Erschienen in:
01.06.2005 | Original Article
The validity of predicting maximal oxygen uptake from a perceptually-regulated graded exercise test
verfasst von:
Roger G. Eston, Kevin L. Lamb, Gaynor Parfitt, Nicholas King
Erschienen in:
European Journal of Applied Physiology
|
Ausgabe 3/2005
Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to assess the validity of predicting maximal oxygen uptake \(\left( {\dot V{\text{O}}_{{\text{2max}}} } \right)\) from sub-maximal \(\dot V{\text{O}}_{\text{2}}\) values elicited during a perceptually-regulated exercise test. We hypothesised that the strong relationship between the ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) and \(\dot V{\text{O}}_{\text{2}}\) would enable \(\dot V{\text{O}}_{{\text{2max}}}\) to be predicted and that this would improve with practice. Ten male volunteers performed a graded exercise test (GXT) to establish \(\dot V{\text{O}}_{{\text{2max}}}\) followed by three sub-maximal RPE production protocols on a cycle ergometer, each separated by a period of 48 h. The perceptually-regulated trials were conducted at intensities of 9, 11, 13, 15 and 17 on the RPE scale, in that order. \(\dot V{\text{O}}_{\text{2}}\) and HR were measured continuously and recorded at the end of each 4 min stage. Individual’s RPE values yielded correlations in the range 0.92–0.99 across the three production trials. There were no significant differences between measured \(\dot V{\text{O}}_{{\text{2max}}}\) (48.8 ml·kg−1·min−1) and predicted \(\dot V{\text{O}}_{\text{2}}\) max values (47.3, 48.6 and 49.9 ml·kg−1·min−1, for trials 1, 2 and 3, respectively) when \(\dot V{\text{O}}_{\text{2}}\) max was predicted from RPE values of 9–17. The same was observed when \(\dot V{\text{O}}_{{\text{2max}}}\) was predicted using RPE 9–15. Limits of agreement (LoA) analysis on actual and predicted \(\dot V{\text{O}}_{{\text{2max}}}\) values (from RPE 9–17) were (bias±1.96×SDdiff) 1.5±7.3, 0.2±4.9 and −1.2±5.8 ml·kg−1·min−1, for trials 1, 2 and 3, respectively. Corresponding LoA values for actual and predicted \(\dot V{\text{O}}_{{\text{2max}}}\) (from RPE 9–15) were 5.4±11.3, 4.4±8.7 and 2.3±8.4 ml·kg−1·min−1, respectively. The data suggest that a sub-maximal, perceptually-guided, graded exercise protocol can provide acceptable estimates of maximal aerobic power, which are further improved with practice in fit young males.