Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery 8/2010

01.11.2010 | Original Article

Complications, recurrences, early and late reoperations after stapled haemorrhoidopexy: lessons learned from 1,233 cases

verfasst von: Johannes Jongen, Anne Eberstein, Jens-Uwe Bock, Hans-Günter Peleikis, Volker Kahlke

Erschienen in: Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery | Ausgabe 8/2010

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of the study was to analyse the outcomes of all patients requiring a reoperation after an initial circular stapled haemorrhoidopexy (SH) for prolapsing haemorrhoids.

Methods

Data of all patients undergoing a circular SH from 1998 thru 2007 available in a prospectively collected database were reviewed, and all patients who had reoperations were studied.

Results

During the study period, 1,233 patients (551 females, median age 52 years) underwent a circular SH. Complete follow-up was available in all patients (median follow-up 7 months, range 0.5–100); 127 patients (10.3%) required one or more reoperations. Early reoperations (<30 days) were necessary in 47 patients (3.8%), and 45 (3.6%) were stapler-related complications. Late reoperations (>30 days) were performed in 84 patients (6.8%) and 57 (4.6%) were stapler-related. A learning curve was observed with significant reduction of early (<30 days) and late (>30 days) reoperation rate with time.

Conclusions

Reoperations after SH are necessary in about 10% of the patients. The majority of the reoperations are due to either complications arising from circular SH, recurrent/persistent haemorrhoidal symptoms or other anorectal issues not addressed by the circular SH procedure (3.8% early; 6.8% late). Circular SH appears to be an effective procedure for symptomatic haemorrhoidal disease; however, training and learning curve issues should be addressed to minimise treatment failures.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Koblandin SN, Schalkow JL (1981) Eine neue Methode zur Behandlung von Hämorrhoiden mit Hilfe eines Zirkularstaplers. Wissenschaftliches Archiv des Zelinograder Medizinischen Institutes (Kasachstan) 27–28 Koblandin SN, Schalkow JL (1981) Eine neue Methode zur Behandlung von Hämorrhoiden mit Hilfe eines Zirkularstaplers. Wissenschaftliches Archiv des Zelinograder Medizinischen Institutes (Kasachstan) 27–28
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Longo A (1998) Treatment of hemorrhoidal disease by reduction of mucosa and hemorrhoidal prolapse with a circular suturing device: a new procedure. Proceedings of the 6th World Congress of Endoscopic Surgery. Bologna, Monduzzi Editore 777–784 Longo A (1998) Treatment of hemorrhoidal disease by reduction of mucosa and hemorrhoidal prolapse with a circular suturing device: a new procedure. Proceedings of the 6th World Congress of Endoscopic Surgery. Bologna, Monduzzi Editore 777–784
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Cheetham MJ, Mortensen NJM, Nystrom PO, Kamm MA, Phillips RKS (2000) Persistent pain and faecal urgency after stapled haemorrhoidectomy. Lancet 356:730–733CrossRefPubMed Cheetham MJ, Mortensen NJM, Nystrom PO, Kamm MA, Phillips RKS (2000) Persistent pain and faecal urgency after stapled haemorrhoidectomy. Lancet 356:730–733CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Pescatori M, Aigner F (2007) Stapled transanal rectal mucosectomy ten years after. Tech. Coloproctology 11:1–6CrossRef Pescatori M, Aigner F (2007) Stapled transanal rectal mucosectomy ten years after. Tech. Coloproctology 11:1–6CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Herold A, Kirsch JJ (2001) Komplikationen nach Stapler-Hämorrhoidektomie. Ergebnisse einer Umfrage in Deutschland. Coloproctology 23:8–16CrossRef Herold A, Kirsch JJ (2001) Komplikationen nach Stapler-Hämorrhoidektomie. Ergebnisse einer Umfrage in Deutschland. Coloproctology 23:8–16CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Jongen J, Bock JU, Peleikis HP et al (2006) Complications and reoperations in stapled anopexy: learning by doing. Int J Colorectal Dis 21:166–171CrossRefPubMed Jongen J, Bock JU, Peleikis HP et al (2006) Complications and reoperations in stapled anopexy: learning by doing. Int J Colorectal Dis 21:166–171CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Senagore AJ, Singer M, Abcarian H, Fleshman J, Corman M, Wexner S, Nivatvongs S (2004) A prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter trial comparing stapled hemorrhoidopexy and Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy: perioperative and one-year results. Dis Colon Rectum 47:1824–1836CrossRefPubMed Senagore AJ, Singer M, Abcarian H, Fleshman J, Corman M, Wexner S, Nivatvongs S (2004) A prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter trial comparing stapled hemorrhoidopexy and Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy: perioperative and one-year results. Dis Colon Rectum 47:1824–1836CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Racalbuto A, Aliotta I, Corsaro G, Lanteri R, Di Cataldo A, Licata A (2004) Hemorrhoidal stapler prolapsectomy vs. Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy: a long-term randomized trial. Int J Colorectal Dis 19:239–244CrossRefPubMed Racalbuto A, Aliotta I, Corsaro G, Lanteri R, Di Cataldo A, Licata A (2004) Hemorrhoidal stapler prolapsectomy vs. Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy: a long-term randomized trial. Int J Colorectal Dis 19:239–244CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Basdanis G, Papadopoulos VN, Michalopoulos A, Apostolidis S, Harlaftis N (2005) Randomized clinical trial of stapled hemorrhoidectomy vs open with Ligasure for prolapsed piles. Surg Endosc 19:235–239CrossRefPubMed Basdanis G, Papadopoulos VN, Michalopoulos A, Apostolidis S, Harlaftis N (2005) Randomized clinical trial of stapled hemorrhoidectomy vs open with Ligasure for prolapsed piles. Surg Endosc 19:235–239CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Ho KS, Ho YH (2006) Prospective randomized trial comparing stapled hemorrhoidopexy versus closed Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy. Tech Coloproctology 10:193–197CrossRef Ho KS, Ho YH (2006) Prospective randomized trial comparing stapled hemorrhoidopexy versus closed Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy. Tech Coloproctology 10:193–197CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Huang W, Chin C, Yeh C, Lin P, Wang J (2007) Randomized comparison between stapled hemorrhoidopexy and Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy for grade III hemorrhoids in Taiwan: a prospective study. Int J Colorectal Dis 22:955–961CrossRefPubMed Huang W, Chin C, Yeh C, Lin P, Wang J (2007) Randomized comparison between stapled hemorrhoidopexy and Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy for grade III hemorrhoids in Taiwan: a prospective study. Int J Colorectal Dis 22:955–961CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Sabanci U, Ogun I, Candemir G (2007) Stapled haemorrhoidopexy versus Ferguson haemorrhoidectomy: a prospective study with 2-year postoperative follow-up. J Int med Res 35:917–921PubMed Sabanci U, Ogun I, Candemir G (2007) Stapled haemorrhoidopexy versus Ferguson haemorrhoidectomy: a prospective study with 2-year postoperative follow-up. J Int med Res 35:917–921PubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Hasse C, Sitter H, Brune M, Wollenteit I, Lorenz W, Rothmund M (2004) Konventionelle Exzision versus Resektion mit dem Klammernahtgerät. Prospektiv, randomisierte Studie. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 129:1611–1617CrossRefPubMed Hasse C, Sitter H, Brune M, Wollenteit I, Lorenz W, Rothmund M (2004) Konventionelle Exzision versus Resektion mit dem Klammernahtgerät. Prospektiv, randomisierte Studie. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 129:1611–1617CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Jayaraman S, Coquhoun PHD, Mathaner RA (2007) Stapled hemorrhoidopexy is associated with a higher long-term recurrence rate of internal hemorrhoids compared with conventional excisional hemorrhoid surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 50:1297–1305CrossRefPubMed Jayaraman S, Coquhoun PHD, Mathaner RA (2007) Stapled hemorrhoidopexy is associated with a higher long-term recurrence rate of internal hemorrhoids compared with conventional excisional hemorrhoid surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 50:1297–1305CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Nisar PJ, Acheson AG, Neal KR, Scholefield JH (2004) Stapled hemorrhoidopexy compared with conventional hemorrhoidectomy: systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Dis Colon Rectum 47:1837–1845CrossRefPubMed Nisar PJ, Acheson AG, Neal KR, Scholefield JH (2004) Stapled hemorrhoidopexy compared with conventional hemorrhoidectomy: systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Dis Colon Rectum 47:1837–1845CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Tjandra JJ, Chan MKY (2007) Systematic review on the procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids (stapled hemorrhoidopexy). Dis Colon Rectum 50:878–892CrossRefPubMed Tjandra JJ, Chan MKY (2007) Systematic review on the procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids (stapled hemorrhoidopexy). Dis Colon Rectum 50:878–892CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Lan P, Wu X, Zhou X, Wang J, Zhang L (2006) The safety and efficacy of stapled hemorrhoidectomy in the treatment of hemorrhoids: a systematic review and meta-analysis of ten randomized control trials. Int J Colorectal Dis 21:172–178CrossRefPubMed Lan P, Wu X, Zhou X, Wang J, Zhang L (2006) The safety and efficacy of stapled hemorrhoidectomy in the treatment of hemorrhoids: a systematic review and meta-analysis of ten randomized control trials. Int J Colorectal Dis 21:172–178CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Sutherland LM, Burchard AK, Matsuda K, Sweeney JL et al (2002) A systematic review of stapled hemorrhoidectomy. Arch Surg 137:1395–1406CrossRefPubMed Sutherland LM, Burchard AK, Matsuda K, Sweeney JL et al (2002) A systematic review of stapled hemorrhoidectomy. Arch Surg 137:1395–1406CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Shao WJ, Li GC, Zhang ZH, Yang BL, Sun GD, Chen YQ (2008) Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing stapled haemorrhoidopexy with conventional haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 95:147–160CrossRefPubMed Shao WJ, Li GC, Zhang ZH, Yang BL, Sun GD, Chen YQ (2008) Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing stapled haemorrhoidopexy with conventional haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 95:147–160CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Burch J, Epstein D, Baba-Akbari Sari A, Weatherly H, Jayne D, Fox D, Woolacott N (2009) Stapled haemorrhoidopexy for the treatment of haemorrhoids: a systematic review. Colorectal Dis 11:233–243CrossRefPubMed Burch J, Epstein D, Baba-Akbari Sari A, Weatherly H, Jayne D, Fox D, Woolacott N (2009) Stapled haemorrhoidopexy for the treatment of haemorrhoids: a systematic review. Colorectal Dis 11:233–243CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Laughlan K, Jayne DG, Jackson D, Rupprecht F, Ribaric G (2009) Stapler haemorrhoidopexy compared to Milligan–Morgan and Ferguson haemorrhoidectomy: a systemic review. Int J Colorectal Dis 24:335–344CrossRefPubMed Laughlan K, Jayne DG, Jackson D, Rupprecht F, Ribaric G (2009) Stapler haemorrhoidopexy compared to Milligan–Morgan and Ferguson haemorrhoidectomy: a systemic review. Int J Colorectal Dis 24:335–344CrossRefPubMed
22.
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Jongen J, Petersen S (2009) Letter to the editor: reviewing reviewers and reanalysing meta-analyses of stapled haemorrhoidopexy. Int J Colorectal Dis 24:989CrossRefPubMed Jongen J, Petersen S (2009) Letter to the editor: reviewing reviewers and reanalysing meta-analyses of stapled haemorrhoidopexy. Int J Colorectal Dis 24:989CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Brown SR, Ballan K, Ho E, Ho Fams YH, Seow-Choen F (2001) Stapled mucosectomy for acute thrombosed circumferential prolapsed piles: a prospective randomized comparison with conventional haemorrhoidectomy. Colorectal Dis 3:175–178CrossRefPubMed Brown SR, Ballan K, Ho E, Ho Fams YH, Seow-Choen F (2001) Stapled mucosectomy for acute thrombosed circumferential prolapsed piles: a prospective randomized comparison with conventional haemorrhoidectomy. Colorectal Dis 3:175–178CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Ganio E, Altomare DF, Gabrielli F, Milito G, Canuti S (2001) Prospective randomized multicentre trial comparing stapled with open haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 88:669–674CrossRefPubMed Ganio E, Altomare DF, Gabrielli F, Milito G, Canuti S (2001) Prospective randomized multicentre trial comparing stapled with open haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 88:669–674CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Shalaby R, Desoky A (2001) Randomized clinical trial of stapled versus Milligan–Morgan haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 88:1049–1053CrossRefPubMed Shalaby R, Desoky A (2001) Randomized clinical trial of stapled versus Milligan–Morgan haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 88:1049–1053CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Correa-Rovelo JM, Tellez O, Obregon L, Miranda-Gomez A, Moran S (2002) Stapled rectal mucosectomy vs closed hemorrhoidectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 45:1367–1375CrossRefPubMed Correa-Rovelo JM, Tellez O, Obregon L, Miranda-Gomez A, Moran S (2002) Stapled rectal mucosectomy vs closed hemorrhoidectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 45:1367–1375CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Ortiz H, Marzo J, Armendariz P (2002) Randomized clinical trial of stapled haemorrhoidopexy versus conventional diathermy haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 89:1376–1381CrossRefPubMed Ortiz H, Marzo J, Armendariz P (2002) Randomized clinical trial of stapled haemorrhoidopexy versus conventional diathermy haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 89:1376–1381CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Ortiz H, Marzo J, Armendariz P, de Miguel M (2005) Stapled hemorrhoidopexy vs. diathermy excision for fourth-degree hemorrhoids: a randomized, clinical trial and review of the literature. Dis Colon Rectum 48:809–815CrossRefPubMed Ortiz H, Marzo J, Armendariz P, de Miguel M (2005) Stapled hemorrhoidopexy vs. diathermy excision for fourth-degree hemorrhoids: a randomized, clinical trial and review of the literature. Dis Colon Rectum 48:809–815CrossRefPubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Gravié JF, Lehur PA, Huten N, Papillon M, Fantoli M, Descottes B, Pessaux P, Arnaud JP (2005) Stapled hemorrhoidopexy versus Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy. A prospective, randomized, multicenter trial with 2-year follow up. Ann Surg 242:29–35CrossRefPubMed Gravié JF, Lehur PA, Huten N, Papillon M, Fantoli M, Descottes B, Pessaux P, Arnaud JP (2005) Stapled hemorrhoidopexy versus Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy. A prospective, randomized, multicenter trial with 2-year follow up. Ann Surg 242:29–35CrossRefPubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Kraemer M, Parulava T, Roblick M, Duschka L, Müller-Lobeck H (2005) Prospective, randomized study: proximate® PPH Stapler vs. LigaSure™ for hemorrhoidal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 48:1517–1522CrossRefPubMed Kraemer M, Parulava T, Roblick M, Duschka L, Müller-Lobeck H (2005) Prospective, randomized study: proximate® PPH Stapler vs. LigaSure™ for hemorrhoidal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 48:1517–1522CrossRefPubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Smyth EF, Baker RP, Wilken BJ, Hartley JE, White TJ, Morson JRT (2003) Stapled versus excision haemorrhoidectomy: long-term follow up of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 361:1437–1438CrossRefPubMed Smyth EF, Baker RP, Wilken BJ, Hartley JE, White TJ, Morson JRT (2003) Stapled versus excision haemorrhoidectomy: long-term follow up of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 361:1437–1438CrossRefPubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Ng KH, Ho KS, Ooi BS, Tang CL, Eu KW (2006) Experience of 3711 stapled haemorrhoidectomy operations. Br J Surg 93:226–230CrossRefPubMed Ng KH, Ho KS, Ooi BS, Tang CL, Eu KW (2006) Experience of 3711 stapled haemorrhoidectomy operations. Br J Surg 93:226–230CrossRefPubMed
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Lomanto D, Katara AN (2007) Stapled haemorrhoidopexy for prolapsed haemorrhoids: short- and long-term experience. Asian J Surg 30:29–33CrossRefPubMed Lomanto D, Katara AN (2007) Stapled haemorrhoidopexy for prolapsed haemorrhoids: short- and long-term experience. Asian J Surg 30:29–33CrossRefPubMed
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Kairaluoma M, Nuorva K, Kellokumpu I (2003) Day-case stapled (circular) vs. diathermy hemorrhoidectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 46:93–99CrossRefPubMed Kairaluoma M, Nuorva K, Kellokumpu I (2003) Day-case stapled (circular) vs. diathermy hemorrhoidectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 46:93–99CrossRefPubMed
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Bona S, Battafarano F, Romario UF, Zago M, Rosati R (2008) Stapled anopexy: postoperative course and functional outcome in 400 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 51:950–955CrossRefPubMed Bona S, Battafarano F, Romario UF, Zago M, Rosati R (2008) Stapled anopexy: postoperative course and functional outcome in 400 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 51:950–955CrossRefPubMed
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Oughriss M, Faucheron JL (2005) Complications of stapled hemorrhoidectomy: a French multicentric study. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 29:429–433CrossRefPubMed Oughriss M, Faucheron JL (2005) Complications of stapled hemorrhoidectomy: a French multicentric study. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 29:429–433CrossRefPubMed
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Lim YK, Eu KW, Ho KS, Ooi BS, Tang CL (2006) PPH03 stapled hemorrhoidectomy: our experience. Tech Coloproctology 10:43–46CrossRef Lim YK, Eu KW, Ho KS, Ooi BS, Tang CL (2006) PPH03 stapled hemorrhoidectomy: our experience. Tech Coloproctology 10:43–46CrossRef
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Raahave D, Jepsen LV, Pedersen IK (2008) Primary and repeated stapled hemorrhoidopexy for prolapsing hemorrhoids: follow-up to five years. Dis Colon Rectum 51:334–341CrossRefPubMed Raahave D, Jepsen LV, Pedersen IK (2008) Primary and repeated stapled hemorrhoidopexy for prolapsing hemorrhoids: follow-up to five years. Dis Colon Rectum 51:334–341CrossRefPubMed
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Gerjy R, Nyström PO (2007) Excision of residual skin tags during stapled anopexy does not increase postoperative pain. Colorectal Dis 9:754–757CrossRefPubMed Gerjy R, Nyström PO (2007) Excision of residual skin tags during stapled anopexy does not increase postoperative pain. Colorectal Dis 9:754–757CrossRefPubMed
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Fondran JC, Porter JA, Slezak FA (2006) Inflammatory polyps: a cause of late bleeding in stapled hemorrhoidectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 49:1910–1913CrossRefPubMed Fondran JC, Porter JA, Slezak FA (2006) Inflammatory polyps: a cause of late bleeding in stapled hemorrhoidectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 49:1910–1913CrossRefPubMed
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Habr-Gama A, Sousa AHS, Correia Ravelo JM et al (2003) Stapled hemorrhoidectomy: initial experience of a Latin American group. J Gastrointest Surg 7:809–813CrossRefPubMed Habr-Gama A, Sousa AHS, Correia Ravelo JM et al (2003) Stapled hemorrhoidectomy: initial experience of a Latin American group. J Gastrointest Surg 7:809–813CrossRefPubMed
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Ebert K-H, Meyer HJ (2002) Die Klammernahtresektion bei Hämorrhoiden-eine Bestandsaufnahme nach zweijähriger Anwendung. Vergleich der Ergebnisse mit der Technik nach Milligan-Morgan. Zentralbl Chir 127:9–14CrossRefPubMed Ebert K-H, Meyer HJ (2002) Die Klammernahtresektion bei Hämorrhoiden-eine Bestandsaufnahme nach zweijähriger Anwendung. Vergleich der Ergebnisse mit der Technik nach Milligan-Morgan. Zentralbl Chir 127:9–14CrossRefPubMed
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Singer MA, Cintrom JR, Fleshman JW, Chaudry V, Birnbaum EH, Read TE, Spitz JS, Abcarian H (2002) Early experience with stapled hemorrhoidectomy in the United States. Dis Colon Rectum 45:360–369CrossRefPubMed Singer MA, Cintrom JR, Fleshman JW, Chaudry V, Birnbaum EH, Read TE, Spitz JS, Abcarian H (2002) Early experience with stapled hemorrhoidectomy in the United States. Dis Colon Rectum 45:360–369CrossRefPubMed
45.
Zurück zum Zitat Kohlstadt CM, Weber J, Prohm P (1999) Die Stapler-Hämorrhoidektomie. Eine neue Alternative zu den konventionellen Methoden. Zentralbl Chir 124:238–243PubMed Kohlstadt CM, Weber J, Prohm P (1999) Die Stapler-Hämorrhoidektomie. Eine neue Alternative zu den konventionellen Methoden. Zentralbl Chir 124:238–243PubMed
46.
Zurück zum Zitat Pinheiro Regadas FS, Murad Regadas SM, Rodrigues LV et al (2005) New devices for stapled rectal mucosectomy: a multicenter experience. Tech Coloproctology 9:243–246CrossRef Pinheiro Regadas FS, Murad Regadas SM, Rodrigues LV et al (2005) New devices for stapled rectal mucosectomy: a multicenter experience. Tech Coloproctology 9:243–246CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Complications, recurrences, early and late reoperations after stapled haemorrhoidopexy: lessons learned from 1,233 cases
verfasst von
Johannes Jongen
Anne Eberstein
Jens-Uwe Bock
Hans-Günter Peleikis
Volker Kahlke
Publikationsdatum
01.11.2010
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery / Ausgabe 8/2010
Print ISSN: 1435-2443
Elektronische ISSN: 1435-2451
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-009-0543-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 8/2010

Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery 8/2010 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.