koch
Joel M. Mor
Renbing Jia
Marc Trester
Nicola S. Pine
Keith R. Pine
Ludwig M. Heindl
Publikationsdatum
15.06.2019
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology / Ausgabe 9/2019
Print ISSN: 0721-832X
Elektronische ISSN: 1435-702X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-019-04395-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 9/2019

Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 9/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Neu im Fachgebiet Augenheilkunde

Update Augenheilkunde

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.