nach oben

International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health

Erschienen in:

01.01.2008 | Original Article

Prevalence and prevention of needlestick injuries among health care workers in a German university hospital

verfasst von: Sabine Wicker, Juliane Jung, Regina Allwinn, René Gottschalk, Holger F. Rabenau

Erschienen in: International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health | Ausgabe 3/2008

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objective

Health care workers (HCWs) are exposed to bloodborne pathogens, especially hepatitis B (HBV), hepatitis C (HCV), and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) through job-related risk factors like needlestick, stab, scratch, cut, or other bloody injuries. Needlestick injuries can be prevented by safer devices.

Methods

The purpose of this study was to investigate the frequency and causes of needlestick injuries in a German university hospital. Data were obtained by an anonymous, self-reporting questionnaire. We calculated the share of reported needlestick injuries, which could have been prevented by using safety devices.

Results

31.4% (n = 226) of participant HCWs had sustained at least one needlestick injury in the last 12 months. A wide variation in the number of reported needlestick injuries was evident across disciplines, ranging from 46.9% (n = 91/194) among medical staff in surgery and 18.7% (n = 53/283) among HCWs in pediatrics. Of all occupational groups, physicians have the highest risk to experience needlestick injuries (55.1%—n = 129/234). Evaluating the kind of activity under which the needlestick injury occurred, on average 34% (n = 191/561) of all needlestick injuries could have been avoided by the use of safety devices. Taking all medical disciplines and procedures into consideration, safety devices are available for 35.1% (n = 197/561) of needlestick injuries sustained. However, there was a significant difference across various medical disciplines in the share of needlestick injuries which might have been avoidable: Pediatrics (83.7%), gynecology (83.7%), anesthesia (59.3%), dermatology (33.3%), and surgery (11.9%). In our study, only 13.2% (n = 74/561) of needlestick injuries could have been prevented by organizational measures.

Conclusion

There is a high rate of needlestick injuries in the daily routine of a hospital. The rate of such injuries depends on the medical discipline. Implementation of safety devices will lead to an improvement in medical staff’s health and safety.

Adams D, Eliott TSJ (2006) Impact of safety needle devices on occupationally acquired needlestick injuries: a four-year prospective study. J Hosp Infect 64:50–55. doi:10.1016/j.jhin.2006.04.012PubMedCrossRef

BGW (2006) Brochure M612/613 risk virus infection [Risiko Virusinfektion]. BGW Hamburg, pp 12–22

Birnbaum D (1993) Needlestick injuries among critical care nurses before and after adoption of universal precautions or body substance isolation. J Healthc Mater Manage 11:40–42

Cardo DM, Culver DH, Ciesielski CA, et al (1997) A case-control study of HIV seroconversion in health care workers after percutaneous exposure. N Engl J Med 337:1542–1543CrossRef

Clarke SP, Sloane DM, Aiken LH (2002) Effects of hospital staffing and organizational climate on needlestick injuries to nurses. Am J Public Health 92(7):1115–1119PubMedCrossRef

Cullen BL, Genasi F, Symington I, et al (2006) Potential for reported needlestick injury prevention among healthcare workers through safety device usage and improvement of guideline adherence: expert panel assessment. J Hosp Infect 63:445–451. doi:10.1016/j.jhin.2006.04.008PubMedCrossRef

Dannetun E, Tegnell A, Torner A, Giesecke J (2006) Coverage of hepatitis B vaccination in Swedish healthcare workers. J Hosp Infect 63:201–204. doi:10.1016/j.jhin.2006.01.014PubMedCrossRef

Deisenhammer S, Radon K, Nowak D, Reichert J (2006) Needlestick injuries during medical training. J Hosp Infect 63:263–267. doi:1016/j.jhin.2006.01.019PubMedCrossRef

Haiduven DJ, Simpkins SM, Phillips ES, Stevens DA (1999) A survey of percutaneous/mucocutaneous injury reporting in a public teaching hospital. J Hosp Infect 2:151–154CrossRef

Hanrahan A, Reutter L (1997) A critical review of the literature on sharps injuries: epidemiology, management of exposures and preventions. J Adv Nus 1:144–154CrossRef

Hofmann F, Kralj N, Beie M (2002) Kanülenstichverletzungen im gesundheitsdienst—häufigkeit, ursachen und präventionsstrategien [Needle stick injuries in health care—frequency, causes and preventive strategies]. Gesundheitswesen 64:259–266PubMedCrossRef

Hofmann F, Wittmann A, Kralj N, Schroebler A, Gasthaus K (2006) Immunologischer und Sicherheitstechnischer Schutz vor HBV-, HCV- und HIV-Virusinfektionen [Immunological and technical prevention of infection with HBV, HCV and HIV]. Anästh Intensivmed 47:S37–S66

Lee JM, Botteman MF, Xanthos N, Nicklasson L (2005) Needlestick injuries in the United States. Epidemiologic, economic, and quality of life issues. AAOHN J 53(3):117–133PubMed

Luthi JC, Dubois-Arber F, Iten A, Maziero A, Colombo C, Jost J (1998) The occurrence of percutaneous injuries to health care workers: a cross sectional survey in seven Swiss hospitals. Schweiz Med Wochenschr 128:536–543PubMed

Mendelson MH, Lin-Chen BY, Solomon R, Bailey E, Kogan G, Goldbold J (2003) Evaluation of a safety resheathable winged steel needle for prevention of percutaneous injuries associated with intravascular-access procedures among healthcare workers. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 24:105–112PubMedCrossRef

Mendelson MH, Short LJ, Schechter CB, et al (1998) Study of a needleless intermittent intravenous-access system for peripheral infusions: analysis of staff, patient and institutional outcomes. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 19:401–406PubMedCrossRef

Müller-Barthelm R, Buchholz L, Nübling M, Häberle E (2006) Qualitätssicherung bei Nadelschutztechniken [Quality control of devices with needle protection technology]. Arbeitsmed Sozialmed Umweltmed 41:210–217

National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (2000) NIOSH releases guidelines on preventing needlesticks. AIDS Alert 15(1):1–2

Nelsing S, Nielsen TL, Nielsen JO (1997) Percutaneous blood exposure among Danish doctors: exposure mechanism and strategies for prevention. Eur J Epidemiol 4:387–393. doi:10.1023/A:1007369016717CrossRef

Pellissier G, Miguéres B, Tarantola A, et al (2006) Risk of needlestick injuries by injection pens. J Hosp Infect 63:60–64. doi:10.1016/j.jhin.2005.12.2006PubMedCrossRef

Prüss-Üstün A, Rapiti E, Hutin Y (2005) Estimation of the global burden of disease attributable to contaminated sharps injuries among health-care workers. Am J Ind Med 48:482–490. doi:10.1002/ajim.20230PubMedCrossRef

Rogers B, Goodno l (2000) Evaluation of interventions to prevent needlestick injuries in health care occupations. Am J Prev Med 18:90–98PubMedCrossRef

Saberifiroozi M, Gholamzadeh S, Serati AR (2006) The long-term immunity among health care workers vaccinated against hepatitis B virus in a large referral hospital in southern Iran. Arch Iran Med 9(3):204–207PubMed

Sadoh WE, Fawole AO, Sadoh AE, Oladimeji AO, Sotiloye OS (2006) Practice of universal precautions among health care workers. J Natl Med Assoc 98(5):722–726PubMed

Smith DR, Wei N, Zhang YJ, Wang RS (2006a) Needlestick and sharps injuries among a cross-section of physicians in Mainland China. Am J Ind Med 49:169–174PubMedCrossRef

Smith DR, Mihashi M, Adachi Y, Nakashima Y, Ishitake T (2006b) Epidemiology of needlestick and sharps injuries among nurses in a Japanese teaching hospital. J Hosp Infect 64:44–49. doi:10.1016/j.jhin.2006.03.021PubMedCrossRef

Sulsky SI, Birk T, Cohen LC, Luippold RS, Heidenreich MJ, Nunes A (2006) Effectiveness of measures to prevent needlestick injuries among employees in health professions. ENVIRON International Corporation, Health Science Institute, Sankt Augustin

Suzuki R, Kimura S, Shintani Y, et al (2006) The efficacy of safety winged steel needles on needlestick injuries. Kansenshogaku Zasshi 80(1):39–45PubMed

Technische Regeln für Biologische Arbeitsstoffe (2003) Biologische arbeitsstoffe im gesundheitswesen und in der wohlfahrtspflege (TRBA 250) [Technical Rule 250: Biological Agents in Health Care and Welfare Facilities]. BArbBL 11:53–73; revised version 2006 BArbBL 7:193

Trim JC, Elliot TS (2003) A review of sharps injuries and preventative strategies. J Hosp Infect 53:237–242. doi:10.1053/jhin.2002.1378PubMedCrossRef

Tuma S, Sepkowitz KA (2006) Efficacy of safety-engineered device implementation in the prevention of percutaneous injuries: a review of published studies. Clin Infect Dis 42(8):1159–1170PubMedCrossRef

US Department of Labour (2001) Occupational safety and health administration, 29 CFR Part 1910, 1030. Occupational exposure to blood borne pathogens; needlestick and other sharps injuries; final rule. Fed Regist 66:5317–5325

Visser L (2006) Toronto hospital reduces sharps injuries by 80%, elimates blood collected injuries. A case study: Toronto east general hospital pioneers healthcare worker safety. Healthc Q 9(1):68–70PubMed

Wijk van PTL, Pelk-Jongen M, Boer de E, Voss A, Wijkmans C, Schneeberger PM (2006a) Differences between hospital- and community-acquired blood exposure incidents revealed by a regional expert counseling center. Infection 34(1):17–21PubMedCrossRef

Wijk van PTL, Pelk-Jongen M, Wijkmans C, Voss A, Schneeberger PM (2006b) Quality control for handling of accidental blood exposures. J Hosp Infect 63:268–274. doi:10.1016/j.jhin.2006.02.006PubMedCrossRef

Wittmann A (2005) Verletzungen an spitzen und/oder scharfen gegenständen im gesundheitsdienst—ein beitrag zur abschätzung der risiken [bloodborne diseases: causes, risks and policy of prevention]. FFAS, Freiburg

Yazdanpanah Y, De Carli G, Migueres B, et al (2005) Risk factors for hepatitis C virus transmission to health care workers after occupational exposure: a European case-control study. Clin Infect Dis 41(10):1423–1430PubMedCrossRef

Titel: Prevalence and prevention of needlestick injuries among health care workers in a German university hospital
verfasst von: Sabine Wicker
Juliane Jung
Regina Allwinn
René Gottschalk
Holger F. Rabenau
Publikationsdatum: 01.01.2008
Verlag: Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in: International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health / Ausgabe 3/2008
Print ISSN: 0340-0131
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1246
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-007-0219-7

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Objective

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2008

Biomonitoring of two types of chromium exposure in an electroplating shop

Evaluation of the interferon-γ release assay in healthcare workers

Differences between younger and older workers in the need for recovery after work

Trends in exposure of veterinarians to physical and chemical hazards and use of protection practices

Assessment of absorbed doses of carbaryl and associated health risks in a group of horticultural greenhouse workers

Biological variations in cadmium, α1-microglobulin, β2-microglobulin and N-acetyl-β-d-glucosaminidase in adult women in a non-polluted area